User talk:Joystick
Image deletion warning | Image:Anne.Frank.cover.B001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Ilse@ 18:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Anne.Frank.title.B002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Ilse@ 18:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Szapira.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Szapira.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Masur (talk) 03:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- plik pochodzi z twojej kolekcji, jednak nie daje mu to jeszcze statusu PD, do czego musi byc znany autor (i data jego smierci) i/lub data pierwszej publikacji. Masur (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- PD - 70 lat od smierci autora lub publikacji jak autor byl anonimowy (a nie tylko nieznany nam). PD-polish - pierwsza publikacja na terenie Polski (lub polski autor) bez zastrzezenia PA. Obie wymagaja podania pewnych danych (autor i/lub publikacja). Tych danych nie ma. Ergo - status zdjecia nie jest pewny, aczkolwiek nie wykluczam, ze z bardzo duzym prawdopodobinstwem jest to PD. Tylko ze licencje nie opieraja sie na prawdopodobienstwie, bo na tej zasadzie 99% plikow znalezionych w necie nie ma swojego wlasciciela, a jednak nie ladujemy ich na Commons. Masur (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC) ps. chodzi tylko o podanie zrodla. Ja nie neguje ze ona jest PD, bo pewnie jest. Zerodlo "archiwum prywatne" to mniej wiecej to samo co "internet". Skoro to reprodukacja, albo dokument, nalezy podac date, tytul, cokolwiek. Masur (talk) 19:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- ale nie musisz sie oburzac. Chodzi przeciez tylko o czytelnosc zasad dla ewentualnego uzywajacego grafiki. A sam przyznasz, ze patrzac na obecny opis grafiki, mam prawo sie nie domyslac nawet procenta tych danych o ktorych mi piszesz. Stad jesli jestes wlascicielem tego pozytywu to wystarczy to napisac, podobnie jak domniemana date i domniemane pochodzenie. I tyle. Inaczej sucha informacja "archiwum wlasne" znaczy i wszystko i nic. Masur (talk) 23:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 16:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Pd.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
File:Golem_001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
sугсго 09:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Perec_Markisz.B004.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Perec_Markisz.B004.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Perec_Markisz.B004.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Polarlys (talk) 22:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Ld.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Joystick. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Joystick~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
21:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Skelet mens & gorilla vooraanzicht.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 17:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jidysz.lebt.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|