User talk:Multichill/Archives/2012/June

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Family meal 2 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Family meal 2 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 17:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Aleppo greek mar elias.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aleppo greek mar elias.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION

Hi BotMultichill!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).


I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting some photos in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use them in my book.


Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the pictures will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.


The 2 photos which I would use are: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Starr_010419-0053_Vinca_major.jpg


http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Starr_061017-1255_Stenotaphrum_secundatum.jpg


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request…

My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com

Bye, Edoardo

I sent Edoardo a mail with link to the original authors of the files.--Funfood 09:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

foto's uit het Nationaal archief / Spaarnstad

Dag Multichill, aangezien je in het verleden een hele rits foto's uit het spaarnstad archief op wikipedia hebt gezet, stel ik de vraag even aan jou. Ik zou graag een of twee geschikte foto's uit dit archief willen plaatsen op nl:Radio Tour de France, maar ik begrijp niet helemaal hoe het zit met de rechten op die foto's. Op de pagina van Spaarnstad zijn deze foto's niet zomaar te gebruiken op wikipedia als ik het goed begrijp. Aan de andere kant staat er een selectie van deze foto's wel op wikipedia. Hoe zit dit precies? Zou je me daar wat over kunnen vertellen? Groeten, --Meerdervoort (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-046 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-046 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-046 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-046 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-041 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-041 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-039 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-039 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-018 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:US Navy 100710-O-XXXXX-018 USS New Orleans is sunk as part of RIMPAC 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for these bunch of nominations. But as it seems your bot has done something wrong. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Status of defenseimagery.mil

Hello! Russavia said I could ask you for help. You see, a lot of PD-files have been uploaded from http://www.defenseimagery.mil, an official US DoD media hosting, but some people don't think that we should accept photos from there especially when exact author of work is unknown. For example - here's deletion request filed against my upload. I have an idea of making special licensing template specially for defenseimagery which would stop this misunderstanding and will prevent a lot of deletion requests in future. What do you think? Is this necessary? Best regards, James R. Nockson (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Spanish database

Hi! I want to inform you about a change in Spanish database structure on Spanish Wikipedia lists. Only a minor change. Before, only monuments with an "M" in the field "tipobic=" must be listed, but now, we stated to add other kind of monuments and also we want to include this year other kind of cultural heritage, like gardens, archelogical zones, etc. So, not only M items must be listed, but all of them. The bot could now ignore this field. If I didn't explain enough good, please, ask me. I wrote you because I didn't find where was the place to tell this. Thank you. --Millars (talk) 12:21, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done Platonides (talk) 16:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Whoo, your talk page reached the postexpand template include limit: «Post-expand include size: 2047999/2048000 bytes»

grep -c '<!-- WARNING: template omitted, post-expand include size too large -->' User_talk:Multichill.htm => 76

Platonides (talk) 17:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quesions about WLM

Hi Multichill,

I am on the WLM 2012 team for Wikimedia Israel. If it's alright with you, I would like to ask a few questions regarding the deployment of WLM.

After reading the documentation and tools pages, I couldn't quite figure out how the upload mechanism would be deployed in practice, especially in individual languages. From what I understand, someone needs to create a Commons UploadCampaign. Will we be able to translate the campaign interface only after it's created? Also are pages such as this in TranslateWiki relevant? Will we be able to test the upload system before it's available to the public, and if so how?

Thank you in advance. Cheers, Ynhockey (talk) 20:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

As discussed on irc: We need to setup a new campaign for Israel and translate that here at Commons. Plan is to setup all the campaigns in August. Testing is done at test wikipedia this year. Multichill (talk) 20:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - Omsingel De Nederlandsche Bank (5).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - Omsingel De Nederlandsche Bank (5).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 11:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - Omsingel De Nederlandsche Bank (5).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - Omsingel De Nederlandsche Bank (5).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Multichill (talk) 11:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Monuments database/Unused images

Hi Maarten,

It looks as though the Swedish entry in the Unused images page has somehow mismatched templates. The BBR-template goes with {{BBR}} on Commons.

{{Fornminne}} is for a second category of monuments which, although they took part in WLM2011, still don't have lists on sv.wiki (and therefore aren't in the database). This second list is currently being prepared and should be ready for the 2012 WLM. This brings me to something else I've been thinking about. Should this second type of monument get a second table in the database and if so should the current "monuments_se_(sv)" be renamed e.g. "monuments_se-bbr_(sv)" (and the new one "monuments_se-fmis_(sv)". /Lokal_Profil 14:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes, we should rename it and align everything like Denmark. Multichill (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Ok. I'll drop you a line again when the lists are up and the sv-wiki template is constructed. Meanwhile is the template in Commons:Monuments database/Unused images only a typo on the page or is {{Fornminne}} rather than {{BBR}} actually used by the bot? /Lokal_Profil 23:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
We should get this fixed soon. Shouldn't be too hard if we do it together. Multichill (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Hiding a category

Hey Maarten, just wondering why you hid the category Category:US National Archives series: World War II Posters, compiled 1942 - 1945 and if you would object to me unhiding it. It seems to be a useful category for Commons users (rather than a maintenance category). If not, should I add them all to the category's parent, Category:World War II posters from the United States? Kaldari (talk) 19:44, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

If you intersect something with a souce it becomes a source category and thus hidden. Multichill (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2011/Monuments database/Statistics

Multichill,

Er zit overduidelijk een fout in de tellers. Ik verwijder de laatste tijd nogal wat gesloopte gebouwen en voeg af en toe een nieuw monument toe en toch blijft die teller steeds maar optellen. Gisteren heb ik drie monumenten verwijderd en één monument toegevoegd deze morgen zag ik dat de teller toch met één eenheid was toegenomen. Dringend na te kijken dus. Sonuwe (talk) 18:19, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Dat komt omdat jullie niet de het systeem aanhouden, maar een eigen systeem hebben bedacht. De id's horen uniek te zijn, dat zijn ze nu niet. Multichill (talk) 20:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

SieBot removals due to admin mistakes

The images have been restored. However, SieBot removed the transclusion of the images from pages en masse while the images were still deleted, hence my request that SieBot be used to restore those instances. Deryck Chan (talk) 21:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't operate SieBot I'm afraid. Please ask the deleting admin. He caused the mess in the first place. Multichill (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
The deleting admin didn't remove the transclusions, on the other hand. I'm just lost in this loophole of responsibility... Deryck Chan (talk) 23:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)