User talk:Patrick Rogel/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Patrick Rogel!

Joel Sternfeld image excerpt from Matt Wolf

[edit]

Hi Patrick - We know Matt Wolf and we are using the freeze frame with his authorization. Please let me know what you would like me to change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YoavFriedlander (talk • contribs) 22:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick The request for undeletion of an image from the public domain,has not been addressed. Request you to undo your decision. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legolas111 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maya selva en 2017.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, thank you for the recommendation but I think I might need some help here. I am trying to upload photos of myself, Maya Selva (I know, that is really my name) and I don't know exactly how. All those photographs were paid by me to use them at my website and the internet, and I´ve been recently reading Cigar Makers articles who coul'd use them. Can you tell me what I should to to succesfully upload my photos? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NinaCobosMayaSelva (talk • contribs) 15:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naum Koen.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, thank you for your deletion recommendation. You have noted this is a copyright violation as the image is also used at this url (https://biz.nv.ua/markets/naum-koen-ja-mechtal-stat-bolshim-chelovekom-2511287.html). I provided this image to https://biz.nv.ua for use on their website, so the refractive alliance do not hold copyright on the image. I have all the copyrights of using this image under my user as "Angelina 770" to Wikipedia. Angelina 770 (talk)

File:Naum early.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, thank you for your deletion recommendation. You have noted this is a copyright violation as the image is also used at this url (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhHYR5qKvJM). This is my youtube account and I have all the copyrights of using this image under my user as "Angelina 770" to Wikipedia. Angelina 770 (talk)

S

[edit]

Hello Patrick

This is about the deletion of the poster of The Answer. Kindly be informed that there was no copyright infringement involved. The said poster is freely available on the net and a simple google search would prove the same. It is also available on the IMDB page of the movie. Bring new to the forum there may have been mistakes in submission but not with intent to violate copyright. Kindly permit publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legolas111 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


File:นายแพทย์ นพพร ชื่นกลิ่น.jpg

[edit]

็21/01/2019 Hi Patrick, This is dr.nopporn picture, He hold copyright license of himself picture. He took picture from government studio and release his picture to press for use in public news media and www.matichon.co.th this site is news media website in Thailand. If you close look into this image it differences resolution brightness because This picture is mostly use in news media, Finally reason he is my boss and He holding the position director of Health Systems Research Institute in this news https://www.matichon.co.th/local/quality-life/news_1013652.

File:DZ Reinstein Headshot.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, thank you for your deletion recommendation. You have noted this is a copyright violation as the image is also used at this url (http://www.refractivealliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Reinstein-MD-Dan.jpg). I provided this image to www.refractivealliance.com for use on their website, so the refractive alliance do not hold copyright on the image.

Please can we have the deletion recommendation removed?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjajbafgalla (talk • contribs) 15:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File: File:Alderman Joe Moore at Annual Events.png

[edit]

Patrick, I have updated where I got the images from to create my derived work. All of these images come from Joe Moore who is a public official and has given me explicit permission to upload these photos to wikipedia. If you could please explain where I can go to demonstrate that I have this authority I would much appreciate it. I also received similar warnings from you on the following images I uploaded, all of which I have been given permission from Joe Moore to upload and should be in the public domain given they are from a public official and are on a website paid for by the public: File:Marijuana Dispensary in Rogers Park.jpg ; File:Participatory Budgeting Chess Tables.jpg ; File:Rogers Park mural created from participatory budgeting.jpg ; File:Rogers Park Participatory Budgeting Vote.jpg

Thank you

File:9-a UK reklambildo.svg

[edit]

Hello, I received the notice that the picture is missing permission information and "there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license". As I wrote in the description, the picture was made by myself and it is a vector render of a poster from 1913. The original poster itself is published in Wikimedia Commons as "ineligible for copyright". --Etuardu (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ministro do Turismo Marcelo Álvaro Antônio durante a cerimônia do Prêmio Nacional do Turismo 2018.jpg

[edit]

Dear Patrick, please undo your request for the deletion of this file. The link it was originally posted with wasnt working properly, but the current link shows the image.

Carlos Ricarte (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gov Logo Arabic.png

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. This logo is specific to Ismailia Governorate within the governorates of the Arab Republic of Egypt I design this logo and own its rights 15:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


File:Gov Logo English.png

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. This logo is specific to Ismailia Governorate within the governorates of the Arab Republic of Egypt I design this logo and own its rights 15:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


File:Ismailia Flag.png

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. This logo is specific to Ismailia Governorate within the governorates of the Arab Republic of Egypt I design this logo and own its rights 15:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Ism logo jpg.jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. This logo is specific to Ismailia Governorate within the governorates of the Arab Republic of Egypt I design this logo and own its rights 15:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamed Ali Eldeen (talk • contribs) 16:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anton Vezuv.jpg

[edit]

Dear Patrick Rogel, the author of the photo, Jakab Péter has submitted a release request via e-mail. When can I expect to get my photo back on wikipedia? Thank you. - Pityhaitt

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pityhaitt#File%3AAnton_Vezuv.jpg

File:Amis2019桌曆台中場.jpg

[edit]

請管理員幫我移除這個檔案

File:Amis20181208.jpg

[edit]

請管理員幫我移除這個檔案 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lin79115 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Arnstein Aassve.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick,

I am a beginner so I apologise for the inconvenience. The file "Arnstein Aassve.jpg" which has been marked as a possible copyright violation by you is actually a picture of Prof. Arnstein Aassve taken from Aassve's secretary in the Grafton Building of Bocconi University. Originally the picture was taken for the IFAMID's website which is managed by Prof. Aassve [1]. I talked to both him and her to ask if I could use this picture and upload it on wikimedia. She told me to do it and that she did not want to have any claim to the picture. What can I do to ensure that the picture can be used? Sincerely, -- Franzchi95 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franzchi95 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

S.Cohen-Scali1.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, As I 'm beginner, I don't know how to send the written declaration as an author for this pictures. I took this pictures when Sarah Cohen Scali come in my Middle school to speak to my pupils about her book "Max". The background of the picture is still the same in the school library. And I can show another picture with S. Cohen Scali and the pupils but it's not the place to show this kind of pic in Wikipedia. What do I do ? I don't understand the problem : Sarah Cohen-Scali is a public people and the picture was taken during a professional activity. She knows we made photos. And we write an article for our school website too : http://college.montbard.free.fr/2013/Cohen-scali.html Thanks to help me to find the right way to do. Sincerely, --3Cpasteur (talk) 17:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riguccini belt.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, the file "Riguccini belt.jpg" is a photo that was taken by the same photographer by Alessandro Riguccini, was the same Alessandro Riguccini (the sole owner of the photo) to authorize the VA Sansepolcro to upload it on his site (after it had already been uploaded on Wikipedia). However, if you need evidence I leave you here the email of Alessandro Riguccini: "nerowarrior@hotmail.it" where you can write and himself will attach the authorization of the same with a copy of a document attached. I remain at your disposal for any clarification. Sincerely best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.66.209.46 (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martha Alf photo (45705702802).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:Martha Alf Retrospective (39433814444).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:Martha In Morris Chair (40112780062).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:Pears Series XIII -2 (39493472965).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:Two Bosc Pears (39679358644).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:Pear -1 for Andy Wilf (40390196651).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:1975 Black and Red (40827948692).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:1977 Pear Series V -1 (Four Pears) pencil on bond paper 12 x 28 in (40827947822).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:1982 Pear -1 for Andy Wilf 12 x 18 (40827948682).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:Alf New Glass City 9-11-02 2002 (40827948052).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:B07 (39975503155).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter.

File:Alf 2 (40827946962).jpg

[edit]

Please undo your request for deletion of this file. I have added thupdated the permission tag with following to the permissions info regarding having previously sent written permission from the authors to the helpdesk: "requested permissions from real authors Ethel Fisher and Martha Alf have been provided via helpdesk [Ticket#: 2018022310011238] Jtucker77 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "2018022310011238 OTRS ~riley (talk) 02:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)" if this is not sufficient permission in this instance, please let me know how I may better satisfy the requirement. I am operating with full permission from the original creators. Thanks for your concern and attention in this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtucker77 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick. Please reconsider your request for speedy deletion of this file. The author Pierre Jovanovic himself mailed me this picture specifically free of rights for inclusion into Wikipedia. Maybe it has been used elsewhere, but the owner is Pierre Jovanovic and not fnac. What should I do to address this issue? What is the next step that I should take? Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micha Jo (talk • contribs) 16:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Please consider [Ticket#2018102310005499] Confirmation of receipt (Re: release of Мило_Бошк [...]) received at Tue 10/23/2018 1:00 PM — Preceding unsigned comment added by ID007NS (talk • contribs) 12:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ID007NS (talk • contribs) 12:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider [Ticket#2018102210005008] Confirmation of receipt (Re: release of Предраг_Ј [...]) received at Mon 10/22/2018 12:22 PM — Preceding unsigned comment added by ID007NS (talk • contribs) 12:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is my picture. Licensed to Donna Moderna but my copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMaro52 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, dear Patrick! The photo you have delated is published in our official website http://fpk.in.ua. All rights belong to our institution. And there is no violation of copyrights! We just want to publish it on our wikipage. So could you explain if there are some special license terms in this case and how could i upload this file legaly on wikimedia? Катерина_ФПК (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick; this file has been deleted as considered a recreation of the File:Shake Before Use Pared Verde01BN102.jpg; and it is another picture!!! In this case taken from the original author (Carlos Vega) and agreed to be published. Could you please explain which where the basis to consider that a picture is violating copyright??? musikciclopedia (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not any original uploader as I have improved this image contrast, I don't know the source and/or licencing of this image. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 03:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My upload

Hi. Why have you reported my upload as a copyright infringemente? Would you please specify how does my upload violate any copyright regulation? It's purely a photograph of street art depicting the exact same image as these other uploads: here, here and here. --Hqfngawz (talk) 14:50, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Hope I don't get into any trouble for that upload. Now I know I won't upload pictures of street art depicting recently released movies or anything alike. Btw I'm impressed by what seems to be your understanding of the slight differences between Spanish and Portuguese copyright law. Cheers --Hqfngawz (talk) 17:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de foto

[edit]

Hola Patrick

Me has borrado la foto File:Foto-carlos.jpg con la excusa de que la copie de http://www.lecturalia.com/autor/4987/carlos-aurensanz

Dime un correo y te mando el archivo original y el permiso de la autora.

Creo que la subí muy rápido sin seguir las instrucciones

o la subo denuevo con el permiso

a ver si soy capaz


un saludo

José María

Un cordial saludo (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Barkhane

[edit]

Bonjour, la vidéo d'où ont été extraites les images sur Barkhane a été publié sous Licence de paternité Creative Commons (réutilisation autorisée). Elles peuvent donc être publiées sur Wikimedia Commons. Tan Khaerr (talk) 12:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non. C'est un reportage de France 3 Grand Est, publié sur youtube avec la licence Creative Commons CC BY. Tan Khaerr (talk) 12:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pas du tout, la vidéo a été publiée par la chaîne youtube de France 3 Grand Est, dans laquelle il est bien précisé que les images filmées au Mali viennent d'un reportage. La vidéo a été importée sur youtube avec la licence Creative Commons CC BY. Ces images peuvent donc parfaitement être importées sur Wikimedia Commons avec la même licence. Tan Khaerr (talk) 12:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Non, une demande de suppression immédiate n'est pas acceptable, je n'ai pas envie tout recommencer parce qu'un admin aura supprimé le fichier sans vérifier (comme il arrive parfois). Le plus simple serait de reconnaître que vous vous êtes trompé et d'annuler vos contestations. Tan Khaerr (talk) 14:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Et voilà c'est exactement ce qui vient de se passer à l'instant. Merci de me faire perdre mon temps. Tan Khaerr (talk) 14:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconvenience, I'm new in wikimedia. I marked the source as "erhalten direkt vom Fotograf zur Veröffentlichung unter CC-BY-SA" which can be translated as "received directly from the photographer to publish it under CC-BY-SA license". Can you please help me, what have I to do to mark this case correctly? Rainer Gutsche (talk) 06:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong use of the {{No source since}} template

[edit]

Please do not use {{No source since}} if a file clearly has a source, like you did here and in other cases. Use {{Speedy}} in case of clear copyright violations (which this wasn't) or regular deletion requests in other cases. See also this discussion. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC) Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−[reply]


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Patrick Rogel. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour, je suis la personne qui a les droits sur la photo de MARIE PARIE, pourquoi ce message de Copyright???? bien a vous --Mariepariedoudou (talk) 23:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Artak Avetyans photo.

