User talk:Wuzur/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Modeltrain2.jpg

Hi, I just declined your train -- I put most of the reasons in the area that the gallery gives it. Thank you for making the description more 'descriptive' I didn't check to see if it is used in any of the encyclopedia articles, but knowing the scale will allow it to be used there and other places more easily by other people. That G scale was one I read about that was supposed to be a set for driving through a garden layout (and outside); I really was curious about that. I think that that was the last copy of model railroader that I bought.... If you look at the photograph at full resolution, and look at the stuff along the center of the engine, the front of it is really sharp but the smoke stack gets kind of soft on the edges.

I am not fond of declining images; I don't want to discourage you either. -- carol (talk) 11:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

No problem. And thanks for your annotation on my image. --Wuzur (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Benches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition: There is symmetry both in the static elements (benches) and dynamic elements (people). --Ikiwaner 07:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dicentra-spectabilis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Flickr images

Hi. As a result of your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers, I have added you to the reviewers list. Please see the instructions at Commons:Flickr images/reviewers and add {{User trusted}} to your userpage. You can ask me if you need any help. Cheers, Rocket000 (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Wilhelm Molterer.jpg

What's the problem with the image? I've explained the situation at the deletion page, would be nice if you could respond ASAP. Thanks! —Nightstallion (?) 18:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Please rename this image

Dear 'trusted user'

  • Can you please rename or follow up on my failed nomination to rename this tomb: Image:Ramesses III KV11a.jpg (I was the uploader) The flickr source gave the wrong indentification for it until a reliable contact on Commons told me it was actually that of pharaoh Setnakht, Ramesses III's father. I also gave another image for my reasons here. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Done. The next time the bot is running the image will be renamed. --~/w /Talk - Usefull stuff 08:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank You. One comment: Does this exercise here mean that only trusted users are allowed to make rename proposals? I thought this wouldn't be a problem here....since I was the original uploader, not a third party. Perhaps my impression is wrong. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
To avoid vandalism only users that have been trusted on Commons:MediaMoveBot/CheckPage. Maybe it would be possible that original uploaders can rename their images, ask on the project talkpage. In a short time images can be renamed as pages currently can --~/w /Talk - Usefull stuff 08:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Rename image request

Dear Trusted user Wuzur, Can you please place a name change for this image of Ramesses II's son here: Image:Khasekhemwy.jpg from Khasekhemwy.jpg (who was a pharaoh in his own right in the 2nd dynasty of Egypt 1,500+ years before Ramesses II/the Great) to Image:Khaemwaset.jpg Even the original image uploader notes that it is an image of Khaemwaset/Khaemweset in the image description....who did not become a king of Egypt although he was crown prince for a time. I believe the uploader made a simple error in the title. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

✓ Done --~/w /Talk - Usefull stuff 19:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Category:OTRS pending

Hi,

Sorry, if my question is stupid, but what is the difference between Category:OTRS pending and Category:Items pending OTRS confirmation of permission ?

Thanks.--Bapti ✉ 07:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, the only difference is that my Category just contains images. It was late and I just did't saw this category. Sorry for editing this, next time I'll look better inside the template text. --~/w /Talk 16:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
So, can I remove Category:OTRS pending ? :p --Bapti ✉ 19:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Do. Thanks and sorry again. --~/w /Talk 11:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Rename another image

Dear Wuzur, I, the uploader of this image here: Image:Triad of Ramesses II with Amun and Hathor.jpg formally request that you please rename it as Image:Triad of Ramesses II with Amun and Mut.jpg instead. An Egyptologist told me the hieroglyphs over the female goddess reads as 'Mut the great mistress of Isheru, mistress of the sky and the two land.' Unfortunately, in Egyptian theology, Hathor and Mut were closely interrelated with one another.

  • Secondly, when does the bot which renames images run--the first request I placed on September 13 has still not been implemented. Does it run once a month? I'm sorry but I am not fully knowledgeable of Commons procedures. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
✓ Done If you plan to make more of this requests it is easier if you ask unburocratic here but there is no problem if you make requests here.
The Bot runs whenever User:Betacommand thinks it is the right time to do, just ask on his talkpage to remember him. --~/w /Talk 13:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete image

Dear Wuzur, Now that the rename bot has succesfully renamed this image as Khaemwaset, (Ramesses II's son), can you delete the incorrect image here: Image:Khasekhemwy.jpg It would minimise any confusion...I have gone through the foreign wikis and replaced them with the correct image--Khasemwaset.jpg. So, it shouldn't be in use any more. Thank You. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

The image will be deleted in the next time. I do not have the right to do this, but the people for that are informed. --~/w /Talk 13:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Notice of namespace-rename "Image" -> "File"

Dear user, the MediaWiki developers recently announced that the "Image:" namespace is going to be renamed to "File:". "Image:" will remain an alias. The canonical namespace name wgCanonicalNamespace will change from "Image" to "File".

I noticed that you use wgCanonicalNamespace in either your monobook.js page or a JavaScript file in your userspace (check this list).

