User talk:Moroder/Archives 2017-2

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Gidoni Bembo (Venice), facade on Campo San Zan Degolà.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope and probably a QI, too, if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment thanks. Well this Spur...zem guy doesn't agree for QI :-))) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Gidoni Bembo Santa Croce Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too harsh shadow for me. -- Spurzem 19:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Sometimes Venice is dirty sometimes it is like this. ;-).--Moroder 20:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)  Question Do you think I should send it to Graphic labs --Moroder 21:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)  Support There are no complaints about this image. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana di ghisa Corte della Cazza Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you remove the yellow drinking straw? Further the image seems a bit gloomy. -- Spurzem 12:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)  Question This is realistic Venice. Do I have to clean up also the sigarette stumps and the rust ;-) --Moroder 21:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC) I thought you wanted to show us a fountain and not filth. ;-) I beg your pardon. -- Spurzem 22:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Comment I want to show Venice as is. Servus --Moroder 11:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)  Support For me the photo has real good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Saint Sebastian Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clifford Ray 2017 in Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What a great smile! Good quality. --W.carter 23:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sherman White American football in Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Lygea tied to the bull by Giuseppe Moretti Sarasota Florida 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum entrance Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Cà d'Zan Sud Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:33, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Cà d'Zan Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Good quality. --W.carter 20:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum internal courtyard Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting view... Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Lygea tied to the bull by Giuseppe Moretti Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hideous statue! Good photo. --W.carter 20:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum entrance main facade Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Venetian sphynx Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Juliancolton 00:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum arcade Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Wonderfull RilkeRainer (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St Ulrich Urtijei Angel awakens the prophet Elijah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St Ulrich Urtijei Saint John evangelist Patmos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 16:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Spostamenti categorie

Ciao, perdona ma lo spostamento che hai fatto da Category:Santa Maria Assunta (Montichiari) a Category:Duomo di Montichiari sarebbe da discutere, tra l'altro hai rimosso almeno due categorie accessorie lasciandole sulla categoria orfana e non è tecnicamente corretto. Posso anche capire che popolarmente una chiesa di chiami Duomo di... ma qui in commons semmai la convenzione dice Duomo (montichiari) non di Montichiari (sarebbe semmai of Montichiari). Comunque sia le chiese hanno sempre una dedicazione, non sono palazzi, sono edifici religiosi quindi hanno sempre una dedicazione ad una figura religiosa. la cosa più corretta sarebbe citare per intero la tipologia (Duomo) e la dedicazione (di) Santa Maria Assunta + la disambiguante tra parentesi (Montichiari) ma... c'è un ma. Se dovessimo badare a tutti i titoli in qualche caso non si finirebbe più di citarli tra chiesa parrocchiale, arcipretale, cattedrale, basilica etc etc, quindi la cosa migliore sarebbe trattare l'edificio dal punto di vista architettonico, che gli sia stata dato il titolo, ad esempio, di basilica minore in seguito architettonicamente non è rilevante. Tra l'altro, anche se è raro, essendo normalmente assegnato alla chiesa più importante della parrocchia sede della vicaria, se per caso viene deciso di costruirne uno più moderno e spazioso il titolo decade, che si fa allora, si scrive Duomo vecchio? E se fosse una ricerca personale? Se poi si parla di nomi popolari quelli sono fuorvianti, nella mia città c'è una chiesa popolarmente chiamata San Domenico che in realtà è Sant'Antonio Abate. Tu dirai, che c'entra? E invece c'entra, dato che se volessi andare a cercare qualche opera artistica dove viene raffigurato un San Domenico se passassi a visionare quelle foto non ne troverei uno perdendo del tempo. Insomma anni di lavoro nella categorizzazione mi/ci ha portato a degli standard semplice da comprendere e da ripetere, anche in funzione del tantissimo lavoro sporco di categorizzazione veloce di immagini non o male categorizzate, così da trovarle velocemente non solo per la suddivisione territoriale laica, ma anche per dedicazione, suddivisione ecclesiastica, periodo di edificazione (meglio se si conosce l'anno certo di inizio e fine lavori (anche se su questo... ci sono chiese che hanno subito da modesti a profondi rifacimenti per cambiarne l'aspetto in base ai gusti del tempo, chiese di un bel romanico, semplice, essenziale, in mattoni rossi deturpate da una improbabile facciata neoclassica di non eccelsa fattura per limitati fondi).

