User talk:Pierpao

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

grafici militari[edit]

Photoshop CS3 :-) --Noclador (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested moves on COM:DL[edit]

Hi, Just to tell that the requested moves cannot be executed by the delinker bot. Enjoy the work. --Foroa (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Category:Women_by_name[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Women_by_name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:12, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

People vs peoples[edit]

Peoples is correct as the plural of people, ethnic group. The plural of people, a bunch of persons, remains people, a bunch of persons. --Foroa (talk) 14:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Catégories vides[edit]

Pourrais-tu s'il te plaît, à ce propos, jeter un coup d'oeil dans

et - si tu comprends l'allemand - dans cette discussion sur le forum? Merci. Bohème (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour ton message et - bingo ! :-) Bohème (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Renaming request for Pont su la Meuse, Domremy-la-Pucelle 01 09.jpg[edit]

Thank you for renaming. Please check in future details, when you think you need rename in another name than proposed by the uploader/requester. 01 09 means picture #1 in 2009 of this object and is not part of a date definition. Picture is taken 6 September 2009 not 1st. -- Хрюша ?? 12:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Question about pd-text[edit]

Hi Pierpao,
I saw you 'keep'-decision on this file: File:India_House_Amsterdam_Logo.jpg. I don't want to argue about the decision but I was wondering why this logo is considered to be text only/text with simple geometric shapes. Is the flower considered to be a simple geometric shape? I thought this phrase was relating to squares, circles, semicircles etc and that an arrangement of simple geometric shapes were already considered to be non-simple. Do you have a link where I can read a bit more about this so I don't nominate files anymore that fit this threshold.
Best regards, JZ85 (talk) 08:47, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Cat removing[edit]

What is this supposewd to mean? I hope it was by accident, otherwise I'd consider this vandalism [1] - and many others. Please undo all of these edits. --FA2010 (talk) 20:21, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Drassodes Lapidosus.jpg[edit]

Obviously you did not understand why I requested renaming the above image. The species depicted there is not Drassodes lapidosus, but a Clubiona sp. Therefore the image is named and described incorrectly. This incorrect name leads to the situation that the image is used on a lot of pages related to Drassodes lapidosus, while, in fact, it is not that species. Readers of Wikipedia are presented with incorrect information all the time because the file is incorrectly named and described.

I am not the only one complaining about this. Also see [2]. The original author seems to be no longer active and does not react.

Please reconsider renaming the file again, otherwise this problem will never be solved. --57.79.167.152 12:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Aiuto: modifica nomi files[edit]

Grazie, ho messo la parola "File" davanti al nome di questo file e anche di questo, potresti correggerli? .--Franco aq (talk) 19:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Grazie, ma File:Tsarevich (Fabergé egg) surprise - 2.jpg dovrebbe diventare File:Tsarevich (Fabergé egg) and surprise.jpg. --Franco aq (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Paintings frames[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Paintings frames has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

--Saibo (Δ) 00:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


Category:19th century oil paintings[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:19th century oil paintings has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 19:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 45943f6f425989435cecfbdcd6cd383d[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Leo Gestel, Self Portrait.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Screenshots[edit]

What movie screenshots am I supposed to have uploaded? Did you even read the descriptions of the images? I have done careful research to check that they are all in the public domain. --Lobo512 (talk) 19:29, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Renaming[edit]

There was no reason whatsoever to rename the file http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Leo_Gestel,_Self_portrait,_1941,_pastel.jpg&diff=65822395&oldid=65822314 Please refrain from such senseless renamings. In fact, commas and similar characters are even rather bad in filenames. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 22:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for you suggestion. In commons:rename there is no mention about commas, moreover if they were bad, why are allowed by Mediawiki? Anyway usually i do not use commas in renaming but according to point 6 of commons:rename i did it to armonize Leo gestel self portraits that you can find in category:Leo Gestel. Thanks again--Pierpao.lo (listening) 06:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Contre-jour[edit]

Contre-jour is against daylight. It is an extreme form of en:Backlighting_(lighting_design) but not the same. --Foroa (talk) 14:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 009042425b8bcc3aeed057214953ceff[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Categorie "by style" e "by period"[edit]