Please check and replace all occurrences of 

wgCanonicalNamespace == "Image"

with 

wgNamespaceNumber == 6

to ensure that your scripts keep working. Thanks! --Dschwen (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Help rename this image

Dear Wuzur, Help! Can you please kindly place a rename request on this image: Image:Diadem of one of Thutmose III's three foreign wives by John Campana.jpg I gave it the wrong title. I wish to rename it Image:18th dynasty crown of an Egyptian queen/princess by John Campana.jpg In the corrected description, I noted that the owner is unknown. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

 On hold, sorry there are no slashes allowed in image names. --~/w /Talk 08:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Then I propose this title: Image:18th dynasty pharaonic crown by John Campana.jpg Is it acceptable? --Leoboudv (talk) 09:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
✓ Done --~/w /Talk 09:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:CCF13102008_00000.jpg

The image is from 1885, it was copied in 1987. What licence should I give?Karel leermans (talk) 14:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

{{PD-Art}} is the right one. Please write a statement into the deletion request. --~/w /Talk 15:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Rename request

Dear Wuzur, Can you please rename this file from Image:Wold and Fox Hunt by Rubens1.jpg to Image:Wolf and Fox Hunt by Rubens1.jpg I hit the 'd' instead of the 'f' key for wolf. Thank You. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

✓ Done --~/w /Talk 08:26, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank You Wuzur. By the way, is this person on Wikipedia the same person who runs the Betacommand rename bot: [1] I checked Betacommand's username account on Commons but he has made no edits on Commons in October so far. I wanted to ask him when his rename bot runs. So far there are 635 images waiting to be renamed. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes this is him, just pook him in his talkpage. --~/w /Talk 08:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Help

The bot just looks if the last edit on the page is made by a trusted user. --~/w /Talk 15:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Dear Wuzur, I wish I knew this information before. If I did, I would not have made that last edit. Oh well, that's all in the past now. Anyway, just to let you know I supported your RfA. I didn't know you were running to be an Admin...but I suppose you are not allowed to canvass for support. With kind Regards from Canada --Leoboudv (talk) 05:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Glückwunsch, lieber Administrator!

Ein Willkommenspräsent für unseren neuen Administrator von deinen Kollegen...
čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

Herzlichen Glückwunsch Wuzur! Du hast jetzt die Rechte eines Administrators auf Commons. Nimm dir bitte einen Moment Zeit, um dir die Seite Commons:Administratoren und die in Verbindung mit der Beobachtungsliste stehenden Seiten durchzulesen (insbesondere Commons:Administrators' noticeboard und Commons:Deletion requests), bevor du damit beginnst, Seitenlöschungen, Accountsperrungen oder Änderungen am Seitenschutzstatus bzw. an den geschützten Seiten selbst durchzuführen. Der Großteil der Bearbeitungen eines Administrators kann durch andere Administratoren wieder rückgängig gemacht werden, mit Ausnahme der Zusammenführung von Versionsgeschichten, die deshalb mit spezieller Obacht behandelt werden muß.

Wir laden dich herzlich ein, mit uns auf IRC Kontakt aufzunehmen: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Du findest zudem in dem Commons:Ratgeber zur Administratorentätigkeit vielleicht eine nützliche Lektüre.

Bitte überprüfe, ob du in der Commons:List of administrators und den jeweils nach Datum oder Sprache sortierten Listen eingetragen wurdest und ergänze deine Daten andernfalls.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Na dann mal ran an den Feind :P abf /talk to me/ 14:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Happy admin ;) abf /talk to me/ 14:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Congratulation ;-) FloNight♥♥♥ 20:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Possible rename

I did not create this image file here: Image:JewelsAndWeaponsOfQueenAhomseNefertari.png. But if you inspect the second edit by its creator in the image history, the uploader (Captmondo) notes the object belongs to Queen Ahhotep, not Ahmose Nefertari. I suggest that this image be renamed Image:Jewels and Weapons of Queen Ahhotep.png to clear up any confusion.

However, will a rename be a problem given that the wrongly titled image is used in a few articles like this one: [3]? What is your honest opinion, Wuzur? If not, please rename the image. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
✓ Done. I uploaded the image manually, placed a requested on User:CommonsDelinker/commands. After it was fulfilled I deleted the old image rightaway. --~/w /Talk 17:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks Wuzur. You handled the situation perfectly! The thing was the current title is very confusing but since it was used in an article[s], I didn't know what to do. --Leoboudv (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Bande dessinée

I do not blame you having deleting the page. You were right, there was not any file, because you have deleted them. However, can you undelete it please, I have many files to add (for example those). In addition, why did you delete the file discussed here Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Astérix & Obélix Bruxelles rue de la Buanderie.jpg. The discussion was not closed, I had sent a lot of mails to organizations, and I wanted to ask for the permission to relaease the works under a free license. I do not understand why you deleted the file before I can find a solution.

And of course, do not delete the categories Category:Wall paintings in Brussels and Category:Sculptures in Brussels, because I there is no question of FOP for these images. These monuments belong to the city of Brussels, not the authors. I am searching for a proof of that, so do not delete the files please, until I obtain a clear reply from the city of Brussels (for I have sent mails).

In addition, the mass deletion of the murals you have done yesterday are unjustified. There were some cases in which the de minimis arument was valid. It is also the case for Category:Wall paintings in Brussels and Category:Sculptures in Brussels, so you cannot delete them without opening a discussion. And I repeat that the monuments photographed belong to the city of Brussels, and thus are released into the public domain. There is no question of FOP here.

