User talk:Janwikifoto

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Now maybe this is a unified account. Kanske nu detta är unified.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010 0c176 1866.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010 0c176 1866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image file names are not very good[edit]

I do not find the names of the files you upload very accurate or revealing. for example Estpresident 1c300 8564.jpg is of Carl bildt. Were I to search for Carl Bilt I would not find this image. Gregors (talk) 21:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

A picture can contain more than one person/subject. You need to search on Category. That is what people have told me. But there seems to be no standard on file names. Instead of spending a lot of time on the file name, I have spent some time on Category, and Description. Did this help? --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Categories for this image are "January 18-20, 2011 Toomas Hendrik Ilves in Sweden | Carl Bildt", so by searching for the correct category you get it. Another example is Estpresident 1c300 5549.jpg, there are sooo many people in the picture that it is impossible to name it according to all persons. However, many names are missing from the catogory as well, the question is who should take the time to figure out all the names? --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Kategorier[edit]

Hej, jag ser att du bara ha lagt namn på personer på bilderna. Egentligen ska man ange, födelseår, yrke och annan ankytning som t.ex. Category:John Travolta. Egon Eagle (talk) 17:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image in Uppsalatidningen[edit]

Hello! Just wanted to let you know that one of your images was re-used in Uppsalatidningen, but that the use does not seem to comply with any of the licenses you specified. See File_talk:Eric_Saade_1c310_7098.jpg. --Bensin (talk) 10:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Well spotted! But - how should it have been? What is the correct attribution? Hur skulle det ha varit? --Janwikifoto (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Ja, det var lite kul att känna igen bilden och kul att de använde den. Attribueringen såg OK ut, men om jag förstår rätt så ställer både GFDL- och CC-licenserna krav att man på något sätt bifogar eller hänvisar till licensvilkoren:
  • GFDL: "this License [...] and the license notice saying this License applies to the Document [should be] reproduced in all copies"
  • cc-by-sa: "For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page."
Det jag främst reagerade på när jag såg bilden var att det inte ens framgick vilken av de två licenserna (eller båda) de ansåg gällde när de återanvände bilden. Ju fler människor som känner till och lär sig de fria licenserna och deras fördelar desto mer material tror jag kommer släppas under dem och desto bättre för oss alla. Men upphovsmän måste kunna lita på att licensvillkoren respekteras och särskilt av etablerade medier. Uppsalatidningen har trots allt en upplaga på över 100 000 exemplar varje vecka och om de bara hade kostat på sig att krafsa dit ett litet "(cc-by-sa)" så hade jag nog inte tänkt mer på saken.
(In short: The attribution seems OK, but the article does not specify under which license they are using the image.) --Bensin (talk) 01:36, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Ah, intressant! "fria licenserna och deras fördelar.. mer material... kommer släppas". Ok, jag kan tänka mig en del fördelar. Men, det vore intressant att veta vilka fördelar du tänker på! Som annan parentes kommer jag nog att sluta ladda upp med GDFL och bara använda exakt en CC-version, bara för att ha en enda version aktuell. Det verkar tillräckligt svårt att veta hur villkoren för enbart senaste CC-versionen fungerar. --Janwikifoto (talk) 17:24, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
En fördel med fria licenser generellt är ju att andra kan återanvända materialet utan att be om lov först. Då får materialet lätt spridning och upphovsmannen får exponering. En annan fördel med just CC är att licensen är flexibel och att man som upphovsman kan specificera ganska precist hur man vill att materialet ska återanvändas. En tredje är att de är lätta att förstå både för upphovsmän och distributörer. --Bensin (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Dirk Niebel 1c399 0354.jpg[edit]

I have problems confirming the source. It seems to me that you are actually the author or copyright-holder. Am I right? -- RE rillke questions? 17:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

What problem? Why? How? Was fur probleme? Warum? Wie? I think it is clear from the file description page, but please tell me the problem! Best --Janwikifoto (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
In the source section there is the link to http://politik.in2pic.com . When I click on this link, I can't find the photo. That's all. -- RE rillke questions? 21:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Ah, that is just a web page that will contain picture references, more pictures, text, and more - in the future. It is _not_ finished yet. However pictures where taken at the Foreign Ministry in Sweden, the press attache of the German Embassy knows me, as well as your german wiki-representative in Sweden, Prolineserver. Pictures taken at about 1.5 m distance. So if you want to use the pictures elsewhere, please make sure to credit "politik.in2pic.com" by a clickable link. I did also do some pic of Guido Westerwelle, and I will keep an eye out for more people. All the best, --Janwikifoto (talk) 22:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
One suggestion: {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0|attribution=http://politik.in2pic.com}} . And one note to prevent further confusion: When publishing these photos in the same resolution on your website without a date and a license (or a more restrictive one) and a patroller or similar encounters this, he will probably tag it with no permission until it is verified that you are http://politik.in2pic.com. Usually we would use COM:OTRS in this case.
Thank you for sharing professional photos and releasing them under a free license. -- RE rillke questions? 10:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0|attribution=http://politik.in2pic.com}} - how can I upload by Commonist with this setting? It is impossible to upload each picture separately, that will take too long time. OTRS - I have heard about it, but it becomes too difficult to send an email for each picture. If somebody wants to remove my pictures, then fine for me - it is not my loss. But I was thinking about writing some kind of letter, and put a JPG or so on my own server, with the license permissions and conditions. It seems you know something about licenses Rillke, if you like to write more about licenses then I would like more contact. Some Nobel price winners will come soon as uploads. --Janwikifoto (talk) 12:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Download this license file and replace it in folder Commonist\etc (I recommend a backup of the old file somewhere). Nobody wants to remove your pictures and I am not a lawer. For OTRS, we'll find a simple solution. -- RE rillke questions? 21:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Balticfreedom 1c558 6357.Beatrice Ask.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Balticfreedom 1c558 6357.Beatrice Ask.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | svenska | +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Please see the file's page for more info.

