User talk:Ronn

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archief

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Haags Gemeentearchief[edit]

Beste Ronn, Misschien had je dit verwijderverzoek al gezien. Jij hebt in het verleden ook wel eens foto's uit dat archief ge-upload. Ik weet oprecht het antwoord op deze auteursrechtelijke vraag niet, maar zou jij misschien je licht er over willen laten schijnen? Vysotsky (talk) 11:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ik weet niet of ik het juiste antwoord wel heb. Ik heb in een reactie op een discussie in De Kroeg hierover een vraag gesteld. Vriendelijke groet, Ronn (talk) 10:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schilderij van Valkenburg?[edit]

Dag, Ronn.

Via je nieuwe artikel over Valkenburg bekeek ik de reeks afbeeldingen van zijn schilderijen, waarbij me leek dat File:Valkenburg Interior of a Burgher House.JPG wel een erg vreemde eend in de bijt is – het doet ouder aan, meer zuidelijk en westelijk ook vooral. Bij inzoomen lijkt de handtekening inderdaad niet die van Valkenburg, maar toen ik de uploader vroeg, kwam die met een foto van een bijschrift dat er in het Museum te Rostock bij zou horen.

Wat is jouw indruk? Ik hoor het graag. Groet, Eissink (talk) 12:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

P.S. Inmiddels vind ik het schilderij hier wel beschreven. Zijn vroegere werk zou in de stijl van Category:Balthasar Denner zijn, maar voor mij blijft het vooral een belabberd schilderij, dat verdomd weinig weg heeft van de andere Valkenburgs – een vervalsing? Eissink (talk) 12:40, 6 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Ik heb me niet inhoudelijk in Valkenburgs werk verdiept, maar ben het met je eens dat dit een vreemde eendje is. Ronn (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Valhalla[edit]

Hoi, jij had ooit hier: [1] een delete template neergezet. Maar de afbeelding is nog steeds aanwezig op Wikipedia, en ook in gebruik op [2]. Moet hier nog iets mee gebeuren? Als je de ingevulde source informatie combineert met deze [3] comment lijkt me dat dit niet op WIkipedia thuishoort. Sitethief (talk) 15:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig Nick[edit]

Dag, Ronn. Via Category:Brandmonument, Enschede kwam ik bij de maker, de Duitse beeldhouwer Ludwig Nick (Münster, 1873 – Weimar, 1936). Ik kan relatief weinig informatie over hem vinden: beschik jij misschien over de juiste literatuur, of heb je wellicht een ingang om (online) verder te zoeken? Vanderkrogt.net verwijst naar een RKD-profiel dat niet (meer) bestaat, en verder vind ik slechts summiere informatie bij een veilinghuis, waar een Meissen beeldje van zijn hand toch een aardige som moet opbrengen. Als je een tip hebt: graag, dan kan ik wellicht een artikeltje over hem aanmaken. Ik heb overigens bij de Village Pump/Copyright ook een vraag gesteld aangaande afbeeldingen van zijn werk. Groet, Eissink (talk) 20:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hallo Eissink, ik kan je helaas niet verder helpen. Mijn verzameling literatuur beperkt zich tot Nederlandse beeldhouwers en een enkele Belg, geen Duitsers. Ik zou ook niet weten of ze er een Duitse tegenhanger is van het RKD of KIK. Gr. Ronn (talk) 07:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ik ken het Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon - Internationale Künstlerdatenbank een beetje. (Achter betaalmuur?) AKL heeft een redelijk lemma over Ludwig Nick. Vysotsky (talk) 09:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bedankt, beide. Via mijn KB-abonnement heb ik toegang tot AKL, wat een prachtige database. Ik zal eens beginnen met het Wikidata-item bijwerken, misschien zit er een artikeltje in. Nogmaals dank, Eissink (talk) 12:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Resultaat: en:Ludwig Nick. Eissink (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

File tagging File:NespMauro.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:NespMauro.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NespMauro.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 07:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Kamer van Koophandel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 11:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 00:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:28, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 23:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]