User talk:Fr02774
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Bonjour.
- Tu n'as pas choisi la bonne licence, celle que tu as mise dit Moi, créateur de cette œuvre, cède ladite œuvre au domaine public. Il faut mettre plutôt {{PD-old}}.
- En l'absence de date, la validité du domaine public est douteuse (70 ans après la mort de l'auteur). Il faudrait au moins qu'elle soit d'avant 1900.
Amitiés. --GaAs11671 16:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:SGDB72_les_7_fontaines.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SGDB72_les_7_fontaines.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:SGDB72_les_7_fontaines.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Bapti ✉ 08:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- bonjour,
- Je suis un peu perdu. Que dois-je faire comme modification sur cette photo, en plus de modifier la description.
- la licence a déjà été modifié en PG-OLD : est-ce suffisant ? Il s'agit de carte postale datant d'avant 1920, donc ayant 90 ans. Dois-je préciser autre chose ?
- pour les autres photos, je vais reprendre toutes les descriptions.
- merci
- cordialement --Laurent DAVID (talk) 08:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comme indiqué, il convient de dire d'où bien cette photographie dans le champ "Source". Une carte daté de 90 ans est probablement dans le domaine public, mais ce n'est certain si on ne sait pas d'où elle vient.--Bapti ✉ 08:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Merci d'importer proprement vos images
[edit]Bonjour,
Veuillez importer correctement vos images en les nommant d'abord de façon correcte, en ajoutant une description précise (dans un modèle {{Fr}} si cette description est écrite en français) et en mettant une catégorie appropriée. (exemple). Dans le cas contraire, vos images ne seront pas utilisables par les autres utilisateurs faute de pouvoir être trouvées...
Cordialement--Bapti ✉ 08:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
File:SGDB72_etang5.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
High Contrast (talk) 14:57, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:SGDB72_Blason.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:SGDB72_Blason.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SGDB72_Blason.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bapti ✉ 16:32, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:SGDB72_Cadastre_1809.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SGDB72_Cadastre_1809.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:SGDB72_Cadastre_1809.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Bapti ✉ 16:33, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:SGDB72_ancien_blason.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:SGDB72_ancien_blason.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SGDB72_ancien_blason.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Bapti ✉ 17:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:SGBD72_clocher_detruit.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SGBD72_clocher_detruit.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:SGBD72_clocher_detruit.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Bapti ✉ 18:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Wikipédia n'est pas un bulletin municipal
[edit]Bonjour,
Je viens de supprimer un certain nombre de photos que tu avais importées et qui ne présentaient clairement pas d'intérêt sur les projets Wikimedia. Wikipédia n'est pas un bulletin municipal mais une encyclopédie : on ne raconte pas ce qui se passe en 2010 dans la commune, mais on synthétise les connaissances sur cette commune ;) Il reste néanmoins possible de remettre en ligne ces images si besoin. J'ai aussi supprimé d'autres images en raison de l'absence de liberté de panorama en France (cf COM:FOP) : il n'est pas possible de prendre librement en photo l'œuvre d'autrui.
Je viens de finir le ménage sur les images en les renommant et catégorisant correctement : merci d'avoir avancé en partie le travail ;)--Bapti ✉ 18:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- quelles sont les photos interdites ? je ne vois pas ce qui manque et pourquoi ? Toutes les photos mises en lignes étaient de mon travail.
- Merci
- --Laurent DAVID (talk) 19:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Voici des exemples de photos supprimées :
- Pour le cas 1 (Wikipédia n'est pas un bulletin municipal) : la photo des commerçants du bourg.
- Pour le cas 2 (pas de liberté de panorama) : la photo du restaurant scolaire (pas utilisable sans autorisation de l'architecte).
- Cordialement--Bapti ✉ 20:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- OK pour le cas 1, mais je tombe sur le c... pour le 2. je ne pensais pas qu'il existait un pb de droit sur des bâtiments publics, accessibles à tous.
- bref, c'est loin d'être évident à savoir ce qu'il est possible de mettre ou pas.
- je crains que je vais encore faire quelques erreurs avant de bien tout comprendre.
- cordialement, --Laurent DAVID (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Il n'y a pas de mal à faire des erreurs du moment qu'elles ne sont pas répétées ;)
- L'absence de liberté de panorama est une exception française qui est malheureusement devenue assez contraignante pour Wikimedia Commons.--Bapti ✉ 19:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)