User talk:Nyttend

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Welcome to the Commons, Nyttend!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 19:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Nyttend, I noticed you put Image:Stillwater Downtown.jpg and Image:Enid Downtown.jpg in the category Churches in the United States. Why not create the category Churches in Oklahoma and put the two photos under that category instead? --Georgeryp 20:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Downtown Beaver Pennsylvania

Thanks, but it is easy. It is just one or two clicks on the automatic function in the software AcdSee . The software is not really expansive but the automatic functions are brilliant. --Marku1988 21:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bluffton_northward_along_Main_Street.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Bluffton_northward_along_Main_Street.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

24.165.124.148 20:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Maps by User:Nyttend

Hi, i hid your category to seperate them from other categories. Greetings, --Martin H. (talk) 00:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

You can make hidden categorys visible by changing your preferences (Preferences->Misc->Show hidden categories), please try this. If it is to uncomfortable you may revert my edit to your category. --Martin H. (talk) 00:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hello just here making certain that the welcome template was here also

I will be honest, I only used the help template to remember the badname template because I occasionally get a little discombobulated with the naming of my uploads. A link to the deletion guidelines is in there!! Yay!

I personally had much more luck though just putting the delete template on it and following those instructions and haven't actually read these guidelines in a long while. -- carol (talk) 23:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Baker Electric Building

Thanks for uploading so many Cleveland images. The building on Euclid is officially the Baker Motor Vehicle Company Building in the NRHP, but it is more commonly called the Baker Electric Building. Here's a recent Plain Dealer article about its restoration. I'm not sure where the Baker factory was located, but given the large footprint of auto factories and the high values of Euclid Avenue land at the turn of the century, it seems reasonable to assume that the factory wasn't on Euclid. - EurekaLott (talk) 04:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

File deletion warning

File:Birnirk Site.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Doncram (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Re:File:Winnibigoshish Lake Dam.jpg

Its simple, follow the LOC templates link http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/hhh.mn0389 and you will come to the archival description page of this survey. The survay consists of 11 b&w photographs, 10 data pages and 1 photo caption card, you see the survey number somewhere on the page (HAER MN-65) and the stable link with the digital ID hhh.nm0389. You can click the Item on the Top 11 b&w photographs because they are already digitalized. Klick it and you will see the 11 photographs. Your photo is nr. 4, survey id MN-65-4, thats important to find the image in the caption card. Click the photo. You have two download options at the bottom, select the High res TIFF image. Its 19 MB large, so the download will take some time. Open the file with a software i dont even have photoshop so i use ms office picture manager. Edit the TIFF file like you want, maybe crop the borders, and export it to jpg. You can get the informations about date and author from the photo caption card. --Martin H. (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:180px-Kujau wiki.jpg

Hi Nyttend, please do not remove a {{delete}} template inserted by someone else as you did here. This has to be done by the admin who processes the associated deletion request. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Permission templates question

Earlier today, you dealt with the File:Waterfall in the War Memorial Park.jpg, changing the "OTRS pending" to the standard template with the OTRS ticket number. I was confused about one thing, however: you replaced the {{attribution}} with the OTRS ticket number template — don't we need to have some sort of copyright tag as well as the OTRS ticket number template? I've restored the permission template and moved the OTRS number elsewhere in the image description; if you get a chance, please look at the page and fix it if I've done something wrong. Nyttend (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

You've left it exactly how I should have done; my script for adding OTRS templates failed. Thanks. Stifle (talk) 15:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] 1531 Stout Street

It was fun to go down and take this picture. Thanks as always for your great edits to this and others. It was a difficult building to photograph; the street is narrow. Here is the front view, which I though was not as good as the shot I eventuall chose. Denverjeffrey (talk) 12:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Puye Ruins.jpg

It was a nice photograph and agree but if the author does end up replying and agrees to have it under a free license forward it to OTRS and contact me and I'll be happy to restore the photograph. Bidgee (talk) 13:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Talkback