[edit]

Dear Patric, the image was provided me by Artak himself to be published in Wikipedia in the article about him. If you have any concerns regarding the copyright of this image you may contact Artak personally via Facebook messenger. I'm removing the copyright warning from the image and will be thankful if you just help me to input necessary corrections to avoid such concerns in the future. Regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yerevantsi2018 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autorisations de réutilisation du fichier File:Laurent Coulondre by Jérémy Bruyère.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour Patrick, Pour faire suite à votre message concernant l'autorisation de la photographie sus-citée, Jérémy Bruyère (qui en est l'auteur) a fait parvenir un email contenant la permission écrite à OTRS (permissions-fr@wikimedia.org) hier. Ce devrait donc être chose validée d'ici peu. Bien cordialement, --CJazz (talk) 07:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Faisant suite à votre message de ce jour, j'ai donc ajouté dans la page de la photo le bandeau {{OTRS Pending}} comme souhaité. Vous en remerciant, Cordialement, --CJazz (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SAOCOM Patch

[edit]

Hi Patrick. I would like to know the reasons of the speedy deletion of the SAOCOM Patch. The whole site is under a CC-BY-2.5 AR, there's even a license tag specially for sites of the Argentine government.--BugWarp (talk) 00:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The ASI logo is in the public domain.--BugWarp (talk) 13:20, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

deleting some pics

[edit]

Hello my friend, You've sent 4 messages about deleting hose files دانا جبر.jbg لجين اسماعيل.jpg فيلم زينة.jpg The reasons: copyrights violating. .. Those pics are free for use and you can find them in many sites,I asked permission from the official website for actor lojain ismail "the actor in those pics" .. and ghey accepted. PLEASE, don't block me and allow the pics. In the future I'm ready for any punishments if someone reported for those pics copyright violating. Thank you

Latest files

[edit]

It seems that you're tracing every upload I make. I don't want to think it is personal... - Fma12 (talk) 15:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Commanders of the Escola de Comando e Estado-Maior do Exército (Brazil)

[edit]

Good morning, Patrick. You've proposed the elimination of some photos that I put in this article. I really took them from the school site (http://www.eceme.eb.mil.br/antigos-comandantes). This data are from absolute public domain. How can I explain it? Or how can I give the correct credit of the photos? Thank you very much for your help! Luiz265 (talk) 08:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Good evening! I've changed the source (http://www.eceme.eb.mil.br/antigos-comandantes) and the author (unknown author) in all the photos. I've also put the license (PD-BrazilGov) for the photos taked before 1983 and (cc-zero) for the recent ones. In the site http://www.eceme.eb.mil.br/antigos-comandantes it's now clear that: "These pictures below are public domain, regarding to orders from the Brazilian Army Command and General Staff College." Now, I ask you to cancel the nomination for deletion. Thank you very much, Luiz265 (talk) 21:41, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are very blind when you are not looking for a translation. Only text licenses are restricted to free use.

[edit]

All files are licences - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ See at left at pages - https://www.kritiky.cz - few minutes before we have photos licence at bootoms at pages: Fotografie, jehož autorem je web 10Mpix.cz nebo Kritiky.CZ, podléhá licenci Creative Commons Uveďte autora-Zachovejte licenci 4.0 Mezinárodní - (translate: Photograph created by 10Mpix.com or by Kritiky.CZ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0 International)- You are very blind when you are not looking for a translation. Only text licenses are restricted to free use.

Photos have the correct license to use on Wikipedia .. Please clear your suggestion for deletion.

--Simca 17:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ninja Sex Party on the set of Next To You.jpg

[edit]

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I removed your copyvio tag on File:Ninja Sex Party on the set of Next To You.jpg and instead started a deletion request, which can be found here. I explained my reasoning for opposing the deletion there. Cheers, IagoQnsi (talk) 00:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour Patrick, J'écris pour vous saluer et savoir comment vous êtes, en plus de cela pour vous dire que la photo est mon travail, je l'ai également téléchargée sur mon profil linkedin et sur mes médias sociaux personnels. Peut-être que je vais avoir quelque chose de mal? aidez-moi et conseillez-moi éventuellement. Merci beaucoup et bonne journée.--Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, all right, at this moment Silvana Pizzuto is very busy, I can ask you to delete the photo and delete the history, so that puts a picture that I did with my Sony Alpha 55 SLR camera? Of course if I can do something for you, ask. a greeting from Calabria.--Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talk) 17:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted File:Angel Quintana Gómez.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick Rogel, my pic File:Angel Quintana Gómez.jpg has been deleted. But the pictures is mine, I'm Angel Quintana. I don't know why I cannot use it. Maybe I should upload in a differente way, please let me know what I can do to fix it. Thanks --Angelquintanagomez (talk) 23:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file Székely_Norbert.jpg

[edit]

Hello Patrick, My picture was deleted, and I took from my camera, edited on my laptop, and I uploaded. I really would like your help to understand how can I upload this picture without been deleted.

(https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Székely_Norbert)

Thank you,

Best regards,

alencar.rossoni — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alencar.rossoni (talk • contribs) 07:19, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific journals of Serbia

[edit]

Dear Patrick, We have permission for those pictures of scientific journals by publisher. Please wait till our administrator put OTRS number on the files. Sincerely 11sasapus11 Aleksandra Popovic Librarian at University Library in Belgrade

Monsieur Patruck Rogel, Récemment vous avez averti la photo que j'ai importée dans Wikimédia Commons. On m'a dit que c'est parce que cette photo était déjà sur Facebook. Mais c'est moi qui l'ai prise, l'object est mon conjoint, en plus je suis photographe. Et même sur Facebook, mon nom est mentionné comme photographe. Je voudrais vous demander de faire un peu plus de vérification et attention, avant de faire n'import quel avertissement. Merci beaucoup. Mme MIZUTANI Kanae

Je suis désolée d'écrire tout ça ici, mais je ne sais pas comment je peux vous contacter autrement. Bonne soirée.

Thanks for Your explanation. I did not know that.--11sasapus11 (talk) 19:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emile-Allain Séguy

[edit]

Merci pour ta vigilance ! Léna (talk) 23:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de fotos

[edit]

Hola me ha puesto usted un mensaje de borrado de fotos por que el Sr. Baixas no ha dado su autorización. Son dos cuadros que tengo en mi casa y comprados en galerías de arte. Son míos y los derechos también. Un saludo. Lmdolar (talk) 17:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piesie Super.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick Rogel . You reported my upload as a copyright infringement? It is a photograph of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piesie_Super I have in my archives. There are no copyright issues with it. MrOrhin (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai télécharger une photo sur Commons, mais je ne suis pas capable d'inscrire les crédits sur ma photo. C'est pourquoi j'ai attrapé une restriction, et je ne veux pas cela... — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinChoquetteWiki (talk • contribs) 23:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick, this is an image that I created, wholly own the copyright to and am irrevocably releasing to distribute on Wikimedia Commons under Creative Commons. How can I request that this photo be undeleted? --Alextincbs (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

bollywood hungama pictures

[edit]

hello, i have uploaded all this images from bollywood hungama, and i removed water mark with photoshop. why did u nominate them for deletion, plz remove it. How do u nominate a image for deletion only beacause it does not have water mark, i had seen many images which are review without and passed without watermark VenkateshMgna (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC) My images are reviewed by a wiki commons user and how do you nominate them again for deletion, plz can u first read the instructions first and tell me...VenkateshMgna (talk) 00:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VenkateshMgna (talk • contribs) 18:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Patrick Rogel plzz see this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_VenkateshMgna it was written that there was no valid reason for deletion VenkateshMgna (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bollwood hungama deletion requests

[edit]

Hello this file is Origanally posted to http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/parties-and-events/south-indian-international-movie-awards-2013-day-2/south-indian-international-movie-awards-2013-day-2-27/ you can also see the watermark. Plz remove this from nomination deletion request.

This photo was also was first posted to http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/parties-and-events/celebs-grace-siima-awards-2018/celebs-grace-siima-awards-2018-2/ you can also see the watermark, how could nominate after seeing the watermark too??

VenkateshMgna (talk) 10:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC) Patrick Rogel https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_VenkateshMgna plzz check this file it was written that deletion debate has closed and u cannot nominate again VenkateshMgna (talk) 10:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As for this image, it is basically an ownership of the Saudi Ministry of Media and it is not an ownership of that site, which you have mentioned, however this image is under the ownership of official Saudi government authority. I always see you deleting this image with a number of weak excuses; do you hate me for no reason it seems to me like that???????? Zozr789 (talk) 10:00, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de foto

[edit]

Hola Patrick

Me has borrado la foto Patry_white_grabando.jpg con la excusa de que ha sido tomado de un video que no es libre, pero es una foto de un video de la misma protagonista del articulo, publicado en su canal de youtube donde permite que se copie siempre y cuando se le de crédito.

Ha sucedido lo mismo con Camila-Arteche-Premios-Platino-Joyas-Sarah-Kosta-Blog.jpg/220px-Camila-Arteche-Premios-Platino-Joyas-Sarah-Kosta-Blog.jpg Aquí le muestro el intercambio de mensajes que tuve con Sarah Costa, la autora de la foto donde autorizó su utilización. Puedo reenviarle el mensaje si lo desea. Ticket#2018100410008165 De: Sarah Kosta Store [2] Enviado el: miércoles, 29 de agosto de 2018 13:25 Para: lilian@codyas.com Asunto: Re: Desde Cuba

Buenas tardes!

Con gusto pueden usar esas fotografías. Me gustaría a cambio que me mencionen como autora de las mismas.

Agradezco que me hagan llegar un screenshot para subirlo a nuestras redes.

Saludos!

Sarah Kosta Directora

+598 95 645 991 Skype: SarahKosta SARAHKOSTA.COM MVD, UY

Saludos Lilian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lizz1986cu (talk • contribs) 16:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC) -- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jack McMullen et Elliot Barnes-Worrell.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Zozr789 (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Me has borrado una imagen publicada por el grupo terrorista de Sendero Luminoso en la década de 1980. la imagen es de dominio público en Perú bajo la licencia

Public domain
This file is in the public domain because This is effectively in the public domain; since it was produced by the Communist Party of Peru (a.k.a Shining Path'), any copyright would belong to a terrorist organization and would be legally unenforceable. Note that PCP is subject to U.S. sanctions [3], under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA, 50 U.S.C. Chapter 35). As such, it is believed that the corresponding U.S. copyright is "blocked property."

This template must not be used to dedicate an uploader's own work to the public domain; CC0 should be used instead.

This work must carry justifications for free usability in both the United States and its country of origin.

Además el Archivo no presenta ningún problema de copyright ya que fue subida por el mismo grupo terrorista. Aspíllaga (talk) 5:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

No entiendo, el video sí contaba con licensia de uso libre, la imagen lo saqué de aquí, un video que se le está permitido el uso libre: [4]. GRACIAS. RockSkaPunkMetal (talk) 19:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission

[edit]

Permission: [Ticket#2018092710007312] Oświadczenie TW-ON --Tchnienie (talk) 19:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission Gabriella Crespi

[edit]

Hello, I created the Gabriella Crespi page and, before uploading the picture, I contacted the Gabriella Crespi archive. They sent a declaration of consent to Wikipedia. Could you give me a feedback? Thank you.

Deletation my uploads

[edit]

Hi. I got notif that you flag my uploads. Thank you so much for reminding me. I am sorry I am new user, I dont know much about copyright screenshot from youtube, my bad.but I see so many photos in wikimedia that are screenshots from youtube as well like File:Kim Rae-won in 2017.png, File:180601 Kim Seok-jin arriving at Music Bank Rehearsal (3).png and File:1117 Jin (BTS) Dispatch Photo Shoot LA (2).png. Why they are allowes to be in wikimedia?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirseoki124 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cornelia Dörr (Schauspielerin)

[edit]

Dear Patrick Rogel, something turned out wrong with this: [Ticket#2018091410003224] Confirmation of receipt (Re: File:Doerr,Cornelia- [...]) Can you help? Thank you very much, --Party diktator (talk) 15:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

[edit]

When editing a page on Commons there is a small field labeled "Edit Summary" or "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. This will help you avoid leaving misleading summaries like you did here.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:53, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Naschy as Alaric de Marnac.jpg

[edit]

Bonsoir.

Carolina Gonzalez a envoyé le courriel d'autorisation ce jour à 19h11 (heure de Paris) et reçu le Ticket# 2018100810008407.

Si vous êtes un vérificateur OTRS, merci de faire le nécessaire.

