User talk:Kallerna/2009

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Quality Image Promotion

Cirsium arvense.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirsium arvense.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

old pavement pic

Just to let you know that I promoted this to QI and added it to Road surface on enwiki, which didn't have a picture to illustrate pavement deterioration. Good work! Daniel Case (talk) 15:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! kallerna 16:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Nova Scotia Duck-Tolling Retriever headshot.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nova Scotia Duck-Tolling Retriever headshot.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Please review

Hi, I think it's a bit unfair to fellow nominees to constantly ask for review of your images. You nominate lots of images, some of them might get overlooked, but hey, that's life. I for example nominated just one photo (and in fact my first nomination) which has been constantly overlooked, but I have refrained from nagging people to review it. It really rubs me the wrong way seeing you trying to get attention over other users. Please show some common courtesy next time. Thanks. --Ferengi (talk) 19:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it's forbidden to ask for review. I understand you, but putting text like "Please review" may get attention from people who don't usually review photos. But if you think that it's rude, I can stop it. Sorry. kallerna 19:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
I forgot to thank you from reviewing QI's. It's good to have people like you who can review any photos! Thanks! kallerna 19:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
I try to review as many photos as I can and leave none out, it's just that there are simply too many nominations. I also usually give priority to reviewing older nominations so that they don't get left out (unless some new nomination grabs my eye, in a positive or negative way). Asking for review is indeed not forbidden (if it was I would have reverted you Face-smile.svg), so I just made the above comments. It was a one time mention, I'll leave it to your discretion from now on. Keep taking beautiful pictures! --Ferengi (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
I'll try! Face-smile.svg kallerna 08:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Paistekärpänen (Helophilus pendulus).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paistekärpänen (Helophilus pendulus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kamomillasaunio (Matricaria recutita).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamomillasaunio (Matricaria recutita).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Old pavement.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old pavement.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Libellula quadrimaculata.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Onnenkoski.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Onnenkoski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Maitohorsma (Epilobium angustifolium).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maitohorsma (Epilobium angustifolium).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Linnakepuiston ranta.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linnakepuiston ranta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kirnu.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirnu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Erinaceus europaeus 4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erinaceus europaeus 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Hoverfly Säppi 2009.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoverfly Säppi 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tabanidae 2009.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tabanidae 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Tabanidae 2009.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysops divaricatus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Flies on Leucanthemum vulgare.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flies on Leucanthemum vulgare.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Juvenile Erinaceus europaeus kallerna.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juvenile Erinaceus europaeus kallerna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aalto-malja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Prestige -sun glasses.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prestige -sun glasses.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hoverfly Pori.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoverfly Pori.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Sitruunaperhonen (Gonepteryx rhamni).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sitruunaperhonen (Gonepteryx rhamni).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sirokeijunkorento (Lestes sponsa).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sirokeijunkorento (Lestes sponsa).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Ernesto Cardenal a la Chascona.jpg

Perhaps you can have a look at that QI-candidat, I reduced the noise --Mbdortmund (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Yep, it's better now. kallerna 10:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Motocross helmet.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Motocross helmet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Calliphoridae.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliphora vomitoria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Itäkeskus shopping centre.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Itäkeskus shopping centre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Firefly-shoes.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firefly-shoes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tyrni Säppi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tyrni Säppi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Härkäpää (Phalera bucephala) Säppi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Härkäpää (Phalera bucephala) Säppi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kas-Pin photos?

Hi, Kallerna!

You can make photos of Finnish Kas-Pin trainings, sports uniform, emblems, etc.? It is really very rare.

With best regards --George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:11, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

May be too rare, no associations on my town. I'll promise to take photos if I see anything, but that's very unusual sport. kallerna 12:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Branta canadensis kallerna.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis kallerna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Ripped pig.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ripped pig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

my QI nomination

Hello Kallerna, please correct your small mistake here: [2] --> my gold crystal nimination, thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

There weren't your signature. Please add it. kallerna 11:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
ah, OK. I reverted it. Thanks a lot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
No problem. kallerna 09:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Sitruunaperhonen (Gonepteryx rhamni).JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sitruunaperhonen (Gonepteryx rhamni).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sitruunaperhonen (Gonepteryx rhamni).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 18:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Golf balls kallerna.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golf balls kallerna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dendrocopos major with dead pig.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dendrocopos major with dead pig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Säpin majakka.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Säpin majakka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

PV Valsörn II.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PV Valsörn II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scarce copper.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scarce copper.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Glyptobothrus brunneus.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pholidoptera griseoaptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Olkiluoto 1&2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olkiluoto 1&2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rupikonna-Bufo bufo.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rupikonna-Bufo bufo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stop misunderstanding

Hi, Kallerna!