Saibo (Δ) 20:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Saibo, you have the title Icense Reviewer. Are you an expert in licenses? If so, contact me urgently. Unfortunately, the most serious error in this upload-batch is that they all have the incorrect category "EURion". Since you are some kind of admin, you might want to fix this for all the files. Sorry now it is late night bedtime so no time for this. --Janwikifoto (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes I am "license reviewer" and probably soon admin and have a quite good knowledge of licenses. However, the categorizing action is not related to it - I did use the gadget cat-a-lot to remove the wrong Category:EURion easily - glad to help. Why was it included?
You make many valuable photos! :)
If you want to ask me anything regarding licenses and it is urgent please write on my talk or send me an email or contact me in IRC. Or - ask the guys at COM:VPC.
@File:Balticfreedom 1c558 6357.Beatrice Ask.jpg : I wrote: "Not clear who the photographer is. If you are the photographer please say so by using {{own}} in source and your username in the author field. If you want to advertise your website only in the auhtor field then use something like {{own}} by Janwikifoto in source."
Do you understand what I mean? Oh, I just see that Rillke did ask you about the very same thing in the section above. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 04:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Cat Category:EURion was there because of previous upload. Commonist is not easy to use.... --Janwikifoto (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Aikido_lesneven_2004_a4dn894_9042.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aikido_lesneven_2004_a4dn894_9042.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GeorgHHtalk   10:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 11:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:EURion.SEK.500.front.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:EURion.SEK.500.front.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

File:EURion.SEK.100.front.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:EURion.SEK.100.front.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Janwikifoto. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Per Unckel[edit]

Hello, I just commented on one of your photos. The man on the picture is not Per Unckel. Please have a check! Calle Widmann (talk) 20:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Stefan Lofven.EU-dagen2011 1c379 6412.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stefan Lofven.EU-dagen2011 1c379 6412.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Reckless182 (talk) 22:50, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Riksmotet2011 1c568 9266.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Riksmotet2011 1c568 9266.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

85.24.184.251 21:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Goran Hagglund 0c225 3305.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Goran Hagglund 0c225 3305.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

85.24.184.251 21:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Re: Do not violate copyright[edit]

Hello Janwikifoto. What image do you refer to? --RanZag (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

You are probably referring to the image File:Eric Saade 2011 cropped.jpg. And you are wrong, I in no way violated copyright: I uploaded the image using this Wikimedia automatic tool for derivative works. 'Source' is set automatically by the tool as a link to the original image, and everything else has been set by the tool in accordance with the copyright. --RanZag (talk) 22:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

This week is Image:Charlotte Perrelli 1c310 7029.jpg in Estonian wikipedia on Main page. Thank you for picture and congratulations to Sweden for win in Eurovision! Taivo (talk) 23:31, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

http://politik.in2pic.com[edit]

Hi! As you can see from messages above, there is an issue with your uploads from http://politik.in2pic.com: you should clarify if you are indeed the author of the website, and perhaps send a ticket to OTRS. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 21:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Estpresident 1c300 8523.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Estpresident 1c300 8523.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Estpresident 1c300 8556.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Estpresident 1c300 8556.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:03, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Estpresident 1c300 5335.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Estpresident 1c300 5335.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:04, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Estpresident 1c300 8538.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Estpresident 1c300 8538.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Estpresident 1c300 8698.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Estpresident 1c300 8698.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Årvasbåo (talk) 20:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright Notice[edit]

The following files have been deleted, and I hereby withdraw the below mentioned files from "Creative Commons copyright", and I claim full personal copyright, not allowing any use, on Wikipedia or Wikimedia foundation, or any other "wiki", unless approved by me in writing. Anyone using or uploading the following files without a written permission will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, for copyright violation. The following files may not be stored on wikimedia foundation servers, including so called "restore" which will be treatde as a copyright violation by the wikimedia foundation, as the files should have been deleted and purged.

Stockholm 2013-02-06 Janwikifoto --Janwikifoto (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Riksmotet2011 1c568 9266.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 8523.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 8556.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 5335.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 8538.jpg, File:Estpresident 1c300 8698.jpg

Today 2014-09-15 the following file has been deleted and removed, so the above withdrawal of creative commons copyright applies for File:Stefan Lofven 1c379 6362.face.jpg and File:Stefan Lofven 1c379 6362.jpg and these files should have been deleted and purged from commons.wikimedia.org. Stockholm 2014-09-15 12:21 CET Janwikifoto --Janwikifoto (talk) 10:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9014.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9014.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9014.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9040.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9040.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9040.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9059.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9059.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aikido lesneven 2004 a4dn894 9059.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Janwikifoto. You have new messages at Ellin Beltz's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

User:Janwikifoto/template pic-politik[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:Janwikifoto/template pic-politik has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Janwikifoto/template pic-bloggers[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:Janwikifoto/template pic-bloggers has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Janwikifoto/template picinfo[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:Janwikifoto/template picinfo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

RE: Did you receive my email?[edit]

I've answered this not once, but twice now. It also seems that you unilaterally ignored my talk page notice, because if you had read it you would know that I maintain talk page archives. -FASTILY 06:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)