User talk:Y.haruo/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Imelda Marcos in 1954.jpg

File:Imelda Marcos in 1954.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Imelda Marcos in 1954.jpg

File:Imelda Marcos in 1954.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

LGA talkedits 09:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File in Cancellazione

salve, ho notato il suo messaggio di cancellazione el mio file, ora ho appena sostituito il la licenza del mio file, prechè quella foto li l' avevo caricata sul sito da dove proviene la foto, quindi sono io il detendore del copyrigt della foto che avevo caricato sul sito :) --Filippo Corradi (talk) 09:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

The author is "Unknown Person". Do you hold the copyright?--Y.haruo (talk) 08:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Georgivac uploaded files

I do hold the copyright of the wrestler pictured and would like it not removed. The picture before that was the same wrestler as The Pharaoh and also hold the copyright for that too.Georgivac (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

The Picture of Gabriella Ricca has permission granted from Jared Steckler and Chris LaChall/Courier-Post to use. If you need contact information for them, just let me know. Thank you. Georgivac (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Because the administrator will not notice your opinion even though wrote it on this page, I transferred it to deletion requests.--Y.haruo (talk) 00:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand. Please advise or provide a link as to where I can find it was transferred and what to do. Much appreciated.Georgivac (talk) 01:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Commons require that the owner makes a clear statement that they release the image under a free license by OTRS. Commons cannot confirm the copyright status without the licensed email at OTRS. Therefore, it is necessary for uploader to submit consented email to OTRS. More details can be found Commons:OTRS. Please be sure to read it.--Y.haruo (talk) 00:07, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

media Gustave and Anselme Bucher de Chauvigné

I believe this issue has been now been resolved, can you possibly confirmed, and possibly removed banners. thank you.--Lowinski (talk) 12:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Thompsons files

User:Fleejoseph, who uploaded File:Penny Thompson in Civil Air Patrol Uniform 1945.jpg and File:Larry Thompson at Work.jpg, contacted me in the IRC help channel regarding the deletion tags on those images. He said Penny Thompson was his sister and that he did personally take both photos. I did a Google Image search and found no instance of either image elsewhere (excepting a Wikipedia mirror). Thus I see no reason to doubt his account which makes him the original creator of the photos, not just the person who uploaded scans of photos taken by someone else. Please consider removing the deletion tags.

Fleejoseph also said he didn't personally take the photo File:Roadable Ercoupe.jpg which was originally published in the Southeastern Aviation News, a newspaper owned by Penny Thompson, so that one probably should be deleted unless we can find out whether copyright has expired, which seems very difficult. Huon (talk) 23:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Per File:Penny Thompson in Civil Air Patrol Uniform 1945.jpg; Please look closely, this photograph is a panel of urethane or Styrofoam.
Per File:Larry Thompson at Work.jpg; This file is the photograph during his working time. It is natural to think that the author of the photograph is not his relative but rather the Miami Herald.
I guess it from the above-mentioned thing, the uploader does not seem to be the brother of Penny Thompson who is about ninety. Probably he will be the person concerned for Larry and Penny Thompson Memorial Park. Even if I remove the tag under the present conditions, other people will submit a deletion request newly. I wish you and the uploader add appropriate Commons copyright tag to each file. See and use Commons:Hirtle chart.--Y.haruo (talk) 05:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

File:The_Ritz.jpg

Yes. Please delete it asap. I made a mistake and I didn't manage to delete it on my own... Italian law permits to use movie screenshots and so does Italian wikipedia. I'm trying to upload the file on Italian wikimedia, but I can't find it....— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabrizioberloco (talk • contribs) 03:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)‎ (UTC)

Unfortunately the upload page of Italian wikipedia was not found in me either.--Y.haruo (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your Anti-Vandalism steps. Happy editing ahead :) . ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Adminship

こんにちは。いつも精力的なご活動を拝見しています。突然ですが、Y.haruoさんは管理者になることに興味はおありですか？ まだ日本語話者の管理者は多くありません。削除関係に長年関わっていらっしゃるY.haruoさんは適任ではないかと思います。もし興味がおありでしたら、推薦する用意がありますのでご検討ください。推薦の流れなどについてはUser_talk:Yasu#Adminshipが例として参考になるかと思います。 --whym (talk) 11:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