Ciao Pierpao. Volevo avvisarti che ti ho cancellato le due categorie Category:Art in Italy by style e la successiva "by city" che hai creato recentemente. A parte che erano assolutamente ridondanti perché esistono le stesse "by period", ma poi tieni presente che nelle nostre categorie che riguardano l'Italia NON vi sono categorie "by style". Le abbiamo tutte eliminate e sostituite con le corrispondenti "by period"; un lavoro di uniformizzazione che abbiamo fatto un paio di anni fa in quanto queste categorie artistiche erano categorizzate alcune "by style" e altre "by period", risultando così ora l'una, ora l'altra "mancanti o inesistenti" mentre invece erano semplicemente rese nell'altra forma. Giusto per informarti affinché tu possa... uniformarti! "Ciao e buon lavoro. --DenghiùComm (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

File da cancellazione immediata?[edit]

Ciao Pierpao. Il file E3 2010 Castlevania Lords of Shadow.jpg che ho caricato poco fa, perché dovrebbe essere da cancellazione immediata? --Fabyrav (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Il fatto è che l'avevo trovato così su Flickr (con questa licenza) e sarebbe stata utile per una pagina, non so poi se la licenza su Flickr è giusta o sbagliata. Comunque la foto si voleva concentrare sull'ambiente e sull'evento, non sul logo o sugli screenshot, però se viola il copyright, pazienza. --Fabyrav (talk) 19:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Category rename[edit]

In regards to:Commons:Categories for discussion#Category:Photos of topless females featuring armpits ✓OK You were not too bold. You found something to change/improve, and took action. We depend on everyone's contributions. Senator2029talk 18:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Category for discussion[edit]

Category:Women touching their-selves in art[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Women touching their-selves in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

--Cynwolfe (talk) 00:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Katie Waltern[edit]

You categorized Category:Katie Waltern in Category:Unidentified people of the United States. That doesn't make much sense to me: if we have her name, in what sense is she "unidentified"? - Jmabel ! talk 05:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Because there was no category before [3] and I didn't know if she was a dancer or a singer or what else, usually people is categorized by job, and... I forgot to add people by name. But if you want you can remove Category:Unidentified people of the United States. Thanks--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

categorizzazione :)[edit]

Ciao Pierpao, ho visto il tuo intervento su Category:Photographs (with graphics effects) of cats grazie :) però guardando un po' ho trovato questa Category:Photographic effects non pensi sia + indicata? al posto di Category:Optical effects ??? grazie ciao (PS: per favore risp nella mia talk come su wikipedia, che sennò mi dimentico, ciao grazie ancora) --Pava (talk) 17:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Mappe di Shepherd[edit]

La cartina deriva da File:Shepherd-c-030-031.jpg. Grazie. --Cristiano64 (talk) 08:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Ho fatto qualche aggiunta/precisazione. Spero vada bene :) Correggi pure. Grazie ancora. --Cristiano64 (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: foto di quadri e incisioni[edit]

Grazie per la tua cortese risposta. --Massimo Telò (talk) 14:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

COM:File renaming and recent file moves[edit]

Hi Pierpao, thanks for volunteering in file renaming. Today I am writing you because I observed some files possibly renamed not in accordance with the policy: [4] [5]. I am also not happy with the situation that we can't change a file's title without the file's name. But we have this technical limitation and changing the file's name often causes trouble (especially if the uploader does not like it or if it is highly in use). So one could interpret the reason "sorting" as Harmonize file names of a set of images or misleading names into accurate ones but this needs a lot of fantasy. As long as no one else complains it's not a big deal but if someone does you are in danger loosing your file mover flag.

