User talk:Okki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Guillaume Griffon 20100411 BD-Aix 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

88.175.125.47 07:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Attaques personnelles à mon égard

[edit]

Salut C'est moi Panama2014. J'ai été victime d'une attaque personnelle de la part de compte tendance CAOU dont l'un est un banni de Wikipedia. J'ai alors fait une RA qui n'a pas été traitée et le banni est venu me harceler. Je crois que la RA n'a pas été traitée car les propos tenus sont en français. Par ailleurs on assiste aussi à une désorganisation depuis commons. J'ai des diff. Pourrait on parler ? Pourriez vous faire quelque chose ? Cordialement. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mickie James has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 14:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Okki, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2017 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 02:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)´[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (tJosve05a (c) 18:33, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proteger les fichiers importants

[edit]

Cher Okki !
C'est tout naturellement que je me suis tournée vers Magog the Ogre pour demander de supprimer l'ancienne version du fichier en raison des renseignements personnels. Ainsi, il va supprimer tous les quatre mes fichier. Lisez, s'il vous plaît, ici :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_V2016#Be_kind_enough_to_undo_the_deletion
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Magog_the_Ogre#To_remove_the_file
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Éric _Laborey
Je vous serai reconnaissante si vous pouviez m'aider à proteger ces documents importants.--V2016 (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dinan

[edit]

Salut,

Franchement, merci pour ta catégorisation de mes photos de Dinan. J'avoue que j'avais un peu la flemme d'identifier tous les sujets et avait donc remis cette corvée à plus tard. Quelle surprise de constater que c'est déjà fait. Sauf que maintenant, je me sens un peu coupable :)

Encore merci ^_^ Okki (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Désolé de te couper la catégorisation sous le pied ;) Il est vrai que j'essaye d'être assez réactif dans les images de la Category:Bretagne. Et comme on ne sait jamais si le téléversement sera repris plus tard par l'auteur pour aller chercher LA bonne catégorie, je m'y mets assez souvent. Bonne continuation, --Fab5669 (talk) 09:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PS : il serait peut-être utile que je n'ai pas fait d'erreur : n'ayant jamais mis les pieds dans la ville, cela est toujours possible;
File:Marylise Morel 20080315 Salon du livre 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marseille 20131005 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SpanishSnake (talk) 02:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tiana Lynn has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 00:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is now locked

[edit]

Hello. I'm rxy, one of a steward. Your account is now globally locked due to your account is compromised. Please contact to ca-email>ca@wikimedia.org (WMF Trust and Safety team) for details. Thanks. (cross post with w:fr:Discussion_utilisateur:Okki#Your_account_is_now_locked)--Rxy (talk) 20:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mont-Saint-Michel

[edit]

Coucou ^_^

Je reviens tout juste de Bretagne, où j'ai pu prendre tout plein de nouvelles photos. Avant d'attaquer l'import de ces dernières, je me suis dit que ça serait pas mal de trouver le courage de finir de m'occuper de celles d'octobre dernier XD

(oui, je sais, j'abuse un peu :)

Lors de mon précédent périple breton, on avait également fait le Mont-Saint-Michel. Alors oui, je sais, contairement à la croyance populaire, ce dernier ne se trouve pas en Bretagne (ah ah ah). Ce qui n'empêche pas les bretons de vendre tout plein de cartes postales du Mont dans toute leur région :)

Enfin bon, tout ça pour dire que j'ai pris peur en voyant les centaines de photos en vrac dans la catégorie Mont Saint-Michel. Sans parler de toutes ces sous-catégories... Non, vraiment, le Mont aurait bien besoin d'un super catégorisateur tel que toi (sifflote) :p

Dans tous les cas, merci pour Saint-Suliac (et sans doute les communes à venir :) Okki (talk) 16:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

C'est gentil de penser à moi. Mais, vois-tu, j'ai déjà, je pense, bien assez de boulot avec toute la Category:Bretagne. Et comme tu l'as souligné, le Mont l'a quittée, la Bretagne ! Je te rejoins pourtant sur le besoin de catégorisation, surtout sur un monument comme celui-ci (et c'est bien le problème : le touriste a, j'ai l'impression, tendance à être moins précis dans ses catégories). Je vais passer mon tour. En tout cas pour l'instant (qui sait ? plus tard...). Bon week-end, --Fab5669 (talk) 06:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Okki,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Jean-Luc Nancy 20100328 Salon du livre de Paris 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aventurijn (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

YouTube celebrities has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--IagoQnsi (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, PantoKrtor (talk) 14:17, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photos du barrage de Bimont... ou Zola

[edit]

Bonjour,

En consultant category:Barrage de Bimont, j'ai constaté que plusieurs photos, notamment de toi, répertoriées là étaient en fait des photos du barrage de Zola (le petit, situé en aval). Peux-tu vérifier, et faire les reclassements nécessaires ? Indice : sur le haut du mur de Zola, il y a une sorte de barrière alors que sur Bimont c'est une rambarde en béton ; on peut aussi comparer les plans d'eau, très différents (un étroit et un large).