こんばんは。突然のご提案に光栄であるとともに戸惑っております。私はパトローラーとなってから10日も経っておらずパトローラーとしての実績はほとんどないでしょう。しかも私をパトローラーとしたのは今、投票が行われている最中のダフネ・ランティエさんです（ソックパペット発覚以前ですが）。日本語話者の管理者が少ないことも認識しており、微力ながらお力添えはしたいと考えますが、時期が悪すぎると思います。私のパトローラー資格も含めてダフネさんの件がどう波及するか判らない現状では、管理者への立候補は無理じゃないでしょうか？--Y.haruo (talk) 13:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
活動範囲（特に言語）が違いますし、偶然時期が重なっただけで特に関係がうたがわしいということはないかと思いますが。権限付与については、他からのステップアップでないと管理者になれない訳ではない（私の場合もそうでした）ので、仮に取り消しになっても問題はないでしょう。くだんの投票は18日で終わることになっているので、RFA開始のタイミングとしてそのあとにあたる20-26日あたりはいかがでしょうか。もう少しゆっくり考えたいということでしたら、もちろんお待ちすることもできます。 --whym (talk) 11:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
考えておりましたがご提案をお受けする所存です。この時期にそういう声が掛かったのも何かの御縁でしょう。よろしくお願いします。--Y.haruo (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
ありがとうございます。Commons:Administrators/Requests/Y.haruoを投稿しました。Candidate's acceptance への受諾宣言をいただけますか。その際、上のほうにあるRfa-endを含む行のコメントアウトもお願いします（投票終了日時が表示されるはずです）。 --whym (talk) 03:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:GEN. JOHN A. QUITMAN AND BATTALION OF MARINES ENTERING MEXICO CITY.JPG

File:GEN. JOHN A. QUITMAN AND BATTALION OF MARINES ENTERING MEXICO CITY.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 03:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrator

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Y.haruoさん、管理者ご就任おめでとうございます。あなたに管理者権限が付与されました。削除や保護、ブロック、保護されたページの編集などの管理作業に入る前に少し時間をいただいて、Commons:管理者のページを読んで、関連ページをウォッチリストに入れてください (特に管理者伝言板と削除依頼を)。管理行為の大半は他の管理者によって差し戻しが可能ですが、履歴統合は差し戻しがきかないため実行の際には特に注意してください。


IRCでほかのコモンズ利用者と話すことができます：#wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Commons:Guide to adminshipを読むこともきっと有益でしょう。

管理者リストと、その関連ページである 言語別リストおよび就任時期別リスト をチェックして、あなたの名前がまだなかったらつけ加えてください。

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for getting in touch. I want to study more about an administrator.--Y.haruo (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Welcome, dear administrator! Enjoy the ride! *<:o)yes --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lenin nehru park viplove.jpg

Hello, I think you may have misread my reason for the DR. My concern wasn't freedom of panorama or copyright. The problem is that the background and statue are from two different pictures, photoshopped into a fake image. This is clear from looking at the edges of the statue. Guanaco (talk) 10:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, I agree with you. But I think that it is not the reason for deletion.--Y.haruo (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Ah, no big deal to keep it I suppose. I've removed it from all the Wikipedias, which is good enough. Guanaco (talk) 10:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Commons has almost none of the photographs of this statue. Commons:Project scope say "New and existing files of poor or mediocre quality may or may not be realistically useful for an educational purpose depending on what they illustrate and what other files we have of the same subject. Where a subject is rare and/or difficult to capture, even a poor-quality file may be of significant educational value, especially if Commons has very few or no similar files already." Please refer to realistically useful for an educational purpose. Therefore we should not delete it. Your measures will be better under the present conditions. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

COM:CDC

Hello, Please stick on the exact format. 

Replace File:IAA 2017 (1Y7A1792).jpg with File:File:IAA 2017,Frankfurt 2017 (1Y7A1792).jpg across all Wikimedia projects. Reason: exact, or scaled-down duplicate

You try to replace files with non existing files (Because of the double File:File: extension). And please don't add section headers. Thanks :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your inquiry.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Images from Geograph Britain and Ireland

Category:Images from Geograph Britain and Ireland has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

You removed the {{Speedydelete}} template, so I expect you have something to say. --bjh21 (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

File:51-101-0033 Odesa Bazarna SAM 3993.jpg

You deleted image in higher resolution and left image in lower. You should do vice versa.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

That is my mistake. I have completed restoration. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.--Y.haruo (talk) 00:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

this is not fair...no proof... i think it is outragious...

re ellection of the Kimberley Driscoll 50th Mayor of Salem. and this is a negative action on the waterfront re development


A poster for Lili in 1953

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.155.215.167 (talk) 23:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

no proof...very sad...i dont like the place...all negative.Y.haruo is not fair in bringing this out in wikimedia. i watched my friend take the photo..its all good.!

File:Памятник Т.Г. Шевченко (Мелитополь).jpg

thank you Kimberley Driscoll 50th Mayor of Salem for the amazing waterfront renovation

Commons:Deletion, this is not a nice thing..my good friend- Posted this picture of the waterfront in salem mass and now someone who has never been to this seaport, decides to try and delete a picture that a good friend of mine took.. so i got an email. with a link to this page---i have used wikipedia but never this media side to the game... so i went online...picked out a user name to make this comment to leave this picture alone — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commons Deletion umnonono (talk • contribs) 20:53, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Antennae galaxies (captured by Chandra, Hubble and Spitzer).jpg and Messier 66 in the Leo Triplet (captured by the Hubble Space Telescope).jpg

