User talk:Stomac~commonswiki

File source is not properly indicated: File:Brown_kiwi.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Brown_kiwi.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Brown_kiwi.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

NZ location maps mass deletion

Hi Stomac, New Zealand location map files that you uploaded have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. The discussion is at Commons:Deletion_requests/2010/04/01#NZ_location_maps. The files are:

• File:NZ-Masterton.png
• File:NZ-mount_Hikurangi.png
• File:NZ-Ruatoria.png
• File:NZ-Eketahuna.png

Benchill (talk) 07:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Registan Samarkand Uzbekistan.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

VI

Salut as toi, je en comprend pas trop ton dialogue sur l'image que tu as mise en VI. Elle me parait bien. Le scope n'est pas parfait et il faut aussi un géocodage mais çà ne sera pas difficile. Si tu as des problèmes appelles! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Salut, en fait j'avais placé ma photo dans les nominations de sets... Pas facile de s'y retrouver quand on commence... D'ailleurs, je n'arrive pas à changer le scope, ni à indiquer la géolocalisation. Les données sont dans l'edit, mais ne s'affichent pas. Si tu sais comment faire, un coup de main, voire un edit serait le bienvenu! --Stomac (talk) 15:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

C'est toujours compliqué au début mais tu n'es pas seul. Regarde la syntaxe du scope, tu rattaches le scope à une catégorie et du décrit se qu'il y a avoir. Le geocodage doit être dans la légende de la photo: je l'y ai mis. Godot ne devrait pas trader à lever son feu rouge: çà devrait passer. Reviens quand tu veux. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Monastère

En Théorie il ne doit y avoir aucune image dans la catagory Géorgie. Tu peux donc pour quelque chose d'aussi important créer la category . C'est fait. Regarde les modification sur la légende de la photo et sur le scope. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Registan Samarkand and three madrasahs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose Technically it does not belong in this section as a single image.--Godot13 (talk) 03:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Oppose withdrawn--Godot13 (talk) 17:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Indeed, sorry for the mistake, the picture is now in the good section. -- Stomac (talk) 14:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ananuri Monastery and Zhinvali Reservoir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Babazhi Khatun Mausoleum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment il serai utile de créer une catégorie pour lui et de rattacher le scope a cette catégorie.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:56, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Info C'est fait, j'espère correctement. -- Stomac (talk) 08:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
• presque, ce n'était pas facile car il fallait créer la catégorie "Babazhi Khatun Mausoleum" puis la placer dans une catégorie a créer qui était celle des mausolées au Kazakhstan, qu'il faut rattacher a "Mausoleum by country". Ne t'inquiété pas on y arrive vite. J'ai modifier tout çà et le scope, qui est effectivement plus simple.
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tamgaly-Tas Petroglyphs Kazakhstan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Regarde comment le scope a été modifié pour le relier à la catégorie la plus proche --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Ak Orda Presidential Palace.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ak Orda Presidential Palace Kazakhstan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Dans ce cas tu as bien placé ton image dans la catégorie "Ak Orda Presidential Palace" donc pointe le scope sur la catégorie. Regarde mes modification du scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Khan Shatyr Entertainment Center.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Khan Shatyr Entertainment Center, in Astana, Kazakhstan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment essaye de modifier le scope en fonction de la nomination précédente. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Cette fois, ça devrait être bon. J'ai mis la dernière sous-catégorie pour toutes les photos candidates. -- Stomac (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tamgaly Petroglyphs Kazakhstan. World Heritage Site..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All crietrai met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traditional costume for Nowruz Kazakhstan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 07:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Ak Orda Presidential Palace.jpg

File:Ak Orda Presidential Palace.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jebulon (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Annebecq, Calvados, France. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

All criteria met but one : the scope needs "NW (or SE...) view", as we usually do here. --JLPC (talk) 17:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Orientation of the view added. -- Stomac (talk) 05:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support : VI now. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orthodox church, Tekeli, Kazakhstan. View from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ascension Cathedral, Almaty, in Kazakhstan. View from the South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Khan Shatyr Entertainment Center.jpg

Eleassar (t/p) 21:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Registan Samarkand Uzbekistan.JPG

File:Registan Samarkand Uzbekistan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 15:35, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Stomac. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Stomac~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

05:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)