Again, thanks for helping at Commons. Kind regards -- Rillke(q?) 07:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

categorizzazione sedan Lancia nere[edit]

Ciao Pierpao, ho visto che hai cambiato la categorizzazione di alcune fotografie della Lancia Thema 2011, spostandole dalla caterogia "black sedans" alla sottocategoria "black Lancia sedans" senza però averla creata, questo ha portato alle due immagini una lacuna nella loro categorizzazione. Io ora ho creato la categoria che tu molto probabilmente volevi creare però volevo chiederti se avevi fatto queste operazioni anche con altre immagini. Ciao grazie --Pava (talk) 22:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

la mia non era una critica, volevo solo capire, cmq le avevi categorizzate come 2010 black sedan ed era vuota anche quella, le ho spostate io, ho solo chiesto perchè quei link rossi. Non ho capito come posso aiutarti, lo faccio volentieri :) --Pava (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Wrong edit[edit]

Please note that "by 1938" means "before 1938 or in 1938", not "in 1938". http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Christian_Rohlfs_Buchenwald.jpg&diff=84392847&oldid=84329817 --FA2010 (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Re:Bar italiano[edit]

Riguardo a cosa scusa? :) --Viscontino (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Mestieri[edit]

Grazie mille. Riguardo ai commenti ti giuro che ho cercato su it.wikipedia basandomi sull'interwiki di en.wikipedia. Per esempio "balloonist" non aveva "mongolfierista" che poi è una parola che conosco. Il punto è.. che ti ringrazio anche per il resto. Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Monument of Nizami Ganjavi[edit]

Buongiorno, Pierpao. I'm user from Azerbaijan. The last year in your city, in your beautiful city was erected a monument of a very famous Azerbaijani poet Nizami Ganjavi. This monument was erected in Villa Borghese park (in Viale Madama Letizia). Could you make a photo of this monument and upload it to the Commons? Grazie per il vostro tempo)) --Interfase (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Nuvola icon categorization[edit]

Hello! Was this second edit accidental? An SVG version is linked from the description. —David Levy 15:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes I really wonder what you are doing? Apart from a number of PNG who already have a SVG.[6] Why the category "modified" is obsolet? Should it be deleted? Why you create Category:Nuvola PNG icons? What meaning has this category? another small mistake Is there a evidence to this: “All SVG versions of Nuvola icons are modified, so they should be categorized under Category:Nuvola SVG icons, not here, as their status as "modified" is implied by not being a PNG.”? All identical GNOME icons are modified? Sorry about that, but this is questionable and should be mentioned on the Commons:Project Nuvola 2.0+!? -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ 13:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Pierpao, sorry for my late answer. That sentence is written at top of Category: Modified Nuvola icons, so they is now empty!? This simply means that all these SVG are not originals!? -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ 14:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Per favore prendi ASSOLUTAMENTE visione di questa discussione[edit]

Ciao perdonami se mi permetto (e se lo metto così in evidenza) ma per favore devi assolutamente prendere visione di questa discussione, bisogna fare qualcosa altrimenti si cancelleranno moltissime immagini Commons:Bar_italiano#Campagna_di_cancellazione_per_il_NO-FOP_Italy_.28_.C3.A8_fatta_molto_male.29. Ho spiegato per bene perché le immagini non devono venir cancellate, ma l'utente né mi ascolta né partecipa alla discussione --Pava (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:People with black skin[edit]

Do you want to state you agree with deleting this category? if you do, please type in Support or Delete as your comment. grazi.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

undeletion request[edit]

Ciao :) vista la tua esperienza con la licenza delle immagini e la loro correttezza, puoi dire il tuo parere tecnico su questa discussione? Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:.22_13_-_ITALY_-_monuments_of_Milan_in_art_-_marking_pen_drawings_colored_by_children_-_Teatro_alla_Scala.jpg_.E2.80.8E. Grazie mille ciao --Pava (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

[[Media:]]

Please index subcategories correctly[edit]

Hello. Please use capital letters for the sorting variables that appear after the "|": xxx|Flowers and not xxx|flowers. Men and Women (or Males and Females) are top-indexed together in gender-specific subcategories: xxx| Female and not xxx|Female. Thank you. Orrlingtalk 13:28, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel (renaming)[edit]

What you mean when renaming is Electress Wilhelmine Caroline von Hessen-Kassel (Princess of Denmark). The Files mean Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel, a Prussian princess. The original file name was short, but not wrong. „Hofdame“ means „court lady“ (gentildonna?). However, the attribution to Wilhelmine von Hessen-Kassel not seem to be clear. See also my references in this file. Wilhelmine was the women of Heinrich von Preussen, the young brother of Friedrich II. (Federico II). Therefore, she was named „Prinzessin Heinrich von Preussen“. --Botaurus (talk) 09:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