Hallo Y.haruo, apparently you have deleted the wrong ones. Now we have here the (despite file size not better) duplicates without correct categories and licence. Can you fix this? Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 00:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Ras67: In either case, I deleted small file size image because I thought that larger file size images are more useful. I put back two images which I deleted. But I don't know which one is correct. Please nominate a normal deletion request in future, if you want to delete the image which I left.--Y.haruo (talk) 20:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Re-uploaded

Hi, thank you for cleaning up! Look here. Best, --Achim (talk) 21:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Redirect

Hi, I wonder why you created the redirect Category:Putjatin Worte again. Do you need it for some particular purpose? Best regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

@Jochen Burghardt: This category is used from 2007. I thought about the influence on other users and made redirection. Please refer to COM:REDCAT. If there is sufficient reason, we will delete it. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
@Y.haruo: Apparently, you found a redlink to Category:Putjatin Worte? I wonder, where you found it. - The reasons why I had suggested the category redirect for speedy deletion were: Category:Putjatin Worte ("Worte" meaning "Words" in German) was a duplicate of Category:Buch der Bücher (Putjatin) ("Buch der Bücher" meaning "Book of Books" in German). Both categories were to hold media about the book "Worte aus dem Buche der Bücher" (meaning "Words from the Books of Books" in German) by Nikolai Abramovich Putyatin. The name of the former category was even less expressive than that of the latter, so I chose the latter to be kept. According to the "What links here" tool, there were (and are) no links to the former category page, so deleting doesn't have influence on any user currently. More important, I don't think it makes sense to have a redirect for every possible combination of buzzwords chosen by somebody to designate a book (or any other entity). For example, "Putjatin.1924", "WadBdB", "Putyatin-Words", "Putj_Words_Book_Books", etc. are all sensible combinations somebody might come up with; adding them all would pollute the name space indefinitely. - Best regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

 Question I have some questions.

  1. The title of this book is "Worte aus dem Buch(e) der Bücher". Why do you not use the official name like Wikisource?
  2. Does other users not mistake it for normal words?
  3. What kind of advantage is there by deleting the redirection?
  4. Is it useful educationally to delete this redirection?

If it's alright with you, please tell me.--Y.haruo (talk) 08:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

@Y.haruo: Sorry for the delay. Here are some replies to qour questions:
  1. I found both Category:Putjatin Worte and Category:Buch der Bücher (Putjatin) existing; I didn't create any of them. Renaming to the official Wikisource name seems to be a good idea.
  2. The wiktionary link refers to the most widespread meaning "Buch der Bücher" (i.e. denoting the Christian bible). I don't think that Putjatin's book title is related to that meaning; however, I didn't read the book, so I'm not quite sure. — Anyway, it is a good idea that the category name should make obvious that a book is meant. I found several methods for achieving this; examples are Category:C. R. Forrest, 'A Picturesque Tour Along the River Ganges and Jumna in India', London: R. Ackermann, 1824, Category:Les pigeons (1824 book), Category:Sämmtliche Werke (Körner 1823), Category:Dzieje Narodu Polskiego za panowania Władysława IV. Króla Polskiego i Szweckiego (1823) by KWIATKOWSKI, Category:Wahrheit und Dichtung (Kirchhofer). The latter follows the same scheme as Category:Buch der Bücher (Putjatin).
  3. An example of the practical importance of name space pollution is the list of completions of a user input to HotCat: When typing "wadb" in order to get the completion Category:Wadberg, I don't want to have Category:WadBdB instead (which is earlier in alphabetical order). Therefore, if some name is not used at all, like Category:WadBdB, and also like Category:Putjatin Worte, it shouldn't be a redirect.
  4. I don't understand this question. Neither keeping nor deleting the redirect will educate in any way, won't it?
Did you find a redlink to Category:Putjatin Worte? Where?
Best regards - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done I deleted the redirection by the reason of a notice period having been expired. However, the present category name is insufficient. It is possible that the user who does not know the circumstances makes a category newly. I want you to suggest the renaming of the category to prevent it. We must avoid the editing battle.

@Y.haruo: Thanks! Do you have a particular suggestion how the category should be renamed? Following the Wikisource title, but appending the author to mark it as a book title rather than normal words, I think "Category:Worte aus dem Buche der Bücher (Putjatin)" could be ok? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
I think it's fine with your plan.--Y.haruo (talk) 02:50, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
I renamed the category, and changed the template Template:Buch der Bücher (Putjatin) accordingly. It will take some time until the files move to the new category, since they are auto-categorized by the template. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Illinois Treasurer Pictures

I see you flagged multiple pictures I have uploaded from the official Illinois Treasurer Website. I uploaded these picture thinking they were permissible to use since they came from a .gov domain. Where can I get similar photos of the people to upload? Do you have advice of how to get permission to use these pictures? Political Geek (talk) 07:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

DRs

Hi. Any chances to slow down User:Yallappa Nandi? Sayonara. --E4024 (talk) 13:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Slow down means blocking? I'm sorry. I do not understand the standard of the blocking.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Admins can "talk" to people with more authority. I hate to see anybody blocked. Have a good New Year. --E4024 (talk) 15:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
BTW they have slowed down by themselves already; no need to work. Thanks all the same. --E4024 (talk) 15:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Mulhacén