This why I demand:
1. the undeletion of the images of Parcours BD de Bruxelles, plus the corrresponding category,
2. the reopening of the discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Astérix & Obélix Bruxelles rue de la Buanderie.jpg, which was not finished,
3. the interdiction to proceed to the mass deletion of Category:Wall paintings in Brussels and Category:Sculptures in Brussels, until I receive a mail from the city of Brussels confirming that the images are free, and otherwise granting the permission or not to release them under a free license. --Pah777 (talk) 11:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

You still don't understand: The city of Brussels cannot authorize anyone to take pictures of works that it has not created itsself. The copyright of these works are owned by the creator, no matter if the work is owned by the city of Brussels or not. No matter what they say, we need permission from the copyright holder, not from the city. -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 11:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
The city of Brussels may have bought the rights to the author (you have admitted it yourself). However, I have received a mail from http://www.bruxellesbd.be and http://www.brusselstrip.be explaining that the rights are owned by the city, the author and the publisher. It may be necessary to ask the permission to the three. I won'y do it, but I still claim that the de minimis argument can be used for some images, for example this one Image:Parcours BD 01.JPG. Mass deletion is impossible ! --Pah777 (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The images are definitly copyvios as there are now. We have waited long enough. If you revive a permission for the images I can restore them. (If you need the images to show them the right holder, I can post the Flickr-links) --~/w /Talk 15:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes I would like the Flickr links please, and above all the names of the uploaders of the images if possible. Or better, is it possible you undelete the files for a while, so that I can upload them with a fur in the english encyclopedia (until I am granted a permission). Many thanks, if you can do it. I remind you it is the Category:Murals of Brussels--Pah777 (talk) 16:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Voilà. Just make a list of images you need and i'll find the best way to upload the images to the English Wikipedia. --~/w /Talk 17:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Parfait, merci. Here are the most important:

Would it be possible to give a list of articles in which the images were used? (If not it not the problem, but better to restore them on en) --~/w /Talk 17:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Done. If you have any problem with the image and articles, ask to en:user:Fram or myself. Generally, it would be preferable to put the images at the end of the articles, if possible in the section "In popular culture" or "Memorabilia" when it exists. Thanks, and do not hesitate to enjoy the articles about comics and bring your contribution ! --Pah777 (talk) 22:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
I uploaded every image marked with an OK. Due some problems now I'll upload the last two later. Please put the images into the articles, I don't know much about comics, it was just to prove the proper fair-use on en. --~/w /Talk 17:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Noch mehr FOP-Bilder aus Brüssel

Hallo Wuzur, habe beim Stöbern grade noch Category:Wall paintings in Brussels, Category:Sculptures in Brussels und Category:Art in MIVB station gefunden. Da ist auch so einiges dabei, was nicht ohne FOP geknipst werden darf. Vielleicht magst du mal durchgucken, wenn nicht, sag Bescheid, ich werde dann entsprechende DRs eröffnen. Grüße, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Ich hab grade nicht viel Zeit, du kannst ja einen Mass-DR eröffnnen, dann kann zentral diskutiert werden. --~/w /Talk 15:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Alles klar, vielen Dank. Wird so demnächst geschehen. Grüße, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

de:Hauptseite

Hi, wie wäre es, erstmal eine 1 tägige Vollsperre auf alle auf der Hauptseite eingebunden Commons-Bilder einzurichten. Weiteres wird wohl unter de:WP:AN#Commons-Bilder auf der Hauptseite diskustiert werden. Wer weiss ob der "Heini" noch weitere Accounts hat. Gruß --Jutta234 (talk) 17:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Ich weiß nur nicht wie das technisch zu bewerkstelligen wäre, da müsste ein Admin von hier jeden Tag ran (ob jetzt Direktsperre, oder Kaskade). Man sollte mal einen Bugreport für projektübergreifende Kaskadensperren einrichten. --~/w /Talk 17:50, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

"high traffic"?

Kannst du mir bitte den tatsächlichen Grund deiner gegenwärtigen Sperrung dieses Templates mitteilen? "high traffic"? Das kann es ja wohl nicht sein. Unsere Diskussion verläuft zweifellos sehr konstruktiv und weit entfernt von einem Edit-War. --T.M.L.-KuTV (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

High traffic im Sinne von "Dieses Template wird auf vielen Bildern eingebunden" (um genau zu sein auf jedem BArch-Bild). Jeder Edit belastet die Job Queue und führt dadurch zu einer erhöhten Serverbelastung. Außerdem kann jede Änderung auf tausenden von Bildern gesehen werden und ist daher Vandalentanfällig. Aus diesem Grunde werden solche Templates generell vollgesperrt. Einen Administrator kannst du aufmerksam machen, indem du {{Editprotected}} auf die Diskussionsseite einfügst. Die Verbesserungsvorschläge habe ich eingearbeitet. --~/w /Talk 09:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Danke für die Information und für die Änderungen, die du bereits vorgenommen hast. Für das Vorgehen habe ich vollstes Verständnis, kam gestern allerdings "schief" rüber, weil wir mitten in der Diskussion standen und Textänderungen notwendig wurden, aber kein Ansprechpartner nach der Sperrung greifbar war. Ich z.B. sah mich aufgrund einer Diskussion, die auf Wikipedia begann und dann später bei Wikimedia Commons weitergeführt wurde, gezwungen, erstmals auf Wikimedia Commons zu arbeiten, wo ich mich überhaupt nicht auskenne. Schön wäre es gewesen, vor der Sperrung erst zu schauen, ob (neue) Leute bemüht sind, an der Verbesserung der Textgestaltung zu arbeiten und einen kurzen entsprechenden Hinweis in die Diskussion einzuwerfen; oder während der Sperrung direkt dir Vorlage "Use editprotected" auf der Disk-Seite des Templates einzubinden. Dann hätte es diese ganze Verunsicherung bzw. das Missverständnis gestern nicht gegeben. So aber habe zumindest ich mich ausgesperrt gefühlt.
Ferner denke ich, dass ich dich auch direkt hier fragen kann, anstatt auf der Disk-Seite: Duesentrieb schrieb "oder" ist weder in der deutschen Sprache noch in der Logik exklusiv, es schließt ein "und" nicht aus. Sonst wäre das ein "entweder... oder". Ein "und/oder" schadet aber auch nichts. Diese Ansicht teile ich nicht. In der Umgangssprache und philosophischen Logik gibt es durchaus einen Unterschied zwischen "und" und "oder". Wenn Duesentrieb Recht hätte, würde das "und" in der deutschen Sprache keinen Sinn machen, da es stets durch ein "oder" ersetzt werden könnte. Auch in der allgemeinen deutschen Sprachauffassung wird ein "oder" nicht (auch) im Sinne von "sowohl als auch" aufgefasst, sondern im Sinne von "entweder ... oder". Deshalb nun meine Bitte, bei der Formulierung der beiden Templates noch die Form "und /oder" zu ergänzen. Denn das Ärgernis, das mit einem ausschließlichen "oder" verbunden ist, liegt auf der Hand. Ein Beispiel: Gerade bei NS-Themen kann das ausschließliche "oder" suggerieren, dass der Inhalt eines Beschreibungstextes zwar "politische extrem" sein kann, aber nicht "falsch"! Deshalb muss hier dringend ein "und" hinzugefügt werden. Gruß, --T.M.L.-KuTV (talk) 13:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Kleine Anmerkung: Damit dieses Problem auch für andere deutlich werden kann und sich der Fehler nach der Änderung nicht wiederholt, werde ich eine Kopie des vorangegangenen Abschnitts auf den Disk-Seiten der Templates kopieren. --T.M.L.-KuTV (talk) 13:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Ich entschuldige mich nochmal dafür, dass ich nicht daran gedacht habe die Vorlage auf die Diskseite einzubinden. Die Diskussion (zumindest auf dieser Seite) lief noch nicht, ansonsten hätte ich die Vorlage erst nach Beendigung gesperrt. Im Übrigen teile ich ChrisiPKs Meinung, die er auf der Diskussionsseite zu der Vorlage geäußert hat. --~/w /Talk 14:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Ich möchte freundlicherweise auch für andere Leser hier den Hinweis hinterlassen, dass sich Wuzur und ich an anderer Stelle sehr positiv miteinander ausgetauscht haben. Mein Posting beruhte zum Teil auf Unkenntnis bezüglich der üblichen Vorgehensweisen auf Wikimedia Commons und meinem Mangel an Wissen, welche Ansprechpartner bei diversen Problemen hinzugezogen werden können. Danke auch hier an Wuzors Verständnis und Unterstützung. Gruß, --T.M.L.-KuTV (talk) 18:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Got source?