Concludo, il "nostro" Duomo è Chiesa di Santa Maria Assunta, così come la Chiesa di Santa Maria del Fiore è il Duomo di Firenze, San Marco è il Duomo di Venezia ma è anche basilica. Ti invito a farti una lettura di ciò che è relativo alla chiesa sia come architettura che come titolo ecclesiastico, forse ti si aprirà un mondo.--Threecharlie (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

• Ciao, ho trovato due categorie per lo stesso oggetto e ho cercato di rimediare. Ti ringrazio di avere definitivamente sistemato la cosa. Potrei chiosare che quasi tutte le chiese vengono definite per il loro "rango" o per il santo al quale sono dedicate. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida Pelican rear view fliing on Bradenton Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum rose garden Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, you just made the photo like it had to be made --Michielverbeek 22:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum main entrance Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Circus Museum Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida Millar Bay from Longboat Key.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:03, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Cà d'Zan front view Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Peulle 00:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida Pelican fliing on Bradenton Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:25, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida pier Bradenton Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1; people on the pier are not really disturbing the composition --Michielverbeek 18:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida mullet fishes Durante Community Park 2 Longboat Key.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari Madonna del Suffragio portale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Pinnata Kygelia Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Banyan tree Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida white heron Durante Community Park Longboat Key.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringling Museum Cà d'Zan front view detail Sarasota Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Happy Easter! -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida white heron Longboat Key.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari piazza Santa maria castello Bonoris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great place in Lombardy. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari Museo Lechi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charming architecture. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari via Mazzoldi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari castello Bonoris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality although the corner sharpness is weak. --Code 04:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari edificio razionalista aquedotto 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari duomo e piazza Conte Treccani.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari portone via Mazzoldi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari via 25 Aprile 113 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 Michielverbeek 21:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari Piazza Santa Maria e duomo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari via Mazzoldi via Tre Ramati.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari duomo facciata e Piazza Santa Maria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari via Mazzoldi annuncio mortuario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari San Pancrazio facciata principale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although I can't understand the use for such a very large file of this subject but I guess there is a reason. --W.carter 09:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida Pelican on dock on Bradenton Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 15:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari Piazza Santa Maria e cupola del duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari Piazza Santa Maria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari via 25 Aprile 61-63 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 09:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari duomo facciata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 04:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida seagulls 2 beach Longboat Key.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharp focus to the birds --Michielverbeek 19:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari duomo facciata intera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work. -- Ikan Kekek 01:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida shop Bradenton Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari Piazza Santa Maria e duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari castello Bonoris salita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida Ibis 2 Durante Community Park Longboat Key.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florida seagulls beach Longboat Key.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari duomo Ultima Cena Romanino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte e Rio dei Mendicanti a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa San Lazzaro dei Mendicanti Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:12, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari duomo Ultima Cena Romanino 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments My favorite bible scene. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro doppio ritratto di Tullio Lombardo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari duomo facciata allegoria della religione .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro San Sebastiano Mantegna Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro Venere allo specchio Tiziano Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 09:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano Santa Maria degli Angeli Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 21:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio Priuli Rio de Santa Sofia Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good moment to take this kind of photo (no shadows), and quality high enough for Q1--Michielverbeek 07:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano San Pietro Martire San Antonio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano Canale degli Angeli Santa Maria degli Angeli Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paratoni S. Cristina y Pic Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Correr Contarini Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Storto Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments La Serenissima! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari via 25 Aprile 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Contarini del Bovolo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Contarini del Bovolo scala dall alto Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano Rio dei Vetrai Campo Santo Stefano Campanile Santo di Stefano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Venice is a big love of mine. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano Palazzo da Mula Chiesa San Pietro Martire Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro statua di Flora marmo di Carrara Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Sebastian by Mantegna (Venice), Collezione G. Franchetti Ca'd'Oro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 04:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Correr Contarini facciata Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro pluteo con aquila Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:24, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro virtu di Cristoforo Solari Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a crop would be better --Livioandronico2013 21:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro Vittore Carpaccio Annunciazione Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Then ok too me. --Berthold Werner 10:26, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola Grande di San Marco Ospedale di Venezia facciata ovest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo Venezia facciata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 07:44, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Double portrait by Tullio Lombardo, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 15:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paintings in the Galleria Franchetti Madonna con bambino e San Giovannino by Jacopo del Sellaio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Please discuss this photo by comparison with File:Jacopo del sellaio, Virgin and Child 01.jpg, File:Jacopo del sellaio, madonna col bambino e san giovannino, ve.JPG and File:Madonna col Bambino e san Giovannino di Jacopo del Sellaio.JPG. I think the last one has overly blue white balance and is more unsharp, but I haven't seen the painting and have no idea which of the photos is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for asking. IMO, #1 has too much contrast, the original paiting is very soft; #2 is blurred; #3 is more blurred too and you are right about wb, I#ve seen it more yellowish. --Wolfgang Moroder(talk) 20:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
    • @Ikan Kekek: I uploaded a new take. Maybe you like it even better? Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