My mistake. Your references are good. Anyway I renamed this picture because its title was not correct and this File:Kreis_des_Antoine_Pesne_-_Bildnis_einer_unbekannten_Frau.jpg that is another version of the same picture with a similar title. Moreover in the description was specified "unknown lady". Thanks for your correction--Pierpao.lo (listening) 23:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I've replied to you[edit]

on User talk:Orrling#Category:Black and white photographs of women. Orrlingtalk 11:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop creating "Females" categories[edit]

Please don't create any more "Females" categories when there's a "Women" category of the same topic with marginal differences (as in the arts). I've commented for you on this matter elaborately on my tlakpage here, so, as long as we're still discussing this issue please avoid creating more duplicate categories by splitting "Women" and "Females". Thanks, Orrlingtalk 15:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I hope you understand the message from the recent threads by multiple editors on Commons. Please avoid creating any new category for females or women when either one of them already exists. Thanks, Orrlingtalk 19:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Asia ok.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Asia ok.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Video di Ecoltex[edit]

Ciao, mi sono permesso di copiaincollare in toto la categorizzazione che hai fatto del video di cui abbiamo parlato al bar e, dato che occupano la stessa cat, ti dispiacerebbe passarle in rassegna velocemente per controllare che ve ne siano di non consone? Intanto grazie per la dritta (mi ero completamente dimenticato di aver fatto un paio di video anche io che sono finiti nella categoria madre).--Threecharlie (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

re: ciao[edit]

Ciao :) mi fa piacere sentirti dire queste parole, a cosa ti riferisci in particolare? Alla "campagna" ?? --Pava (talk) 20:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Beh dai non è successo niente, non si smette mai d'imparare :D grazie mille --Pava (talk) 15:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Sottoesposizioni[edit]

Il tag "underexposed" non è stato creato per giudicare l'immagine o la capacità artistica dell'autore ma semplicemente per segnalare all'atelier che si occupa di ritocchi che è mecessario che prendano visione dell'immagine (non necessariamente perché la foto è scura, ma anche perché il colore è totalmente sbilanciato per via di una illuminazione fioca, tipicamente una lampadina). Io personalmente non faccio ritocchi se non in casi davvero estremi (qui trovi un esempio di cosa intenda io per "underexposed": per favore, guarda come era l'immagine prima del mio ritocco, e come è adesso), e se marco una immagine (ho già abbastanza da fare con le mie, per mettermi a pattugliare quelle altrui) è perché davvero siamo a un caso limite.
Per esempio, nell'immagine in cui mi chiedi se io sia sicuro, la risposta è (anche perché il tag si riferisce a questa versione, non a quella attuale, che è già ribilanciata proprio a seguito dell'inserimento di quel tag!). Il caso e la coincidenza vuole che bolo77 sia mio amico, che abbiamo visitato assieme il museo quando lui fece le foto, e che io abbia visto il mosaico originale. Ti assicuro che le tessere del mosaico sono bianche e non gialle, a parte una fascia ottagonale arancione. Questo, credo, taglia la testa al toro. Quanto ad Arno Roca, non ho presente di quali immagini tu stia parlando: dovresti usarmi la cortesia di farmi un esempio, in modo che possa comprendere di cosa esattamente tu stia parlando. A giudicare dalle miniature, infatti, dovrebbero essere tutte ok, salvo un paio che sono dei macchioni indistinti, nelle quali però non vedo nessun tag di underexposed. Se mi fai un esempio capisco meglio.
Quanto al fatto che a tuo parere sarebbe meglio cancellare le immagini piuttosto che ritoccarle, come sai su Commons ogni punto di vista vale quanto ogni altro punto di vista. Se tu ritieni di dover mettere in cancellazione le immagini, questo è un tuo diritto; semplicemente, io sono veramente molto restio a farlo, salvo quando siamo di fronte a un copyvio. Ecco perché preferisco il tag, che dopo tutto dù origine a una azione reversibile (la versione originale resta online) ad una cancellazione.
Ciao, e grazie per la stima. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 18:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Perché dici di "disturbarmi"? Le pagine di discussione sono fatte per discutere, altrimenti cosa le usiamo a fare? :-D
Il fatto è che io sono viziato perché ho fatto il direttore di giornale, e quindi so che quelle foto così scure sono inutilizzabili. E no, l'autore, essendo uno sconosciuto, difficilmente meriterà di venire citato e usato "as is". Se ci fai caso, perfino il fatto che meriti una categoria a sé è stato messo in discussione... Quindi, cosa le teniamo a fare, quelle macchione nere? Quale pagina di Wikipedia potrebbero mai illustrare, un domani?
Ad ogni modo, quelli che citi sono casi limite. Togli pure il tag da quelle foto ed amen. Anzi, ho visto che lo hai già fatto. Vorrà dire che in futuro le metterò direttamente in cancellazione, dopodiché qualcun altro mi scriverà dicendo: ma perché cancellarle? basterebbe ritoccarle... WikiCommons funziona così! :-) Ciao, buon lavoro. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 18:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed wikis[edit]