Cordialement. --Guise (talk) 21:51, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Patrick,du hast ein Bild von mir von Simone Menne als Urheberrechtsverstoß angemahnt. Würdest du das bitte rückgängig machen. Das Bild steht für Medien und Veranstaltungen zur freien Verfügung. Die Messe herCareer nutzt es auch aus diesem Grund und ist auf keinste Weise selbst der Urheber. Ich wollte nur die Wikipedia-Seite ansprechender machen, durch die Verwendung eines Bildes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnaQuickRathgeber (talk • contribs)

File:Scumbag Poster Border 10 8 18 AMERICAN Small.jpg

[edit]

Dear Patrick,

My company, World Domination Pictures, Inc. owns the rights to this image and I have uploaded proof of ownership to the dispute email address provided at Wiki Commons. It is a legal signed document prepared by my attorney proving that artist D.J. Rabiola signed over his rights to the artwork to my company. Please undelete this image and/or tell me what else you require. I even have a PSD file where I added a new laurel yesterday. What more do you need? Theskeletone (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)TheSkeletone 1-11-18[reply]

File:Požarevac collage.jpg

[edit]

This is not derivat! Zeks127 (talk) 20:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Požarevac collage.jpg

[edit]

This is not derivat! No authors of the last image Zeks127 (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://sr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Црква_Светог_Николе_у_Пожаревцу Zeks127 (talk) 20:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is my own work. This image is not owned by anyone. Zozr789 (talk) 12:28, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) You just made of collage of some COM:NETCOPYVIO. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reported

[edit]

Dear Patrick Rogel you flagged 9 OF MY UPLOADS for no reasons, the copyright being clearly indicated: 4HcxdV9x, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 Int; for the montages. I do not understand. Moreover, you have been reported or in conflict over a dozen times including:

Patrick Rogel

   Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes/juillet 2017#Demande concernant : Patrick Rogel, L'Exterminateur, Alain133 - 28 juillet
   Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes/mai 2017#Demande concernant : Patrick Rogel, L'Exterminateur - 17 mai
   Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes/mai 2017#Demande concernant : Patrick Rogel, La Poule turulèque, L'Ornithorynque - 8 mai
   Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes/avril 2017#Demande concernant : Patrick Rogel, L'Encornet, La Poule turulèque - 25 avril
   Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes/avril 2017#Demande concernant : Patrick Rogel, Préparation hash, L'Encornet - 21 avril
   Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes/avril 2017#Demande concernant : Patrick Rogel, Capitaine Caverne, Le Siphoneur - 13 avril
   Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes/janvier 2017#Demande concernant : Tiger Chair, 90.85.181.209, Patrick Rogel - 3 janvier
   Wikipédia:Vérificateur d'adresses IP/Requêtes/avril 2016#Demande concernant : Abbé3A , *SM*, Patrick Rogel - 21 avril

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Comit%C3%A9_d%27arbitrage/Demande_de_r%C3%A9vision_d%27arbitrage/Marcellus55-Patrick_Rogel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4HcxdV9x (talk • contribs) 13:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dusepomandore.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm sorry, but I don't have the time to do this right at the moment. The photo File:Dusepomandore.jpg is not a copyright violation. I've checked into the two identities (Respubliko de Gvapolando and Jo Dusepo) involved here and talked to her--both are the same person. She uploads her photos to Commons. The article the photo is going into, w:Mandore (instrument), is an appropriate place. Once she added the photo to commons, I would have placed the photo in that article myself, if it wasn't already done. I'm sorry I don't know how to properly deal with discussing this kind of issue on Commons (do I have to open a delete file conversation when it shouldn't be deleted at all?). I upload here, but mainly write on Wikipedia.Jacqke (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I work in promotions and events at Yellow Arch Studios. I got these photos from our google drive where a friend uploaded the photos that he took himself. We have used the photos on our website and sent them to journalists when doing articles about the business. We just want to upload the photos to our wikipedia page, there would be no copyright violation as we took the photos and haven't copyrighted them!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoebelang (talk • contribs) 15:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You Deleted our photos and keep deleting

[edit]

Hello, I'm Piattaformaresistenze and this is our website: http://piattaformaresistenze.it/it/ why you deleted our photos and keep deleting ? You have no rights. Because we are the copyright holders and this is our work so stop it first verify it then do something you doing a wrong. You don't have any rights to do. Our Team done very hardwork and you just keep deleting why ??? Which prove you need let me provide you. You are such a negative person you have no reason to delete our work we are the copy right holders this events and photographer is our so why you doing this ? Do You have any prove this is not our work or do you found someone els who says its his/her work ??? No Right? So stop it and publish our work restore the photos If you need any prove just tell us we can provide you please try to understand don't be so negative be positive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piattaformaresistenze (talk • contribs) 13:17, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for welcoming

[edit]

Dear Patrick, Many thanks for your attention and care. Just wanted to explain that the pictures uploaded by me are the works of my late father, the prominent artist-illustrator Zurab Porchkhidze, and the photos I captured by myself at our home where the originals are kept and hanged on walls. Due to the policy of copy-writing I just sent my request for permission to Wikimedia Commons, hope everything is OK so that I will be able to freely upload mu father's works, whose proud heir I am (sure I wouldn't be urged to write these explanations, but the article dedicated to my father is on Georgian language, soon I hope to create English and Russian versions too). Best wishes, Sincerely Yours, Maia Porchkhidze, aka MayaPor1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayaPor1 (talk • contribs) 09:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted File:Alfredo J. Balsera.jpg

[edit]

I am a rookie editor and would like a little more direction as to how to go about attributing the proper copyright to a photo. I took the photo in question from the website of the person who I created the wikipedia about. I tried giving license to the people who created it but it was still deleted. Any suggestions? I sure don't want to be flagged as a spammer or someone trying to do ill in the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius1433 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Image Bram van Sambeek

[edit]

Hello Patrick,

I noticed that you have deleted the file with the image by Bram van Sambeek because of suspected copyright violations. The image is used with permission by Bram van Sambeek himself and downloaded from the download section on his website, where image free from copyright can be downloaded for publicity reasons: http://bramvansambeek.com/downloads/.

Although, I am new to Wikipedia, I would have appreciated a heads up first, before deletion, because now I have to appeal it.

Warm regards, Sobatipep --Sobatipep (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bram van Sambeek image

[edit]

Hello Patrick,

Thank you for the explanation. That really helps. I will work on it.

Warm regards, Sobatipep --Sobatipep (talk) 13:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marie-Hélène Prouteau

[edit]

Je ne sais pas que faire de plus pour sourcer cette photo. Elle m'a été remise par la personne qui a pris la photo et qui accepte qu'elle soit partagée sur wikipedia.

--[[User:DenisH|DenisH] (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion?

[edit]

Yes we understand that this is an album cover, but we are the management company for the label and owns rights to that file and all images of the artist that we have uploaded. You may remove the image that we dragged from google and we can replace it with the original source file? is that okay?

Hello and greeting Patrick, You have marked our copy written image of our artist as infringement violation. We represent the Artist and have full rights to use and display said image and all future images uploaded. We kindly ask that you remove your claim. Thanks!

File:Brug 400, 2018, Kiosk zuid (2).jpg

[edit]

See the file. The theatre is probably the smallest theatre in Amsterdam. There was no copyrightsign on the poster. Problem is the given URL on the poster is not available; they can only be contacted via Facebook, but even there I get sometimes "page not found". If there is a problem with copyright please let me know what to do. Even the name of the theatre on the poster is probably not right; a sing above the door (see the same file with (3)) mentions it should be "'t Bruggehuisje".Ceescamel (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michel Vaucher posant pour une publicité des TPG en 1991.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour Patrick, Cette photo est jugée comme un scan de journal. L'objet de cette photo est la lettre adressée à M Vaucher, lettre écrite sur une photocopie partielle d'un journal. Je suis assez confus sur le droit d'auteur, mais si vous confirmez que le droit d'auteur reste sur le support premier....ben je le noterai à l'avenir. Si la photo est recadrée, laissant donc un peu du contexte pour comprendre le mot de son ami, est-ce recevable ?

File:Abigail 'Astronaut Abby' Harrison Aspiring Astronaut Founder The Mars Generation.jpg

[edit]

This file is owned by me and should not be deleted - while I have published it on Twitter - I give permission for creative commons here. Please do not delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stargirl1997 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC) --Stargirl1997 (talk) 22:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abigail Harrison Aspiring Astronaut.jpg

[edit]

This is my image and I uploaded it with permission to use - I also loaded it on Twitter which you are referring to - that is my image. Please do note delete the file. --Stargirl1997 (talk) 22:33, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neveu Patrice.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour,

Je reviens vers vous concernant la suppression de l'image citée.

Je m'occupe de l'administration du portail Wikipédia de Monsieur Neveu. (J'ai en ma possession une photocopie de son passeport pour preuve)

Cette photo m'a été fourni par l'intéressé lui-même.

Pouvez vous m'indiquer la démarche pour débloquer la situation

Merci — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polux17 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion Ann Weber, artist

[edit]

Hello Patrick, I have just submitted an email to wikimedia: Andrea Serna <andrea.serna1@gmail.com> 11:11 AM (5 minutes ago) to permissions-commons

I hereby affirm that I represent Ann Weber, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ann_Weber,_artist. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Dr. Andrea Bruce appointed representative of Ann Weber 2018-10-25

Please withdraw your request for speedy deletion

               18:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)18:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)18:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)~

Dear Andrea Serna,

Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2018102510009053].

Yours sincerely,

The Volunteer Response Team

   2600:1012:B009:30F:D40A:1E71:D099:1ED2 18:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Esta fotografía es de propiedad de Mario Mariño y mía, tenemos la original, de gran formato, que demuestra quien es el autor de esta fotografía. El sitio del Premio Konex ha publicado esa fotografía con el permiso nuestro, pero es de nuestra propiedad. Si compara la que publicamos nosotros y la que publica el sitio de los Premio Konex, verá que la nuestra es de mayor formato y de mayor calidad (y la que tengo en mi propiedad, es mayor aun, con 300 dpi) por lo cual, JAMAS podríamos haber utilizado esa foto que está publicada en formato mucho menor. Solicito retirar la notificación de borrado inmediato de NUESTRA fotografía.

Black Ruby Poster.jpg

[edit]

Hello, how are you? The owner of the image sent the Declaration to OTRS a few hours after I posted the poster. Will you restore it? Thanks!.-- Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 04:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped image does not show in WP article

[edit]

Patrick Rogel: Hi. Regarding this file we were discussing earlier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Madraiwiwifatiaki.jpg. After I cropped it to delete the other person in the background and uploaded it (in fact, twice) into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Adelaide#Notable_people, the old image/file still shows up. Why does not the cropped image show up or what should I do to be able to use the cropped image? Kindly help. Many thanks again.Jacknpoy (talk) 01:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please review again this pic. I think that the licence is under CC. --Serbianboy (talk) 13:40, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ley argentina 25 años

[edit]

¿No es suficiente que la imagen tenga más de 25 para que yo la pueda subir? Según la Ley 11.723, Artículo 34 y el Artículo 7 inc. (4) del Convenio de Berna. --Adriel 00 (talk) 14:18, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Respondeme lo antes posible. --Adriel 00 (talk) 15:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpg

[edit]

this was photo that you Deleted, i have the copy right to it, i took this photo. the photo that ayelet shaked tweeted is a "different photo" look at the difference, my photo has an israeli flag in the photo the photo ayelete shaked tweeted has NO israeli flag in it as u can see its a different photo taken from a different camera see link: https://twitter.com/Ayelet__Shaked/status/993113948676345856

--Joecento (talk) 00:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


its passed 30 days, when will the Deletion requests be removed ? --Joecento (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Yves Thos

[edit]

Bonjour,

j'ai reçu un message comme quoi des photos de toile du peintre Yves Thos que j'avais mis en ligne en 2008 (10 ans déjà) ne faisaient pas l'affaire.

J'ai l'impression d'être "une cible" pour vous;

Je suis le propriétaire de ces toiles que j'ai acheté de façon officielle. j'ai toutes les factures; Quel est le problème 10 ans après,

merci Dominique Salé — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domimf (talk • contribs) 13:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mireya Derksen.jpg (marked as possibly violating copy rights)

[edit]

Hello, I have just received your message about my upload 'Mireya Derksen.jpg' which is being marked as possible copyrigt violation. Please be informed that I am in close contact with copyright holder (in this case, the lady on the picture) and I have received my copy of the photo on July 22nd 2018, specifically to be used in a Wiki page. There is no management or record label involved, so it's an agreement between the artist (copyright holder) and yours truly.

Therefore I kindly request you to review your somewhat premature conclusion about possible copyright violation.

By the way, the link you are referring to (https://www.facebook.com/235356203625496/photos/a.235356250292158/293338434493939/?type=1&theater) points to Facebook fan page, of which the owner is uknnown to us and probably did NOT obtain permission to use the photo.

Thanks in advance for your help. JayDee2014 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.29.146.61 (talk) 22:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

VECTOR

[edit]

Hi, Patrick

I think you misjudged the copyright of two pictures of the Vector. There is an official OTRS ticket present from the Dutch ministry. Please revise your nomination. Regards, Take Mirrenberg (talk) 06:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick, stop nominating my uploads before taking good look at the permissions. Why would the ministry tamper with the OTRS permission? And it is good use to react on my contribution right above before nominating more. Is this this a bot or so? 62.140.132.68 12:37, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Enquiries about pictures

[edit]

Hello. Can the pictures in this article (except the first one) be uploaded here? The pictures was taken during the royal wedding in 1956. According to Template:PD-Malaysia, it should be considered public domain. So can the pictures be uploaded? --Tofeiku (talk) 10:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply. Another question may I ask, can I crop and upload pictures from this 1959 Brunei government newspaper (the picture in the first page) and all pictures from the newspaper that was published more than 50 years ago? Template:PD-Brunei. Thanks. --Tofeiku (talk) 14:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo d'Alain Fuchs

[edit]

Bonjour Patrick Rogel, je reviens vers vous concernant la photo d'Alain Fuchs. Pourriez-vous je vous prie regarder mon ticket et m'indiquer les éléments manquants ? En vous remerciant, --Parscilet (talk) 13:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rebonjour, merci de votre réponse ; j'ai bien envoyé un email à permissions-fr at wikimedia.org le 23/10/2018 à 14:51 mais je n'ai pas eu de nouvelles depuis... Je viens de relancer. Bien à vous, --Parscilet (talk) 13:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unjustified DR at the latest World Cup 2018/5

[edit]

How does it come that YOU say these people/authors or source is not valid?? I know Martin Horn personally, also Karsten Witte and Carambol. They send the pictures to me for uploading. Stop giving it a DR!! Regards Rafael Zink (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mireya_Derksen.jpg (my 2nd attempt dated 30-10-2018) again tagged for deletion...

