User talk:-jha-

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I am user from the germanspeaking wikipedia.

Please consider contacting me there, 
since i do not check my page here that regularly. Thanks. 
---jha- 01:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo jha, bitte lade die geänderten Versionen von Image:1144em.jpg doch unter anderem Namen hoch. So hast Du u.a. während der laufenden Exzellenzkandidatur das Originalbild verändert und das gar nicht wenig. Gruß --Überraschungsbilder 17:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Ich habe den Gamma-Wert -wie angesprochen- geändert. Rest der Antwort siehe Diskussion am Bild. ---jha- 00:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Wenn Du die Drehung und Korrektur der stürzenden Linien meinen solltest: Da hättest Du Dich verguckt. Das erfolgte bevor das Bild als Kandidat eingestellt wurde. ---jha- 00:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ein Bild

[edit]

Die Grafik wurde freigegeben, da ist eine doppelte Version in der deWiki irgendwie blöd... -- Verschlimmbesserer 13:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Es stimmt also doch, was mir berichtet wurde: Wenn Du etwas schreibst dann ist' immer ganz knapp unter der KPA-Schwelle. Danke für's persönliche Kennenlernen. ---jha- 14:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt würde mich nur noch interessieren, wer das über mich schrieb. -- Verschlimmbesserer 17:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, wäre gut wenn du die Datei nochmal hoch laden kannst, Tipfeher im Dateinamen ;) Sonst setzt bald irgendwer ein {{Rename}} auf die Bildseite und das Bild wird von einem Bot unter einem anderen Dateinamen gespeichert, dannach sieht die Bildbeschreibung dann total zerklüftet aus (Beipiel: [1]) und das Bild taucht in deiner Gallerie nicht mehr auf. Einfach neu hochladen und das falsche Bild mit {{bad name|new name.jpg}} zum löschen markieren. --Martin H. (talk) 21:28, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry für den Tippfehler. Ich hoffe immernoch, dass Mediawiki bald eine echte Rename-Extension erhält. Bis dahin ist Löschen und Neuhochladen nur ein Zumüllen der Datenbank, da nichts wirklich gelöscht wird. ---jha- (talk) 22:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File deletion warning File:Aufruf an Sprayer DSCF0695.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Lilyu (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besten Dank für den Hinweis, aber ich hänge nicht an dem Bild, von daher... ---jha- (talk) 01:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i'm sorry, i found it funny too, but i was just wondering about the possible derivative work issue :) I talked with bastique on IRC, and i told him to speedy keep the DR, but he let it goes it's way. We will see... Maybe... Is there COM:FOP in germany ?----Lilyu (talk) 05:30, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Feet in white socks compared.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Marcusmax(speak) 14:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, -jha-!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


korrekt ausgerichtete Bilder

[edit]

Hallo -jha-,
könntest du beim Hochladen der netten UrbEx-Bilder von den Beelitz Heilstätten darauf achten, sie geich in der richtigen Ausrichtung hochzuladen. Mit IrfanView ist die Drehung mit 2 Clicks erledigt, hier muss jemand die Beschreibungsseite öffnen, den rotate-Befehl einfügen, speichern und anschließend muss der bot die Datei drehen und die gedrehte wieder hochladen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alle Bilder haben eine korrekte Orientation im Exif. Irfanview zeigt sie korrekt an! Leider scheint Mediawiki das nicht zu beachten. ---jha- (talk) 20:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Na ja, hier ist MediaWiki aber entscheidend. Außerdem hast du anscheinend übersehen, dass es schon eine cat für dieses topic gab, die aber um 1 Zeichen von deiner neu gewählten abweicht. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wie drehe ich die denn, wenn sie im Irfanview schon richtig angezeigt werden? Zweimal um 180 Grad und dann wieder speichern? Oder gibt's dafür ein Script (z.B. für Imagemagick), um die Bilder nach Exif zu drehen und "ohne Exif-Rotation-Flag", aber im Bild selbst dreht wieder abzuspeichern? ---jha- (talk) 21:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nachtrag: Ich habe wirklich Probleme, die richtigen "falsch gedrehten" Bilder ausfindig zu machen, da Irfanview, ACDSee und auch die Windows-Bordmittel (Miniaturenansicht, Diashow) alles richtigherum darstellen, nur eben irgendwie nicht für Mediawiki richtig...---jha- (talk) 22:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, ich habe was gefunden, um das komplett zu automatisieren. Wie repariere ich denn das mit der "Vertipper"-Kategorie Category:Beelitz Heilstätten? Gibt es einen Bot, der die irgendwie automatisiert in Category:Beelitz-Heilstätten schieben kann? ---jha- (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Schon geschehen, Administratoren haben dafür Zugriff auf User:CommonsDelinker/commands. --Martin H. (talk) 00:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
RE:Drehung: In Irfanview gibt es unter Einstellungen > JPG/PCD/GIF ganz oben den Schalter "Bild automatisch drehen (nach EXIF-Info)". Bei mir ist das ausgeschaltet (also nicht angekreuzt). Schau mal wie es bei dir ist. Vielleicht ist das der Grund für die differente Darstellung. --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Michele_Merkin_1-42.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:-jha-/Lizenz

[edit]

Hi!