• No, I think I like this better, because the very close crop of the frame in the new picture leaves me feeling a bit off-balance. I'll  Support this as best in scope based on your reply above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 12:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scuola del Cristo (Venice) Main facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 12:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro ritratto Giorgio Franchetti di Franz von Lenbach Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good photo of the original work. --Peulle 10:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Correr Ala Napoleonica affreschi soffitto Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio dell'Acqua Dolce Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari San Pancrazio abside e campanile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Check the note. --C messier 09:28, 26 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 15:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Looks ok now. Good quality. --W.carter 08:54, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montichiari chiesa Maria Immacolata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I'm sure about the crop of the sky. IMHO, it is too unbalanced now. --C messier 08:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 19:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 08:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio dei Mendicanti da Ponte Cavallo sud a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Zeno Manin - Sceriman Rio Tera Lista di Spagna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola del Cristo Crocifisso Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The head is on the dark side, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro vera corinzia Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and charming. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Pasqualigo o de Noal graffiti a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro Canal Grande first balcony Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would crop the unsharp areas to the left and right edges. --C messier 10:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the suggestion. The areas are not unsharp but the windows are covered by some strange material. I don't feel it so disturbing otherwise cropping would delete the beautyful crown glass window --Moroder 14:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC). Good quality. --Ermell 08:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polittico della Passione, by Antonio Vivarini, complete view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Clearly best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 23:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Salvador chiostro a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice...also for FP --Livioandronico2013 21:03, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Pasqualigo o de Noal a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality... being aware that it is probably nearly impossible to avoid any tourists in Venice. --Cayambe 07:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campo Manin a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro interior Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Contarini del Bovolo scala a chiocciola Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top of the building could have been slightly sharper. But for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa San Lazzaro ai Mendicanti Ospedale Scuala San Marco Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Merati e Berlendis a Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit unsharp towards the corner but IMO still OK a for QI. Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Marcuola retro Canal Grande Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:41, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Malipiero Trevisan Castello Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Marcuola statua di vescovo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro Madonna col Bambino Vincenzo Foppa Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro ritratti di Carlo e Marion Franchetti di Franz von Lenbach Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Merati e Berlendis a Cannaregio Venezia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa San Michele in Isola Venezia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ca d Oro doppio ritratto di Tullio Lombardo Venezia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ca d Oro doppio ritratto di Tullio Lombardo Venezia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano Canale degli Angeli Santa Maria degli Angeli Venezia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro Madonna col Bambino Sansovino Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro due leoni Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Ermagora a Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures in the Galleria Franchetti Elemosina di San Martino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope, IMO. Considering the number of photos of this sculpture, it would be good to create a new subcategory for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Question Thanks for the suggestion but what happens to the scope with a new cat. Do I have to post a new nomination? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment - I don't know. Maybe wait until after this nomination goes through, then create the new subcategory. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frescos by Vincenzo Foppa, Madonna del tappeto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio di San Marcuola Ponte Storto nord Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Calbo Crotta Canal Grande Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano San Pietro Martire San Antonio di Giacobe Mussner Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Correr Ala Napoleonica affreschi soffitto dei in Olimpo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro Madonna Il Riccio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro torso Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Pasqualigo Giovanelli Rio di Noale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Bild Hof Villanders

Hallo, hab Dein Bild in niederer Auflösung unter Nennung Deines Namens im Quellenverzeichnis, für eine schriftliche Zusammenfassung eines Vortrags für Südtirols Wanderleiter/innen verwendet. Vielen Dank peter sader bildungshaus kloster neustift — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.234.238.121 (talk) 10:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Marcuola interno lato sud Canal Grande Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano Calle de l'Ogio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano San Pietro Martire portale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano Ponte de Mezo Rio dei Vetrai .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano sottoportego per Calle de l'Ogio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro soffitto a cassettoni Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough, and I love the baby that says "Mama, Mama!" -- Ikan Kekek 06:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro Cortile e portale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca d Oro cavana Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Hof Boden in Pflersch