[edit]

Hi Patrick, I saw you tagged my new photo -which is my own work- for quick deletion, because you apparently found a similar (NOT THE SAME) photo on https://www.mireya.nl/?p=50# Folder : Media then Fotoshoot. I have seen a similar (but not the same) photo there. That is very well possible as I am her photographer and copyright owner / intellectual owner of this particular photo series (in the green dress and with a castle in the background). I made a series of photos, sent her one to put on her own web site (and it'll be probably somewhere on her Facebook or Instagram too), and we agreed to use one (from the same series) for a Wiki page. I don't think it is copyright violation if I (copyright owner, owner of the intellectual property) and the lady in the picture (owner of her web site) agree that she can use my photos AND we agree to use one photo from the series on Wiki. That's our business decision.

What do you want me to do? I need this photo online to start creating a Wiki page. - Should I send over my camera so you can check the pictures are still on there? - Can you also please describe the steps you followed and what you investigated before concluding that MY OWN WORK is violating anyone's copyright? Did you -for example- send an email / contact form to www.mireya.nl and ask if Deeben Media & Services is the photographer of the work, and if it was agreed to post the work to Wikimedia Commons?

I'm looking forward to your reply. In the mean time I have asked Miréya to remove the photo you referred to, but I feel this is the other way around as I am basically required to upload a unique, yet unpublished picture so anyone can start using it and spread it all across the Internet.

I shoot my own photos, I edit them, I upload them and yet it's not good. It's getting kind of frustrating to spend 2 evenings on this.

Kind regards, JayDee2014 (talk) 23:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick, could you please explain what is wrong with this file? It was uploaded from Picasa with appropriate license review template. Picasa died since then, thus of course permission is not available on Picasa anymore. However, it is not possible to contact the gallery owner either, exactly because Picasa died. Normally license review is exactly for these cases, isn't it enough here? — NickK (talk) 00:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you could have missed my post, could you please have a look at it? The timing for fixing the problem is just a week, but I don't understand what is wrong and thus cannot fix it. Thanks — NickK (talk) 01:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

[edit]

Hello Patrick. I have seen you are taking the time to look at the files that are being uploaded in the context of the GLAM-Wiki Initiative with the Brazilian National Archives. I am actually learning as we go, as I am mostly familiar with Brazilian law, and the decisions that are being made on files this cultural institution has sent us is actually helpful. At the same time, I am sorry this is taking so much of your time. The goal of this initiative is of course to contribute meaningfully and positively. From what I am learning as we go, I have been taking out from the upload set from 15% to 20% of the images I receive. I was wondering if you'd have time to check before I run the upload what images you feel might be problematic. I could contact you through here and share with you available metadata (normally metadata will look something like [5]. The yellow cells indicate images that were possibly problematic). Again, I am sorry for issues this initiative have created, and hopefully we can work out a way to improve this flow of contributions. Cheers. --Joalpe (talk) 16:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You might also find interesting to read on the context of this initiative: [6]. Thanks. --Joalpe (talk) 16:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piero Cazzola.jpg

[edit]

I'm new in wikimedia. I marked the source as "CC-BY-3.0" because this file has been received directly from the "Associazione culturale Russkij Mir" di Torino. This file isn't on web. This file has been received from Anna Roberti, the Honorary chairwoman of this Associations. Can I publish it under CC-BY-SA license"? The Association isn't interested in copyright. Can you help me, please? How can I to do to mark this file correctly? Excuse me for incorrect English.--Annalisa Santi1 (talk) 14:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick! Anna Roberti sent the email to get a permission via COM:OTRS/it. I hope the notice will be removed soon. Bye.--Annalisa Santi1 (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

update. added new pic. added latest acting role

[edit]

Patrick, you flagged a pic that I uploaded to my daughter's wiki page. (Allisyn Ashley Arm) We own the copywrite to the pic. I was the one who uploaded it to her IMDb page as well. I requested undeletion... but I'm not sure if that will work. Please help me fix it. Thanks! -Steve A

File:William_Michael_Boyle_press_photo.jpg

[edit]

Hello and thanks for your attention. I believe there's a misunderstanding here. The French site that's making use of the William Boyle press photo appears to be a secondary user, not a copyright holder. Looking at booknode.com, anyone can freely add to or delete pictures from that site. There are no copyright provisions or licensing procedures involved, unlike Wikimedia Commons. The actual copyright holder appears to be the one who did the upload to Wikimedia Commons. My suggestion is that the deletion request be withdrawn until the uploader's contribution is duly recognized by the Commons process. Your flag came almost immediately after the upload. Rory1262 (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see deletion has already taken place. It's my belief that in due course, there will be undeletion once the misunderstanding is recognized. Rory1262 (talk) 21:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

template deletion request

[edit]

Dear Patrick,

Yesterday, I've sent an email about declaration of consent for File:Jeong Yun-seok in October 2018.jpg. Can I delete this template (in the file) now? {{No permission since|month=October|day=29|year=2018}} Please reply and thank you. St3095 Loves MU (talk) 07:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And may I have to replace this template {{OTRS pending|year=2018|month=November|day=2}} to this template? {{OTRS received|id=2018110410000671}} Or OTRS volunteers who do it? St3095 Loves MU (talk) 08:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Roger Pfund à Genève (Printemps 2018).jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick !

Thank you for your comment. Please find below copy of the message I have just sent to < permissions-commons@wikipedia.org > :


TEXT >>>

From: Louis-Fabrice Jean <louisfabrice.jean@gmail.com

To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Date: 9 nov. 2018 10:45

RE: Confirmation of Permission to publish under free licence



Hi there !

As required, I hereby give permission to publish the under mentioned wikipedia commons file :

File:Roger Pfund à Genève (Printemps 2018).jpg|thumb|Roger Pfund à Genève (Printemps 2018)

under a free licence.

I wish you good receipt of this permission.


Louis-Fabrice Jean

<<< TEXT


I wish you good receipt of these informations.


Regards


Louis-Fabrice Jean — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louis-Fabrice Jean (talk • contribs) 10:10, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steven Little.jpg

[edit]

Good morning Patrick. I'm hoping you can help me solve this issue. You marked File:Steven Little.jpg for deletion; however, the file in question is from the Swanson School of Engineering, and I am the School's Communications Director. I am not sure exactly how to mark it for use since I am also the person responsible for images at the Swanson School and therefore am granting its use.

File:Roger Pfund à Genève (Printemps 2018).jpg

[edit]

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Your response to my last message :

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Following your message please wait your message is processed by COM:OTRS. The current backlog in permissions-commons queue is 165 days. Anyway I'm not sure the identity of the copyright holder can be verified with a gmail account... Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

My questions :

Hi Patrick ! ... So is "the media" going to be deleted within 7 days ? Meanwhile, what would you suggest as remedial steps ? Are you going to cancel the « File Tagging » ?And -subsidiary question- would you mind telling me how to -cleanly and properly- insert the picture of Roger Pfund in the Wikidata rectangle on the top right. All my attempts to do so have failed sofar... Thanks in advance and regards.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louis-Fabrice Jean (talk • contribs) 20:50, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

авторское право

[edit]

Добрый день, значит так, прошу восстановить следующие файлы

  • File:Фургал С.И. khabkrai.ru.png
  • File:Сипягин В.В..png
  • File:Н. Рябов.png

Фургал С.И. khabkrai.ru.png - сайт правительства Хабаровского края, там написано, что материалы свободные Сипягин В.В..png - основание для блока статья регнума НА КОТОРОЙ УКАЗАЛИ ЧТО АВТОРСКИЕ ПРАВА ПРИНАДЛЕЖАТ МНЕ это не бред? Н. Рябов - фото с кремля у нас есть разрешение

АнатоликДАМ (talk) 19:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Marking as possible copyvio because Not found at URL."

[edit]

That's what {{No source since}} is for. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See swedish language OTRS release

[edit]

Files John Lundvik har been OTRS released in swedish langugae. That has been noted in the talk page. On ne parle franacais en suede... Please wait for swedish language OTRS to be applied to the files. --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:04, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ella_Baker_Civil_Rights_Activist_Square_Crop.jpg

[edit]

You are incorrect in marking my upload as a copyright violation.

The original work is uploaded under a commons 3.0 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EllaBaker.jpg

I cropped the work above to create mine (and clearly back-linked to it) File:Ella_Baker_Civil_Rights_Activist_Square_Crop.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinCuddeback (talk • contribs) 17:16, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The work you site as it being derived from is actually a derivative work https://i.pinimg.com/originals/64/74/bf/6474bf3cbf1574d5b9ea8bcac18ab2ed.jpg (note that the white field at the left in the image above has been air-brushed)

KevinCuddeback (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Osman Niyazi Burcu

[edit]

Okay I see where it went wrong, I was putting in the page number I saw at the bottom, it is indeed 378 and not 404. Thank you. KirmiziAdam (talk) 16:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BookCover LudmilaJivkova.jpg

[edit]

Hi Rogel, I just saw that you did mark the File:BookCover LudmilaJivkova.jpg for possible copyright violation since it was a book cover. I got the image wich is not exactly the book coover but a visualisation of iz from the publishing house itself with the allowance to put it in wikipedia, because the autor of the book is someone I know and since the subject is about someone important for the Bulgarian past I decided to make a record in wikipedia, how can I prove this? :) Thank you very much! P.S. If I buy the book and make a photo of the cover, would it also be considered as a violation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elisaveta P. (talk • contribs) 18:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why you not try to instruct the newcomer how to use Wiki? Why always try to delete?

[edit]

That is my comment about you. You waste my time.Maria Steve 72 (talk) 22:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]


Personality rights Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information.

I will add required information. You have to instruct and support how to solve, not try to find reasons to delete. I also comment on your page. Maria Steve 72 (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]

2. Dear Patrick Rogel,

I see you use Wiki not friendly. I shared with you photos not only for personal works. You do not see them can provide you how to live, how to study, how to build friendship?

I clearly do not know your explanation. But I don't have time to augue with you. You do not respect other contributions. Delete other works. My comment: Don't give reasons to offence female though Ms. or Mrs., they are respected. Maria Steve 72 (talk) 23:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)![reply]

They've sent an email to OTRS to confirm the CC BY-SA 4.0 permission. How is it fair use? Thanks, Vermont (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

demande de suppression la page

[edit]

Bonjour Patrick Rogel

Je vous demande supprimer la photo que j'ai ajouté faussement sur Commons, je suis débutent et je ne sais pas quoi faire! File:Starving Girl Who Became Symbol of Yemen Crisis Dies.jpg- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DRIS92#Avertissement_de_suppression_de_fichier_multim%C3%A9dia merci--DRIS92 (talk) 15:54, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MABM 2014.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Misuse of Copyvio templates by autopatroller. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Jim Bangs had a requirement to notify Patrick about the thread, but neglected. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick

This picture, MABM 2014.jpg is owned by user Victor pogadaev and he stated the licence of CC 1.0

User talk:Victor pogadaev (talk · contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasrolhashim (talk • contribs) 05:59, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--Hasrolhashim (talk) 06:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Permission of files in Category: Lu Gi-Zen

[edit]

Hi, all files in Category: Lu Gi-Zen was added Template:OTRS pending after they were uploaded. Lu Gi-Zen's son, who inherit the copyright of these paintings, want to donate these files and will mail to OTRS group soon.

Wikimedia Taiwan and our volunteers uploaded many files drawed by Li Mei-shu in this year, with the same step: upload files, add the template, donater mail to OTRS groups, you may see the history like this and had no any problem. We just did by the same way ealier. Would you please retract all deleted request and wait the OTRS group to check the premission?

All files:

--Reke (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that you still do much editing these two days, so please reply me, even you don't agree my opinion, just give me a reason ok?--Reke (talk) 02:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

Hi Patrick, wanted to sincerely and unreservedly apologise for my comments today,
I originally thought you had tagged multiple images however I've found out you've only tagged one which could easily be considered a mistake (and had I known it was one image I would've suggested the thread be closed),
The lack of sleep has certainly played a huge part in today's comments although that's still no justification,
Anyway I sincerely and unreservedly apologise for my comments which I've now struck and redacted,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons :),
Regards, –Davey2010Talk 21:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a license reviewer

[edit]

File:Daniele Ganser 23.jpg and others.