I noticed your question. The source of the program is available at https://svn.toolserver.org/svnroot/multichill/public_html/gotsource.php . Making bot output possible shouldn't be that hard. Multichill (talk) 21:05, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that. --~/w /Talk 15:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

*lol*^

{{Dont remove warnings/de}} :P abf /talk to me/ 16:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes I just accidentally removed that. --~/w /Talk 17:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Hermann Buhl

Hi, today you deleted Category:Hermann Buhl per this deletion request, but I think the idea was to keep it as a disambiguation category. Maybe you had another reason to delete it, but if it was distraction on your part, could you please undelete it? Thanks for looking into it. --Tryphon (talk) 23:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, sorry. Thought somehow, there should not be such categories. Restored of course. --~/w /Talk 12:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
For your Information: We started a discussion for a policy which should decide wheter keep such cats or not. --~/w /Talk 12:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

deletion/speedy deletion

Hi there, I'd like to ask you a question about this deletion request. I'm currently requesting adminship and I'd like to fully understand other admins actions. Why not speedy-delete in such a case? Would look like a pretty clear copyright infringement to me. Thanks in advance if you're willing to answer. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 21:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

It maybe could have been speedied but it's just that speedy deletions without warning and a little reaction time should the user be given. The user should finally understand why the image was deleted. If you just delete the user will recreate this and other images. The deletion debate can be speedily closed. --~/w /Talk 21:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
erm.... ✓ Done by the way, I would have speedyed, this is in my eyes just beaurocratic. Merry Christmas! abf /talk to me/ 21:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you both for sharing your views ;-) --Eusebius (talk) 21:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Delete

Could you please delete my talk page? I no longer want to be part of the project.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Torax

Thanks,

--Torax (talk) 15:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

We do never delete talk-pages. Sorry. Merry Christmas! abf /talk to me/ 15:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
(EC) Just wanted to say that. --~/w /Talk 15:36, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Know your limitations

With regard to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Guerrero de Mogente 1.JPG, please do not propose to delete things just because you do not understand. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I did not requested a deletin just because i didn't understand that but because the aspect does not get clear out from the image page. A "normal user" who has just a little copyright knowledge has to see whether this file is ok or not. --~/w /Talk 17:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I hope this is enough. Regards. --Dodo (talk) 08:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

No problem now. Sorry for your inconvenience. --~/w /Talk 09:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi!

Dont be hasty. Have a look File:Zwiad kozacki.jpg.Everything is fine--Alex Tora (talk) 11:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Please uploaded the image rightaway with the correct information. This helps everyone the detect copyvios. And don not remove deletion warnings until your are an administrator. I speedily closed that. --~/w /Talk 11:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
I upload in the way is it easy to upload. Thats the right way, I think. The commons tool for uploading is inconvinient. I provide all images with all necessary information and licenses, so no need to panic or grieve. Good luck!--Alex Tora (talk) 11:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Maybe you want to use the Easy upload tool (go to setting->Gadgets->Use old upload form) --~/w /Talk 11:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much! It makes life easier! :)--Alex Tora (talk) 11:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Question about your work!

Hi, dear Wuzur! Sorry for my poor English. I try upload the file "Truba_teploshumoizol.jpg", but you deleted it. It our own image and we want do it free. Why are you delete our image? 

