User talk:Liridon

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Liridon!

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50, move up to 32 pages per minute instead of 8, and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 19:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks :) .--Liridon (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Watermarks[edit]

Another user with funny watermarks not understanding WP licensing: [1]

do you want to send him a note?

përshëndetje, --Albinfo (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

@Albinfo: too late Face-grin.svg.--Liridon (talk) 11:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Liridon,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Anna Tomowa-Sintow.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Anna Tomowa-Sintow.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 01:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for notification @JuTa: I know, you can delete it any time. Couldn't find what type of licence they have, also tried to contact through they website, still no response.--Liridon (talk) 09:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Panoramic view of Shebenik-Jabllanicë National Park from Black Stone Peak.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Shebenik-Jabllanicë National Park from Black Stone Peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, but saturation/contrast should be reduced to get a more natural look --Uoaei1 04:04, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 8.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wikimania Hackathon 2019 - Pre-Conference Day 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Penguins at Boulders Beach, Cape Town (18).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penguins at Boulders Beach, Cape Town (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Stone bathtubs, Theth - 2018 (13).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone bathtubs, Theth - 2018 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Stone bathtubs, Theth - 2018 (7).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone bathtubs, Theth - 2018 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Matterhorn & wooden cottages & skiers, March 2019 (03).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matterhorn & wooden cottages & skiers, March 2019 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Matterhorn & wooden cottages, March 2019 (03).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matterhorn & wooden cottages, March 2019 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Matterhorn, March 2019 (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matterhorn, March 2019 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Matterhorn, March 2019 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matterhorn, March 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 21:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Boulders Beach, Cape Town (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulders Beach, Cape Town (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Tilted --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Please align the horizon and remove the CA. --Ermell 06:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done--Liridon 17:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Still leaning to the right. The disturbing person on the left should be cropped out IMO. --Ermell 07:04, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Done some more changes --Liridon 09:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Luzern - Mount Pilatus - March 2019 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luzern - Mount Pilatus - March 2019 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality Chme82 19:55, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Bela di Supra (Upper Belica).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bela di Supra (Upper Belica).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Fixing persepective and geo tag would be great --Podzemnik 03:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done--Liridon 17:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good good --Podzemnik 03:54, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stockholm - Kungsträdgården - April 2019 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm - Kungsträdgården - April 2019 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Clear detail, good exposure and colour, pleasing scene. --Bobulous 18:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stockholm - Boat - April 2019 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm - Boat - April 2019 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
It needs a small rotation ccw --Michielverbeek 20:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Tilted in cw direction --Poco a poco 20:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Made some changes. --Liridon 19:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC) Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Luzern - Chapel Bridge - March 2019 (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luzern - Chapel Bridge - March 2019 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Imehling 12:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stockholm - city views - April 2019.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm - city views - April 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Zürich - Kirche Enge - March 2019 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zürich - Kirche Enge - March 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Zürich - Kirche Enge - March 2019 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zürich - Kirche Enge - March 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)