User talk:Stefan Knauf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome[edit]

Welcome to the Commons, Stefan Knauf!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Image Tagging Image:Eine Luftaufnahme von Rheinbach.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eine Luftaufnahme von Rheinbach.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 06:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Rüdiger Wölk! Wir sind doch beide Deutsche, also antworte ich dir einfach auf Deutsch. In der Bildbeschreibung des Bildes Eine Luftaufnahme von Rheinbach.JPG ist enthalten, dass es von Florian und Jürgen Losch erstellt wurde. Die Autoren genehmigen die Verwendung dieses Bildes mit der Formulierung „freies Kopieren erlaubt“. Diese Informationen nahm ich beim Hochladen des Bildes aus der Bildbeschreibungsseite in der deutsche Wikipedia. Die Formulierung „freies Kopieren erlaubt“ verstehe ich so, dass damit ausgedrückt werden soll, dass das Bild „frei“ im Sinne „freier Inhalte“ ist. So sind meiner Meinung nach die Autoren des Bildes genannt und auch die Bedingungen freier Inhalte erfüllt. MfG Stefan Knauf 13:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dann ergänze doch bitte die Bild Informationen um den entsprechenden "Lizenzbaustein", Danke -- Rüdiger Wölk 03:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Kannst du mir dann bitte auch sagen, welcher Baustein dafür der richtige ist? MfG Stefan Knauf 13:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
{{PD-self}} wäre passend. -- Rüdiger Wölk 05:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
O.K., ich habe das „{{no license|month=May|day=21|year=2006}}“ dann einfach mal durch „{{PD-self}}“ ersetzt. MfG Stefan Knauf 21:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, dann hat ja alles seine Ordnung. -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eisenbahnsiegbruecke zwischen Menden und Troisdorf.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Eisenbahnsiegbruecke zwischen Menden und Troisdorf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Arafi 13:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Siegbruecke der A59 I.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Siegbruecke der A59 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Arafi 13:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Siegbruecke der A59 IV.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Siegbruecke der A59 IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Arafi 14:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Siegbruecke der A59 V.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Siegbruecke der A59 V.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Arafi 14:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Siegbruecke der A59 VI.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Siegbruecke der A59 VI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Arafi 14:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Siegbruecke der A59[edit]

Hello Stefan,

You maybe saw yesterday I requested some of your pictures for deletion. The request was closed and the pictures were kept. You have to know I don't requested them because of the bad quality. These are good pictures, except for the bike in the foreground. I think it's yours, maybe you could take care next time when making pictures for Wikimedia to put your bike behind you.

Besides of that, I requested deletion because it were more or less the same pictures, each from a little different kind of view. I know why you did make these photographs, because I also go out and make pictures for Wikimedia, and I also make pictures from different angles of view, but I only upload one picture (the best picture) of each subject. In the text on the Upload page, I read that files that are uploaded to Wikimedia have to be USEFUL. I don't see anything useful on 4 images that are more or less the same. Files are also uploaded to Wikimedia to be used in the Wikipedia projects. None of these Siegbrücke-files are used nowadays. You can ask yourself if all these 4 pictures will be used in Wikipedia.

Please keep in mind that it's important for a photographer to make choices. Choices on what pictures are good (to delete the bad ones), and on what pictures are better than other (to upload only the better ones to Wikimedia). I guess the other pictures would be never used.

In the case of Image:Siegbruecke der A59 III.jpg, Image:Siegbruecke der A59 IV.jpg, Image:Siegbruecke der A59 V.jpg and Image:Siegbruecke der A59 VI.jpg, please review and choose what picture is the best one.

I cannot ask Wikimedia to delete the other 3 pictures, but you can. The uploader can request to delete some of his pictures. Would you re-view your uploaded pictures, and make the decision what pictures can be kept, and what pictures can be removed?

So the disk space could be used for other more useful pictures.