   * 11:51, 22 December 2008 Wuzur (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Truba_teploshumoizol.jpg" ‎ (copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing)
   * 11:46, 22 December 2008 Wuzur (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Truba_teploshumoizol.jpg" ‎ (copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing)
   * 11:35, 22 December 2008 Wuzur (Talk | contribs) deleted "File:Truba_teploshumoizol.jpg" ‎ (copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ingenering (talk • contribs) ~/w /Talk 12:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC) (UTC)

The image had no license and a source ("ZAO Inzhenernoe oborudovanie") which claimed that the file is not created by you. Therefore it is not allowed on Commons according our policy. If you think you have the right to upload state here why. You may also be intrested in Commons:Image casebook. --12:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I understand. And what about images "Issledovanie_kiv.jpg" and "Razmeri_kiv.jpg"? Why is it not free? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ingenering (talk • contribs) ~/w /Talk 12:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC) (UTC)
Same with that. Source:ZAO Inzhenernoe oborudovanie and no license given. --~/w /Talk 12:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I work in "ZAO Inzhenernoe oborudovanie". And I must upload these images - it is my work. Must I prove you, that I and "ZAO Inzhenernoe oborudovanie" one person?

Aaaa... When do I upload must choose a free license?

Yes, see Commons:Licensing. For prooving that send a mail to permission-commons@wikimedia.org from your company account. Add then {{OTRS pending}} to the image page you are uploading. --~/w /Talk 12:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I try send it: 

"Hello!
We send this mail in proof, that trust for accaunt Ingernering on ru.wikipedia.org. He can freely use our materials.

___________________________________________
С уважением
    Ведущий инженер дистрибьюторского отдела
    Беспалько Сергей

ЗАО "Инженерное оборудование"
г.Москва, ул.Покровка, д.12
Тел.  (495)229-50-69
      (495)625-39-20
Факс. (495)234-19-51
Моб.   +79266698558
Е-mail: mskdst4@eneq.ru
        
URL: www.saniflow.ru
     www.eneq.ru
     www.vortice-russia.ru"

from my email (xxxx@eneq.ru). But I get in reply the next mail: 

"This is the mail system at host smtp1.sitek.net.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message.

                   The mail system

<permission-commons@wikimedia.org>: host mchenry.wikimedia.org[208.80.152.186]
    said: 550 Address permission-commons@wikimedia.org does not exist (in reply
    to RCPT TO command)"

What are me doing?

Oh, sorry I forgot an "s" the mail is permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please note that the image has to be freely used for everyone not just for Wikimedia. --~/w /Talk 16:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

CARLO LAMBERT: LE LIERRE: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Le Lierre, 1929 par Carlo LAMBERT.jpg

Carlo Lambert est décédé en 1940 comme héros de la guerre.

Il s'agit de l'unique photo connue d'une de ses oeuvres, scannée personnellement par moi-même.

C'est lui rendre hommage que de la divulger. (Photo dédicacée personnellement). Cette photo doit être conservée.

Bruxellensis

Sorry

Hello. Sorry for the inconvenience. I should have been more careful in these things because, even though the license is right and compatible, the image that appears on it does not specify if it is copyrighted or not. That happened to me twice. If you look at the rest of the files I have uploaded, I did not have any problem, excepting the first ones, mainly as the result of my ignorance on this field. I currently work as a sysop and bureaucrat on eswiki and I always pay attention to these things, but this time I lost it. Therefore, if you deem necessary to delete the image, I agree with you and offer my apologies for such an embarrassing fact. Kind regards from Spain, --Gustavo86 (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I opened a deletion request. This does not neccesarily mean that the file will be deleted. I don't know (and I think no one does) any exception in international law. There is no problem with that. Someone uploads a file and the next one delets it. You aren't get blocked for that and certainly not if you upload many good images. You don't need to say sorry for that. --~/w /Talk 19:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. By the way, there is a user who is uploading images without mentioning the sources. I've been following him on eswiki and I certainly think some of the images or all of them may have a copyright. Check them out if you have time. Regards, --Gustavo86 (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
I deleted them. All were definitly copyvios. --~/w /Talk 08:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Stanton-railroad-easment.jpg

You wrote "Deleted", but the file is still there. - Erik Baas (talk) 23:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I forgot to press the delete button. Many thanks for beeing such attentive. I deleted the file. --~/w /Talk 10:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Piraten.jpg

The artwork on the box is copyrighted --Jodo (talk) 13:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I opened a deletion request. Please state the next time more clearly why the image should be deleted. --~/w /Talk 14:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Tadao Ando artwork

Was denn nu? ;) [[ Forrester ]] 09:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Ich würd mal sagen, da mochte mein Skript mich nicht. --~/w /Talk 11:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

2 deletions questioned

Why did you delete File:Ft Worth Modern 15.jpg and File:Ft Worth Modern 16.jpg? Both User:Jarekt and I argued at Commons:Deletion requests/Tadao Ando artwork that there was absolutely no problem with these images under U.S. law (Cecil's argument, if accepted, amounts to it being illegal to publish photographs of public interior spaces, clearly not the case in the U.S.) and neither he nor anyone else responded with any coherent explanation of why this would be an issue. The buildings are in the U.S., so any issue under Japanese law would not apply: the nationality of the architect is clearly irrelevant. - Jmabel ! talk 20:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

