User talk:Yatrides

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Yatrides!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Foetus retouché.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Foetus retouché.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bowman dying in front of the slab monolith.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bowman dying in front of the slab monolith.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Foetus towards the earth.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Foetus towards the earth.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bowman-death.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bowman-death.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The Slab monolith.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:The Slab monolith.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Slab monolith-2001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Slab monolith-2001.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Foetus towards the earth.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Foetus towards the earth.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bowman in its Foetus.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bowman in its Foetus.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bowman dying in front the slab monolith.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bowman dying in front the slab monolith.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Essential vibration 97x130cm (1982).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 17:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Yatrides, as the source page (http://www.yatrides.com/) is (C) ARR and as we have no direct evidence whether you are really the artist George Yatrides, you need to send a written confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The spiral pillar of time 65x92cm (1982).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 17:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Christ, Leica et orange 92x73cm (1963).JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Foetus cross the monolith-1958.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Foetus cross the monolith-1958.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 17:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:XVIIIème salon montmorency.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ray Garraty (talk) 17:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Beaux quartiers magazine N° 15 été 2013.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pleclown (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

russavia (talk) 18:11, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocage[edit]

Tout d'abord, merci de votre intérêt pour Commons et les projets Wikimedia en général.

Vous avez été bloqué en écriture par un administrateur, suite à vos téléversements de ce jour (le 27 juin 2013) pour une durée de 1 jour. En effet, vos téléversements d'aujourd'hui sont ce que nous appelons des copyvios, des violations de copyright. Commons respecte les droits des auteurs et la communauté est attentive à cela. Conséquemment, nous n'autorisons le téléversement que des oeuvres dont vous êtes l'auteur. La reproduction (via un scanner ou un appareil photo) d'articles, de catalogues ou de couverture de magazines ne vous accorde pas le droit de licencier ces travaux sous une licence compatible avec Commons. Seul les auteurs des originaux en ont le droit (Tout comme je ne pourrais pas téléverser une photographie d'un de vos tableaux sans votre autorisation, même si j'en étais le propriétaire.)

Je vous invite à lire cette page : Commons:Licensing et suis à votre disposition si vous avez d'autres question.

Si vous préférez discuter dans une autre langue, signalez le, et nous nous arrangerons.

Pleclown (talk) 18:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

________________________________

Ma réponse présente est destinée à "Pleclown"

Bonjour,

Toutes les références que je viens de vous expédier concernent mon travail de peintre ou de chercheur fondamental. Le brevet US nombre 3.840.028 du 8 octobre 1974, qui est dans la liste que je vous ai communiquée est un de mes brevets dont certains ont été acceptés par les examinateurs les plus intransigeants tels US Patent Office à Washington, Allemands et Britanniques, toutes revendications accordées. Les plus importants concernant de nouvelles propriétés de la lumière émise par des corps solide en incandescence et son influence sur les éléments hydrocarbonnés. Nous savons que notre soleil est en incanscence variable thermonucléaire et que l'espèce humaine est hydrocarbonnées.

Lorsqu'il s'agit de textes ce sont des articles de journaux connus distribués et vendus à des centaines de milliers d'exemplaires. Comme vous avez pu le constater, c'est une organisation de recherche L'Argus de la Presse", qui m'a communiqué ces articles de journaux tels le Dauphiné Libéré, La République, l'Eclaireur etc.

Concernant les catalogues tels Marie-Claire, Châteaux et Demeures, Figaro magazine, Magazine des Arts et tous les autres que je vous ai envoyés contiennent un long texte attribué à mon œuvre. Exemple le magazine du Lion's Club de 1983 dont la couverture représente mon œuvre vendue 120.000 € pour les enfants myopathes de l'Est de l'Europe. C'est grâce à l'Art que cette opération a pu réussir et expédier 500 tonnes de matériel médical américain, des jouets et des fruits dans un pays communiste.

Concernant les catalogues de manifestations à l'échelle mondiale tels les Biennales internationales de 1987, 1989, 1991et 1993, vous avez constaté que j'en suis l'Invité d'Honneur ce qui est signalé sur les couvertures de ces catalogues, leur texte intérieur et reproductions ne concernent que mon travail exclusivement sur 54 à 72 pages.

