User talk:Kaitha Poo Manam
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
File:P.Ramadas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Roland zh (talk) 18:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
File:Memorandum News in Kerala Kaumudi Daily.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:First Edition of Prathibhavam-Page-4.jpg
- File:First Edition of Prathibhavam-Page-2.jpg
- File:First Edition of Prathibhavam-Page-1.jpg
- File:Introduction of Prathibhavam Booklet.jpg
- File:Front Cover of Prathibhavam Booklet.jpg
Yours sincerely, Stefan2 (talk) 11:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Stefan2, How can you define this files are Unlikely uploaded one by me.Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- These are unlikely to be own work by the uploader because they look like newspaper pages and such things. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Stefan2, How can you define this files are Unlikely uploaded one by me.Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Peoples Snap.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Roland zh (talk) 17:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep- I have changed its license and placed -Consent|1=full-Template and it is used in my User page. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Peoples in Eravikulam national park-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Roland zh (talk) 17:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep- I have changed its license and placed -Consent|1=full-Template and it is used in my User page. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Peoples in Eravikulam national park-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Roland zh (talk) 17:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep- I have changed its license and placed -Consent|1=full-Template. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
File:A Snap To Memories.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Roland zh (talk) 17:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep- I have changed its license and placed -Consent|1=full-Template and it is used in my User page. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Eravikulam national park museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Roland zh (talk) 17:46, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep- I have changed its license and placed -Consent|1=full-Template and it is used in my User page. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
File:View of Munnar Mountains.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Roland zh (talk) 18:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep- I have changed its license and placed -Consent|1=full-Template and it is used in my User page. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:26, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Geetha Hiranyan news in Madhyamam gulf edition.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Geetha Hiranyan news in Madhyamam gulf edition.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Geetha Hiranyan news in Madhyamam gulf edition.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
JuTa 18:35, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ju, the website has already added Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License in its home page (See the site). The website says according to its License words that "This website is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. In short, this means you can freely reuse and distribute any of this website content, also commercially, for as long you provide". Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, you are correct, I realized that later and changed the problem tag to {{Licensereview}}. regards. --JuTa 09:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ju, the website has already added Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License in its home page (See the site). The website says according to its License words that "This website is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. In short, this means you can freely reuse and distribute any of this website content, also commercially, for as long you provide". Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ju, thanks, and, is it necessary to license review even in the case of a website permission?Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 09:59, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, like {{Flickrreview}} the licensing of the source website might change in future, but when reviewed and confirmed the images can be left on commons. --JuTa 10:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ju, that's correct and it is very necessary to Wikipedia.Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 10:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Geetha Hiranyan news in Madhyamam gulf edition.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 21:14, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Article of Geetha Hiranyan in Madhyamam daily.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Please read the description of Category:Personal files: it is not just "Pictures of a person". With some exceptions, if an image is in use on a main-space page on a Wikimedia project, it is not a personal file. -Apocheir (talk) 14:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Apocheir (talk), Sorry for the mistake and thanks for the information. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 15:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
File:D.F.M.F Dharna-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sathish kalathil (talk) 06:01, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Poem of Geetha Hiranyan in Prathibhavam news magazine.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Poem of Geetha Hiranyan in Prathibhavam news magazine.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Leoboudv (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Samyuktha Varma.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Samyuktha Varma.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Samyuktha Varma.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—Vensatry (Ping me) 10:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)