Bonne journée ! --Fr.Latreille (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Désolé pour le dérangement ! C'est moi qui n'avais rien compris. Les photos dont je te parlais sont celles du "contre-barrage" au pied du barrage proprement dit, avec côté rive gauche l'émissaire du canal Marseille-Nord. Donc sont parfairtement à leur place. --Fr.Latreille (talk) 16:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fredrika Stahl FNAC LIVE

[edit]
Fredrika Stahl FNAC LIVE
Bonjour Monsieur Seguin,

Je m'appelle Fredrika Stahl, je suis artiste et vous etes venue faire des photos de mon premier showcase Fnac en 2006. Je vous contacte car je voulais vous demander un énorme service, celui d'enlever la série des photos que vous avez prises ce jour la à la Fnac des Ternes. Ces photos ont plus de 13 ans et ne sont plus du tout raccord avec mon image d'aujourd'hui et elles sont parmis les premieres qui sortent quand on recherche mon nom sur google. Je sais que c'est un grand service de vous le demander, mais étant aujourd'hui sans maison de disque, je dois faire tout ce travail d'image toute seule. Je vous serais très reconnaissante si vous pouviez m'aider et je ne manquerait pas à vous donner une accréditation lors du prochain concert pour que vous puissiez faire des photos plus à jour! Milles mercis! Fredrika Stahl FredrikaStahl (talk) 21:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Fredrika, je suis l'une des artistes prises en photo par M. Seguin dans la même année et je souffre du même problème que vous. Avec l'aggravant d'avoir eu toutes les photos prises exposées, sans aucun triage respectueux envers l'image d'un/e artiste. C'est comme il ne voulait pas comprendre qu'on a besoin de notre image et de la maintenir actualisée. Je suis vraiment désolée pour vous et desespérée pour moi, parce qu'il y a un homme blanc, français, occidental, qui dicte de façon très machiste et raciste le genre d'image qu'un artiste va avoir sur le web, la sienne. Très dictatoriel et j'ai déjà perdu tout respect et patience. Je suis en train de parler avec Wikipedia directement à l'égard de ses publications d'images sans autorisation au préalable. Le deal étaint uniquem de les publier sur ce réseaux pour les télécharger plus facilement. Il n'a jamais mentionné le upload définitif et éternel des ces images qui me donnent du vertige 17 aprés. C'est vraiment abusé !!! Outilmail (talk) 01:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Carmela Chergui 20100328 Salon du livre de Paris 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 12:46, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:FLAC_files_of_classical_music_by_composer has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Holly Body has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 23:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Brittany O'Neil has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 23:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Lee Caroll has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Dahlia Grey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Tera Heart has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Tamara Lee has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Blake Mitchell has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Isis Nile has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Kelly O'Dell has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Coral Sands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Sandi Beach has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Kimi Lixx has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Rachel Love has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Kristina St. James has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


FredWalsh (talk) 00:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aline De Lima

[edit]

Bonjour ! J'aurais aimé très aimablement vous demander de retirer les images concernant Aline De Lima de vos archives sur ce site, s'il vous plaît. Ce n'est plus de son intérêt de voir des images la concernant sur le web, et vous êtes le seul à les garder. Ma cliente souhaite garder son image et noms en privé. J'apprécie votre compréhension. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:14C:110:A071:ADFB:9A27:DA5B:84AA (talk) 04:43, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pour une telle demande, il est préférable d'envoyer un mail à info-commons@wikimedia.org Okki (talk) 20:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Page Kennedy has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Commodores has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 12:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Nick_Teplitz has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Keystone18 (talk) 18:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Keye Luke publicity 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Keye Luke publicity 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 12:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changement de photo sur une Page

[edit]

Bonjour Monsieur, Veuillez m’excuser, je ne sais pas comment faire et j’espère ne pas faire d’erreur afin d’entrer en contact avec vous. Voici ma question. Est il possible de changer la photo sur la page d’un artiste lorsque la photo est de vous ou que c’est vous qui l’avez mise ? bien cordialement Simsarol Simsarol (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Akie Namiki has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--125.230.83.62 16:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]