User talk:Hegvald

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Hegvald!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Östhammar Municipality[edit]

Ursäkta om jag störde dig i ditt arbete med Category:Östhammar Municipality när jag var inne och petade i kategorin samtidigt. Det var oavsiktligt. --Zejo (talk) 15:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Fullösa[edit]

I saw it eventually and stopped the commonist upload. But to write the letter on my Norwegian keyboard this is just a tiny mistake to make and too easy to miss. I will reupload with the corrections made. (There are more churches in the pipeline. What an amazing area!) Haros (talk) 13:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Using images from the Royal Collections of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland[edit]

Hello! Recently there were many high quality images downloaded from the Royal Collections of Great Britain. Also there is a large category of these images. And it is not forbidden to spread the image of the Royal Collection? Since earlier scandal was already with the National Portrait Gallery in London. Moreover, the Royal Collection is not allowed to spread these images, I asked. It is better to remove them, so that later there was no problem. In principle, I'm waiting for the last answer from the Royal Collection, which accurately recognize the legal capacity of such images. Today we all will know and I'll still write.


Re Commons:Deletion requests/Images uploaded by Ph931221[edit]

If you found more pictures of that user that you think have copyright issues, please open another DR for them so all admin actions are logged correctly. Thanks in advance and best regards, Alpertron (talk) 13:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Stockholm-8217.jpg, File:Stockholm-8219.jpg[edit]

Hello Hegvald, I thank You for the determination. Greeting --Hedwig Storch (talk) 08:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Ekeby kyrka[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Ekeby kyrka has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this <articlefeedback-table-heading-page>, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 21:26, 22 June 2014 (UTC)