User talk:İdvadimela

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Cano58)
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, İdvadimela!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:47, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Commons'a[edit]

Selam Cano58. Elünüze sağlık. yüklediğiniz dosyalardan KM olanları buraya yükleyebilir misiniz ? Takabeg (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Merhaba. Şu sıralar biraz yoğunum. Ama zaman buldukça yükleyeceğim. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Facebook User Profile.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Facebook User Profile.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This unsigned sentences written by User:Aguzer 12:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Twitter User Profile.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Twitter User Profile.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rapsar (talk) 16:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

File:İstanbulUnitedXP.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:İstanbulUnitedXP.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rapsar (talk) 16:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Elektrik telinin üzerinde bir kumru.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Elektrik telinin üzerinde bir kumru.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 08:59, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Hey. I don't very know English. I am file uploading at Commons. Why demonstrated deletion candidate? What's the problem? Contribution to do? I don't understand (!)(?) --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
  • * I read the reason for deleting. A few more files. If installed on the site crashes? Then don't need to make contribution here. Because completed the content. In addition, files are not disgrace. Anyone can not install a featured picture. My contribution enthusiasm and good intentions gone... There are numerous pictures like the pictures that I have installed. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

+ This unsigned sentences written by User:Aguzer 14:42, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Request[edit]

Hi. I have a request to you. Can you delete this picture? Only used on Wikipedia. Unnecessary to be here... --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Ankara :-( But if Commons doesn't have photos of same area with better quality, photo is in Commons:Project scope. So your request is unreasonable on my opinion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes. According to you is unreasonable. But these images can be used only Turkish Wikipedia. Uploading pictures here, why do you think? Because images can at the all Wikimedia projects. It comes to picture is district photo. Only there being used. Aside from this. I possess all the rights as the person who make up the picture. I don't want the image to be here. Therefore, I request you to delete. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Could you please provide link to category with images of district on Commons? Just to compare situation with domesticated cats :-)
I don't think that city districts are notable for one particular project. There are probability that such articles may appear on other language editions of Wikipedia as well as Wikivoyage or Wikibooks in book about Ankara. Other possible usage is Commons:GeoCommons (and possible external sites) if you'll add coordinates.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Okay. Keep for Wikivoyage. There is a similar picture to him a few neighborhood. If the not problem install them. I obviously a little worried. I am uploading photos at Commons. There are pictures cats as well as the likelihood of a problem. Those pictures are not deleted. I recommend to you read the keep the reasons. They can be used global scale as you say. Wikispecies, Wikiversty and others project... There are no users who should be deleted. I think not more. Stop the request for deleting the pictures. Because the deletion is not possible. I would like to continue to contribute to a happy and relaxed... Thank you. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
What is the love of this deletion? For this reason I said. Don't the make a contribution. Content is finished. I go to Africa. I find a lion. I take the photo to internal organs. Or something similar. I ınstall to a picture at Commons. It will be deleted? What is the harm in those pictures? A user in a comment there. "They are totally in scope. We can use them on related articles. Also they are being used in user's personal pages". More pictures installed on the site doesn't crash. Then delete the other pictures. What's the point? Even a couple of cats too. No picture is out of copyright is not deleted. If the image is not a disgrace. Already we'll see. It not deleted the pictures... Keep the Ankara photos. No problem about that. And finally. Write the your posts at the my talk page for In your answer to be aware. This a little advice. Thank. Good works... --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Process of finding something useful should not resemble process of finding needle in hay heap. Sure if you will make photo of rare subject - it'll be useful. Sorry, but this is hard to apply to domestics cats.
It's much easy to keep discussion in one place.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Okay. İn wait for the outcome of the debate. A decision is made. Let's wait, let's see. Good works. --- Cano58 (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)