Ampel by DraGoth.gif Thanks
Buongiorno! Thank you for your strong support for NonFreeWiki; it is much appreciated. Arrivederci! Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 13:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Caricare immagini derivate da Commons[edit]

Grazie per la risposta al quesito posto nel Bar. Chiedo cortesemente delucidazioni sul metodo da te seguito: parti dal caricamento guidato?. Grazie. --Massimo Telò (scrivimi) 12:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Men_wearing_hats[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Men_wearing_hats has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Australian_pearls[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Australian_pearls has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Alan Liefting (talk) 21:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

grazie[edit]

Grazie a te per il messaggio. Spero un giorno di riuscire a tornare attivo, ma credo sia solo una questione di tempo ;) A presto--Trixt (talk) 21:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Spostamento[edit]

Ciao! Eh, era poco ortodossa, ma confidavo che leggendo la spiegazione si sarebbe capito... ora vedo di rimediare, grazie della segnalazione :) -- Syrio posso aiutare? 10:10, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Ah, non sapevo potessi farlo tu! Stavo andando a rompere le balle a Jaqen :D allora:
Sostanzialmente andavano solo scambiate di posto...
Grazie mille! -- Syrio posso aiutare? 10:19, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Lo so, è che il nome di destinazione era già occupato dall'altra foto, allora ho fatto così (a margine, posso dire che, anche senza leggere la spiegazione che avevo messo, al vedere una richiesta di spostamento al titolo ":File:Switch places with File-XXX.jpg" qualche domanda dovrebbe sorgere spontanea?). Più che altro, adesso il nome di questa foto non è uniforme con le altre della categoria, che seguono tutte il pattern "Piazzo di Segonzano - chiesa dell'Immacolata - X". -- Syrio posso aiutare? 11:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Mail[edit]

La mia è attivata. Ciao! --Xinstalker (talk) 17:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Please, don't do it again[edit]

If you don't wish to move a file, it's OK, don't do it. But, please, don't remove the move request. Uploader request is a perfectly valid reason to ask for a file rename, especially considering that, if you read Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion I could simply ask for deletion (#7 criterium) and upload it again. That's the reason for having the possibility of simply renaming articles. Again, if you don't want to move it, you'd better not edit the file page. Thanks -- Discasto 07:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Never mind, a file mover with the right understanding of the policies has taken care of the task. -- Discasto 17:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome. Anyway, you, as file mover, must apply current file move policies, not future ones. Does it make sense? -- Discasto 20:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Re[edit]

Ciao! Ti ho risposto. Grazie comunque! Ciao! --Xinstalker (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

RfC on the scope of file renaming criterion 2[edit]

Pursuant to the closing of the RFC "Proposed overhaul of the "Which files should be renamed?" section", a second RfC has been opened at Commons:Requests for comment/File renaming criterion 2 specifically to address the scope of criterion 2, which currently reads "To change from a completely meaningless name to a name that describes what the image displays." Since you participated in the initial discussion, I am notifying you of the follow-up RfC.

Please note that I fully anticipate that the first few days will see a number of additional options proposed, so it may be a good idea to check back periodically on the RfC.

Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Hello Pierpao. Just in case you were not aware, anyone can move categories using the same tab as for articles. If you request deletion for the Bearded Men category, you can move the original category and take the category history with it. Also I should have said that the files in the category don't get moved so they will have to be moved separately. Green Giant (talk) 12:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Uccello[edit]

tutto a posto , si è trattato di un errore di sbaglio. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)


Code issues in User:Pierpao/common.js[edit]

Hi Pierpao, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Pierpao/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 4 new jshint issues -- the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 35 character 43: ['categorymembers'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: data['query-continue']['categorymembers']['cmcontinue'],
  2. ISSUE: line 35 character 62: ['cmcontinue'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: data['query-continue']['categorymembers']['cmcontinue'],
  3. ISSUE: line 70 character 29: Use '===' to compare with '0'. - Evidence: if ( old_length == 0 ) {
  4. ISSUE: line 91 character 14: Don't make functions within a loop. - Evidence: });

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 07:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC).

Category:Santo Stefano di Magra–Sarzana railway[edit]

Nella lingua inglese è corretto l'uso del trattino lungo.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 15:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios[edit]

Hi,

Please inform the uploader. Thanks for your help. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fma12 (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Loghi[edit]

La questione dei loghi va vista di volta in volta, non c'è un caso generale. Ecco perché il template non è validato in automatico. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:14, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Microsoft Windows XP Logo 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 02:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Category:Fëdor Ivanovič Šaljapin[edit]

Can you please explain what language is it? according to the rules which transcription you did it? And what for? --Shakko (talk) 15:03, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Renames[edit]

Hi Pierpao, please see User talk:Vzeebjtf. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 12:53, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Images_using_filenames_with_Facebook_photo_identities_nominated_for_deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Images_using_filenames_with_Facebook_photo_identities_nominated_for_deletion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Muzammil (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Fotobank.az watermark removing[edit]

Hi, Pierpao. Could you teach me how did you remove the fotobank watermark from this image? I mean which program did you use, which watermark template or smt.? Maybe I will remove another watermark myself. --Interfase (talk) 07:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Carrière de marbre, près de Jaipur, Rajasthan, Inde.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrière de marbre, près de Jaipur, Rajasthan, Inde.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

BUON ANNO!![edit]

Ciao Pierpaolo tanti auguri di Buon Anno, un felice 2015 ricco di buone cose ;) --Pava (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Moving[edit]

ehm - so moving and with that violating the Commons language policy and the rename guidelines is okay, moving back is not possible because it does not fit the rename guidelines? That's what you saying? Or did I get it wrong? ...Sicherlich talk 23:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

ah I see, you reverted yourself. thanks. Did not see it was removed by Medium69 again ...Sicherlich talk 23:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
no problem. Anyways, it seems the guideline (and the language policy) is just waste of webspace as nobody cares about it ...Sicherlich talk 10:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Men_by_name_(flat_list)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Men_by_name_(flat_list) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Rudolph Buch (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Images_of_airplanes_with_bad_file_names[edit]

Please do not keep placing your new Category:Images_of_airplanes_with_bad_file_names under Category:Aircraft.

  • The new category is badly named. The word "airplanes" should not be used in Wikimedia projects - "aircraft" is the correct word for both singular and plural aircraft.
  • The new category is purely your invention, and therefore contains your personally selected image files, and does not fit correctly into the hierarchical schemas of categories Aviation and Aircraft. It properly belongs under Category:Selected photos of aircraft.PeterWD (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Copies of paintings[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Copies of paintings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Waltham, The Duke of 07:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

undo triathlon bikes[edit]

I, It is not a triathlon bikes its a triathlètes on the bike, they have a lot of picture with this bike, and they are not in this category. if you dont understand why is not is, ask a question please. the catégory equipment its for à picture whith only the aero bike, not for triathlètes, please remote your undo. Best regard. --Kagaoua (talk) 08:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Grazie[edit]

per gli spostamenti :) volevo giusto richiederli. Ciao, -- Syrio posso aiutare? 15:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Roma[edit]

Sì, gira questa voce di corridoio che io sia di Roma :-) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Una sola cosa: tecnicamente, per le foto di s. Pietro e collegate, dovevi indicare "Files of the Vatican City", visto che non è Roma... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Stop overcategorization[edit]