It's not illegal to publish such photos, but the interior is simply copyrighted. There is no exception for putting this under a free license in the US law unless the architect decides so. --~/w /Talk 10:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
So are you saying that all photos in the interiors of (recent) buildings have copyright problems, since they inevitably incorporate elements of the buildings? That seems bizarre. Surely the claim must be something weaker than that. - Jmabel ! talk 19:49, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Unless they don't meet {{PD-ineligible}} and are in a country which has a law which says that - yes. --~/w /Talk 19:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I still don't get this. The building is in the United States. The picture was taken from a public space (the lobby). Freedom of panorama#United States says that there is freedom of panorama for buildings in the United States and that in the U.S. "Anyone may take photographs of buildings from public places. The photographer holds the exclusive copyright to such an image (the architect or owner of the building has no say whatsoever), and may publish the image in any way." So what exactly is the problem? - Jmabel ! talk 04:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Please note that not every lobby is a public place just because every can go into it. The building should be open 24/7 is just one criterium for a public place. The second thing is that interior is not a building but architectural artwork. The term "building" just describes the fassade, what you can see from outside. --~/w /Talk 11:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Where do you get this 24/7 criterion? It runs counter to what I have always heard was the understanding of "public space" in U.S. copyright law. I understand that is the criterion several places in Europe, and possibly elsewhere, but in this case only U.S. law should be relevant. - Jmabel ! talk 16:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The US law simply says "public place". A place which is open just a half day can't be public. There are different interpretations of any word so you may want to start a undeletion request. I'd be strictly against it, others maybe not. --~/w /Talk 16:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
These particular images aren't important to me, but the policy is. We have literally hundreds, maybe thousands, of such images. So COM:UNDEL wouldn't be the place to take it up; I'll try to start a conversation at the Village Pump. - Jmabel ! talk 18:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


Wuzur, could you please comment at Commons:Village pump#Public space (clarification needed for U.S.) so that your side of the issue is also properly presented? - Jmabel ! talk 21:59, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Since you have chosen not to comment there, I have reluctantly opened a request at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Ft_Worth_Modern_15.jpg_and_File:Ft_Worth_Modern_16.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Ingenering

As i see you had talk with User:Ingenering. He recreated images for using them in ad-like article in Russian Wikipedia. Do they have OTRS or not? Rambalac (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't have more information than you can see above. Maybe you should contact a OTRS member. --~/w /Talk 18:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Small request

Hi! Can you remove this photo? Thanks in advance! Regards, Patrol110 talk 16:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

I'll delete the image when CheckUsage is ready again, to proove it is not used. --~/w /Talk 16:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Okay! I've done it! All links fixed to the new name according to Polish Wikipedia (CheckUsage Sorry, the Wikimedia Toolserver is currently down for maintenance) Patrol110 talk 17:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The problem is that we don't know wheter it is used in other articles or not. In a few hours it should work again so we can see that. It's on my todo-list, so you can count on me. --~/w /Talk 17:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Yep :) Thanks and Happy New Year! Patrol110 talk 17:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

POTY 2008

Hello, I'd like to upload / check / run the POTY tools for 2008. Can you tell me specifically what is needed for this? I copied Bryan's POTY 2007 python scripts to my harddrive. A few minor changes are needed (changing 2007 references to 2008, changing bryans server paths to something different, possibly adding thumbnails or other minor support files, and testing to see that everything is running properly). -- JalalV (talk) 15:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

First of all I need the files itself ;-). Then I'll upload them to my toolserver account, change the needs and create the desired DB tables. --~/w /Talk 15:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Help rename this image file

Dear Wuzur,

✓ Done —Wuzur 14:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

POTY

Have the tests been completed? It'd be nice to start soon, but, you know, if there's problems, or if you don't have time to get to it yet, well, noone's going to be too upset that the team that tried to pull together POTY at the last minute hit a few problems. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

There is a little problem with the python version used on the toolserver (bryan had an own one). I think I should handle this quickly. —Wuzur 17:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

1 more edit

Dear Wuzur, Thank You for placing a rename request on this image file: File:Tomb TT339 of Pashedu (Kairoinfo4u).jpg

  • One question. Can you make one more edit to the image file here such as placing a second full stop or dot after Seti I. I made an anonymous edit to rename the tomb as TT3, not TT339 as you can see here: [5] So the rename request will fail since an anon IP made the last edit to the picture file unless you make another edit---like placing a second dot/full stop after Seti I. I'm sorry I did not realise this until now. Can you help. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done —Wuzur 17:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

E-Mail

-- Cherubino (talk) 21:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Galleria Eintrag

hallo wuzur, bin grad etwas verwirrt. war heute dran an dem eintrag für "Galleria" etwas zu machen. anscheinend hast du es als es noch nicht fertig war mit "wikifizieren" versehen. nun sind die aktualisierungen & fotos weg. was hab ich falsch gemacht?--Kitty82 (talk)

Du befindest dich hier auf Commons, dem Bildarchiv, der Artikel auf Wikipedia, der Enzyklopädie, wo auch dieser Beitrag hingehört. Aber nun gut, ich hab kein Problem, das hier zu diskutieren. Allerdings versteh ich deine Frage nicht so richtig. Was genau ist passiert? Die Bilder haben nichts mit Bearbeitungen zu tun. Es könnte sein, dass du einen sogennanten "Bearbeitungskonflikt" mit mir hattest, was das ist und wie man den umgeht, kann man auf der entsprechenden Hilfeseite lesen. Wenn du eine genauere Antwort möchtest, musst du deine Frage präzisieren. —Wuzur 19:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Lieber Wuzur, sorry für die Verwirrung. War tatsächlich ein Bearbeitungskonflickt. nun eine Frage zu meinen hochgeladenen Bildern: ich sollte die weiter kategorisieren - weiss aber nicht wie... bzw. wie ich wieder auf die Bearbeitungsmaske der Bilder zurück komme. kannst Du mir da weiterhelfen? danke — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitty82 (talk • contribs) 11:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Auf jeder Seite findest du oben einen Knopf, der (je nach Sprache) "Edit" oder "Bearbeiten" heißt. Da kannst du drauf klicken und die Seite weiter bearbeiten. Passende Kategorien kannst du mit diesem Tool finden. —Wuzur 11:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Rocky Steps of the Art Museum

