User talk:Janericloebe/Archive/2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Janericloebe/Archive!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rühmann2.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rühmann2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rühmann2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 12:36, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Nürnberg Burg Burgbasteien Vestnertor 001.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:40, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Masurischer_Kanal_Verlauf_001.svg

Hallo, ich möchte Ihre Datei für eine Grafik in einem Buch verwenden. Wie genau soll die Namensnennung erfolgen? Gruß Michael Martin Yohe (talk) 22:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Hallo. Moechte mir keine falschen Lorbeeren aufsetzen. Die Basis des Bildes stammt von User:NordNordWest (File:Russia Kaliningrad location map.svg). Von mir stammt lediglich der Verlauf der Kanals und die Beschriftung. Gruss --Janericloebe (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
OK, dann werde ich auf User:NordNordWest verweisen. Gruss Yohe (talk) 09:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Angebliche Messtischblätter

Hallo Janericloebe,

wie bist du denn auf die Idee gekommen, diese und etliche andere Bundesarchivdateien in die Category:Messtischblatt einzusortieren? Messtischblätter sind topographische Karten. Bei den Bundesarchiv-Dateien handelt es sich hingegen um Luftbilder, also aus der Luft aufgenommene Fotos. Folglich sind diese Dateien in der Messtischblatt-Kategorie falsch, und ich bitte dich, sie dort wieder zu entfernen. Viele Grüße --Rosenzweig δ 12:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

PS: Vielleicht stattdessen eine neue Kategorie für die Luftbildkarte des Deutschen Reiches (so hieß das wohl, vgl. Link zum Bundesarchiv bei jeder Datei) anlegen? --Rosenzweig δ 12:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Bin auf die Idee gekommen, weil diese Dateien entsprechend den aelteren Messtischblaettern nummeriert sind und auch das gleiche abbilden. --Janericloebe (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Es sind aber dennoch keine. --Rosenzweig δ 20:45, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

File:VillaSavoye.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:VillaSavoye.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:24, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Amsterdam Gebouw Batavia 001.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Gebouw Batavia 001.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.