Concernant les adjudications de mes œuvres chez celles effectués chez Christie's, elles sont largement diffusées dans la presse à grand tirage.

Je souhaite vous avoir renseigné correctement,

Georges Yatrides 27 juin 2013, 23:51h

J'ai envoyé une copie de ce message à Ray Garraty et à "Russavia" qui sont intervenus en examinateurs.

--Yatrides (talk) 21:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Tout d'abord, veuillez comprendre que ces suppressions ne sont en aucun cas une critique de votre travail, qu'il soit artistique ou scientifique.
En ce qui concerne le brevet, il est possible que celui-ci soit acceptable sur ce site, je me renseigne et reviendrai vers vous sur ce point.
En ce qui concerne les textes, catalogues et magazines, seuls les auteurs (des textes ou compositions) ont la possibilité de les licencier sous une licence acceptable pour ce site. Même si vous en êtes le sujet, vous n'en êtes pas l'auteur. La diffusion des dits textes ou magazines ne fait aucune différence. Comme je vous le signalais dans mon premier message, nous respectons les droits d'auteur et sommes attachés à ce point.
En ésperant avoir éclairci ce point,
Pleclown (talk) 11:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

_________________________

Bonjour,

Je vous remercie pour votre compréhension et comprends votre position. Pour ma part, je pensais qu’il me fallait enregistrer ces articles dans Commons Wikipedia pour démontrer leur existence aux modérateurs éventuels, qui n’arrivent pas les retrouver du fait de leur ancienneté. Je ne pensais pas les publier moi-même sur Wiki. Mais cela devrait servir les modérateurs soucieux de précisions.

Pour les textes des articles concernés, leurs auteurs en sont propriétaires intellectuels, je le conçois.

Mais les Couvertures de Catalogues d’Exposition qui représentent uniquement des œuvres qui sont de ma création, il me semble qu’ils pourraient être représentés en clair sur Wikipedia? Je ne contesterai pas votre jugement, cependant on peut rappeler ici mes droits intellectuels sur les reproductions de mes oeuvres.

Quant au brevet 3,840,028 il est de ma création propre exclusive, accordé par les Offices de Brevets dont US Patent Office, que je vous ai cités précédemment . Je ne l’ai cédé à personne pour des raisons précises. Il m’a fallu utiliser différentes matières hydro carbonées et finalement le tabac donc les hydrocarbures sont mieux décelables dans le type d’expérience que j’ai réalisé. J’ai pu démontrer qu’un corps solide en incandescence variable par le fait du foyer de combustion d’une matière hydrocarbonée, dans lequel il est introduit, générait des fumées et vapeurs différentes des hydro carbures émis par le foyer seul de cette matière. Il m'a fallu créer une machine capable d’introduire industriellement dans des cigarettes, un corps solide (tube d’acier 440 préalablement façonné spécifiquement). Cette machine elle-même offre de multitudes possibilités pour réaliser des programmes complexes ayant trait à différentes opérations distantes. Ce brevet est de ma création exclusive et je ne l’ai cédé à personne ou organisation, car cela aurait entrainé une plus forte consommation de tabac alors que cela n’est pas l’objet de cette découverte qui présente d’autres facteurs. En effet la race humaine est hydrocarbonée est notre Soleil est en incandescence thermonucléaire variable : cela détermine les résultats chimiques et physiques que j’ai démontrés au CEA (AEC) et la révélation de nouvelles propriétés de la lumière qui remettent en question plusieurs théories déterminantes admises actuellement.

J’apprécie le ton modéré que vous utilisez pour me souligner les impératifs de Wikipedia et ainsi à mieux connaître les réactions des modérateurs qui interviennent.