Sehr geehrter Herr Wolfgang Moroder, Ich schreibe Ihnen, weil ich zufällig "Pflersch" im Internet suchte und auf Ihren Eintrag mit Foto stieß. Den Hof, den Sie als Bodenhof oder Hof Boden benennen ist in Wirklichkeit der Rainhof in Pflersch. Ich bin Historikerin und habe mich lange mit den Höfen in Pfersch beschäftigt. Zudem lebe ich in Pflersch auf dem heutigen Paulnhof, der ursprünglich die Bezeichnung "B(P)odenhof" hatte. Meistens wird in solchen Fällen wie hier das "Schneeballsystem" ausgelöst, so dass weitere Leser dieser Seite im Internet den falschen Namen weitergeben oder die Besitzer selbst sich ohne es sich bewusst zu sein falsch benennen. Ich bitte Sie deshalb den irrtümlich gegebenen Namen dieses wunderschönen Hofes in Pflersch mit dem richtigen Namen, nämlich "R a i n h o f" auszutauschen. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich der Bauer selbst auf weiteren Webseiten mit "Bodenhof" vorstellt. Bitte dies zu bedenken!

Danke vielmals

Brigitta Schölzhorn-Hecher (Bodenhofbäurin (Paulnhof) in Pflersch) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.107.107.131 (talk) 18:54, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Correr Ala Napoleonica affreschi soffitto 2 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:17, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Correr Ala Napoleonica affreschi soffitto 3 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:40, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Contarini del Bovolo panorama Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, excellent details. I just doubt the WB, it is quite on the yellow side. --Uoaei1 18:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)  Comment Danke! Das war an dem Tag die Stimmung--Moroder 18:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Correr Ala Napoleonica sala da ballo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 00:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano San Pietro Martire lato ovest Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The building seems to lean slightly to the right, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 18:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Comment thanks for the review. I reviewed the vertical lines left and right and they seem perfect. Can you put a note please?--Moroder 17:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murano colonna romana granito Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schönes Foto, aber könntest Du bitte die Perspektive korrigieren? Die Säule und der Laternenmast neigen sich nach rechts.--Manfred Kuzel 15:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Servus und dankeschön --Moroder 21:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC) Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 04:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale rampa scuderie Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale Cappella Paolina dettaglio soffitto Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale cortile interno Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done. -- Ikan Kekek 07:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale corazziere di guardia al Quirinale Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Handsome. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di Gesù e Maria interno Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo affresco allegoria volta Doria-Pamphili Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Corsini alla Lungara interno scale Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musei Vaticani Papa Pio XI Adolfo Wildt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di Gesù e Maria volta Ascensione Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale Piazza del Quirinale scuderie Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale corazziere di guardia cortile interno Quirinale Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bravo! E buon composizione. -- Ikan Kekek 04:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pincio Panorama di Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casina Valadier lato SO Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 11:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo statua di Flora Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 14:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo Fontana del Nettuno a Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale palazzo e obelico con dioscuri Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 11:54, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Altemps Apollo Citaredo Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not optimal due to a tight top crop but still ok --Poco a poco 11:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo delfino della Fontana del Nettuno a Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 05:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo Fontana della dea Roma a Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 05:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo delfino della Fontana del Nettuno dietro a Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A WOW! photo to my eyes. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2017 Talbot Lago T26 1947 posteriore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What a nice heinie! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2017 Talbot Lago T26 1947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco del Pincio Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo Obelisco Flaminio a Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right now, this is too hazy and washed out for QI, in my opinion. Could you edit it so that the haziness of the day is evident, but not to the extent of real unsharpness? -- Ikan Kekek 10:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC) +contrast Thanks for the hint--Moroder 11:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)  Support - Much better. -- Ikan Kekek 22:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo sfinge a Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo statua di Bacco con cornucopia Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2017 Talbot Lago T26 GS Berlinette 1950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2017 Talbot Lago T26 GS Berlinette 1950 retro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice butt. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Image use

Dear dr Moroder, We would like to use one of your images of a fetal brain USS, where it can be appreciated both the lemon and banana signs, for ilustration of a clinical case within a congress setting. Hope that it is OK for you.