Best Regards, Arafi 08:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Arafi! Commons isn't only useful for pictures that are directly useful in other Wikimedia projects. Commons also serves with galleries, that are linked in other projekts (look there for example). But in the future I will try to make my choices more selectively. Best wishes Stefan Knauf 12:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File mover[edit]

The functionality of the template {{Rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Societas Verbi Divini of Poland[edit]

Your modification is incorrect. The category is about members of Societas Verbi Divini in Poland. --WlaKom (talk) 22:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I think that "Society of the Divine Word is an order of Catholic Church in Poland" means that the order is only in Poland. But in fact the order works worldwide. If you are sure that you are right, please change it back.
If the category is only for Polish members of Societas Verbi Divini, the correct name of the category is "Category:Members of the Societas Verbi Divini from Poland". The name "Category:Societas Verbi Divini of Poland" sounds like it is for all stuff of the society that is in Poland, maybe monasteries or something. --Stefan Knauf (talk) 13:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bug_mit_Vorlagen_de_und_en.png[edit]

File:Bug_mit_Vorlagen_de_und_en.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vssun (talk) 06:43, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schiffsmodell_Nautilus.jpg[edit]

File:Schiffsmodell_Nautilus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miel Kirche.jpg[edit]

If you don't see a difference keep the original -- to my eyes it is heavily bent. I tried to adapt size to image information (empty enlargement). Vermip (talk) 19:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vermip! Oh, I see, what you did. I think that you did correctly by the guidelines. Stefan Knauf (talk) 21:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Georgenkirche Eisenach[edit]

Hi, sorry, dass ich erst jetzt antworte. Bin umgezogen und hatte kein Internet. Also das Bild ist abends aufgenommen worden, aber ich glaube mich düster zu erinnern, dass die Zeit auf der Turmuhr nicht so ganz mit der realen übereingestimmt hat, aber ich glaube es war abends, denn ich war im Winter dort...möglich, dass es da grade dunkel wurde.

Hallo Zairon! Danke für die Auskunft! MfG Stefan Knauf (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dateinamen[edit]

Hallo Stefan, warum schreibst du bei der Dateinamensvergabe immer Strasze statt Straße? Falls das ß wegen mangelnder internationaler Geläufigkeit auf Bedenken stoßen sollte, kann man immer noch Strasse schreiben.--Leit (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Leit! Ich schreibe das Eszett in Dateinamen nicht als ß, weil dieses Zeichen in Dateinamen doch manchmal Probleme machen kann. Und ich umschreibe es als sz, weil es so heißt und weil man es als sz nicht fälschlicherweise wie ss aussprechen kann. MfG Stefan Knauf (talk) 21:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dafür kann man es als sz fälschlich aussprechen. Wenn überhaupt wäre es aber Straeszette, denn einfach sz wird es nicht ausgesprochen. Nur wenn man über den Buchstaben selbst redet, heißt es Esszett, genau wie De zu D und Em zu M (ohne dass man deshalb Emutter, Emarie oder Emongolei sagt). Nach der alten Rechtschreibung würde man wohl kaum muß als musz schreiben, um das ß zu vermeiden. Die Austauschbarkeit von ß und ss ist hingegen allgemein bekannt, in der Schweiz sogar ausdrücklich so geregelt.--Leit (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Leit! Das ß ist eine Zusammensetzung aus einem Lang-s (ſ) und einem „deutschen“ z (ʒ), deswegen ist sz die einzige mit heutigen Buchstaben mögliche historisch naheliegende Umschreibung. Bei Schweizer Rechtschreibung stolpere ich immer über so Sache wie, dass sie „Masse“ schreiben und „Maße“ meinen... MfG Stefan Knauf (talk) 23:29, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mich hat sie jedenfalls verwirrt und es würde mich nicht wundern, wenn es anderen genauso erginge. Jeder weiß, dass Strasse=Straße, nicht aber jeder auf den ersten Blick dass Strasze=Straße. Über kurz oder lang wird es da sicher, ganz ohne mein Zutun, die ein oder andere Verschiebung geben – allein aus Gründen der Einheitlichkeit. Ich selbst nehme einfach immer das ß, weil doch ebenfalls ober kürz oder lang alle Computer damit klarkommen werden. Und wir planen hier ja langfristig.--Leit (talk) 01:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke übrigens...[edit]

... für Deine Änderungen dieser Art. Schöne Grüße --Sir James (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Sir James! Danke für das Lob. Ich habe mir gestern und vorgestern alle Bilder angesehen, die in der Kategorie Sankt Augustin einschließlich Unterkategorien waren, und habe dabei etwas aufgeräumt. MfG Stefan Knauf (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas Stefan... All OK. Nevit Dilmen (talk) 18:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Stefan Knauf (talk) 18:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaetzchenfoermchen.jpg[edit]

File:Plaetzchenfoermchen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stefan_Knauf&oldid=374000155"