I noticed your licensing template, which I fear is not acceptable according to the Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy. Your template includes the licensing templates which always have to be linked directly from the image description page. There are a few options I can see to solve the issue, the simplest one is possibly to change the template so that it includes only your specific “comments” (e.g. that thumbnail exception and the copyright warning at the bottom), and move {{GFDL-1.2}} out of the template, so that the image description page would read

{{GFDL-1.2}}
{{User:-jha-/Lizenz}}

(But there are also other possibilites.) I’ll gladly help with that change if you want. Thanks, --Mormegil (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kann man das auch in einer Kultursprache ausdrücken? --ST 22:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ich verstehe es auch mit Google-Translator nicht, was da bemängelt wird. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 23:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Der will nur stänkern. --ST 23:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Was fühlt ihr beide euch eigentlich angesprochen? Zudem halte ich die Regel für sinnvoll, da damit ein schnelles umlizenzieren, das zudem nur schwer nachvollziehbar ist, verhindert wird. Raymond 20:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Raymond, ich achte dich und deshalb bleibe ich hier auch sachlich, auch wenn es schwerfällt. Es ist etlichen sehr aktiven Fotografen nicht nur auf .de einfach Leid, ständig was zu hören, daß man nicht umlizensieren darf, wenn aber von fremder Hand die eigenen Werke umlizensiert werden. So wundert es nicht, wenn einer der besten Fotografen weltweit (Fir0002) das Handtuch wirft. Mit der Lizensierungspolitik werden Fotografen nicht gewonnen sondern verschreckt. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 22:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image location requested

[edit]

Do you know the location of the wind turbine in File:Rotorblattreinigung an Windkraftanlage - DSCF0856.JPG? I suspect it is somewhere in Germany. I would like to refine the category for the image. Currently it is in the general category of Category:Wind turbines. We have many subcategories for wind farms in various countries, states, etc. If I know where the wind turbine is, I can categorize it better, and I can possibly identify the wind turbine manufacturer - we have categories for them too. Thank you for any help you can provide. Even an approximate location should help, as I can look at wind farm listings in the area. --Teratornis (talk) 20:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mamiya C330.
File:Bender an Hauswand in der Düsseldorfer Kiefernstraße DSCF0100.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--High Contrast (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anschlussinstallation_auf_THW-Gelände_P5030156.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thiemo Schuff (schuff.eu) (talk) 08:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anschlussinstallation_auf_THW-Gelände_P5030155.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thiemo Schuff (schuff.eu) (talk) 08:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pisa_-_Campo_Santo_-_Campanile_4_-_2005-08-08_17-30_4832.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Common-Man | My Interactions 20:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pisa_-_Campo_Santo_-_Campanile_4_-_2005-08-08_17-30_4832.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Common-Man | My Interactions 20:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:AMG-Taxi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Geagea (talk) 03:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kunststoffmasken_in_Schaufenster_DSCF1226.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 02:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo -jha-, wo (Land) hast du dieses Foto aufgenommen? --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

fehlt da vielleicht ein Link? Ich bekomme vom Hand aus die URL nicht eingetippt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.201.194.160 (talk • contribs)
Keine Ahnung was du meinst. Wenn du auf das Link in der Überschrift klickst, solltest du beim Bild landen. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taxis at EDDT-(jha).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frage zum Ort eines Bildes

[edit]

@-jha-: Danke für dieses Bild (File:Einrichtung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland DSCF2118.jpg). Ich hatte die Bilder der Category:Structures in Germany at night nach Bundesländern sortiert. Lediglich bei diesem Bild gelang mir das nicht. Weißt du noch, an welchem Ort bzw. Bundesland das Bild entstanden ist? Viele Grüße Triplec85 (talk) 10:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hessen, Offenbach (Landkreis)
Danke. Siehe jetzt unter Category:Structures in Hesse at night ;-) Gruß Triplec85 (talk) 22:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]