FYI. Undeletion requests/Current requests Evrik (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Dali image

You might like to comment here. Regards, --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Forrester/monobook.js&diff=18467818&oldid=15205957

Das verursacht bei mir n Fehler....die tabs vom bad old ones tool werden sofort wieder geschlossen + es kommt manchmal irgendwas mit ns error [[ Forrester ]] 10:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

OTRS invitation

The OTRS system is looking for trusted volunteers to help staff our German-language image submission queue. I would like to invite you to look over what OTRS involves and consider signing up at the volunteering page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Danilowiki.jpg

File:Danilowiki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

132.199.211.11 17:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Image for deletion

Hi there, you had closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:WIS idea .png as Deleted, but the image was never removed. Mind stepping back over and taking care of that task? Cheers :) — Huntster (t • @ • c) 23:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Somehow I must clicked on the wrong button. Thanks for the info. —Wuzur 09:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
And thank you :) — Huntster (t • @ • c) 21:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Castle Hluboky.JPG

Hi,
contributor from cswiki, Podzemnik, said me, that you wrongly closed Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Castle Hluboky.JPG. I check the problem and he is right, you followed inaccurate help page. I repaired Commons:Freedom of panorama#Czech Republic, previous version can easily lead to misinterpretation of Czech Copyright Act. You can see used arguments and materials.

As it is recommended in Commons:Deletion_requests#Appeal, I ask you for reconsideration of your decision in Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Castle Hluboky.JPG. Thanks for your time. --Beren (talk) 00:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Please start a new deletion request and link to the old one to discuss it again. —Wuzur 11:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vrané nad Vltavou, přehrada, schema.jpg is similar case. When it ends, I will have decide if start a new discussion or not. Thanks. --Beren (talk) 16:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

wikipedia:Gregory Chaitin photo

Thank you Wuzur, and I'm sorry I assumed since it's in public photo album, it is under US Public License. I will go through the links you provided (Commons:Licensing, Commons:Licensing, Commons:Image casebook, Commons:Help desk) and make sure I upload only appropriate files.

Could you also check the image for wikipedia:Fred Cohen, because I obtained the photo the same way: Google-ing.

I deleted the second file, too. Since there is no law (neither in the US, nor in other countries) that on the internet published images are free for others to use we have to stick to the existing rules. Commons only allows free files, which either are put under a free license by the author (the license allows e.g. free commercial use) or have no copyright more on them (this happens e.g. 70 years after the photographer died). The links I gave you are a good starting point. And thanks for the reply :-) —Wuzur 12:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Request for Permission

Hello Wuzur,

First of all, I apologize for the lengthy message. I have copied and pasted here the email-conversation I had with Gregory Chaitin, asking him for a photograph we could use on wikipedia. Today, I got a promising result, so I am asking for permission to re-upload the specified photo to wikimedia to be used on G. Chaitin's wikipedia article.

1) My request

from Hunan Rostomyan <hunan131@gmail.com>
to Gregory Chaitin <gjchaitin@gmail.com>
date Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:47 AM
subject Photograph
mailed-by gmail.com

Dear Professor,
The point of my letter concerns your Wikipedia article, to which I tried to add a photograph of yours, taken for an IBM article. It :can also be found at http://reallyhardsums.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/godel-intuition-versus-formality/, with Godel above, and Turing :under your photo. Blogs can use it, why not Wikipedia? Because they require explicitly free licensed photos.
If it is possible, could we use one of your photos for your Wikipedia article, because people might want to see who you are when :reading about you there. Imagine Godel's or Kolmogorov's pages without their photos?
Thank you and whatever your decision my be, thank you very much for your time.


2) This is his response to my request

from Gregory Chaitin <gjchaitin@gmail.com>
to Hunan Rostomyan <hunan131@gmail.com>
date Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 7:06 AM
subject Re: Photograph
mailed-by gmail.com

Thanks for your interest.
I do not understand these legal matters.
As far as I can see, there is no solution.
I cannot take a photo of myself.
Therefore I do not own the copyright
of any of my photos, that belongs to the photographer.
Therefore I cannot give anyone permission to
use one of my photos, that would have to come
from the photographer.
That black and white photo of me that you want
to use belongs to IBM, I suppose.
As far as I am concerned, you are free to use it,
but for Wikipedia that does not seem to be
sufficient.
Very sorry!

3) End of conversation about the IBM photo

from Hunan Rostomyan <hunan131@gmail.com>
to Gregory Chaitin <gjchaitin@gmail.com>
date Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 7:37 AM
subject Re: Photograph
mailed-by gmail.com

Thank you for the quick response. I have to write an email to IBM then.

4) G. Chaitin offers me to use another photo

from Gregory Chaitin <gjchaitin@gmail.com>
to Hunan Rostomyan <hunan131@gmail.com>
date Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:26 PM
subject Re: Photograph
mailed-by gmail.com

Can I suggest that you use the photo here?:
http://www.festivalmatematica.gov.ar/home09/press/material/005.JPG
It was prepared for newspapers to use to cover a math festival in Buenos Aires this year.
You would have to crop it to remove the other two people.
To get permission to use this, I suggest you contact the press officer given here:
http://www.festivalmatematica.gov.ar/home09/web/en/press/index.html
Rgds,
GJC


> I did contact the press officer on July 18, 2009 but no response to this day


5) Today came the good news

from Gregory Chaitin <gjchaitin@gmail.com>
to Hunan Rostomyan <hunan131@gmail.com>
date Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:14 AM
subject Re: Photograph
mailed-by gmail.com

If you want to give that photo to Wikipedia, please go ahead.
It was an IBM publicity photo expressly intended for public
distribution.