Bien cordialement,

Georges Yatrides

--Yatrides (talk) 14:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
En ce qui concerne le brevet, il semblerait que vous puissiez le téléverser. Il vous suffit de faire une demande de restauration des fichiers supprimés (ceux du brevet).
Pour les couvertures de catalogues, malheureusement, celles-ci ont souvent un titre, une mise en page, qui fait que ce ne sont pas seulement des reproductions de vos oeuvres, mais ce qu'on appelle des oeuvres dérivées, pour lesquelles il faudrait obtenir l'autorisation de tous les auteurs, c'est à dire vous, mais aussi les maquettistes des couvertures, ce qui me semble compliqué.
Il n'y a par contre pas de problème à ce que vous téléversiez des reproductions de vos oeuvres, si vous le souhaitez. J'attire toutefois votre attention sur le fait que les reproductions que vous télévereriez devront être mis sous licence libre, avec tout ce que cela implique. Je vous invite à bien lire le texte de la licence CC-BY-SA, qui est la licence la plus utilisée sur ce site. Vous pouvez la trouver en cliquant sur ce lien
Cordialement,
Pleclown (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

______________________________________

Yatrides 03 juillet 2013


Je prends note concernant le brevet. En soulignant ici qu'une trentaine de brevets qui ont trait à mes recherches fondamentales personnelles exclusives en physique m'ont été accordés toutes revendications agréées dans les pays aux examens rigoureux dont USA, Allemagne, Grande-Bretagne. Je prends note pareillement pour les images de mes oeuvres dont certaines sont extrapolées, artistiquement, de mes brevets sur de nouvelles propriétés de la lumière dissociée de l'espace, ce qui se perçoit dans mes peintures.


Concernant les couvertures de magazines qui ne comportent que mon nom en capitales couvrant toute leur surface sans aucun autre signe, il serait plausible que je puisse les utiliser en Commons. Qu'en pensez-vous?


Au plan de la communication interne dans Wikipedia, est-ce que les modérateurs Wiki peuvent prendre connaissance de l'existence des articles que j'ai essayé d'enregistrer sur Commons et qui ont été bloqués? Car ils sont importants mais souvent de dates antérieures lointaines que les modérateurs ne peuvent atteindre.


Merci de votre aide,


Cordialement,


Georges Yatrides


Note: De nombreux sites indépendants s'intéressent à mon travail. Cependant seuls deux sites sont officiels :


Yatrides.com ( "Yatrides maître du temps", titre du livre d'Arthur Conte, Ministre et Historien de la Vème République sous Charles de Gaulle), site réalisé par la Fondation du même nom, dont le Bureau est constitué de Hauts fonctionnaires; son objet est de garantir mon travail notamment contre les faussaires (141 faux répertoriés à ce jour dont certains sur Internet). J'en suis membre d'honneur et comme le site corrélatif ne traite que de mon oeuvre, la législation des droits intellectuels en fait ma propriété enregistrée à mon nom.


Yatrides.org ("La spirale du temps", titre en relation avec mes brevets. Il traite de la validation de mon travail par l'Etat français, dont ses départements d'investigations fiscales. Mon travail y est apprécié d'intérêt public. Identiquement selon les mêmes droits de la Propriété intellectuelle, ce site est enregistré à mon nom.


--Yatrides (talk) 10:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Concernant les couvertures, je crains que la réponse ne reste négative. Même si l'ajout se limite à votre nom, en application du principe de précaution, ces images ne seront pas acceptées.
Concernant l'accès aux fichiers supprimés, la réponse est également négative. Les fichiers supprimés ne sont plus visibles. Je vous invite à héberger ses images ailleurs si vous le souhaitez, par exemple sur votre site personnel. Les contributeurs pourront alors y accéder.
Par ailleurs, même si les sites dépendent de la même entité, Wikipédia et Commons sont indépendants. Je ne traite ici que la partie image, qui rentre dans le cadre de Commons. Pour la partie Wikipédia, je vous conseille de vous adresser aux contributeurs sur la page de discussion des articles qui vous sont consacrés: ici pour l'article en anglais et ici pour l'article en français.
Cordialement,
Pleclown (talk) 11:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ezekiel 1978 (89 x 116 cm) and Yatridès en 2012.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ezekiel 1978 (89 x 116 cm) and Yatridès en 2012.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Pleclown (talk) 11:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comme vous êtes le sujet de la photo, je doute que vous puissiez en être l'auteur. Merci de confirmer que l'auteur autorise la diffusion sous licence libre de la photo (seul lui peut le faire). Pleclown (talk) 11:36, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
J'ai bien reçu votre email, mais je préfère converser ici.
En ce qui concerne la photo ci-dessus, je vous conseille de suivre la procédure d'envoi d'email à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, en stipulant bien que vous êtes l'auteur, cela évitera tout problème futur.
En ce qui concerne les catalogues, ma réponse restera négative.
Par ailleurs, je vous invite à lire cette page. Même si elle ne s'applique pas totalement à votre cas (vous entrez clairement dans les critères), la partie sur la publicité me semble tout de même intéressante. Wikipédia est une encyclopédie, elle compile des informations déjà existante. Ce n'est pas et ne doit pas être un annuaire d'artistes, avec une cotation. Les collectionneurs ne devraient pas se référer à Wikipédia pour juger de la valeur de votre oeuvre, l'encyclopédie ne servant qu'a fournir des informations factuelles et sourcées sur votre vie et votre oeuvre.
Je vous invite aussi à lire cette page sur les menaces judiciaires et cette page sur l'appropriation d'articles et à les partager avec Monsieur Gilbert Arnaud, qui a laissé des messages très borderline sur les pages de discussion des articles vous concernant sur les Wikipedia en français et en anglais.
Merci de garder à l'esprit que nous sommes tous des bénévoles, et de supposer la bonne foi de vos contradicteurs. Personne ne cherche à vous nuire, nous ne cherchons qu'à construire tous ensemble un beau projet.
Cordialement,
Pleclown (talk) 17:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Uploads by Yatrides. Regarding your many uploads of copyrighted artworks.

