User talk:AKoenig

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

sorry for the inconvenience. I hope I could fix the problem. --AKoenig

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand

Dateinamen[edit]

Hallo AKoenig, kannst du deine Bilder mit "sprechenderen" Namen benennen. Das hat mehrere Gründe. Stell der nächste nennt sein Bild auch nur Dom oder Waldweg. Wenn die Namen eindeutiger sind, besteht die Gefahr nicht, dass sie von irgendjemanden irrtümlich überschrieben wird. Außerdem soll dein Foto ja auch gefunden werden. Es wird sicher niemand dein Foto unter Dom suchen sondern eher unter dem Ort. Außerdem heißt in den verschiedenen Sprachen Dom etwas anderes, wie Haus etc. in eingen slawischen Sprachen. Auch die Suchmaschinen gehen auf die Dateinamen. Hoffe geholfen zu haben. gruß aus Ö K@rl (talk) 08:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Projektrahmen[edit]

Hallo AKoenig, bitte respektiere, dass Commons einen Projektrahmen hat und beigetragene Bilder tatsächlich nützlich für einen edukativen Zweck sein müssen. Dazu gehört, dass die beigetragenen Bilder wirklich sinnvoll nutzbar sind, sie eine sinnvolle Bildbeschreibung enthalten und auch sinnvoll kategorisiert werden. Bei etlichen, wenn nicht fast allen Deinen Bildern vermisse ich aber sämtliche Kriterien des Projektramens.

Beispiele:

  • File:Dreieck aus Baustellenelementen.jpg: keine Bildbeschreibung, kein Hinweis darauf, wo das Dreieck steht , keine Kategorisierung. Wieso denkst Du, dass dieses Bild tatsächlich nützlich für einen edukativen Zweck ist?
  • File:Baustellenwagen im Wald.jpg: keine Bildbeschreibung, kein Hinweis darauf, wo der Bauwagen steht , keine Kategorisierung. Wieso denkst Du, dass dieses Bild tatsächlich nützlich für einen edukativen Zweck ist?
  • File:Gehen 1.jpeg:keine Bildbeschreibung, kein Hinweis darauf, wem die Beine gehören, keine Kategorisierung. Wieso denkst Du, dass dieses Bild tatsächlich nützlich für einen edukativen Zweck ist?

-- Ies (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ausblick - Wiesen.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gehen 1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zaccarias (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]