Habitator terrae correctly requested a license review for their uploads. There is a link to an external site, there is some statement that quite possibly won't suffice, but with a license review requested you should leave that decision to the license reviewers. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. License review is for where the source website has a compatible license, which is not the case here. 'No permission' is fine for this file. Jcb (talk) 06:42, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: "Fotos dürfen gratis verwendet werden. Aber bitte unbedingt & immer Fotograf/in angeben." is not free enough for me. Is that sufficient justification for a Copyvio tag with text "License review NOT passed: No evidence of the claimed license at the claimed source.", or would a DR be more appropriate?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G. and Jcb: Why this isn't free enough? The license allows use without any condition than attribution, and it dosen't have any other restriction so {{Attribution}}. The reviewer @Leoboudv: revied this at a few pictures. Habitator terrae 🌍 09:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) @Habitator terrae: Google translates those sentences as "Photos may be used free of charge. But please always & always specify photographer." We require free licenses to permit commercial use and derivative works per COM:L. Those sentences do not qualify for your use of {{Attribution}}. I have tagged all files from https://www.danieleganser.ch/fotos.html as copyvios.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: Wrong. While that is the purpose of a license review, Patrick Rogel is not a license reviewer and shouldn't make that judgment when a review was requested in good faith. It doesn't even matter if he was right in this case, you don't want me to randomly start closing DRs, even if I did it flawless. On some sites the license can be very hard to spot. That's why we have license reviewers. This actually makes it worse: Patrick tagged File:Daniele Ganser 4.jpg as "no permission" when it already had a license review. This is completely unacceptable and Patrick Rogel should explain this.
@Jeff G.: "no permission" or a DR could be acceptable (when you do it, because you are a license reviewer). But since some have a license review, it'll have to be a DR.
@Habitator terrae: "Photos can be used free of charge, but you must attribute the photographer" (translated) doesn't specify if derivatives are allowed. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:32, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G. and Alexis Jazz: For example in CC BY-SA 4.0 there is no restriction fo commercial use, but there it don't clearly allow commercial use, but it allow it. So if there no other condition than attribution, "use", use means to use commercial and use in a deratived way. Habitator terrae 🌍 10:21, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In most jurisdictions, commercial use as well as derivative work is only allowed if explicitly allowed. Which is the case for CC-BY-SA 4.0. This may be borderline between 'no permission' and 'copyvio'. Jcb (talk) 15:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ isn't the license, it's the deed, in the legal license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode) you could read nothing about "commercial". Habitator terrae 🌍 17:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also User_talk:Habitator_terrae#Lizenzierung_und_Genehmigung_File:Daniele_Ganser_23.jpg, but please discuss here. Habitator terrae 🌍 17:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only for information: The pictures were deleted by @Ronhjones: without DR. Habitator terrae 🌍 10:44, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Habitator terrae: Jeff G. tagged them for a speedy deletion. I left them for a while (actually over 6 hours - rather long for a speedy), no one changed it to a DR - the speedy template clearly says "Appeal: If you think that the file does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please open a regular deletion request and remove this template." No one did that, and Jeff's reasoning seemed (and still does) seem perfectly valid to me. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ronhjones: Thanks! @Habitator terrae: For the record, my complete copyvio rationale was 'License review NOT passed: No evidence of the claimed license at the claimed source. https://www.danieleganser.ch/fotos.html says "Fotos dürfen gratis verwendet werden. Aber bitte unbedingt & immer Fotograf/in angeben." Google translates those sentences as "Photos may be used free of charge. But please always & always specify photographer." We require free licenses to permit commercial use and derivative works per COM:L. Those sentences do not qualify for the uploader's use of {{Attribution}}.' without single quotes. I'm sorry that it was so long that it got cut off. I know, brevity=soul(wit).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:58, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And also only for the record I added ":See [[User_talk:Patrick_Rogel#You_are_not_a_license_reviewer]]". Habitator terrae 🌍 13:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, if sombody write, you could use picture a picture without, paying and only say, you must attribute the author, this must include the commercial use, because for the legal text of the of CC BY 4.0 include in no way the word "commercial", but it allow commercial use if conditions are accepted (like CC BY-NC allows all commercial uses if all conditiond are accepted --> If you use it in non-commercial way). Also I thing use, means use. If use, means you couldn't make deratives of this work, you could use it in no way, because making deratives of the work is only one way use of much. Like reproduce is only one way of use. So if somebody say, you could use a work with the only condition, that you must attribute the author, this means you could use in all ways, if you be sure, that the author always will be attributed. Habitator terrae 🌍 13:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No permission?

[edit]

Hello! I looked at this in February, wrote to the uploader and then found in the page history that the uploader says h/s is the artist. Are we doubting that now? Will OTRS be required for all users who upload their own artwork? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk you wrote "Hi Serge. Following your message you refer to Den man tau has being the author of these paintings. Please note that I've not asked this user's permission but Dramamonster's. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)"[reply]
I have no idea what you mean. Who is "Den man tau"? If you look at that page history, you'll see that what I wrote above is accurate. Dramamonster says h/s if the painier. See it? Pls reply here, or on that image page's talk, not on my talk! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, "Den man tau" only moved the page. This us what I meant for you to look at. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SergeWoodzing: Following your first question ("Will OTRS be required for all users who upload their own artwork?") has been asked to go thru OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what you mean by that either. Have you noticed what the uploader wrote in the page history, that he/she is the author of the artwork? Please reply to that, yes or no. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that I've just nomitated a file which has been deleted by Administrators. The same Administrators have replied to the uploader's undeletion request that a permission via OTRS was needed. So, again : "Will OTRS be required for all users who upload their own artwork?" : the reply has been "Yes" for this particulary file. If you don't agree with the Administrator's decision feel free to explain your point of view on the right COM:UNDEL section. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your replies are incomprehensible to me. We'd better have an admin look at this. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:58, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Floorshell-4-2.jpg and others

[edit]

Hi Patrick! You deleted the images I uploaded here:[7] and I wanted to ask how I can prove ownership of those photos. Trimaco did take those product photos and our idea was to have them here so that others could use our product images for free. Any information you can give us will be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trimacoinc (talk • contribs) 16:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affi1.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick!

You have requested the deletion of this image. I have downloaded it and donated to wikimedia commons for over 10 years now, without any problem. If you had a doubt, you could have asked me for the original image rather than launching a delete procedure. And I think I would have given it with pleasure to Wikimedia Commons. Best regards, --Zenman (talk) 16:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files deleted

[edit]

@Racconish: Hi both of you, I have no words to describe how I feel now. I'm very disappointed because I realized that the work in wikimedia of some years have been deleted in a week. Yuanga I'm considering stopping collaborating with wikipedia. --Unnika (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Unnika: , it is very simple, we do need an authorization to undelete these files. If you have any enquiries about how to do it, let me known, I will be happy to help you out. — Racconish💬 22:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Npd and OTRS pending

[edit]

Hi,

Please do not add the {{Npd}} tag to the files which have already been tagged with {{OTRS pending}}. The {{OTRS pending}} tag will automatically turn into an {{Npd}} tag after 24 days. (That is exactly why Commons:OTRS/backlog is updated everyday by an OTRS admin.)

Thank you. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A. Doren by Cherl Harrison.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, can you explain the issue with this file release for use on WP please?:

  • Cherl Harrison created the file herself,
  • it's unique as it is a Polaroid image,
  • it hasn't been previously published,
  • she is the sole owner of its copyright.
  • on the file page she has licensed it under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

Is this easily fixed by Cherl who is not usually an editor? Jamesmcardle (talk) 05:49, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

user:fritzober/discussion/An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Ama Ata Aidoo (2014) - Ausschnitt.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Patrick Rogel! Du hast mir auf meiner Diskussionsseite die Info hinterlassen, dass 3 von mir von Flickr.com hochgeladene Dateien wieder gelöscht werden mussten. Das Ganze lässt mich etwas ratlos zurück. Könntest du mir hier oder dort Erklärungen zu dem Vorgang geben? Danke im Voraus --Fritzober (talk) 08:06, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Er antwortet nicht oder nur ganz selten. Offenbar hat er es sich zur Aufgabe gemacht, hier den Blockwart zu spielen. Die vielen Löschandrohungen, die er bei meinen Bildern gemacht hat, sind alle völlig unsinnig. --Frau Olga (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksander Kopiński

[edit]

Hi, I saw that picture "File:Aleksander Kopiński 01.jpg" is deleted. I have written few words about it here. I hope that it's possible to publish picture again soon. TR (talk) 15:02, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, we have a permission both from person pictured and from photographer. I'll send to OTRS. TR (talk) 11:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yannick mireur

[edit]

Hi, sorry I am not sure this is the right way to reply; I am really struggling to figure it out. About the pictures that were uploaded and indeed have no copyright, I simply won't put any.

Many thanks

--Ymaure (talk) 17:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick, Concerning this file, it is taken by me, that is clear.The wax figure is a property of Grevin museum and I do not remember if taking photos of their subjects was cleary forbidden. If you think that I have no right to publish this photo that I took in 2006, feel free to delete it. Thank you.

BlueEagle1 (talk) 19:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, this file is in the public domain as a work of the U.S. federal government (having been posted on the Representative in question's social media). Similar evidence of permissions has been sufficient for similar files, including File:Steve Russell official congressional photo.jpg, File:Elise Stefanik official congressional photo.jpg, File:Dave Brat official congressional photo.jpg, among countless others. Westroopnerd (talk) 16:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Patrick Rogel the photos are for the best in history

[edit]

Patrick Rogel Mr. Patrick, those photos of 4 photos are other authors who died 70 years ago,but they are unknown authors

, those images I leave in the history of Peru, to give a good biography page, those 4 photos were found in the military library of Peru in the center of Lima, and the photo of the last decade of 70, it was in the newspaper file the trade, those photo made in Peru, please do not delete those 4 photos, to make a good biography in wikipedia. In case of File:Fernando Belaunde Terry (1).jpg, it was taken in user fmurillo, which I found in the center of popular action party in downtown Lima center. they are correct in character square of peru, president of peru, fernando belaunde terry, those are from me, DO NOT ELIMINATE PLEASE PATRICK !!! Fmurillo26 (talk) 19:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


What do you need in that image — File:Belaunde y Morales Bermudez.png— [[User:Patrick Rogel|Patrick Rogel]

the, was the unknown author, found in center popular action supporter, members of partisan said that the author had died in 10 years, you do not know his name, he only said saved in the gallery old photographsFmurillo26 (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Patrick Rogel[reply]

EneasMX and recent photos

[edit]

Hello colleague, I reverted the four photos that you marked as possible copyright violations. EneasMx is a professional photographer and one of the few CC high quality frequent contributors in Mexico also member of the CC Mexico chapter. As you can watch here he have a nice collection of donated photos that also pretty used in Wikimedia projects and beyond. Best, --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 00:44, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

permission of file:MBS feat.jpg

[edit]

Hi bro.
In the image link you will find at the end of the site a sign indicating the license of the content of the site as a whole. when clicked it will automatically redirect to the Creative Commons site. So i think the image license is true! Greetings --علاء فحصي (talk) 00:50, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Droit d'auteur

[edit]

Bonjour Patrick vous m'avez laissé un message, m'indiquant que les autorisations communiquées pour publier les documents que j'a importé ne sont pas recevable Les mails ont été envoyés par Coline Moire, depuis son adresse mail coline@ecolescreatives.com Les Ecoles Créatives est un regroupement d'école, parmi lesquelles se trouve l'ESMA. Et Coline Moire est responsable communication de l'ESMA, et des Ecoles Créatives Or, l'ESMA, la société de production de tous les films que j'ai ajoutés à ce jour, est le détenteur des droits d'auteur ! Je ne vois pas trop comment faire autrement Merci par avance de votre aide --Lindaz818 (talk) 08:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sachsenwaldsiedlung in Schönningstedt.jpg

[edit]

Wie kommst du darauf, den von mir hochgeladenen Bildern „Sachsenwaldsiedlung in Schönningstedt.jpg“ und „Gertrud Lege Bürgermeisterin Schönningstedt.jpg“ würden die nötigen Urheber- und Herkunftsangaben fehlen? Bitte entfern bei den beiden Bildern den unnötigen Baustein. --Frau Olga (talk) 15:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bilder des Kreisarchivs Stormarn habe ich um die entsprechende URL ergänzt. Die Bilder mit dem Urheber Olga Bandelowa sind meine eigenen Werke. Ich bin Olga Bandelowa. --Frau Olga (talk) 18:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Frau Olga: Du kannst das mit COM:OTRS/de verifizieren. Habitator terrae 🌍 17:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

西安皇城西路与光辉巷丁字路口附近

[edit]

I suggest that you should read it first to learn about Chinese copyright laws.Best wish.Liuxingy (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover-Flip2007.jpg

[edit]

Hi, have your read my comments regarding my copyright? All of the cover is my work. Please put the file back so it can be used again. ThanksKassner (talk) 16:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files of Brazilian Army

[edit]

Hello, Patrick! I really uploaded some photos very similar of ones that are deleted recently. In my understanding, they are in public domain. They belong to the List of Commanders of Regimento Deodoro, a Brazilian Army military unit. They can be found at http://www.2gacl.eb.mil.br/index.php/comando/ex-comandantes. I made some changes to prepare then better for visualisation.