6) My happy response

from Hunan Rostomyan <hunan131@gmail.com>
to Gregory Chaitin <gjchaitin@gmail.com>
date Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:29 AM
subject Re: Photograph
mailed-by gmail.com

Thank you sir. I am going to re-upload the photo, put my original request and your today's letter in the summary.


7) Seconds later, comes the link from G. Chaitin, the same one I used before

from Gregory Chaitin <gjchaitin@gmail.com>
to Hunan Rostomyan <hunan131@gmail.com>
date Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:27 AM
subject higher resolution photo
mailed-by gmail.com

Higher-resolution version of the photo you want:
http://www.umcs.maine.edu/~chaitin/greg3b.jpg

Sorry, but simply "intended for public" isn't enough. The photographer has clearly to stata that anyone can use the image freely for any purpose according to any of the licenses. But many thanks for mailing him about this, at least a good try. —Wuzur 16:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh well, thanks for your time. Hunan131 (talk) 16:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Wuzur!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Löschung von File:Arena auf schalke gelsenkirchen germany.JPG

Hallo Wuzur,
ich vermute dass du o.g. Datei auf Veranlassung des Uploaders gelöscht hast. Ich hatte mich im Vorfeld bereits mit Martin H. beraten. IMHO ist eine komplette Löschung bei einem bereits 2005 hochgeladenen Bild keine gute Lösung (um nicht zu sagen inakzeptable) für das eigentliche "Problem", weil dieses Bild natürlich vielfach außerhalb von Wikimedia verwendet wird; nur mal so für einen schnellen Eindruck: [6]. All diese Nutzungen sind jetzt ihrer Quelle beraubt, weshalb ein redir vom alten auf den neuen Datennamen das absolute Minimum wäre. Der saubere Weg ist m.E. ein Oversight-Eingriff, durch den der unerwünschte Eintrag aus dem upload-log entfernt wird, ohne diesen selbst zu beseitigen. Auch die nicht deklarierte "Migration" der Urheberschaft des ursprünglichen Uploaders (und vermuteten Urhebers) auf User:Friedrich Petersdorff macht mir Bauchschmerzen. Ich habe an diesem Wochenende kaum Zeit, aber m.E. ist das nicht die geeignete Vorgehensweise, auch wenn es sicher die schnellste war. Wir können gerne auch einen Dritten, wie z.B. Martin H. oder wer dir lieber ist, hinzuziehen. Vielleicht hat er ja eine bessere Idee. --Túrelio (talk) 09:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Ich habe gerade mal probeweise einen redir angelegt und festgestellt, dass (zumindest für uns) der ursprüngliche Upload-log einsehbar bleibt. Also muss auf jedenfalls OV ran. Das sollte der Uploader aber selbst beantragen. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Um ehrlich zu sein hast du schon Recht, dass das Bild außerhalb von Wikimedia verwendet wird, daran habe ich nicht gedacht. Der User hatte mir nicht mitgeteilt, dass er schon mit jemandem darüber gesprochen hat, sonst hätte ich mich natürlich abgesprochen. Ich verstehe, dass dies eine suboptimale Lösung war. Mir fällt außer dem Oversighteingriff nichts ein, aber gab es dazu nicht einen Bug, der verhindert, dass Bilderversionen gelöscht werden? —Wuzur 14:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Bug .. - keine Ahnung. Diese Doppelanfrage war unglücklich, zumal ich auch nichts davon wusste, bis ich auf deinen Edit stieß. Ich habe ihn inzwischen gebeten, selbst Oversicht der upload-logs zu beantragen, weil auf die "alten" Dateinamen zumindest ein redir gelegt werden sollte. Ich hoffe, er macht es. --Túrelio (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Admin inactivity

Hello Wuzur, you might be interested in this discussion: Commons_talk:Administrators/De-adminship#Activity -- A9 (talk) 18:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 04:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:YoungerMarx.JPG

Hallo, you had kept this file in 2008. I would like to dispute the decission and reacitvate the deletion request since:

  • the file from March 2006 is a doublette of the older File:Marx3.jpg from December 2005.
  • the file has obviuosly been made up from File:Marx4.jpg, I guess it is taken from some publication in Eastern Europe during Soviet time, see also my comment on File talk:Marx3.jpg. Actually this picture Marx3/Younger Marx does not belong into encyclopaedic articles.

So while at most one version of YoungerMarx and Marx3 may perhaps be kept for documentary purposes, in order to have some control, the version YoungerMarx should be deleted.

Greetings, Rosenkohl (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Wuzur/Archive 1. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you abf «Cabale!» 15:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Foto Br 80

Bei dem Foto handelt es sich keinesfalls um ein originales Modell der Fa. MÄRKLIN, vielmehr wurden Gehäuse und Treibgestell verschiedener Modelle im Selbstbau "kombiniert" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.1.114.70 (talk • contribs)

Das Modell kam so aus einer orginalverschlossenen Packung, auf der Märklin draufstand, dies ist nach besten Wissen ein Originalmodell. Wie kommst du darauf, dass die Lok nicht echt sein soll? —Wuzur 17:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Ich gehe auch mal davon aus, dass das tatsächlich ein Original ist, da gab's mal vor ein paar Jahren kurz vor Weihnachten eine Aktion bei Aldi, mit einer sehr einfachen Version einer Dampf- bzw. Diesellok, die sich nur im (Plastik-)Aufbau unterschieden. Ist keinesfalls mit dem Modell 3404 o.ä. zu verwechseln! a×pdeHello! 17:25, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
This talk page in other languages:
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wuzur/Archive_1&oldid=357954960"