User talk:Artix Kreiger/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 →
File:Wind Erosion in north central South Dakota (14112342990).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

creating duplicates

Hi you recently created thousends of doublictes - see here and the next pages. I'm busy to clean that up now. But please not to create duplicates in future. Thx. --JuTa 14:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

HI, I'll block your bot now for a while, as it continues uploading lots of duplicates. --JuTa 20:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
@JuTa: , I would like to apologize for the mass upload. It was irresponsible of me. Feel free to nuke them. Artix Kreiger (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
I would recommend you apply for a bot flag of your second account User:Artix Kreiger 2, and only continue (unattended) mass upload when this gets approved, and your upload scripts or whatever are checking and preventing duplicates. Otherwise you creating a lot work unneccessary work for other people like removing those dupes. Actuanly about a week ago we had about 1500 dupes and now within a few days more than 3000 mainly because of your activity. --JuTa 20:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #298

20:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Want to restart. Some of the pictures are incorrectly categorized from transfer

Question about your mass deletion: you can not just change the categories? Hystrix (talk) 13:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

lol. I should have thought of that. Perhaps I should do that instead. Artix Kreiger (talk) 13:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
File:EL FARO Board Meeting (27230293659).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ariadacapo (talk) 11:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

File:641 of 'The Colonies- treating of their value generally-of the Ionian Islands in particular ... Strictures on the administration of Sir F. Adam' (11009724313) (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

✓Jæ✓ 14:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

reply

@: . feel free to speedy them all. Thanks Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:EL FARO Board Meeting (27230293659).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Please see the deletion page
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Artix Kreiger (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

duplicates again

Hi, your bot User:Artix Kreiger 2 is currently uploading duplicates again. Examples:

Please stop it or that account will get blocked again. --JuTa 22:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

already stopped. Artix Kreiger (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thx. --JuTa 23:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
By the way, there is a specific speedy delete template for duplicates {{Duplicate}}. --Elisfkc (talk) 03:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Artix Kreiger!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Elisfkc (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Video Screenshot

I am going to apologize in advanced for all of the deletion requests that I am about to send you. They are all Flickr2Commons video issues. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Flickr-ing flames (23277626460).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Admiring the view Upper Kananaskis lake. (36574930984).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Barrier lake Alberta Canada (21178533318).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:A blast from the past boxing day 2015 (38959965101).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Arriving at Kananaskis falls Albereta Canada oct 2015 (21780892318).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Bonsai boulders (26272891893).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Camp fire video (23557624241).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Cochrane Labour day parade 2017 (37094091995).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Canoe meadows Kananaskis Alberta Canada (26626201660).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Canoe meadows Kananaskis Alberta Canada (26626201660).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Corri robb trail to venting ridge (21238830001).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Calgary Police service pipe band Canmore 2016 (29407990911).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Crescent Lake Alberta Canada May 22nd 2017 (34447643230).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Crescent lake Alberta Canada 2017 (33411175432).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Elbow lake October 22 nd 2017 (26136601459).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Elbow Lake Alberta Canada oct 2017 (37843049606).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Elbow Falls November 2017 (24391063558).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Edworthy falls Alberta Canada Oct 22nd 2017 (37834767462).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2018





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 13:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Artix Kreiger, IMO, if the depicted/included person is not notable (in scope) per see, it does not make much sense to upload these kind of shots. --Túrelio (talk) 14:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio: , nominated for deletion. Feel free to treat any as {{Speedy}}. Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Artix Kreiger, as there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in the US for non-buildings, you need either to blank out the content on the video board or delete the image itself. Same for File:HD Hexagonal Video Board, Dodger Stadium, Los Angeles, California (14494765886).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Artix Kreiger, do you know the sculptor of these busts? As there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in the US for non-buildings, they cannot be uploaded, if they are still in copyright, which is a bit complicated to check, as the US changed the terms for a number of times over the years. --Túrelio (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio: , I have stopped uploading the images from the album. I will nominate for deletion. Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I didn't want to suggest that. It depends on the "noise" rate (unusable/usable images) of a Flickr account. We at Commons try to consider all sorts of copyright-aspects. The typical user at Flickr often has little to no clue about that, even if it's an honest user; not counted the Flickr-washers. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Antique Automobile Club of America

I notice we don't have Wikipedia page on AACA. You seem well placed to create one. Should you feel so inclined to do, we have Article wizard to make the task easier. I am sorry to discover that so many Americans still can't afford to buy new cars ;¬) --P.g.champion (talk) 14:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #299

File:Galatea lakes exploring (36087121320).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 18:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

21:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2009 Pontiac catalog cover (26808938256).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

File:The UN Courier April - June 2017.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4nn1l2 (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Jalta (2058280044).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Carl Ha (talk) 19:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Horse shoe Falls Alberta Canada (33367088094).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

FlickreviewR 2

Would you mind temporarily stopping your mass Flickr2Commons uploads? Your uploads have crowded up Category:Flickr review needed and the FlickreviewR 2 bot seems to not be able to keep up with your upload rate. We are sitting at close to 5000 files waiting for review right now--Elisfkc (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Pease categorize the files and make sure they meet COM:SCOPE. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
@Elisfkc and Steinsplitter: , Done and I will re-read COM:SCOPE. Artix Kreiger (talk) 17:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

LOC duplicates

Hi, I can see you have been uploading from the LOC Flickrstream, something I've been working on as a project User:Fæ/LOC. One part of my upload process is to search Wikimedia Commons for matches to the official LOC ID and display any other non-identical uploads by me or other users on the image page in a gallery. Can you please consider doing some housekeeping on your uploads to either do that, or have a better form of duplicate identification? Obviously the FlickrID is not useful for this.

As an example, this search shows a recent upload of today, matching a TIFF and jpeg version uploaded back in 2014. Unfortunately the version you are now uploading from Flickr is both a duplicate and inferior quality to the 2014 versions. If the others from Flickr are the same quality, it may be better not to upload them, it just makes for a large housekeeping problem without improving content.

Thanks -- (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

I apologize. I will stop and will start dealing with the duplicates. Its only 691 uploads so. Artix Kreiger (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Can you explain, please? Cf. File talk:Red Crowned Crane Closeup Profile (12072378424).jpg --Veliensis (talk) 15:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Veliensis: , it is already descriptive with the "red" crown. It does not necessary to move descriptive to another.. Artix Kreiger (talk) 15:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
The picture does not show a en:red-crowned crane, but a en:black-necked crane. These are different species.--Veliensis (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Veliensis, I see. File moved. Artix Kreiger (talk) 15:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Cultural Gardens of Cleveland (20645086399).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 15:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #300

I see you have created "Category:Railroad images uploaded by Artix Kreiger". Every file in this category is taken in Taiwan, but you have created Category:Taiwan images uploaded by Artix Kreiger. I don't understand the difference between these two categories. So, my problem is: Why not replace it with Category:Taiwan images uploaded by Artix Kreiger?--Kai3952 (talk) 14:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

There is a difference. It will be populated later. Dont do anything about it. Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Alicia, Zuma Beach, Malibu, California (3125721646).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)