Liamdavies (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Yatridès EZEKIEL[edit]

07 novembre 2013

Je vous confie mes sentiments et ressenti, car je devine chez vous une volonté de tempérance

Que feriez-vous si étant un peintre vivant modestement, une de vos œuvres vendue aux enchères pour les enfants myopathes de l'Est, permette l'envoi de 600 tonnes de médicaments et 150 Tonnes de fruits et jouets, et qu'on vous déclare que c'est une honte d'être heureux et pourquoi pas fier de cette action, "car un grand peintre n'a pas le droit de l'être (fier)" signé EEng. Auparavant j'avais déjà agi ainsi pour les enfants Chrétiens du Liban. A mon âge, soupçonné de vouloir être le plus riche du cimetière est une aberration non "modérée". J'ai souvent agi ainsi plutôt que d'être asservi par des impôts. Je pense que d'être irrité par de tels propos est plausible, en disant que mon comportement vis-à-vis de Wikipédia allait changer, c'est-à-dire ne plus considérer la valeur de cette formule encyclopédique, qui aurait une importance irremplaçable si n'importe qui ne pouvait intervenir avec son bagage restreint. On a pu s'apercevoir que je n'ai pas demandé l'intervention de Yatrides et son siècle, qui a pourtant les meilleurs juristes, car je tiens vraiment à ma tranquillité

Ainsi donc, je ne discuterai plus comme je l'ai fait jusqu'ici pour justifier mes requêtes: en effet cela a été défini comme tentatives de provoquer l'accord des modérateurs intervenant, en quelque sorte le viol de leur conviction propre, souvent très loin du sujet pourtant. Le temps fera son travail et pas au bénéfice de tous.

Je vous remercie du ton que vous utilisez pour me souligner votre recherche d'un "beau projet", auquel je pensais pouvoir participer.

Cordialement,

Georges Yatridès

--Yatrides (talk) 17:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Je comprends votre ressenti, et en suis touché. Je vous demande de m'accorder quelque temps afin de répondre le mieux possible à votre message. Pleclown (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ne le prenez pas mal, mais un certain nombre de contributeurs pensent que vous n'êtes pas Georges Yatrides, mais un usurpateur qui cherche à lui nuire. Afin de lever ce doute, et le risque d'usurpation d'identité, il apparaît nécessaire de prouver votre identité. Pourriez-vous envoyer un mail à commons-permissions-fr@wikimedia.org en donnant les informations permettant de lever tout doute au sujet de votre identification. Ce courriel ne sera lu que par un petit nombre de contributeurs soigneusement désignés au sein de notre association et qui garantissent la stricte confidentialité de vos écrits. J'ai moi-même accès à cette adresse et pourrais ainsi confirmer votre identité auprès des autres contributeurs.
Je souhaite vraiment que ce micmac se résolve, car j'apprécie votre démarche de libération de certaines de vos oeuvres, et de partage de celles-ci sur ce site.
En ce qui concerne les propos tenus par EEng sur la version anglaise de l'encyclopédie, je vous invite à ne pas y accorder trop d'attention. C'est une des raisons pour lesquelles il est déconseillé d'écrire sa propre fiche Wikipédia, les jugements pouvant être à l'emporte pièce et parfois très durs. La barrière de la langue est un frein supplémentaire, il est en effet difficile pour les anglophones d'accepter des sources non anglophones, peu d'entre eux maîtrisant une autre langue que l'anglais.
J'espère que nous pourrons continuer un bout de chemin ensemble, et vous invite à écrire ce mail d'dentification et à m'informer ici de son envoi, afin que je puisse le traiter le plus rapidement possible.
Cordialement,
Pleclown (talk) 19:31, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

