User talk:Filomena

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Leave yr message below:

WARNING TO YOU[edit]

HELLO,

THIS IS MY DISCUSSION PAGE.

PLEASE DO NOT EDIT, DELETE OR CHANGE ANYTHING: IMAGE, LETTER, SIGNATURE, DISCUSSION.

RESPECT IT.

I WILL NEVER DO THAT WITH YOUR OWN PAGE.

IF YOU WANT TO LEAVE A MSG, I ONLY READ MSGS IN ENGLISH.

ANY OTHER LANGUAGE WILL NOT BE RESPONDED.

THANK YOU.'


WARNING TO YOU # 2[edit]

AS I´VE SAID TO THE USER ABOVE, ANY AND ALL MSGS FROM NATIVE ENGLISH OR OTHER NATIVE LANGUAGES USERS OR ADMINISTRATORS WILL BE FULY WELCOMED ON MY DISCUSSION PAGE.

ANY AND ALL MSGS WRITTEN WITH NATIVE PORTUGUESE ARE NOT WELCOMED, MSGS WHITHIN ANY OTHER LANGUAGE ARE ALSO NOT WELCOMED.

I INTEND TO MAKE AN OPEN DISCUSSION, I DON´T WANT TO BE DISTURBED WITH INTIMIDATION IN OTHER LANGUAGES.

I WILL DO THE SAME WITH YOU.

TKS, BEST REGARDS.

fi-Filomena 19:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agora posso responder em português ou quer que continue a escrever em inglês? PatríciaR msg 21:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll write in English then. You could provide a link to your new archive on the top of the page. I don't have to reach any agreement with Dantadd, I haven't touched your warnings since you asked me to. You reach an agreement with him.
I didn't understand the PHP bit. PatríciaR msg 21:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not your waitress. You tell him. I've had enough of this childish behaviour from you. If you don't want further interference from portuguese speaking admins, please stop bothering me and ask another administrator to intervene. You've been asked by three different admins to not remove warnings from your page, and one of them is certainly not a portuguese speaker. If necessary, and to avoid further interference from portuguese-speaking admins, I can take your complains to the administrators' noticeboard. Good that we've been writing in English.
It's midnight here, I'm going to bed. I don't have to reply to you instantly. Greetings. PatríciaR msg 22:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to your many messages[edit]

You will find my answer in your archive. Your friend created the archive very soon after I posted my message so I will assume that you did not read it. --Herby talk thyme 07:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your interaction with other users[edit]

I regret having to post this on your talk page however I must ask you to consider carefully your interaction with other users on this project. Although it is virtual this is a community and as such we must be able to get on together. Your comments and tone indicate to me that you are finding this difficult. I ask you to take some time out and consider your interactions. If you are unable to do this I will consider enforcing a break in your editing --Herby talk thyme 12:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response which I appreciate. However I have to say that I get many different contributions on my talk page. Unless my time is short they all get the same treatment. On a collaborative project it is not possible to say that I will not listen to contributions of users with particular attributes and you cannot do that and be part of this project either. --Herby talk thyme 12:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please remember that this is Commons not another project. It is interaction here that concerns me and I will confine myself to dealing with places I am active. Please do not bring issues from other Wikis to this one, thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I was off line for a while & will probably not be back on again until tomorrow. Thank you for your comments. However please bear in mind the action of reverting the removal of warning on a talk page is appropriate. I have done so myself and I said this to you before in a post that is in your archive. There is nothing wrong with that action. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for proving the links. They confirm my view that the admins concerned acted completely correctly by reverting your removal of warning messages and left a note to that effect in the edit summary. I have found this the policy of all Wikis that I use and I have done the same myself. Please be assured that there is nothing directed at you personally in this. The same action would be taken by any user towards any user removing warning messages.
Also please remember that we all "work" here as volunteers. We give what time we have available freely. If we have no more time then we will be unable to deal with a matter straightaway. In the same way I will not be online much today as I have other things to do myself - it implies no disrespect of you (indeed you would be showing me and other users disrespect if you thought otherwise) merely that time is limited. --Herby talk thyme 09:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • reset

I appreciate your views. However the behavior of the administrators has no fault. They have behaved reasonably and I must tell you that had you behaved the way you did on en Wikibooks where I have often been the only available administrator I would quite probably blocked you for your actions.

  1. The licensing of your uploads is at best questionable.
  2. You removed warnings that were recent repeatedly.
  3. The tone of your postings was unhelpful.
  4. Your page was archived extremely quickly.
  5. There is still no link to that archive.

All of this is against policy and against the spirit of co-operative working which is essential to the project. This will be my final posting to you as my time is short and I have much to do, however if you continue to contribute to this wiki please do so in a way that is co-operative or it is highly likely you will be blocked from editing. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did say that that was my final posting - I shall not respond to any more of your posts as I do find them unreasonable and have many other issues to attend to. If you examine talk pages you will see how most people format their archives so that they are easy to find. Equally they leave them for a period of a month very often. Nothing unreasonable has been done here to you. I have indicated to other admins that if you are unable to work in a co-operative manner a block would now be reasonable. I shall not be on line now for some time --Herby talk thyme 16:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:652933095 72e192763b.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:652933095 72e192763b.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This image was clearly watermarked http://simonepedacos.multiply.com/, which does not show any signs of endorsing the license you stated. Please do not upload images from Flickr which have clearly been uploaded there with fraudulent licensing statements which have not been approved by the legitimate copyright holder. Images from Flickr users reasonably suspected to violate copyright laws may be deleted without further notice. Thank you for your understanding. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Discurso_central_do_brasil.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Discurso_central_do_brasil.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Robert Campin - L' Annonciation - 1425.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Robert Campin - L' Annonciation - 1425.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1838JC056.image_media_horizontal.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 12:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Filomena&oldid=6886373"