Mulhacén is correct whereas Mulhacen is incorrect, that's why I asked for its deletion. Thanks for understanding Triplecaña (talk) 14:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

According to Category names, "Category names should generally be in English (see Commons:Language policy)." However, this is a very vague problem. I welcome your suggestion. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

File: Alessandro Lussiana in Anfitrione.jpg and

Dear Y.haruo, I write to ask you some explanations about the deletion of this file https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Alessandro_Lussiana_in_Anfitrione.jpg I had this file, and also others, from the owner of the picture, who is also the subject of the image and the subject of the wikipedia page I am editing; how can I propose this pictures that the owner provides me, since these pictures have no copyright but are made by the same person? Thank you very much for the help. --Gabrilele85 (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

This photograph has been already published in Facebook. If you are the copyright holder, please send us a clear statement that you wish to release your work (with a link to the original location) under a specific free license. See Commons:Email templates for the preferred form. More details can be found Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. The ticket will be reviewed by a volunteer. If it is right, the image will be restored.--Y.haruo (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Picture Suzuki

Hello Haruo, do you have any accessible source in English that specifies when this picture was taken? It is required to bring an article on the English wikipedia to Featured status. Thanks.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello Tham. This photograph series appeared serially in Japanese magazine "Bungeishunjū" from August, 1949 to August, 1951. The photographs of four people were placed in the magazine on a month. This serialization was published as a collection of photographs in April, 1953. I have the photo book, but unfortunately the shooting date are not written there. This picture is posted on early page(page 5) of this photo book, so I think that this picture was taken in 1949, but I think that there is not the English source. I'm sorry that I wasn't helpful.--Y.haruo (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Z8kvlyeu7esy.jpg

The license was probably incorrect (as I didn't create the file) but I contacted the original poster of the image in February this year and he said that he was okay with it. I followed up yesterday and he was still okay with the image being on the site. If you have any questions, please follow up. Zzzoom (talk) 19:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

The verbal promise is not accepted on Commons. Please exchange e-mails to upload the image. This page will be useful for your question.--Y.haruo (talk) 19:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Diane Greene

Hi. Why did you delete File:Diane_Greene.jpg and File:Diane Greene-turned.jpg?Ferdi2005 (Posta) 18:26, 29 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdi2005 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello. These photographs are copyrighted by Steve Jennings via Getty Images. see 1and 2. It is unlikely that the author approves the Flickr's license.--Y.haruo (talk) 18:57, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

カテゴリ移動についてのご助力依頼

初めまして。User:Miyaと申します。カテゴリの改名と大量張替についてbot依頼の方法がわからず困っていたところ、User:CommonsDelinker/commandsの履歴でお名前を拝見して、ご助力をお願いに参りました。

ja:大阪市交通局の廃止とja:大阪市高速電気軌道（愛称：Osaka Metro）による運営移行に伴うカテゴリ移動について井戸端で相談が出ていました。これを見て、相談者そらみみさんがCategories for discussionに出していた依頼を「削除ではなく改名が必要だろう」と閉じようとしたら、ほかの管理者から "Would you like to do the renames" と言われて、CommondDelinkerに依頼したことがない私は途方に暮れております。そらみみさんはすでにCommonsDelinkerのノートでrename依頼を提出済みです。この依頼の "Approve" をクリックしたらいいのでしょうか？それともノートの依頼をUser:CommonsDelinker/commandsに転記すればよいのでしょうか？ お教えいただければ助かります。--miya (talk) 01:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

こんにちは。私は即時削除のカテゴリ移動はやったことが有るのですが、"User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands"の依頼処理は未熟なためやったことが有りません。ですが他の管理者の方の履歴と私の知り得る経験から判断すると、"Approve"をクリックすると"User:CommonsDelinker/commands"に転記されて旧カテゴリから新カテゴリへのファイルの移動が開始され（終了まで時間がかかる場合があります）、旧カテゴリから新カテゴリへのリダイレクトが行われるようです。ただし、カテゴリの移動が終了しても"User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands"の依頼は自動的には削除されませんので、各管理者が移動後に"move"等のコメントを添えて依頼を削除する必要はあります。試しに1件だけやってみましたが、処理が終わるまで結果は判断できないため今しばらくお待ちください。--Y.haruo (talk) 09:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
追記 Themightyquillさんが既に実施されていましたので、私は依頼を取り消しました。処理にはかなり時間がかかるようです。--Y.haruo (talk) 09:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/04/Category:Stations of Osaka Municipal Transportation Bureauの移動依頼はすべて完了したようです。ただ、Category:Rail track diagrams of Osaka Municipal Transportation Bureau train stations‎ → Category:Rail track diagrams of Osaka Metroの依頼はuser:そらみみさんのrename依頼によりCategory:Rail track diagrams of Osaka Metro stationsへと改名されたようです。一つだけ改名先が異なるのですが、Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/04/Category:Stations of Osaka Municipal Transportation Bureauはその旨を記せば閉じることができるのではないでしょうか。--Y.haruo (talk) 09:49, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
"Approve"をクリックするだけでコマンド転記とカテゴリ移動が可能になるのですね！Categories for discussionもこれで閉じられると思います。お教えいただきまことにありがとうございました！今後ともどうぞよろしくお願いします。--miya (talk) 11:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jacquelinekato