_____________________


Roybon, 12 décembre 2013

M'étant absenté pour mon travail, votre message qui me parvient correspond bien à la modération qui devrait être appliquée par d'autres Wiki.

je vais suivre votre conseil et je m'adresse sur le champ à "Commons-permissions". Mais malgré votre intervention je doute quant au résultat qui me devrait m'être bénéfique. En corrélation avec ce doute, je pense que mon travail ayant servi à Stanley Kubrick et plus récemment à Lars Von Trier, ce qui est reconnu par des personnalités indépendantes diverses qui me sont étrangères, est l'écueil véritable. A noter de plus que pour nombre de modérateurs, les éléments qui concernent ma biographie ne doivent pas être présentés sur Wiki par d'autres personnes qui apprécient mon travail. Enfin, que ces personnes pratiquent l'anglais d'Oxford ou non, l'anglais/US que certains modérateurs pratiquent pose problème, ajouté à un manque d'érudition patent si ce n'est de compréhension.

Ce bout de chemin parcouru ensemble que vous proposez est bien sympathique, qui encourage mes 82 années à se prolonger. Pour l'heur, ma santé est correcte et je m'appuie sur mon Grand-père paternel décédé à 116 ans.

Bien cordialement

Georges Yatridès

--Yatrides (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2013 (UTC) _________________________[reply]

Roybon, 17 décembre 2013

J'ai tenté 3 fois de correspondre avec commons-permissions-fr@wikimedia.org: le 12, 14 et aujourd'hui même 17 décembre; Mes messages sont revenus non réceptionnés avec la mention :

This is the mail system at host mwinf5d69.orange.fr. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. The mail system <commons-permissions-fr@wikimedia.org>: host wikimedia.org[208.80.152.186] said: 550 Address commons-permissions-fr@wikimedia.org does not exist.


Cordialement,

Georges Yatridès


--82.122.71.183 14:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

_________________________

GEORGES YATRIDES IDENTIFICATION[edit]

Roybon, 17 décembre 2013 - 2ème édition


J'ai tenté 3 fois de correspondre avec commons-permissions-fr@wikimedia.org: le 12, 14 et aujourd'hui même 17 décembre; Mes messages qui précisaient mon identification, sont revenus non réceptionnés avec la mention :

This is the mail system at host mwinf5d69.orange.fr. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. The mail system <commons-permissions-fr@wikimedia.org>: host wikimedia.org[208.80.152.186] said: 550 Address commons-permissions-fr@wikimedia.org does not exist.


Cordialement,

Georges Yatridès


--Yatrides (talk) 14:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Désolé, c'est entièrement ma faute. L'adresse est permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org, j'ai inversé les deux premiers mots.
Veuillez m'en excuser.
Pleclown (talk) 14:56, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Veuillez excuser le délai, j'ai été pris par d'autres occupations de la vie réelle.
Nous avons bien reçu votre pièce d'identité, et celle-ci est suffisante pour vous identifier. Il n'y a donc plus de problèmes.
Un modèle a ajouter à tout vos téléversements a été créé: {{Yatrides}}. Il vous suffit d'écrire {{Yatrides}} dans le champ Other informations de l'assistant de téléversement.
J'ai appliqué ce modèle sur les fichiers que vous aviez déjà téléversés.
Pleclown (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:1983 Christie's 22.03.83, 'L'autre rive' Yatrides oil-paint record sale. Page 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]