Mrs Monge (monge.carme@gmail.com) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.139.201.25 (talk) 13:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

• It's my pleasure --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musei Vaticani Cortile della Pinacoteca statua fontana Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musei Vaticani Cortile della Pinacoteca Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are two blurred birds in the sky, could you remove them, please? --Basotxerri 15:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC) Done I shot the birds ;-) --Moroder 16:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banca Intesa San Paolo Via del Corso Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 15:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mille Miglia 2017 Lancia lambda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza del Popolo statua di Bacco a Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quirinale Piazza del Quirinale fontana Dioscuri e scuderie Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontana del Quirinale (Rome) - Statues of Dioscuri, view with Scuderie del Quirinale.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta S Eufemia 590 591 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The roof line might have been a bit sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta S Biagio 796 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 09:47, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Ponte San Eufemia Chiesa Santa Eufemia Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa della Croce abside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems tilted to the right but good quality.--Famberhorst 17:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC) fixed Thanks --Moroder 05:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Creative photography

You have a problem of color the whites are yellow-greenish. Maybe your screen is not calibrated. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

• It is not the screen but it's my "fault". Since the weather that mornig was awful I work a lot on the contrast and color temperatur to make the pictures more acceptable. If you like I can send you a RAW file and you will see. Thanks for your comment --Wolfgang Moroder

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, pardon me if I don't reply in french. Thank you and I appreciate a lot your interest in my work and your criticism. I think our conversation is interesting for others therefore I will post it on my talkpage. My poit regarding the pictures you reviewed is that I work a lot on our photos we take with digital photography to improve them in regard to the composition, perspective correction light, much less in regard to color, sharpness, noise reduction and reduction of other artifacts. Some of the postprocessing can be done at any time once that the photo is uploaded. Some is much more creative like working on the composition, lighting and colors and this creative process is the one which gives me more satisfaction. In the specific case of the two pictures we discussed I'm pleased to changing the color working on color temperature/WB and a bit less on color saturation. That specially in cases of particular lighting like cast sky, bad weather, evening or night/blue hours. Obviously the more you work on a picture the more it becomes personal ( I remember you approved several times some of my night photographs in Venice). Some reviewers might argue that this tipe of photography reduces encyclopedic value but I'm not so sure about that if a picture is unique and still contains lots of information. Sometimes light with bad weather, night etc gives the monument, the statue, the building even a better nuance than a bright sunshine. Well, all this to explain you, and I believe you partly agree with me, why I believe creative photography has also encyclopedic value and why I don't want to throw away some pictures which I took with bad light conditions and I rather want to improve them with some creative "manipulation". I must say that many of those pictures ar mostly appreciated on QI except some exeptions or critics of yellow/greenish cast like yours. Thanks again and good light! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio delle Convertite Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I`ve always loved those misty mornings in Venice. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Ponte Chiesa Santa Eufemia Rio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Calm and smooth atmosphere in Venice. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Palazzo dell'Accademia dei Nobili Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa dei Santi Cosma e Damiano Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio di Sant Eufemia Venezia sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta S Eufemia 48 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca ingresso quartiere a Sant Eufemia a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Sant Eufemia a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. DoF could be better. --XRay 08:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fortuny (Giudecca) on Fondamenta San Biagio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. If you know what they manufacture, please add that to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:16, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio delle Convertite carcere Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments La Serenissima. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa delle Convertite a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit gloomy, but good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta S Biagio 773 - 777 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Pigeons in Venice | Piccioni a Venezia

Hallo Wolfgang, erst jetzt fiel mir auf, dass Du das hübsche Tauben-Foto schon gestern Abend nominiert hast. Bitte tausch es aus, damit ich ein anderes beaugapfeln kann. Danke im Voraus! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@Johann Jaritz: ??? Naa habs heute nominiert. Versteh nicht. Servus--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 03:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@Moroder: Vielen Dank! Kann nur allzu leicht passieren. Ist kein wirkliches Problem. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa dei Santi Cosma e Damiano vera da pozzo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Who wouldn`t fall in love with all the beauties of Venice? Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio delle Convertite edificio Dreher Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Le scuole Rio del Ponte Piccolo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photographs of Venice lift my spirit. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa dei Santi Cosma e Damiano chiostro Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very special. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio delle Convertite Rio di San Biasio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Donà Giovanelli (Venice), facade on Rio de Noale.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Ponte de l'Anzolo in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Le scuole sul Rio del Ponte Piccolo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa Santa Eufemia lunetta con Madonna e Bambino Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro three girls from Brasil Fondamenta della Pescaria in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charming are your traveling companions. ;-)) Envy!! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magazzini del Sale Basilica Santa Maria della Salute San Marco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa Santa Eufemia Rio Sant EufemiaVenezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charming as usual. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Ponte priuli e Mulino Stucky Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 05:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Rio dei Carmini in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Annotations comme il faut. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ponte Ponte del Prefetto Rio Novo sestiere Santa Croce Venezia.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ponte Ponte del Prefetto Rio Novo sestiere Santa Croce Venezia.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 10:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Ponte Ponte del Prefetto