Since when we are deleting DRs?--Sanandros (talk) 18:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I mistook that to delete it to. I restore the page. Thank you for letting me know.--Y.haruo (talk) 01:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
No problem.--Sanandros (talk) 04:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Bita Daryabari 2011.jpg

Sorry to bother you again, but could you give me the flickr link for this image that you deleted? The article it was used in smells of paid editing to me and I might be able to link the uploader to other accounts. You might also want to see if File:Bita_Daryabari.png looks similar. Thanks Smartse (talk) 20:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Smartse. The flickr link is here. According to the Exif data, this photograph is copyrighted by "© 2010 Drew Altizer". So that means it was downloaded from here.--Y.haruo (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Warner Bros. Records Logo 2002.svg

I believe this file should not have been deleted, as the original deletion discussion was flawed. Please consider undeletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

We need proof that the past argument was flawed. If I undelete this image without a reason, the nominator and others won't accept that. Is there any discussion about this somewhere? In particular, it is necessary to inform the nominator that it is not subject to copyright in US.--Y.haruo (talk) 09:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

吉香公園の銅像について

いつもお世話になっております。そらみみと申します。

私は山口県岩国市の吉香公園の画像をアップロードしようとしていますが、File:田中穂積先生胸像 - 岩国 - panoramio.jpgこの銅像の作者は調べても不明です。発表日が昭和29年か31年との情報があって、すでに50年を経過したから、著作権はフリーだと理解してよろしいですか？--そらみみ (talk) 09:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

こんにちは。リンク先を見てみましたが、現地の案内板と山口県観光連盟では公表年が異なってるとも解釈できますね。ただ、現地の案内文も「昭和二十九年に田中穂積顕彰会が設立され、」と記されるのみで説明版の末尾にも「昭和三十一年三月」と有りますので、顕彰会の設立が昭和29年で銅像の公表年は昭和31年（1956年）ではないかと思います。いずれにしろ、公表後50年が過ぎた団体名義の著作物ですので日本ではパブリックドメインと解することができると思います。しかしながら気になる箇所が案内板に見られます。それは「その後更に昭和五十一年三月岩国錦ライオンズクラブの寄贈により看板及び胸像は改造された。」と記載されているからです[1]。この改造が音楽を流れるようにしただけのものなら問題はないでしょうが、像の外面の改造を含むのであれば新たに著作権が発生したとも解せるからです。その点について岩国市に確認してみますので、著作権の判断については少々お待ちください。--Y.haruo (talk) 11:30, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
ご解答ありがとうございます。お待ちしております。--そらみみ (talk) 22:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
@そらみみ: お待たせいたしました。本日、岩国市公園管理事務所に調べてもらったところ、解答を得ましたのでご報告いたします。田中穂積先生胸像の公表期日は昭和31年3月、この時の著作者は田中穂積顕彰会で間違いないそうです。そして元来の像はコンクリート製だったそうです。その後の昭和51年3月の岩国錦ライオンズクラブの改造は、この像をブロンズ像に置き換えたもので、コンクリート像と同じ型を用いたものとのことです。そうすると現在の像は原著作物の複製に該当するものと思いますので、昭和51年に新たな著作権は発生していないものと思われます。また、周辺の像についても情報を頂きましたのでお知らせいたします。
吉川広嘉像　昭和47年（1972年）10月15日公表 著作者 岩国錦ライオンズクラブ
久能寅夫胸像　昭和60年（1985年）11月16日公表 著作者 久能寅夫先生顕彰実行委員会
重宗雄三像　昭和56年（1981年）3月13日公表 著作者 重宗雄三像建立実行委員会
とのことです。アップロードする際の参考にして頂けると幸いです。commonsのこれらの画像は削除依頼を出さねばなりませんね。--Y.haruo (talk) 14:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
@Y.haruo: お調べいただきましてありがとうございます。田中穂積銅像はパブリックドメインであることについて承知いたします。
周辺の像について、吉川広嘉像はすでに縮小した上、日本語ウィキペディアでアップロードしまして、それ以外の銅像の画像は持っておりません。ただし、田中穂積胸像の手前の歌碑についてはどうですかね。昭和43年の設立でちょうど今から50年前ですが、内容は明治35年の「美しき天然」の歌詞・楽譜のそれぞれ一部及び作詞者武島羽衣・作曲者田中穂積の名前だけです。この歌碑の全体と田中穂積銅像が写る遠景の画像もありますので、芸術性が認められるかどうかはちょっと気になります。もしダメだったら、歌碑にモザイクをかけてアップロードするつもりです。--そらみみ (talk) 15:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
@そらみみ: 画像を拝見致しました。とても良い説明文だと思います。歌碑についてですが、共同著作物の没年が遅いほうの作者である武島羽衣も1967年に亡くなられており、また出版は1923年以前ですので、日米両国ともパブリックドメインの作品になります。そして歌碑の写真によると、その譜面や歌詞などの記載には独創性は見られないものと思います。（これに独創性を認めるとお墓の画像なども駄目になってしまいます。）私見ですがこの歌碑を含めた画像も問題ないものと思われます。--Y.haruo (talk) 16:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
かしこまりました。ご説明ありがとうございます。--そらみみ (talk) 17:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 Info File:Sculpture of Tanaka Hozumi in Kikko Shrine.jpgとFile:View of sculpture of Tanaka Hozumi in Kikko Shrine.jpgの画像2枚をアップロードしました。--そらみみ (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:“Vrindadevi reveals the secrets of Bhakti”, by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1990, Pune.jpg