Ohhh.... Face-smile.svg


First, I offer friendship! Conflicts grow out of misunderstanding.


Two times to You did earlier the remarks. Whether You read it before discussion of users about photos of spiders? Absence of uniqueness is not criterion QI. It only check of technical parametres of a photo.


You can always decline any nomination. This Your Right, and I respect Your opinion.


However the hasty opinion is frequent can wrongly. Your phrase "I do not want to see" is very impolite and not friendly. It is the direct offer to a conflict. I am not afraid of conflicts. In my real life I had to be at war against criminals and to face threats.


I always consider the nominated image in 100 % resolution, and I always attentively read the description. I think some minutes before voting. Sometimes I defer the vote the next day.


That seems too similar, not always is simple actually.


Fish has changeable colouring. Males and females differ the head shapes. It is important for a expert.


Flameknee spider in general is ultra-rare. It is protected by the law (catching in the nature is forbidden). The size with legst approximate 18 cm. Poison is similar to a wasp, however a dose much more. Hairs on a body is too poisonous. Speed of movement of 5-7 km/h.


I'm sorry, if I has tired You with biological details. I wished to justify only my opinion: it is not necessary to decline hasty if work seems too similar. It is to concerns a nomination of any user, not only for me.


In summary... friendship?


Yours faithfully, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 08:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, if "... I don't want to see" seemed impolite, I always try to be polite. Your message is really positive, and I do thank you of it. :)
I like your photos, I just thought that just one of the gallery should be QI, as I always chose only the best of my galleries to QI-nomination. But people have different habits, so that of your should be ok. IMO if you (or anyone else) take(s) couple good photos of the same animal/plant or something with same composition and same point of view and same equipment, only one of them should be QI (for instance, this is QI but this isn't. Both of them are tecnically good enough for QI, but the composition is just too similar. But it's another case when the photos have for instance same composition and stuff, but female and male. Then IMO both of them could be QIs. So I'll withdraw my votes. kallerna 16:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


Now all ok, thanks You.

In my opinion, You can nominate the second photo of a goose. However there not absolutely good color balance: bit some blue.

Two nominations of a sunsets You can rescue if reduce the size of this images. The big size not always well for weak illumination. Places in this photos beautiful, but the engineering photocamera not always can transmit Beauty of the World.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Luokkien nimet

Terve, kuuluuko luokat nimetä Commonsissa ensisijaisesti englanniksi vai alkuperäisellä nimellä? Esimerkiksi tein tämän luokan Ukko-Pekka Bridge, olisiko sen voinut nimetä oikealla nimellä eli Ukko-Pekan silta? Täällä on ainakin luokiteltu sekä suomeksi että englanniksi, ja samaan olen törmännyt myös muuallakin. --Makele-90 (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

En ole täysin varma, mutta englanniksi kai ensisijaisesti, mutta jos kyseessä on yhdyssana, on kai pakko kirjoittaa suomeksi. Mielestäni teit täysin oikein ja kannattaa kirjoittaa englanniksi ellei kyseessä ole yhdyssana. kallerna 10:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Mantukimalainen -.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mantukimalainen -.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tykki Helsinki.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tykki Helsinki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sparkler 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparkler 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Porin merivartioasema Kallo.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porin merivartioasema Kallo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Multiharju-opaste.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Multiharju-opaste.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Levi 293.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Levi 293.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kallo sunset.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kallo sunset.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kallo aalto.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kallo aalto.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Photos request

Photos are necessary of a crucian carp. Approximately 10-15 years ago it was the most usual fish in Europe. Now it is uncommon or rare fish in the Central and Southern Europe. I cannot caught it. It is result of invasion of a prussian carp. A photos with good showing fins is needed (composition like this). And a head of a Crucian carp with close up view.

If You can make it, I will support You with a VI nomination.

I am the writer in Russian Wiki: biology, transport, military vehicles, knives (i good know puukko).