There are no indications of authory in the site. The other time I uploaded then, I made a mistake by supposing that there was an author and you deleted then.

I beg your pardon for any inconvenient and ask your help to maintain this photos in Commons, because they are part of the article about that unit: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/2%C2%BA_Grupo_de_Artilharia_de_Campanha_Leve

In my opinion these photos are allowed by the Licensing Creative Commons CC-Zero (This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.)

Thank you very much! Luiz265 (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again! The site of the 2nd Field Artillery Group specified that the photos of its former commanders are in public domain, as you can see here, in the top of the page: http://www.2gacl.eb.mil.br/index.php/comando/ex-comandantes

I would thank you, if you can remove the deletion tag of the files: File:SáFreire1.jpg; File:FranciscoAlbuquerque1.jpg; File:JoãoSoares1.jpg; File:EdisonPinto1.jpg; File:PauloAndrade1.jpg; File:GilbertoTeixeira1.jpg; File:LuizGonzaga1.jpg; File:GenMinati.jpg; File:GenBeraldo.jpg; File:CarlosVicente1.jpg; File:FernandoSantos1.jpg; File:Castilho1.jpg; File:CarlosSaú1.jpg; File:Freibergue1.jpg; File:BartholomeuFernandes1.jpg; File:MaturanaLopes1.jpg; File:ErbLeal1.jpg.

Best regards! Luiz265 (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaroslaw Wlodarczyk (dziennikarz).jpg

[edit]

Hi Partrick. you requested my picture to be deleted and added a link to tt profile picture (the same picture) as a proof. Therefore I would like to inform you that both tt profile picture and picture on wiki commons is the same person, with the same name and... it is me. That is why I would like to ask you to cancel this request and confirm a picture on wiki. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wlodarczyk (talk • contribs) 21:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

[edit]
Why?
I would like to know why are you sign my file as a copyright violation. I have made the picture from my own IPHONE ! Please kindly expain to me.. Manager.was18 (talk) 14:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Violation

[edit]
Picture Violation
Can you please send me an email!? I can't answer over here it is so difficult.

Please write me alessandro.ossola.87@gmail.com Manager.was18 (talk) 15:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

message

[edit]
message
This is not an easy chat. anyway I have sent to a friend the picture for the journal of montesilvano. the picture is on my phone and my pc too. Should I repost again ?? Manager.was18 (talk) 15:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guido Vianello photos

[edit]

Hello Patrick, I saw your report on the photos of Guido Vianello. The situation is as follows. Guido Vianello's father is a dear childhood friend of mine. He was at Madison in NY for Guido's boxing match and he sent me those pictures asking me to publish them because he is not capable. He tells me that all the pictures were made by him and other friends, and then he sent them for the upload. This is the truth. Mario1952 (talk) 22:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:الشيخ محمد السبيعي.jpg and File:Sheikh-Mohammed 0.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, I am still new to Wikipedia, i work in Mohammed I. Alsubeaei & Sons Investment Company (MASIC), and have been tasked to create a wiki page for the late (Mohammed I. Alsubeaei), i did put the info that the company provided for me including the picture File:الشيخ محمد السبيعي.jpg and File:Sheikh-Mohammed 0.jpg .

But i see that you deleted it, please can you undo the deletion as the pictures and the info belong to Mohammed I. Alsubeaei & Sons Investment Company (MASIC).

and please teach me if there something i should do.

Thank you , — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yfelemban (talk • contribs) 06:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judith Linhares American Painter.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick, the uploader and photographer of this file, Amanda Mason, has informed me that she has sent a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in compliance with the request in order to avoid deletion of the file.--2602:306:CD99:B2C0:7486:1053:E31B:D81E 20:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

[edit]

The comment must be signed in the same edit and belong to a section in order for the notification to work. Sealle (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de François Briault

[edit]

Bonjour, Comme indiquée dans la description de la photo lors du téléchargement, la photo de François Briault est sous bonne liscence. Elle peut être vue sur Flickr. Globetrotteur17 Album: Dans l'oeil de mon objectif ou en cherchant tout simplement François Briault sur Flickr. Cordialement Babin bernard — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.243.60.237 (talk) 10:07, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Before you add deletion templates, like you did at File:Leon dajaku.jpg, you could at least look if this makes sense. Then you would have found User:Jeollo/permission very fast. --Yoda1893 (talk) 11:43, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

Hi I’m not sure how to get email permission from the author because I got it from Twitter. Also, honestly, I’m not even sure the Twitter account that posted the image of her is the author per se, because it’s possible that they got the image from somewhere else. Are you able to fix this problem? This is my first time uploading an image on Wikipedia. Thank you! WikiEditor668 (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
On behalf of your fellow editors, thank you for the good work you do.

Senator2029 07:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry

[edit]

I'm sorry For my error to create the image of Panajot Pano but i never said the image has copyrighted.I'm sorry and I hope to continuing my work to Wikimedia Commons. user:PDSHSV 23:29 16 December 2018 (CET)

[edit]

Hello Patrick,

I would like to make sure I follow the rules. I am a beginner. Let me know how I can either provide the copyright or delete the violating files. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.81.76.131 (talk) 01:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Lieber Patrick Rogel, ich habe heute ein Pressefoto hochgeladen, welches auf der angegebenen Seite zur Verwendung freigegeben ist. Ich hatte mich schon vor Wochen (8.9.) wegen dieses Fotos an Permissions - German Wikipedia <permissions-de@wikimedia.org> gewandt hatte. Leider habe ich außer einer Eingangsbestätigung keine weiteren Auskünfte erhalten. Bei dem heutigen Upload war ich der Ansicht, dass ich alle erforderlichen Angaben eingegeben hätte. Offenbar war das nicht richtig. Ich setze mich jetzt mit dem Fotografen in Verbindung, damit er bitte diese Freigabe ausfüllen möge. Ist das in ordnung oder soll ich das Foto so lange löschen? Mit Bitte um kruze Info, vielen Dank --Wikiuka (talk) 13:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Patrick Rogel, ich habe mich sofort mit dem Fotografen in Verbindung gesetzt, dieser hat mir auch sofort geantwortet. Ich schicke sein Einverständnis nun an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org und hoffe, dass damit das Problem aus der Welt geschafft ist. Viele Grüße --Wikiuka (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

[edit]

Hi, I think you're caught by one of the blocks targeting anonymization services or open proxies. Try disabling any similar stuff and I think you won't be longer affect by any block. --Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]

Hello @Patrick Rogel. I'm replaying to the deletion request of the category Snežana Đorđević.

Snezana Djordjevic is a Serbian journalist (with a 30 year long career), TV host, the editor in chef of a Serbian Cable TV Kopernikus and a host of a political talk show. Therefore, she has an article on Serbian Wikipedia, where these images are used. On those images she is represented in her working environment - in a studio, or with a Serbian notable persons she was interviewing, like Vojislav Šešelj (File:Snezana Djordjevic i Vojislav Seselj.jpg), Minja Subota (File:Snezana Djordjevic i Minja Subota.jpg), Bogoljub Karić (File:Snezana Djordjevic i Bogoljub Karic.jpg)... As a matter of fact, Serbian Wikipedia is lacking on a photo of an famous young actress Brankica Sebastijanović (File:Snezana Djordjevic i Brankica Sebastijanovic.jpg). The File:2017 European Athletics Indoor Championships - awards ceremony.jpg is used on Serbian and German Wikipedia. So, the images definitely are not out of scope. Best--Una Đorđević (talk) 20:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julie Solomon portrait.jpg

[edit]

Hello!

This file was directly uploaded and made publicly available through public domain on Flickr. It is not copyrighted as the subject gave up those rights when making it public domain. If you need, I can put you in touch with the person who (used to) own those pictures.

Thanks, and I hope we can clear this up soon.

WillPeppers (talk) 01:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OttoTschudi1977

[edit]

Faites ce que vous devez faire mais je n'ai pas pris la photo du site du Colorado Hall of Fame. Il m'a été envoyé par Otto Tschudi lui-même. C’est une photo publicitaire commandée par lui pour son propre usage dans la promotion du domaine skiable, en 1977; il n'y a aucun espoir de créer une nouvelle photo "gratuite" de cette période. C'est un problème d'écrire sur n'importe quel athlète des décennies précédentes. Si je devais illustrer un article sur Jean-Claude Killy par une photo de sa cérémonie de remise des médailles à Grenoble en 1968, vous le retireriez sans doute également. Sethmasia (talk) 04:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images from the Natural Image Noise Dataset nominated for deletion and no follow-up

[edit]

Hi User:Patrick Rogel,

You marked several of my dataset images up for deletion, please follow up on your deletion request.

--Trougnouf (talk) 20:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Patrick,

I just messaged the email address I was provided (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) what was required. I apologize that I am not exactly fluent on Wikipedia and how it works, but I did email the images, and attach them. If you provide me with an email address, I can also send them to you directly. I appreciate your help with all of this. I know someone claimed ownership of the photo that had been on there previously (the same man who was attempting to constantly edit my page with misinformation), but hopefully this resolves that issue and you may use one, or both, of the images I uploaded and provide to you herein.

Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by BEManagement (talk • contribs) 22:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The photo "Brian Evans" (Singer).jpg is me. I just emailed your permissions office. I am the copyright owner of these pictures, however, if there is any doubt of this, I have just emailed a statement with my ID. I am the artist for which this particular page was created.

If Joel claims ownership of that photo, it is not accurate, however you are free to use the other photo I also supplied you which is simply my headshot on my page. Right now, there is no photo of me on my page.

I appreciate the help.

Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by BEManagement (talk • contribs) 22:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used with Wikipedia images can be used in public. --ThaiChack 11:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thai Check (talk • contribs) 04:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick, I kindly ask to let me know why you have deleted my image File:Francisco Pesqueira, 2018. Cantante,actor, autor, director y escritor.jpg. this image is from my own work, despite Francisco Pesqueira have used in the social network. Please give me permission to upload it again. Thanks and regardsCarlos Héctor Bonfiglio (talk) 14:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve left work for the day and am typing on an iPod from home. Unfortunately I don’t have my password handy so I cannot log in to my Wikipedia account from home.

The three pictures flagged as possible copyright violations (photos of Ian Goldberg, Lila Kari and Srinivasan Keshav) were all taken by me. I took the pictures for announcements that I posted on the David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science’s website. I used the same pictures for their respective info-boxes on Wikipedia.

I did check the box that I am the owner of the works. Is something else required?

Best, Joe Petrik (jpetrik@uwaterloo.c) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.145.35.16 (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding deletion of the image

[edit]

Hi,

Thank you for bringing in notice regarding the painting images https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Painting_of_Gopabandhu_Das.jpg. I have tried to reach the museum and get the copyright owner of the images. But the images are no more at the museum and they are not sure about where the paintings are.

What do you suggest? I have currently put delete tags on the similar images. These are very old images not very old to got to public license though and it is hard to race the owner. I hope you have some idea about it.Please suggest something.(Shall we mention the source as the museum?) Thank You--Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 05:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Request

[edit]

hi Mr. Patrick Rogel, I am writing, because I want to submit some files to submit to the commond deletion request, see I joined recently in wikimedia commons, and I do a few uploads, usually I deal only with overloading and checking the errors of others, but I usually see a user named Castelbotaccio, and I see that in these days she perseveres on her caricatures, and this pleases me. take advantage of this conversation to present some of the following user files, which he uploaded inspired by the PINTEREST website. now she will see them without any doubt that the following file was modified by the same user anonymously. I think only that acuni should be deleted without ifs and buts:

here are the files that absolutely can not remain on the common, plus half a second, please submit them to the delete page ,,, this user, is giving too many headaches--Ginwe (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

[edit]

Why mine is tagged and File:Jkw4p 2014.png not? – Flix11 (talk) 13:32, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick, I hope you're having a merry Christmas. This file is composed of a PD ubuntu screenshot and original artwork by a flickr user named Black shade 9. According to his/her flickr statement, everything on his/her site is posted under a free license or cc-zero. An earlier version of the image is available here; I've added this source information to the file description. I believe the flickr account to be trustworthy, but I've asked Guanaco to look into the matter and make a final decision. Hope this will clear up any confusion. Enjoy the holiday season. Take care. Nevadawest (talk) 00:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AGF

[edit]

I was asked to assist concerning the nomination you made here. I'm pleased to see that you withdrew the nomination. You accused another editor of an un-declared COI and said "and I'm glad you finaly comply with them.". Surely this was you trying to blame the editor for your misunderstanding. "Finally" .... it was shown that it was your error in misunderstanding. Maybe I have missed it, if so then my apologies, but I think you might offer an apology as this gives a poor account of our AGF policy. Thanks for your attention. Victuallers (talk) 16:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you missed it, Patrick. I was expecting a reply. Merry Xmas Victuallers (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, I was expecting a substantive reply. I can see that you might want to avoid dealing with this. Victuallers (talk) 16:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nagrazhd2.jpg

[edit]

Good day. Please explain what I am doing wrong. The file was taken from the news portal, where is clearly stated: "Any use of materials from the site" New Format is permitted provided that the link to www.nf.dp.ua is active and that the site name is indicated." That's exactly what I did. Why do you want to delete the file? Best regards, Pa30T (talk) 02:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Blair

[edit]

Hello Patrick, I noticed that you marked as unsourced this file. That caused the file to be deleted by @Jcb: . But, actually, a simple search on Flickr would be sufficient to find out that the file was licenced with cc-by-sa-2.0 (here) by its legitimate owner Roz Galloway and wasn't to be deleted. A little bit of more carefulness would prevents us from doing some extra work. I know that it's easy to report as unsourced a file, but in my opinion is "better to light a candle than to curse the darkness" meaning that is better to look for a valid source rather than give in soon withouth looking for it. Regards, -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PS @Nicourse: , you too should be more careful too, though, you didn't mention the correct source when the file was uploaded and that caused the whole incident that came later.

happy?

