Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:AN/B · COM:AN/P

Community portal
introduction
Help deskVillage pump
copyrightproposalstechnical
Administrators' noticeboard
vandalismuser problemsblocks and protections

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new report]
User problems
[new report]
Blocks and protections
[new report]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.


Archives
12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES (index)


Note

  • For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
  • Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • If appropriate, notify the user(s) concerned. {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Umagranger[edit]

Hi,

Umagranger continue to upload images found on Internet after last warning. Please, block.

Best regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done User is blocked for a week, all uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
And is back under Umajoy...
Please block.
--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Taivo: For your information as you blocked the previous account. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
I did not block Umagranger. Herbythyme (for 1 week) and Elcobbola (indefinitely) did. Taivo (talk) 19:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File:WMF share.png[edit]

Protection needed: Please semi-protect it. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 12:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done Widely used image, semi-protected indefinitely. --jdx Re: 12:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

I claimed to you as violence my copyright[edit]

I claimed to you as violence my copyright by Лушников Владимир Александрович How I can complain? This page should not be speedily deleted because:

I created this page and I disagree with the given reason for deletion. Message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted - this is statement of artist Jurita Kalite. All information and photos inder Jurita Kalite copyright and trade mark intellectual property. No any person can not edited this information without agree the artist Jurita Kalite. The page not appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. I do not use Wikipeadia as free web hosting service. I have my own website www.ladyjugallery.co.uk I think this page should not be deleted for this reason. I will go to contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion".
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jurita Kalite (talk • contribs) 15:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey Jurita Kalite. Your English is difficult to understand. Is there another language you can explain the problem in more fluently? GMGtalk 15:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Findgo0[edit]

Hi,

Findgo0 seems only here to promote https://www.findgo.in/. He had been warned not to do so but has continued to upload a lot of problematic files since, even after the deletion of a first batch. Plus, he never gave evidence of permissions for the various sources of his promotional material. Please block.

Best regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring, removing valid warnings[edit]

Armenius vambery (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter logblock user

[1] [2] [3] The user has already been blocked for edit wars before. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 10:24, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Fazilkhaderkt[edit]

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done 3 months, files deleted. Yann (talk) 17:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Lewa42000[edit]

✓ Done Last warning sent, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 18:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
@Yann: Thanks but he seems to ignore the warning and uploaded another copyrighted file. Moumou82 (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done I blocked Lewa for a month (a lot of copyvios). All uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Paurg15[edit]

90% for block evasion; see the last logged action. Upload warring is manifest. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done One week for edit-warring / overloading. Yann (talk) 18:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

To be honest, I don’t see this account was ever warned. The principal problem is socking – first Paurg15’s steps (including es.Wikipedia) were of an experienced editor. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

{{Wrong Exif}} and aliases[edit]

Almost a half thousand file pages depend on the template. Must be autoconfirmed-only permanently. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

I protected two of them; the third, which is a redirect, is not in use.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Yurilizarazo[edit]

User has been repeatedly warned against uploading copyright violations (five times, if I count correctly), but continues to do so. --Jamez42 (talk) 22:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Son personas que critican mucho y contribuyen poco a otras, muy reactivos y poco proactivos, en Wikipedia hay bastantes imágenes que no llevan el mismo "rigor" de censura como se aplica a imágenes que tienen que son base o tiene que ver con artículos políticos o filosóficos, que no son supuestamente "neutrales", se toma la neutralidad como atacar todo lo que no sea de sea centro, o todo lo que sea de izquierda, afortunadamente también hay artículos muy buenos y moderados y wikipedistas que hacen su trabajo, pero encontrar expresiones similares a que haga bien su trabajo porque no vamos a estar detrás recogiendo o corrigiéndole los artículos, o recordar que solo se dejen subir temas de interés enciclopédico o con derechos de autor acordes a la licencie GNL, dejan mucho que pensar sobre quienes hacen esas publicaciones o recomendaciones, primero que toman su actividad voluntaria como una forma de prestigio o subir su ego, tanto que llegan a tratar al resto como si fueran sus empleados o subordinados, claro, dice el manual hay que llenarse también de paciencia con ellos, pero parecen mas "policías" de derecha del mundo real, liberados y sin control en el mundo virtual, con un bolillo en la mano y una comparendera a ver a quien multan, o a quien le dan bolillo o le violan sus derechos impunemente, amparados en su propia interpretación de ley o en la excusa que deben aplicar la norma para mantener el orden, lo mejor es que uno ve sus historiales y solo encuentra contribuciones que en lo personal no debería ir en una enciclopedia sino en una revista de variedades, y así se atreven a criticar todo lo político que se sube, directa o indirectamente porque una imagen dice mas que mil palabras, y buscar acabar con las imágenes, con los símbolos, es una forma de callar o impedir la impresión que una persona pueda obtener para aprender, se presume la buena fe, pero cuando no contribuyen en el objetivo y propósito fundamental que es hacer crecer el conocimiento colectivo, sino que frenan, restringen, esa buena fe podríamos decir por lo menos está viciada de ignorancia. Sobre el caso particular de cada imagen, es cierto he subido varias imágenes y una a una las han ido quitando, censurando, alegando violación de copyright, algo sumamente normal, no es para asesinar a nadie, o aprovechar para liberar traumas reprimidos del respeto a las normas y el orden, lo mas apropiado sería remplazar la imagen inapropiada por otra mas apropiada, eso sería contribuir, pero no, la quitan y dan los artículos, los mutilan, los sabotean, no imagino si ellos mismos harían algo así con sus propios artículos (que en realidad no son de todos o de nadie), no lo creo, antes de automutilarsen buscan un remplazo, aquí no se ve esa buena fe, sino una sistematicidad en quitar y enviar notificaciones como un editor derechista de una prensa vieja y obsoleta que mira al resto como su subordinados y le tira el trabajo en la cara diciendo "eso no sirve", traiga otra cosa que sirva o váyase, así tratan a los wikipedistas que creen violan las normas, como una forma de corregirlos, de hacer mejor wikipedia, cuando es apenas obvio que lo que logran es todo lo contrario, destruir y sabotear los intentos de construcción de conocimiento colectivo, si no sirve la imagen de un artículo, aprovechen, suban otra que sirva, colaboren, pero a veces ni siquiera necesitan otra porque muchas veces son los datos o la información la que está mal, se cataloga mal y es un error común, entonces una persona experimentada puede detectarlo y corregirlo, y no comportarsen como "policías" de Wikipedia, o como "manadas" tan de moda hoy en día donde solo con uno que tome la iniciativa de atacar o agredir los demás van llegando para continuar, bajo la excusa que tienen derecho a hacerlo o que las normas van a protegerlos, del primer comentario, llega el segundo, luego el tercero dice van dos y el cuarto llega y dice, a manera de amenaza siempre, van tres, no faltar que llegue el cuarto o el quinto porque la cobardía no actúa sola, siempre busca cómplices neutrales, igual es su tiempo el que pierden en actividades tan poco enriquecedoras para el espíritu pero es la falta de conocimiento el que los ha llevado de una u otra forma a ello Yurilizarazo (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

  • tl;dr: User claims he’s being harassed by right-wing wikipedians (heh), that copyright violations are normal and less serious than murder, and that instead of (or before?) deleting a copvio image that’s being used in an article we should find a suitable replacement for it. In total, 4283 characters, of which 1 (one) is a full stop. -- Tuválkin 23:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done I gave them a last warning. Strakhov (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)