Attenzione che avete un problema di formulazione, per la licenza per le tue immagini. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta San Giacomo 208 211 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Campanile di San Sebastiano a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Santa Maria del Soccorso a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta S Eufemia 598 599 600 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Palazzo Zenobio degli Armeni a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Palazzo Maffetti Fondamenta S Biagio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Quality acceptable. MEy be weather conditions bad. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 14:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte de la Cereria (Venice), West side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

use of one of your photo

Dear Moroder

I would like to inform you that we are using your photo View_of_Saumur_and_castle_on_the_Loire.jpg, for our still in progress web site for our music association (https://lescordesdeloire.wordpress.com/) and we give credit to you as author (https://lescordesdeloire.wordpress.com/a-propos/credits/) .

Thank you for your beautiful work.of

All the best

Zem — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.50.253.188 (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

• • It's my pleasure --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Chiesa Angelo Raffaele portale a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Doors in xxx categorie? --Ermell 20:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 04:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Chiesa Angelo Raffaele e rio a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Chiesa e Rio Angelo Raffaele a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Monastero Santa Trinita Fondamenta e Campo San Giacomo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Le Scuole dettaglio ingresso a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Chiesa di San Sebastiano medaglione San Sebastiano a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 13:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Fondamenta San Sebastiano Sacra Famiglia a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Campazzo San Sebastiano Chiesa dell'Angelo Raffaele a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Campo de l'Anzelo Rafael a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rabax63 07:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Chiesa Angelo Raffaele lato est Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio dei Carmini (Venice), Fondamenta Briati and Ponte Briati.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, IMO, as it's a different view from File:Rio dei Carmini (Venice).jpg, which is a VI in the scope "Rio dei Carmini to Venice. Estern limit of the Rio." (By the way, can the spelling and grammar of VI scopes be edited after the fact?) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte dei Ragusei (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte del Prefetto (Venice), northern side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Wolfgang, in English, we don't use "aspect" for this; the word is used more for different qualities or properties of someone or something (e.g., a planet has mass, velocity and albedo, all of which are aspects of the planet). Instead, we use "view" or "side" for a bridge. I would suggest rephrasing the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks a lot! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
    • Thank you for taking care of this. Very good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 11:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro vera da pozzo Campo drio il Cimitero a Venezia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte del Prefetto lato sud Rio Novo sestiere Santa Croce Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Palazzo Zenobio degli Armeni dettaglio facciata a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta Rossa arco Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Rio Briati Palazzo con aquila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 15:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Fondamenta Briati Rio dei Carmini in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Peulle 06:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio Briati Fondamenta Rossa Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Chiesa di San Sebastiano medaglione San Girolamo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio del Tentor (Venice), western view from Ponte Rosso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlern aus der Seiseralm Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa del Redentore dettaglio facciata ovest isola Giudecca Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a bit too dark. --XRay 18:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Chiesa Angelo Raffaele rilievo abside Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa e Ponte Santa Eufemia Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Ponte Longo lato nord Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 06:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Le Scuole a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio del Ponte Piccolo Le Scuole a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Ponte Longo lato sud Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left pole is IMO a bit disturbing. Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:18, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorsoduro Rio dei Tentor o della Madonna Ponte Rosso a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa del Redentore portale isola Giudecca Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Croce Ponte del Pagan Rio dei Tre Ponti Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlern aus der Seiseralm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 06:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa del Redentore interno con altare isola Giudecca Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 11:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta Ponte Piccolo est a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta Sant'Eufemia Calle Sotoportego dei Nicoli ovest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Campo del Redentore Fondamenta San Giacomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta Sant'Eufemia Sottoportego e Calle Montorio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta S Biagio Molino Stucky Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO sharpness isn't the best and the crop ate the right should be improved. May be contrast should be improved too, it looks soft. --XRay 05:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 08:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)  Support IMO good enough for QI now. Thank you. --XRay 13:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Longo (Giudecca), south side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Use of this photo for a report cover

Dear Wolfgang Moroder, I am letting you know, per your request, that I have downloaded your full-resolution image to use in a report for my college. The report is about the Navajo Generating Station, and this particular image fit the design perfectly. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Navajo_Generating_Station_from_the_south.JPG

I am including on the photo this reference to you as an author: Photo taken by Wolfgang Moroder.