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

I'll take a photo, when it next time comes in my webs. Can take a while, but I've had them before. :) kallerna 11:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok :). All other biological species of fishes too are welcomed. --George Chernilevsky (talk) 12:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Scale Common Roach.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scale Common Roach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Niittyhopeatäplä.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niittyhopeatäplä.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Maitohorsma (Epilobium angustifolium).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamerion angustifolium (Fireweed).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Kustaanmiekka majakka.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kustaanmiekka majakka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Request of Information about Image Deletion

I request information about the deletion of image "Elcosmonauta-logo.jpg" in the field of alleged copyright infringement, and the rectification of that deletion under the basis that a) I, the uploader, work with the author of the image, b), the image was uploaded by his personal request, and c) the author licensed the image under a Creative Commons Share-Alike 3.0 license. Thank you very much for your time--ErCradel (talk) 12:20, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

I restored it, try to do convince us. kallerna 10:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Tiedosto:Wir Lernen Finnisch.jpg

Terve kävisitkö kommentoimassa Commons:Kahvihuone-- D100a (talk) 19:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

En ole näiden juttujen ekspertti, mutta kirjoitin jonkinmoisen vastauksen. kallerna 09:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Elcosmonauta-logo.jpg

Hi, could you please leave a message there explaining why you restored File:Elcosmonauta-logo.jpg? Your restore summary (discussion) is a bit vague (no link to said discussion), and I don't think the copyright issues have been sorted out. Thanks. –Tryphon 08:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Check this. IMO the image can be now deleted. kallerna 09:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
I see, thanks for pointing it out (I feel ashamed I didn't even look two threads up). I would wait a few days to see if more details are provided about the original image, but feel free to delete it anytime you see fit. –Tryphon 14:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Lilium Pori.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium Pori.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FPs

People riding Kirnu

Hi, Thanks for pointing out the bad colour balance on my robin picture, I often find it is difficult to spot obvious problems with my own photos. It is probably because I am recalling taking the photo, and the pleasure of capturing the moment instead of looking objectively at the photo :-). It is nice when a problem with a photo can be easily fixed (like colour balance). My old camera has a few limitations, resolution, inability to focus in low light conditions, high noise unless you take everything at ISO 50! So I have to work quite hard sometimes to get decent pictures :-). My biggest problem though is composing a good picture, taking notice of all the distracting elements in the field of view, getting the angle right, making a pleasing picture. Anyway what do you think of this, shall I submitt it to FPC? --Tony Wills (talk) 23:44, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Np :). You can submitt it to FPC if you want, but the original was already FPC and it was declined. People could still prefer composition of that one. kallerna 07:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I saw that, it struck me that the subject of the photo was neither really the whole ride, nor the people riding it but something in between. I think this crop is quite striking. I might have a further play though :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 12:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh well, I nominated it but its reception was a bit flat :-(. There was me thinking it was quite a strong composition, but I obviously have to work on composition a bit more :-) :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 10:26, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Sad but true. :( kallerna 12:23, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Old recordings of music suitable for commons?

By accident while looking for legal information about sound recordings I came over this link. In the end of the text it says something about that there are old recordings of in the public domain that are possible to access through the National library of Finland. I tried to find the actual recordings but it seems like the rest of the website is in finnish and I do not understand finnish. If you have the time and interest, maybe you could have a look at the library site and see if it contains something that could be good for uploading on commons? Or maybe it has already been discussed on finnish wikipedia?

Best regards

-- Korall (talk) 19:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

I'll take a look of it later, I'm quite busy at the moment. Aren't all old recordings suitable (PD when they are over ~80 years old or so)? kallerna 14:55, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


I found a link to all of the recordings, so dont mind if your busy, thanks for the reply anyway. =) --Korall (talk) 15:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Olvi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olvi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Epäilyttävä kuva

Moi, tämä kuva taitaa olla tekijänoikeusrikkomus. --Makele-90 (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Olihan se, poistin. Noihin voi merkata {{Copyvio}} niin ne poistetaan. kallerna 09:59, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Pihlavanlahti.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pihlavanlahti.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Woodpile.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodpile.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tikkataulu.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tikkataulu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Water in boat.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water in boat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Sigma 105.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sigma 105.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tamron 70-300.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamron 70-300.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Ahlaisten kirkon kellotapuli.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahlaisten kirkon kellotapuli.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Nomination