File:Yasuo Mizui James Dean statue (Bronze).jpg. and other photos

[edit]

Hello Patrick,

Thank you for your notification. I have sent permission regarding to all photos that you have mentioned. Here is confirmation ticket numberː [Ticket#2018122810005781] Confirmation of receipt (Re: permissions-commons) Kinoue2 (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antonio-Serena.jpg

[edit]

There is a website in the template. Have you looked here before tagging for copyviol? Let's talk if you want here Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Antonio-Serena.jpg--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ali Mohammad Khademi with staff of Homa in Tehran.jpg

[edit]

Hi

Creator of all of three files: File:Ali Mohammad Khademi with staff of Homa in Tehran.jpg, File:Ali Mohammad Khademi and director general and CEO of IATA in Tehran.jpg, and specially File:Ali Mohammad Khademi Family.jpg has been Ali Mohammad Khademi. They have been taken by their from Ali Mohammad Khademi's family with permission to be published on publicly BBCPersian website. You can check the source link: http://www.bbc.com/persian/iran-features-46123888. All of them have "Ali Mohammad Khademi Family Archive tag".

Regards

Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From left Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Farah Pahlavi, Ali Mohammad Khademi - Nowrouz.jpg

[edit]

How come you know it is copyright violated? I recommend you to read public domain policy in Iran:


Public domain
This work is now in the public domain in Iran, because according to the Law for the Protection of Authors, Composers and Artists Rights (1970) its term of copyright has expired for one of the following reasons:
  • The creator(s) died before 22 August 1980, for works that their copyright expired before 22 August 2010 according to the 1970 law.
  • The creator(s) died more than 50 years ago. (Reformation of article 12 - 22 August 2010)

In the following cases works fall into the public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation (Article 16):

  • Photographic or cinematographic works.
  • In cases where the work belongs to a legal person or rights are transferred to a legal person.

The media description page should identify which reason applies.

For more information please see: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iran.

العربية  azərbaycanca  تۆرکجه  English  فارسی  日本語  македонски  русский  ไทย  中文  +/−

Iran

As you read, the picture is from 42 years ago. So, it is in public domain.

RegardsShkuru Afshar (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why their permission to public publish in BBC is not enough?Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, they have authorized the BBC to use their material once not to abandon their rights permanently even for commercial purpose as in the Creatice Commons license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am Iranian and I can guarantee you that we don't have such a thing "to be published once and just for BBC". Whenever we publish something, it means "public publish of many times" RegardsShkuru Afshar (talk) 01:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What I know about Iranian law is here: the 30 years period is for work published so you must find evidence that this work has been published more than 30 years ago (The BBC article dates back of 2018). Second Commons doesn't accept permission from third parties so at least a permission from the heirs of Ali Mohammad Khademi is needed although, idealy, a permission from the photographer(s) is needed. I lauch a regular deletion request so you can explain your point of view there. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:55, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Requeijo

[edit]

Hola, espero que hables español porque mi inglés no es muy bueno y estoy aprendiendo (me cuesta escribir notas largas). La imagen Roberto Requeijo.jpg no cuenta con derechos de autor porque si bien fue rescatada por un periódico en tiempos recientes, la imagen fue tomada por el gobierno de la provincia de Río Negro durante el período en el que Requeijo fue gobernador de facto (1969-1972) y por lo tanto ya no tiene ningún derecho de autor en Argentina. Saludos.--FelipeRev (talk) 23:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Polish public domain

[edit]

Hello, what's wrong with file File:Janusz Roszko.jpg and few others, hm? Authors are unknown anthese files are in Polish public domain (PD-Polish) because of the date of publication. Gower Gower (talk) 04:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks, but read carefully that: „all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed public domain in Poland.” What else is needed to convince you that those pictures are in public domain? --Gower (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Have you ever seen any book from Polish People's Republic period? 99% of them don't have any copyright notice (I graduated librarianship so you don't need to explain me where is copyright notice or etc.). Publishing houses from that period also often don't exist. --Gower (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

amirhossein Bahrami Sani

[edit]

Hi, I am the friend of this person and sent these photos to me. What evidence should I send to you? These photos are also available on the Instagram personal page. Please confirm this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmirhosseinBahramiSani (talk • contribs) 13:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests for these files

[edit]

Dear Patrick, I'm working as Wikipedian in Residence as a part of GLAM project until the end of January in the Theatre Museum of Vojvodina and they have released their photos under free license. When I upload all of the photos they will sign an official licence and that is why I put template:OTRS pending on every photo. I kindly ask you to wait until I get all of the official licence, and not delete the files. --Корак по корак (talk) 09:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Patrick Rogel. I am the GLAM coordinator of Wikimedia Serbia. As user Корак по корак explained, she is working as Wikipedian in residence in this institution, under the supervision of Wikimedia Serbia. This museum is releasing the photos from their archive, which is a slow process, but in 30 days top, permission arrives. Like in 14 residences realized by now (without a single Commons or OTRS issue). Besides that, this is a project of Wikimedia Serbia - we would never let someone to upload files without permission. One more thing. Can you please point me to the page where is written the rule that OTRS pendig can use only administrators? And finally, why the images are deleted, if they had an OTRS pending template, witch can stay for 193 days? Please, bring back files on Commons. Thank you. --Ivana Guslarevic (talk) 12:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Montiel 1983

[edit]

En este link Archivos Entre Ríos, tenes una prueba de que la foto es de un diario de Paraná, capital de Entre Ríos, el 29 de octubre de 1983, por lo que la imagen no tiene derechos de autor en Argentina al haber sido publicada hace más de 25 años. Espero hables español y disculpes que no te escriba en inglés (my english is not very good). Saludos.--FelipeRev (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) File:Sergio Montiel 1983.jpg looks good to me. The photo was created and published in Argentina more than 25 years ago, so it's public domain per COM:CRT/Argentina and {{PD-AR-Photo}}. clpo13(talk) 20:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi les suppressions

[edit]

Bonjour madame monsieur

Pourriez-vous m'expliquer pourquoi vous supprimer les photos et autres que j'apporte pour un certain nombre de personnes et de lieu .


Expliquez-moi de manière claire comment dois-je procéder pour faire les choses dans les règles.

Gwen Gwenriche (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


File:Philipp Aeby.jpg

[edit]

Patrick, you deleted the file just because you found it in public material published by RepRisk? The job of updating the photo of Philipp has been asked to me directly by RepRisk. I have an email by a RepRisk manager (Gina Walser <gina.walser@reprisk.com>) which gives exlplicit permission to publish the photo on Wikipedia. How can I send it to you? --Criguada (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leszek Sagan

[edit]

Patrick. I am the author of this photo. In addition, as a journalist, photographer - I am a wikipedian using my photographic resources for projects on Wikipedia, including the said file, which I made on May 17, 2016 in connection with the ceremony of awarding the title of Honorary Citizen of Szczecin, where the meeting of the city council of Szczecin and his wife was present. . n. med. prof. PUM Leszek Sagan, who, according to the press law, took a picture, and then during the development of the Leszek Sagan project, I put it in this slogan. I take pictures with several cameras: Sony, Nikon, Samsung smartphones, Huawei. I do not agree with the proposal to remove this page immediately, so I remove this tag and explain the reason, because the photo is my authorship, and I performed on September 28, 2018 in connection with the establishment of the Center for the Treatment of Epilepsy. The conference was, inter alia, dr hab. n. med. prof. PUM Leszek Sagan. Keres 40 (dyskusja) 12:39, 8 January 2019

  • Hey. A simple matter. During the ceremony in 2016 there were several photojournalists, journalists and at the same time editor of wikipedia. Łukasz Szelemej is a radio editor, who also works for a courier, a newspaper and also a user on wikipedia. I took pictures with several cameras: Nikon Corporation D4, Sony, Samsung, Huwei, intended for these editors. This photo is of my own, with the entry of Nikon Corporation D4 and those without a description in the metadata was given to the project (Szczecin Leszek Sagan with wife Aneta), because those went weaker and were withdrawn from Commonc, meaning those marked as Lukasz Szelemej, though in the collection Commonc exists. The pictures are both MOJE, so the marker next to the photo (Szczecin Leszek Sagan with wife Aneta) should be removed, the second picture will not be in the password, so it remains, but also the marker next to the photo should be removed. I explained the situation with these two photos in detail. greetings. Keres 40 (dyskusja) 16:34, 8 January 2019

Trump Deplorable Hasty Happy Hour

[edit]

Dear Patrick Rogel, I am inquiring why you chose to delete - or have Pierre Selim delete - this photo that I took by myself of a sign I made myself to greet people arriving to my home. I see no explanation of why this photo was deleted. I own this photo. I do not understand there to be any copyright violation. Do you take issue with my reference to President Trump? Please explain. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TwinsofSedona (talk • contribs) 17:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)--TwinsofSedona (talk) 17:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Patrick Rogel - I find all of this to be confusing. I'm not sure why so many of my personal photos have been deleted, in particular: Javelinas Crossing the Street I personally took this photo in Sedona during a morning walk and am willing to share this with the world. --TwinsofSedona (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2019 (UTC) --TwinsofSedona (talk) 17:46, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Javelina Family in Sedona

[edit]

Dear Patrick Rogel - I believe this photo that I own, I took early in the morning in Uptown Sedona, of a family of Javelinas crossing the road is both educational and would be fascinating to your readers. I am willing to share this with Wikimedia Commons, yet you have chosen to delete it - or had Pierre Selim delete it. Why? Please explain. Thank you. --TwinsofSedona (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Justinhsb (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello Patrick.

I just received notice that you have deleted File:George Crabtree in his office.jpg as a copyright violation. The reason given was: This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo: Mark Lopez

Both Mark Lopez and I are employees of Argonne National Laboratory who produces the images we want to use on the profile.

How do I appeal this?

Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinhsb (talk • contribs) 16:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Justinhsb (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's a crop of File:Skupinska fotografija 11. slovenske vlade.jpg. (licenseː 3.0 Unported). --151 cp (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restituir

[edit]

Soy la esposa de Guido López Gavilán y esa foto la tenemos en nuestronpoder origial Ana Margarita Cabrera Fagundo (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bishop Jan Pietraszko (1911–1988).jpg

[edit]

Hi, I think You're wrong. I used a licesne PD:PRL (or PD:Polish). This photo was made in 1980, before Polish Copyright Law from 1994. So, this is a part of public domain, like another photos with that license. Sorry for my bad English. Best regards, Lelek 2v (talk) 23:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Serge Charles - licence d'un fichier.

[edit]

Bonjour,

Je reviens vers vous au sujet de la photo de Serges Charles. Effectivement malgré que j'ai mis la source, je n'ai pas vérifié les droit sachant que c'est une photo publiée dans un magasine mis dans les boites aux lettres aux habitants de la ville de Marcq-en-Barœul.

J'ai envoyé un mail à la mairie de Marcq-en-Barœul pour savoir si l'auteur ou le détenteur des droits de cette photo (ou la mairie de Marcq-en-Barœul) a mis ou accepterait de mettre la photo sous licence libre pour la mettre sur la page Wikipédia de Serges Charles.

Un homme tranquille 11 janvier 2018 à 15:35 (CEST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Un homme tranquille (talk • contribs) 14:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abramis Brama

[edit]

Hei, Patrick! My loaded files •File:Ivanhoe band rohelisel luhal.jpg

And also: •File:Ivanhoe band valvuriga.jpg

is deleted. I dont't understand, why. It's me and my band. What is wrong?

And:

File:Ozera 1989 .jpg. File:Plaat "Pojale".jpg. File:Ivan makarov data imeni ne znau 1991.jpg.

"images may be deleted after seven days."

Why? All this files is my own repros of my own legal LP-s, it's my music, mu lyrics, my voice, my face. It is my life, my history.