	Hello, Nyttend. You have new messages at Yarnalgo's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Česky \| Deutsch \| English \| Español \| Português \| Română \| Русский \| Suomi \| +/−

--Yarnalgo (talk) 16:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Photo requests - NRHP sites in Valencia County

I will take some photos on my next trip (I live in southern New Mexico, but I travel through this area a few times a year). I got a photo of the Harvey House Museum on this trip, which I have uploaded. Image:Harvey House Museum Belen New Mexico.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) --AllenS (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, I will collect them statewide. Leave a note on my talk page is there is anything you think is especially needed. --AllenS (talk) 03:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Lake County Courthous photo

Hello Nyttend, I have changed the license on my Flickr photo page of the Lake County Courthouse. I hope I used the correct license. If not please let me know. I am sorry for all the confusion regarding this photo. Thank you. --Pdepalma (talk) 13:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Nikbot not giving me a message

You're right. I'm back from holiday and I've just seen that's a bug on wikipedia.py that make the bot crash just before it can notify the problem to the user. However, I've just fixed it :-) Thank you, --Filnik^{\b[Rr]ock\b!?} 10:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Image license question (Denver)

I think the license that was there was the one I originally gave to the picture. Definitely please do not delete it from Wikicommons. I just changed the license to attribution only. That solves the problem, no? Thanks, Denverjeffrey (talk) 21:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for my confusion on this picture's license. I made a change just now -- is it the one you seek? My intent is to give it a license that allows it to remain on Wikicommons, but I guess I am confusing either the picture or the license. Also, thanks for your comments on my Speer Boulevard photo!Denverjeffrey (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Abigor#Talk page speedy deletion?

I deleted the talk page, as you requested; no need for further bureaucracy. –Tryphon ^☂ 14:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Comment

I'm sorry for the error here: File:Miami County Courthouse clock and Justice.jpg

The situation is as MGA explained. When one sees the flickr license, I thought it might be 'safer' to pass it as I saw it: 'cc by 2.0' in this case. I usually check the license and the resolution. My apologies, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:26, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Mounds.jpg

I'm not quite sure, but as far as remember 7 years later the picture was taken at the Bynum Mounds, near milepost 232 on the Natchez Trace Parkway. --Jan Kronsell (talk) 10:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Media with erroneous locations

Nyttend, I just fixed your files to be compatible with the {{location}} template you are using, and today they are back in Category:Media with erroneous locations with clear error messages showing on the file page. You can keep {{location}} template on top (sorry for moving it), but please leave the parameters inside the template intact. --Jarekt (talk) 20:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits on several of my images

Thanks for the category cleanup, but please don't mess with how other people choose to state their re-use permissions. This has been discussed several times on the Village Pump. Unless someone actually gives the wrong permission info - e.g. misattributes the work, claims a CC license on something that is actually PD, etc. - you (and I, and anyone but the uploader) should leave alone their one statements about the image (adding is fine, but removing is another thing). I choose on my images always to be explicit, not implicit, about myself as a source, and that I, as the photographer, am granting rights. I do this as a precaution, because I've found that quite a few of my images get used outside of Wikimedia Foundation projects, and that "own work" has a tendency to turn into a credit to the Commons or to Wikipedia instead of to the actual photographer.

Again, sincerely, thanks for the category cleanup, but please don't "fix" what is not broken. - Jmabel ! talk 03:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Law offices

Category discussion notification

Category:Law offices has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 07:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Jurists

Category discussion notification

Category:Jurists has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 13:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] concerns: Licence for File:Cityhall-Little Rock 131.jpg

Hello, you mentioned that this foto has no correct licence. Please read, what I wrote on the File:Cityhall-Little Rock 131.jpg , that the fotographer W.Beckers gave all rights to me. He is my brother in law!! There are dozens of other fotos of my br.i.l. Please remove the Licencedeletion plague. Greets. --Peng (talk) 15:11, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright post

I dropped a comment at Commons talk:Licensing#Template for US Post Office Department stamp? in response to yours. Ww2censor (talk) 19:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)