User talk:AussieLegend/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1 Archive 2 →

File tagging File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Kam Solusar (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 23:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus Gypsy Heart Tour

Thank you for tagging the image. I was about to do it. Novice7 (talk) 16:36, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Worldwind-Brisbane1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Worldwind-Brisbane1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Worldwind-Hobart1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Worldwind-Hobart1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Worldwind-Melbourne1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Worldwind-Melbourne1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Worldwind-Sydney1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Worldwind-Sydney1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 08:39, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Brass Razoo.jpg

Hi. We've received a letter from a person purporting to be the creator of this, claiming that it is in violation of his copyright. Even official coins in Australia are under copyright - Commons:Coins#Australia - but as an unofficial coin, this one would be under copyright to the designer. You noted on upload that this was "own work" - can I ask you clarify if you meant by that that you were the designer of the coin or simply that you photographed it? (If the latter, of course, it would be a derivative work.) Because of the complaint we've received, we really need to move quickly on resolving this, so your speedy response would be much appreciated. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

It's a photograph I took of a keychain that I've had in my possession since about 1984. I think I know the person you're talking about, he's been posting at en:Talk:Brass razoo since January, apparently having a discussion with himself.[1][2] If there's a problem with the image I can photograph it another way, maybe as somebody holding a brass razoo on a keychain so that it's not the primary focus, which would seem to be OK based on this, or I could permanently solder it to my colorbond fence, which would seem to be OK under freedom of panorama as the fence is publicly accessible. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure Feedom of Panorama applies when the rights holder doesn't approve the display. :) Otherwise, you could tack any copyrighted item to a fence in Australia and call it free. :D We'd probably have to open that one up to community discussion. Likewise, the issue with de minimis exceptions are that if the point of the image is the item - even if it's deemphasized - it's not de minimis. That's why that section says, " Ask yourself: Can the photo be used as an illustration for "Winnie the Pooh"?" If the photo could be used in an illustration about the article, it would probably not work. I'll see if I can get him to license it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't think whether or not the rights holder approves the display is relevant. For example, in the foyer of a hotel is a statue, obviously copyrighted, on a table. Is a photo of the foyer a breach of copyright? Not in Australia it isn't, that's part of the purpose of FoP. You don't need to search for the copyright owner of an obscure piece of art just so you can include it in a photo. The local council investigated this thoroughly a few years ago, when it wanted to publish images captured during a photographic analysis of the community. While I have your attention, could you check if an email been received for File:Sydney Opera House by Kevin Kieberwirth.jpg. It's been over a month since the image was uploaded. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Well, we'd have to take that one through deletion discussion (unless he uses DMCA). But hopefully it won't come to that - I've asked for permission, and we'll see what he says. :) Re: the other one, I'm afraid it's not good news. :( The guy mailed in the letter, but he only granted permission for Wikipedia and specifically excluded commercial reuse. He was asked for a usable licensing statement and hasn't replied. That one is most definitely not permitted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
I believe I have negotiated a CCBYSA license with him. I've tagged the image accordingly. I'll let you know if any additional issues rise. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Images with permission on a third party site

Thanks for your thorough transfer of File:Australian ocean currents.png. In the future, could you please tag images which have valid permission on a third-party site as {{License review}} so that they can be tagged as verified? Flickr images work a bit differently; tag those {{Flickr review}}. Thanks! Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

A little complaint

Please stop Removing my pictures!! I own them no one else does !! SkyPhoenix6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyphoenix6 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 20. Aug. 2015‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

G Blanco pic

Aloha! :-) I hope you don't take the discussion as a personal attack. I think we are on the same page, regarding the whole project. Best, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

No, I didn't see it as a personal attack at all. I just get a little frustrated at the apparent inconsistency in the way images are kept or deleted from commons. --AussieLegend () 11:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, true. But remember, we are all volunteers and not full time international copyright lawyers. That things don't always go the right way is bound to happen sooner or later. Clin Best, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Red Kitten 01.jpg

h0w r u? plz tell about behaviour of cat.

Rinku Nidhi Singh (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)