In similiar circumstances, for files that are used on the wikipedia page “Mumbiram“ and “Rasa Renaissance“, I have obtained a letter from Artist Mumbiram, creator of the original works (paintings), where he is giving his permission to use the creative commons attribution for these low resolution images of the paintings.

Therein artist Mumbiram has cited his own homepage as evidence that he is the creator of the paintings. These are the four images for which an OTRS permission was given and which are attributed with Creative Commons Attribution 1.0 Generic: 

File:Rasa_Art,_%22Encounter_on_the_Way_back_from_the_Forest%22,_Charcoal_by_Mumbiram.jpg
File:Rasa_Art,_%22I_let_him_persuade_me%22,_Charcoal_by_Mumbiram.jpg
File:Rasa_Renaissance_Masterpiece,_Forest_Women_by_Artist_Mumbiram.jpeg
File:Rasa Art, "Meeting by the Stream", Watercolor by Mumbiram.jpg

The files of jpeg images for which you have taken objection appear on Mumbiram's current homepage, www.mumbiram.com. Artist Mumbiram is ready to write an email declaring that he is allowing the use of these low resolution jpeg images of his original paintings as in creative commons license. Could you tell us to whom he addresses such an email ? So that the objections against the uploaded images will be withdrawn.

These are the concerning files for which an objection has been taken: 

File:“Vrindadevi reveals the secrets of Bhakti”, by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1990, Pune.jpg
File:“Radha Svadheenbhartrika (Radha has Krishna to herself in a favourable mood)” by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1995, Pune.jpg
File:Lakhu, 1985, Gouache Watercolour by Mumbiram.jpg
File:”Chitalyanchi Soon” (Daughter-in-law of the Chitale Family ), by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1982,.jpg
File:“Marathi Poets 1982”, by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1982.jpg
File:”Not by bread alone - Kusum making chapattis”, by Mumbiram, Charcoal, Pune 1990.jpg
File:“Kusum brings her Mother Sakhrabai to visit the Artist”, by Mumbiram, Charcoal, 1984, Pune.jpg
File:„Gokula dreaming of India“ by Mumbiram, Oil on canvas, 1988, Japan.jpg
File:Drupada is coming out of the river with Mumbiram, Watercolor, by Mumbiram, 1990.jpg
File:“Red haired amateur palmist girl reading Krishna’s fortune near Govardhan”, by Mumbiram, Gouache Watercolor, Seattle 1976.jpg
File:“Alice Cooper washing Mumbiram’s Hair”, by Mumbiram, Ink-and-brush, Seattle 1975.jpg

Following two files have already been deleted, if I see that right. These two are identical pictures and after confirming with you, I would upload one again attributing it with Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International: 

File:“Do let us go home before it gets light” by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1990, Pune.jpg
File:“Let’s go home before it gets light” by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1990, Pune.jpg

Thanks for your help.--Kusum Bhagavat (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Kusum Bhagavat, you need to send the e-mail that you got permission to OTRS. If it is recognized as a valid permission by volunteers, The corresponding files can be placed in commons. For details on OTRS, please click Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates. Sincerely yours.--Y.haruo (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Y.haruo, Kusum Bhagavat had asked me on my en.wiki talk page to take a look at these. I am unclear on why you have tagged these as "derivatives", as a photo of a 2-D work is just a copy. The sole question you have raised, as I understand it, is whether the author of the 2-D works has given permission, not whether that author's works have in turn incorporated or modified another author's works. Could you please clarify? Thank you. Postdlf (talk) 18:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Postdlf, my demand was permission of the copyright holder who painted these pictures. I was misunderstanding that the uploader took these pictures. I changed them to {{No permission since}}.--Y.haruo (talk) 20:17, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

