User talk:AussieLegend/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1

File tagging File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Kam Solusar (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG

File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 23:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miley Cyrus Gypsy Heart Tour

Thank you for tagging the image. I was about to do it. Novice7 (talk) 16:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Worldwind-Brisbane1.jpg

File:Worldwind-Brisbane1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Worldwind-Hobart1.jpg

File:Worldwind-Hobart1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Worldwind-Melbourne1.jpg

File:Worldwind-Melbourne1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Worldwind-Sydney1.jpg

File:Worldwind-Sydney1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:39, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brass Razoo.jpg

Hi. We've received a letter from a person purporting to be the creator of this, claiming that it is in violation of his copyright. Even official coins in Australia are under copyright - Commons:Coins#Australia - but as an unofficial coin, this one would be under copyright to the designer. You noted on upload that this was "own work" - can I ask you clarify if you meant by that that you were the designer of the coin or simply that you photographed it? (If the latter, of course, it would be a derivative work.) Because of the complaint we've received, we really need to move quickly on resolving this, so your speedy response would be much appreciated. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a photograph I took of a keychain that I've had in my possession since about 1984. I think I know the person you're talking about, he's been posting at en:Talk:Brass razoo since January, apparently having a discussion with himself.[1][2] If there's a problem with the image I can photograph it another way, maybe as somebody holding a brass razoo on a keychain so that it's not the primary focus, which would seem to be OK based on this, or I could permanently solder it to my colorbond fence, which would seem to be OK under freedom of panorama as the fence is publicly accessible. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure Feedom of Panorama applies when the rights holder doesn't approve the display. :) Otherwise, you could tack any copyrighted item to a fence in Australia and call it free. :D We'd probably have to open that one up to community discussion. Likewise, the issue with de minimis exceptions are that if the point of the image is the item - even if it's deemphasized - it's not de minimis. That's why that section says, " Ask yourself: Can the photo be used as an illustration for "Winnie the Pooh"?" If the photo could be used in an illustration about the article, it would probably not work. I'll see if I can get him to license it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think whether or not the rights holder approves the display is relevant. For example, in the foyer of a hotel is a statue, obviously copyrighted, on a table. Is a photo of the foyer a breach of copyright? Not in Australia it isn't, that's part of the purpose of FoP. You don't need to search for the copyright owner of an obscure piece of art just so you can include it in a photo. The local council investigated this thoroughly a few years ago, when it wanted to publish images captured during a photographic analysis of the community. While I have your attention, could you check if an email been received for File:Sydney Opera House by Kevin Kieberwirth.jpg. It's been over a month since the image was uploaded. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we'd have to take that one through deletion discussion (unless he uses DMCA). But hopefully it won't come to that - I've asked for permission, and we'll see what he says. :) Re: the other one, I'm afraid it's not good news. :( The guy mailed in the letter, but he only granted permission for Wikipedia and specifically excluded commercial reuse. He was asked for a usable licensing statement and hasn't replied. That one is most definitely not permitted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I have negotiated a CCBYSA license with him. I've tagged the image accordingly. I'll let you know if any additional issues rise. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images with permission on a third party site

Thanks for your thorough transfer of File:Australian ocean currents.png. In the future, could you please tag images which have valid permission on a third-party site as {{License review}} so that they can be tagged as verified? Flickr images work a bit differently; tag those {{Flickr review}}. Thanks! Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A little complaint

Please stop Removing my pictures!! I own them no one else does !! SkyPhoenix6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyphoenix6 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 20. Aug. 2015‎ (UTC)

G Blanco pic

Aloha! :-) I hope you don't take the discussion as a personal attack. I think we are on the same page, regarding the whole project. Best, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't see it as a personal attack at all. I just get a little frustrated at the apparent inconsistency in the way images are kept or deleted from commons. --AussieLegend (✉) 11:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, true. But remember, we are all volunteers and not full time international copyright lawyers. That things don't always go the right way is bound to happen sooner or later. Clin Best, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

h0w r u? plz tell about behaviour of cat.

Rinku Nidhi Singh (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What the matter "File:Sew le Sew.jpeg.jpg"

It is a simple logo file. What the matter? The Supermind (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As explained in the deletion discussion, it exceeds the COM:TOO threshold. While you may have edited the image it is not yours so you can't claim that you are the author. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:City_of_Newcastle

Category discussion warning

City of Newcastle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HMAS Hammersley Cap

Hi I was seeking to purchase one of these HMAS Hammersley Caps from Sea Patrol. I found one site, Jackonlie.com.au which says "overseas orders please email." which I have sent two emails with no response. If you have any knowledge where I could get one of these caps that would be greatly appreciated! annivan9@gmail.com 64.60.254.226 04:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AussieLegend/Archive_1&oldid=814136210"