Alluvial fan, Taklimakan Desert, XinJiang Province, China, NASA, ASTER.jpg
Nomination Notification
G'day! I love File:Alluvial fan, Taklimakan Desert, XinJiang Province, China, NASA, ASTER.jpg, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alluvial fan, Taklimakan Desert, XinJiang Province, China, NASA, ASTER.jpg. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! :) One of those has already been nominated, but it didn't got the status. But couple of my new photos, that I haven't uploaded yet may have potential to FP :). kallerna 13:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Asa & Jätkäjätkät @ Bar Kino - Puppa J.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asa & Jätkäjätkät @ Bar Kino - Puppa J.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Toller Enäjärvi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toller Enäjärvi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Puro Enäjärvi.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puro Enäjärvi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Jäätynyt ruoho.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jäätynyt ruoho.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tireless contributions

I just want to say that I admire your recent commons contributions beacuse the weather this time of the year so booring and unispiring so I cant really understand how you go out with your camera and document it. Way to go and keep up the nice work!!--Korall (talk) 00:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

And I thought that I've been lazy... :D But I try to take as many photos as I can, althought there isn't too much to take photos from. Thanks, this made my day!
ps. Om du vill, du kan också prata svenska med mig. :) kallerna 10:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Det tråkigaste med att bo på dessa breddgrader är att det är så himla mörkt på hösten. Det är bara dagsljus några få timmar om dagen och i princip hela november har det varit grått och muggigt och ingen sol i Stockholm, ingen snö. Snön lyser i alla fall upp lite när den kommer. Så det gäller att uppskatta de små sakerna.Det blir helt enkelt så att jag inte går utanför dörren om jag inte måste. Jag får spara fotandet till våren och sommaren. --Korall (talk) 15:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Jo, men jag väntar på snö. Det är inte så mörkt när det kommer :). Och vinterlovet ska jag kanske gå till Lappland och njuta av snö. Och det är också så vacker... Hoppas att mina kameran fungerar i kallt Lappland! :) Och om du lever i Stockholm, du kan fotografera arkitekturen där (förstas inomhus), det är fager stad! :) kallerna 18:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Pluggar du? Vad läser du för något? Lappland kan nog vara jättefint. Jag brukar åka till Jämtland på vintern och åka skidor. I år skall jag åka till Florida i stället över jul och nyår. Jag hoppas att jag kommer att hitta något intressant där att fota. --Korall (talk) 12:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Till Florida, jättefint! Det ska vara olik jul i varm klimat. :) En av mina kompisar levde i Pensacola, men han lever idag i Seattle... Jag hoppar att du ska hitta något intressant att fota, kanske alligators? kallerna 15:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Jag hade hoppats på fjärilar och fåglar, alligatorerna ligger ju i vatten hela tiden.--Korall (talk) 17:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Inte hela tiden. :) kallerna 12:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Jäätynyt pensas.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jäätynyt pensas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP votes

Hey there, thanks for all your hard work at FPC. If possible, could you please provide more in-depth explanations to justify your votes? "Poor quality" or "poor composition", while certainly valid concerns, are very vague statements—and they don't give the nominator much info to use towards making necessary edits. Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 14:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Camel Active shoes.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel Active shoes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Question?

Do you want me to sharpen the logs one? I just want to be clear :). I'll respond to the others as soon as I can. While I'm here.

Must have been a cold night.jpg

Some snow for you! Fresh off the camera - regards --Herby talk thyme 14:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

If you can. :) Cheers! :) kallerna 09:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
OK - re-uploaded, let's see if it is QI now :) Regards --Herby talk thyme 10:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! kallerna 11:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Hepan silmä.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hepan silmä.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Happy Holidays

Courtesy of Chico, the Official Commons Christmas Puggle. :P

Ivebeengood.JPG

We've had our differences, I know, but I can honestly say it's been a pleasure working with you on FPC, Kallerna. Let's hope next year is just as exciting! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 07:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Face-smile.svg Happy holidays! kallerna 10:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Suomenlinnan kirkko kallerna.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suomenlinnan kirkko kallerna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Frozen stream Enäjärvi, Pori.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frozen stream Enäjärvi, Pori.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.