:ja-admin needed

Hi Y.haruo, since several days there are 5 files, such as File:アスキー関連会社の統廃合図.png, in Category:Other speedy deletions tagged for speedy deletion for "Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack - A Japanese vandal (ja:LTA:YQM) created this image with intentional false information to deceive other users". However, all these files are still in use on :ja wikipedia. Could you take a look at these files and check whether the speedy-tagging is justified? Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Túrelio, these files are figures to express the combination and reorganization about companies and political parties in Japan. But I do not know if this is wrong (or vandalism). I will ask the nominator what is wrong.--Y.haruo (talk) 16:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Colleague Taivo now has removed the SD-tags. --Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Removing Warning Sign on Images for which Permission has been sent

Dear Y.haruo ! Artist Mumbiram has sent permission by email to use the images on wikipedia (as they are also used on the artist's website www.mumbiram.com) and following ticketnumbers for following images have been issued. Please remove the red warning signs on the images (this media file is missing ....) so the images can be inserted in articles. Thank you.

[Ticket#: 2018071110006623]. File:“Vrindadevi reveals the secrets of Bhakti”, by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1990, Pune.jpg

Ticket#: 2018071110007186]. File:“Alice Cooper washing Mumbiram’s Hair”, by Mumbiram, Ink-and-brush, Seattle 1975.jpg

[Ticket#: 2018071110007168] File:“Red haired amateur palmist girl reading Krishna’s fortune near Govardhan”, by Mumbiram, Gouache Watercolor, Seattle 1976.jpg

[Ticket#: 2018071110007122]. File:Drupada is coming out of the river with Mumbiram, Watercolor, by Mumbiram, 1990.jpg

[Ticket#: 2018071110007033]. File:„Gokula dreaming of India“ by Mumbiram, Oil on canvas, 1988, Japan.jpg

[Ticket#: 2018071110007024] File:“Kusum brings her Mother Sakhrabai to visit the Artist”, by Mumbiram, Charcoal, 1984, Pune.jpg

[Ticket#: 2018071110006963]. File:”Not by bread alone - Kusum making chapattis”, by Mumbiram, Charcoal, Pune 1990.jpg

[Ticket#: 2018071110006918]. File:“Marathi Poets 1982”, by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1982.jpg

[Ticket#: 2018071110006874]. File:”Chitalyanchi Soon” (Daughter-in-law of the Chitale Family ), by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1982,.jpg

[Ticket#: 2018071110006847]. File:Lakhu, 1985, Gouache Watercolour by Mumbiram.jpg

Ticket#: 2018071110006641 File:“Radha Svadheenbhartrika (Radha has Krishna to herself in a favourable mood)” by Mumbiram, Watercolor, 1995, Pune.jpg

--Kusum Bhagavat (talk) 14:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

@Kusum Bhagavat: I removed the no permission tags and added new OTRS pending templates on these files. Until the volunteers finishes the judgment, please wait a moment now.--Y.haruo (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Paul di Resta 2018 (25829615548).jpg

This image has been deleted due to problems of the user who uploaded the photo to Flickr, or something of mine? --Adriel 00 (talk) 15:07, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

@Adriel 00: It has been removed as a problem for Flickr user. According to EXIF metadata, This photograph is copyrighted by LAT Photographic. The uploader Jaguar MENA is on the bad authors list as a user who haven't received permission from the copyright owner.--Y.haruo (talk) 15:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Wrong image deleted

File:Mark-867345.jpg

You deleted the wrong image! The Pixabay account got the image from Commons. They probably recompressed it or something. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I did not notice that. I revised that according to your advice. Thank you for letting me know.--Y.haruo (talk) 19:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Сошедшая с пьедестала

Добрый день! Вы выставили на удаление мою фотографию работы «Сошедшая с пьедестала». Я автор фотографии и владелец картины (купил ее) и полностью обладаю всеми правами на ее использование. Почему удалили работу? Dykanvn (talk) 03:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello Dykanvn.It is difficult for me to write in Russian, so I'm sorry to reply in English. Ownership and copyright are different rights. Even if you own the painting, the copyright will not be transferred to the owner. Generally, the right of the copyright holder continues. The copyright of these paintings has not yet disappeared and you need to obtain permission from the author (Выстропов, Андрей Петрович). Please see Commons:Производные произведения for more information.--Y.haruo (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


Это моя собственность! Я могу сжечь, могу фотографировать и выкладывать фото году угодно! Что за бред? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dykanvn (talk • contribs) 09:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

@Dykanvn: Have a look at this. НоуФрост-san is answering your question on this page.--Y.haruo (talk) 10:47, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Lower resolution vs. smaller image