With best wishes,

Abramis Brama alias Ivan Makarov, leader of band on this photos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abramis Brama (talk • contribs) 09:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2 Issues

[edit]

1. You have flagged: File:OpikDigitalConf.png for speedy deletion. I don't understand why. This is a screenshot that we took of Lembit in a live session. Is this an issue? If so, please can you recommend a solution other than speedy deletion. 2. You have flagged: File:Leon Shpilsky.png as a possible copyright violation. I work for Asgardia https://asgardia.space/en/page/media and have authority to use this image. Leon Shpilsky is the Minister of Finance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcheeseright (talk • contribs) 13:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What to do about picture tagging..?

[edit]

Bonjour Patrick Rogel, please explain what you would like for information to File:Stefan lofven.riksdagen2018.18d952.1660226.jpg since I do not quite understand. There is much evidence that everything is correct, like Autopatrol, Verified uploader, and it actually follows the license conditions. So, please explain, with details about what different possibilities are acceptable. I will look here tomorrow, and see what you suggest. Best Regards, --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rogel wrote > Following your message there's no evidence at source that image has been published under a Creative Commons license hence the template.
Bonjour again, I asked what you say needs to be done. You did not reply to that question. I ask you for help, to make eveything ok according to you. So, you need to reply, with information about what needs to be done. Also different alternatives. Please keep the discussion here, so maybe an administrator can help with exact advice on what to do, and maybe the community can help. Merci bien, --Janwikifoto (talk) 19:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rogel wrote > Hi again. If you don't mind the reply will stay in your talk page. You have all the instructions above: "Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to COM:OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)." Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Your reply seems to be only information links. But, what I need is (a) information about how the webpage with license information should look, (b) what it should contain - according to you, personally. (c) I want to know your own words, you own thoughts, and not quotes from somewhere. What you quoted, does not give the information I need, to make the changes you ask for. If you can give me information about what words are needed, then it is possible to make the changes you ask for. However, I do not want to disappoint you, by making changes you are not happy and ok with. First, let us two agree on what words/changes are needed! Help me get it right! --Janwikifoto (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, are you in Paris? Do you have snow there? I was once in Paris, with snow. And they even had snow now in Jerusalem, I heard. Any snow? --Janwikifoto (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I still see no reply to _what_ you would like to see, for a license. Please comment on that. Best Regards, --Janwikifoto (talk) 16:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Still awaiting your reply and suggestions. Waiting.... --Janwikifoto (talk) 11:47, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Salim al beidh pic

[edit]

Those pictures I took them by my camera , because he is my father , I uploaded them first in a Facebook profile Amr albidh (talk) 05:00, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carmen_Sevilla_no_Hotel_do_Imperio_em_1954.jpg

[edit]

Dear Patrick Rogel, please undo the request for deletion of this file. The image was published in "Plateia", a portuguese magazine published from 1951 till 1986. We have made all references to this images: Revista Plateia, n 69, p.8, 1 Fev. 1954. I hope you will consider our request. Best Regards

Miguelamr3 (talk) 12:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Presidente de la Comunidad de Madrid homenajea a Diego Godín y Amanda Sampedro.jpg

[edit]

Hi, you are right, I didn't realize the 2.0 license was not accepted by Wikimedia. Apologies for the inconvenience caused.

Junta (talk) 20:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not found at URL

[edit]

La imagen File:Enrique Sorrel Contreras - 1935.jpg la haz marcado como "speedy deletion" por violación de copyright indicando que "Not found at URL". La pagina indicada en la fuente tiene un link de descarga de un archivo PDF (http://www.memoriachilena.cl/archivos2/pdfs/MC0068870.pdf) que en su pagina 716 contiene la imagen. Favor quitar mensaje de "borrado rapido". Saludos --Rec79 (talk) 00:53, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:PBN Balbin (13).jpg

[edit]

Patrick, would you mind undoing the deletion request on the following images: And also:

File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan with Field Marshal Ahmed Ismail.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan on his way to ride the Hellicopter.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan with COMSIXTHFLT Commanders at Suez.jpg File:RADM K J Carroll Com J W Husband UK Eng. Mashour RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan Cpt Bottini FR.jpg File:Hel Mine Detector.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan ARE & RADM Brian McCauley US 02.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan ARE & RADM Brian McCauley US 01.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan Inspecting UK Honor Guard at Isamilia 04.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan ARE & RADM Brian McCauley US.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan Inspecting UK Honor Guard at Isamilia 02.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan Inspecting UK Honor Guard at Isamilia 03.jpg File:RADM Ahmed Fouad Hassan Inspecting UK Honor Guard at Isamilia 01.jpg

They are personal photos of my late father and I do hve all hard copies of such pics. As you know photos in the 70s were only hard ones. I scanned them and in all of them my father is part of the picture. none of these have any copy write privilege. they are more than 40 years old and considered as for public use. hope this closes the subject and my photos are back on. regards, mohfouadeg

Hey Patrick Rogel,

Have you considered being an admin? You seem to be worthy of the role. -- 1989 (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Patrick does a lot of good work and I have the sense he improved his work after some initial errors were pointed out, but I think administrators need to communicate more with users. For that reason, I wouldn't support an RfA. I'm not sure Patrick would even like it, this talk page would only get longer. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of the vandalism noticeboard

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Misuse of the vandalism noticeboard. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove deletion requests

[edit]

Rogel wrote > Please do not remove deletion requests. Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Oh, I only deleted NP with makes an auto-delete after 7 days. So an administrator can not close the debate, as no debate exists. Unless a DR is filed. Since you have not read the info regarding the file you tag, and not investigated, you miss vital information. I have marked that info in the Discussion comment. You should probably have files a DR insetad (of NP or ND). Please feel free to file a DR, I included enough basis and comments for you to file a substantiated DR. I am not going to file a DR. In the future, if you investigate a little, take more care, your DR will be ok and good. Can I give any more help, if so, talk to me. --Janwikifoto (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I keep discussion on your page, to keep useful information for Administrators in one place. Please, keep talk on this page. Best Regards, --Janwikifoto (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About File Karl_Stengel.jpg

[edit]

My English is not very good. Please give me the time so a friend of mine can help me to better explain you. 1) "I've made this photo". The true is that a friend of mine made it and he gives me the right to use it without problems, loosing his rights because he knew Karl Stengel, his wife and he want to put it on Wikipedia. 2) This photo was already published on the internet but it is of the friend of mine. 3) This friend of mine works for stengelcollection.org 4) I'm trying to help them to make a Karl Stengel page, I think it was an enciclopedian artist and I hope to make a good page with necessary notes. 5) If you think it's better, we look for a photo not already published in internet of the artist 6) Please help me, I want to make the right thing for wikipedia and for the wife of the artist --Pivari (talk) 18:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WFUNA

[edit]

Refering to WFUNA70.jpg. and Park Soo Gil.jpg I had a long discussion on multiple pages with a number of people. it was resolved. check my page WFUNA logo neg 1c RGB wht-on-blue.jpg for example. The logo was accepted and the pictures are indeed mine.

Please advise.--APG1984 (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hello again! I saw you deleted the WFUNA 70 logo in the end. I was saying (here) that the logo is exaclty the same as It just has a 70 added to it. If the main logo is not under copyright it is difficult to say this one is. Let say you add that "70" to a coca cola logo for example. Will coca cola consider it is a different logo? What do you think? thanks!--APG1984 (talk) 07:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi Patrick

you sent me notification that I did not put proper informations about an uploaded image of myself "Julien Bobroff.jpg".

I'm a little new with this and It's not clear to me what I should add to what I already specified (I took the picture myself, and it's my own portrait in fact). You mention that Institut Cochin used this picture, and I agree since I gave them this picture for the annoucement of a seminar of me I did a few months ago, but I do have all copyrights of this picture, I just lended it to them.

Can you advice me on what I should do now ? Thanks

Julien Bobroff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jubobroff (talk • contribs) 18:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Permission

[edit]

Hai Here you mentioned about the lack of permission. I fail to understand the deletion tag for not providing the permission. The licence is given as CCSA 4.0, then what is the requirement for a permission. Even today's featured photo does not have a permission given.--Vinayaraj (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

[edit]

Hello. Why i have a warning on my talk page? Indeed, It doesn't have a permission to upload, but uploading it for the elections is a different matter. Anyways, the author is the one who created the images, and it was spread on all or Marilao. That means it is a pre-campaign, and it was in public domain. Please reconsider. 👦🗣️ largadas 02:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Julien Bobroff.jpg

[edit]

Hi Patrick

I took the picture in my living room with a tripod and in a delay mode with a Canon EOS. Hope I clarified the situation for you. Any other questions ? Can you remove the tag ?

Best Julien — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jubobroff (talk • contribs) 10:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angelena Change The World.jpg

[edit]

Hi there Patrick, I sent the email already to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the files. I didn't have response yet. What else can I do? Can u enlighten me on that please? Thank u so much! Sweet Regards, Angelena Bonet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABonet (talk • contribs) 21:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted images

[edit]

Why did you erase the images of the FALN and PCV? the Venezuelan law says that if an image has been published for more than sixty years, the year after its publication has been completed, it will pass into the public domain --Ilianovich1986 (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

:File:Šandor Hartig, Rad na bisti Todora Manojlovića, 1981.jpg

[edit]

Dear Patrick, Please to read better. I put {{OTRS pending}} on this file and I have 193 days to get the licence. Don't delete anything and please don't waste my time. I already wrote that I am in GLAM Project and I have limited time to work on it. Thank you!--Корак по корак (talk) 12:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What was out of Scope?

[edit]

Rogel wrote> "Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images", for DR https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Una_%C4%90or%C4%91evi%C4%87

What made you think "personal images"? Please explain, so we can understand how you work, make deletion requests. At least one picture is in a professional TV studio. Athletic awards is a typical wikipedia picture. Keep it here on your talk page, as it pertains to your way of working, your way of thinking. Merci bien pour l'explicacion, --Janwikifoto (talk) 13:28, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naum Koen.jpg

[edit]

Hello Patrick, thanks for this information, what i'll do is try to upload pictures that has not been published before on the internet to avoid such deletion, I am new here and wasn't aware of this situation, Thanks for your guidance. Angelina 770 (talk)

File:Gerd Heusch.jpg

[edit]

Dear Patrick, The image Gerd Heusch.jpg is private ownership of Gerd Heusch. The source of this image is NOT http://www.awk.nrw.de/akademie/klassen/naturmedizin/ordentliche-mitglieder/heusch-gerd.html. They used this image with permission of Gerd Heusch. Please remove the deletion request. Best, Andreas (Pathophysiologie) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pathophysiologie (talk • contribs) 13:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


25.11.2019 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.252.148.8 (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Dear Patrick, We want to re-upload the file Gerd Heusch.jpg which is private ownership of the depicted person. Is it possible to add "nc" and "nd" to the rquired CC licence. We want to have the following licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Thanks for your help. Andreas (Pathophysiology)[reply]

Mariana Bandhold

[edit]

Hi Patrick,

Nice to meet you. I'm writing about two files I recently uploaded of Mariana Bandhold, a portuguese singer:

  • Mariana Bandhold - iHeart Radio.jpg
  • Mariana Bandhold - The Voice Portugal Gala.jpg

Both files were taken from her instagram. I received a notification that these files are "missing evidence of permission", but the sources of both files, which are instagram posts, both contain explicit captions saying: "This photo is free to share and adapt with the requirement of attribution under a Creative Commons license (CC BY S.A. 20)". This is the first time I've come into this situation so I wondered if you might help me in telling me what to do next to ensure these files are not deleted. Their sources explicitly state their free Commons licenses, so should I just remove the deletion templates? Or is there another procedure to follow? I appreciate any help you can offer.

Best
Cristiano Tomás (talk) 22:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the image caption clearly says (verbatim copy) "This photo is free to share and adapt with the requirement of attribution under a Creative Commons license (CC BY S.A. 20)", from link https://www.instagram.com/p/BbID4y2FoOp/ So Maybe Rogel Should Read Better. And reply timely to comments. --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SirEdimon

[edit]

Hi there. I would like to know exactly why the files don't fit for Commons, so I can avoid making this mistake again. I even posted a question at the Village Pump, but it's yet to be answered. If you could answer me, it would be very helpful to me in the future. Thanks.--SirEdimon (talk) 22:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autorisations de réutilisation

[edit]

Bonjour Patrick,

un courriel est en cours d'envoi par les soins de Gerard Barrau à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org . Je lui ai expliqué la procédure, je suis en attente de cela. Chaps the idol (talk) 09:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2 pictures tagged as a possible violation

[edit]

Hello, the images are according to the terms of use by the Croatian Government free to distribute. Restrictions can apply for some pictures but these have none. Greetings, Luke  CroGamer 1 (talk) 09:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

اجازه ی پرونده فرزاد فرخ

[edit]

این برای استفاده در مقاله ی [[ https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%AF_%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%AE | فرزاد فرخ ]] در ویکی پدیا بسیار مفید است اگر به آنجا بروید متوجه می شوید ویرایشگر880 (talk) 22:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]