Hello Pierpao, Files should appear only once in a branch (from the root to the last sub-category). If the file eg is in the Category:Black and white photographs of sitting women, it should not be above (Category:Black and white photographs of women) and not below this category. --Jean11 (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

(transfer)
Hello. As you can read in the description "This category is applied to all black and white photographs (as a tag...". This is the reason why it's a hidden category.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
(/transfer)
reply where the conversation is started,
What I have written above is a fact, it is part commons policies Commons:Categories. --Jean11 (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello Pierpao, I have something read, in case of Black and white of photograhs you are right, sorry. Regards --Jean11 (talk) 14:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Jean11 Never mind. But please tell me. What have you read? Thanks--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
" After the discussion in July 2009, this category had a fairly clear guideline IMO." by docu here. And "This category is applied to all black and white photographs (as a tag, i.e. has no subcategories). This allows to identify easily B&W photos (as a media type). The use of this category in addition to topical sub-categories of Category: Black and white photography remains a subject of contention." --Jean11 (talk) 14:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Ligier Dué First[edit]

Many thanks for corecting the name on the image I uploaded. Regards Charles01 (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

category:Djamila Bouazza[edit]

Are you sure this girls is not Djamila Bouazza? --Pierpao.lo (listening) 05:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Pierpao
Oui je suis sûr et certain qu'il ne s'agit pas de Djamila Bouazza. Vous pouvez vérifiez vous même sur cette source, un site algérien très sérieux, sur l'histoire : Memoria dz, je me base pas uniquement sur ce site, j'ai en plus des :documents en ma possessions qui prouve ça. Si vous avez besoin d'autres informations, je me tiens à votre disposition.
Excuse moi de vous écrire en français, je suis nul en anglais.
Cordialement
Saber68 19:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Pas de problème. Merci beaucoup. Qui est cette fille? File:Djamila Bouazza (1938-2015) 2.jpg--Cordialement Pierpao.lo (listening) 13:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Le nom de cette jeune fille pour ce fichier File:Djamila_Bouazza_(1938-2015)_2.jpg, est Djamila Bouazza, donc il y a pas d'erreur pour ce fichier. Et c'est juste aussi pour ce fichier : Fille:Djamila Bouazza (1938-2015) 1.jpg
Cordialement
Saber68 13:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Correzione immagini[edit]

Ciao Pierpao. Grazie per avermi risposto. Allora le immagini da correggere sono queste:

  • File:Aeolian Islands german map.png il nome di Milazzo (con una L).
  • quattro files di planimetrie di templi greci File:Peripteros.png, File:Peripteros.svg, File:Pseudodipteros 1.png, File:Pseudodipteros 1.svg che presentano tutti lo stesso grave errore, l'opistodomo aperto e comunicante con la cella: non esistono templi greci dove la cella è in comunicazione con l'opistodomo. L'opistodomo, qualora tu non lo sapessi, è la stanzetta situata a sinistra, dietro la cella del tempio, sul lato opposto all'ingresso della cella (il pronaos), che era destinato ad accogliere le offerte dei fedeli. Quello che tu dovresti fare qui è chiudere quel passaggio. Se non ti è chiaro come dovrebbe essere, hai qui un esempio corretto che ti farà capire esattamente come dovrebbero essere corretti questi quattro files. Che mi dici? E' fattibile la cosa? Altrimenti ci rivolgiamo ad altri. So che la WP tedesca ha un "laboratorio" in questo senso, ma non so più né come si chiama né dove cercarlo. Fammi sapere. E grazie fin d'ora! --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Grande Pierpao ! Hai fatto un lavoro perfetto ! In attesa di vedere corretto anche l'ultimo rimasto (il Pseudodipteros-svg), ti ringrazio fin d'ora sentitamente ! Ciao da --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

DenghiùComm Per così poco figurati e poi non potevo certo tirarmi indietro, avrei tradito me stesso :)--Pierpao.lo (listening) 06:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Generic flag of Nord-Pas-de-Calais.svg[edit]

Could you reverse your latest move of this file? It was moved in the first place because it is most certainly not the flag of Nord-Pas de Calais (Cfr. here). Tom-L (talk) 12:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)