Hello! Some time ago, I tagged a group of aeroplane pictures for deletion, since their original uploader had uploaded two versions. I've carefully picked the worse (compressed) versions and let the more quality ones stay. I have noticed, though, that some better-looking ones (broader colour palette, less pixelation etc.) were smaller in size than the worse looking ones. It seemed confusing (why a bigger picture should look worse than the smaller one?), but it was clearly visible. I guess this had originated in some kind of image processor software compression "abilities".
You have deleted many of those I tagged (for example this one or this one) correctly, but you have also inverted my selection in some cases, deleting the supposedly lower quality one, while, in fact, deleting the better quality one. This one, this one and if I see correctly (though in this case, the differences were really small) this one as well. My question is - is there any way how to renew the deleted files? Those left are worse than the deleted ones... --GeXeS (talk) 13:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello GeXeS. I brought it back temporarily so that you could watch these files which I deleted. File:EC-KOH A320-214 Iberia DUS 28JUL08 (3181025016).jpg, File:EC-KOH A320-214 Iberia DUS 28JUL08 (5854450370).jpg, File:EI-DHT B737-8AS-W Ryanair MAN 15JAN09 (3198693045).jpg, File:EI-DHT B737-8ASW Ryanair MAN 15JAN09 (6354076353).jpg. Especially compare these planes and the sky. I think that the images which I deleted is inferior in a characteristic, how can you see it? Please reply if you finish looking.--Y.haruo (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much, but none of the files you just brought back were controversial :o) I was talking about these three:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DWM_737-8AS-W_Ryanair_LAS_19JAN10_(4379573761).jpg
vs https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DWM_737-8ASW_Ryanair_LAS_19JAN10_(6354093935).jpg,
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EC-KGJ_ATR.42-212A(500)_Binter_LPA_04FEB11_(5425049561).jpg
vs https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EC-KGJ_ATR.42-212A(500)_Binter_LPA_04FEB11_(5931307487).jpg
and
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DYP_B737-8ASW_Ryanair_PMI_25SEP10_(5033441278).jpg
vs https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DYP_B737-8ASW_Ryanair_PMI_25SEP10_(6354090075).jpg.
In all these cases, the pic with lower number in brackets should be the better one, if I remember well. --GeXeS (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
@GeXeS: Sorry about that. I have restored the reverse images.
About two images (EI-DWM 737-8ASW Ryanair LAS 19JAN10, EC-KGJ ATR.42-212A), It is exactly as you say. I restored delete images.
About EI-DYP B737-8ASW Ryanair PMI. I cannot tell which is better. How do you see this?--Y.haruo (talk) 19:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
There's a kind-of "rule of thumb" in this set overall - the higher numbers were uploaded later and I think they had been reprocessed in some way, dragging the quality down. Using this, I believe https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EI-DYP_B737-8ASW_Ryanair_PMI_25SEP10_(6354090075).jpg should get deleted - and if you watch very carefully, it is a bit worse than the lower number version, at least my eyes say that :o) Anyways, this should be all, so thank you very much one more time, have a nice day! --GeXeS (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done I deleted File:EI-DYP B737-8ASW Ryanair PMI 25SEP10 (6354090075).jpg as a duplicate.--Y.haruo (talk) 20:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2018 в Україні

Вітаємо!

1 вересня вже традиційно стартувала українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Цього року є трохи змін у правилах конкурсу:

  • фотографії пам'яток, для яких на момент початку конкурсу (відповідно до відомої Організаційному комітету інформації) не було жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт рівний 7 (для кожної пам'ятки);
  • фотографії автоматично вантажаться у категорію, яка бере учать у номінації за найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації за найкраще фото потрібно вибрати необхідні налаштування у завантажувачі.

Також у конкурсі є спецномінація банерів для статей у Вікімандрах, детальніше за посиланням.

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 22:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Ще 4 дні до завершення «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

Привіт!

Наш цьогорічний конкурс добігає свого кінця — залишилося ще 4 дні. Проміжні підсумки конкурсу опубліковано на сайті. У нас зараз понад 13500 світлин, і це значить, що Україна посідає четверте місце, поступаючись Росії (23 тисячі), Німеччині (21 тисяча) та Італії (19 тисяч). Загалом, понад 200 учасників цього року уже. Дякуємо, що вантажили фото у попередні роки, якщо б Вам захотілося ще взяти участь цього року, то може бути корисно переглянути цей пост із покроковою інструкцією як вантажити світлини: «Як подати свою роботу на конкурс». Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Цього року у конкурсі також є ще одна спеціальні номінація — «Єврейська спадщина». Детальніше про неї можна прочитати за посиланням.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».21:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Masaharu Matsushita.jpg

File Masaharu Matsushita

I have given all the sources when I uploaded it. You think those sources are not enough? Thanks for guiding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masahiro007 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC) @Masahiro007: Yes, I can't say that it is enough yet, because we cannot confirm the permission from the copyright holder who took this photograph in 1989. Fair use claims are not accepted, and express permission is required in Commons. For that reason you have to obtain permission from the copyright holder.--Y.haruo (talk) 12:30, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I don't know how to obtain permission from the copyright holder. Should I find a free licensed picture? Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masahiro007 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC) @Masahiro007: Photographs are not essential in articles, but if you think that it is necessary, please do so.--Y.haruo (talk) 16:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naruto logo.svg

Hey Y.haruo,

Would you take a look at the DR linked above? -- 1989 (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done I closed this deletion request. Japanese law is tolerant to text logos.--Y.haruo (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Y.haruo/Archive_1&oldid=342562953"