Since I can't really add the link as you've indicated to a hard copy product, I am hoping this is acceptable to you.

The report is to be printed on June 19, so please let me know as soon as you can if this is not acceptable so I can find a replacement. You can reach me at Theresa.Stacy-Ryan@nau.edu. Thank you, Theresa Stacy-Ryan — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.114.165.183 (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Molino Stucky lapide Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta Sant'Eufemia vaporetto Palanca a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Pudelek 08:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio delle Convertite Portale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 07:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio delle Convertite e Sant'Eufemia Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Eufemia (Venice), statue of Saint Blaise.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta e Campo San Giacomo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo might have been a bit sharper, but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta Ponte Piccolo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio di Sant Eufemia piccioni 2 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isola Santa Maria della Grazia Laguna di Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Fondamenta Sant'Eufemia ovest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Links am Bildrand oben im Himmel scheinen ein paar Fusseln zu hängen. Trotzdem schon mal vorsorglich pro, ich denke, die machst du schon noch wech. ;-) --Smial 12:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)  Done Fusseln wech. Dankee --Moroder 14:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Campo e Fondamenta San Giacomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca rilievo di Madonna con Bambino Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Vendramin Calergi ingresso Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isola San Clemente Laguna di Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Ponte Piccolo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Venice is a love that never rusts. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Foto verwendet

Hallo!

Ich habe dieses Foto hier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mont_de_Seuc_y_l_Saslong_da_Cod_dal_Fil.jpg als Facebook Hintergrundbild verwendet. Danke für die tolle Aufnahme :-) Ich habe es allerdings vorher noch ein wenig bearbeitet - die Farben aufgehübscht und ein bischen mehr Sättigung, etc... Das Ergebnis ist hier zu sehen: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1442380405824366&set=a.1442380742490999.1073741828.100001572606481&type=3&theater

Viele Grüße! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MPreisinger (talk • contribs) 23:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Rio dela Croce giardino Eden Hundertwasser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca chiostro Santi Cosma e Damiano Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plans de Cunfin funtana 1 Santa Cristina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Kreuzmoos Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Wo sind die Spatzen? ;-) -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corpus domini gherlanda spiza Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Radlmoos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments O.K. now --Ermell 16:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Molin San Basegio sul canale Giudecca Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be sharper, but QI for me. --C messier 11:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Glormoos Tafel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corpus domini mujiga de Urtijei Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corpus domini guant dala Gherdeina doi eiles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corpus domini guant dala Gherdeina dan Janesc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corpus domini guant dala Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:24, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Kreuzmoos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one looks a bit pale, could you tone up the contrast a bit or would you get in trouble with the highlights? --Basotxerri 18:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC) Comment If you look at the histogram you will see that the contrast is at the max. Thanks --Moroder 06:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Glormoos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Moosbichlmoos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca Chiesa Santa Eufemia Rio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a gray triangle at the bottom left corner. --C messier 11:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 09:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 14:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Wegabzweigung zum Planermoor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Has anyone seen "Der Wolf im Wald"? Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Planermoor Hochstand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljubljana Prešeren Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastelruth Planermoor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljubljana Regalli house on Miklosiceva and Dalmatinova streets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Contours of the building against the sky could have been a bit sharper, but good for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljubljana portal on Miklosiceva and Dalmatinova streets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would be nicer if it had a bit more space above and below, but OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review. I wanted to emphasize the portal and the two scultures, not the building --Moroder 21:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Ljubljana portal on Miklosiceva 26 street.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljubljana portal on Miklosiceva 26 street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljubljana portal of building of Public Health Department.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mayby it darken the brightest part of pictures? Tournasol7 13:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Question Why? It's not overexposed --Moroder 15:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC) The upper part of the picture seems to be a little overexposed. Or maybe it's just my impression. Tournasol7 18:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC) I watch ones again and good quality after all. Tournasol7 20:58, 29 June 2017 (UTC)