User talk:Butterfly austral

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Butterfly voyages!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lithodes.santolla.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nicely done --Ianare 18:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lithodes santolla.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 5 (should be geocoded, but is not). "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so". I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. -- Rastaman3000 (talk) 16:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Hi. I don't understand very well, what do you want ? The geocoded is Puerto Natales in Chile coord 51 43 S 72 31 W ; the first category is Lithodes, the second is Lithodes santolla ?? is it not enough ?-- Butterfly voyages (talk) 00:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Comment I added the Geocode-Tag but am not shure if the numbers are correkt like this, could you check and correct if it is wrong? --Kersti (talk) 06:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

•  Info Thanks a lot because I didn't know how to do this before...now yes !!! I have already corrected it with Google Earth => -51.716667, -72.516667 now is correct-- Butterfly voyages (talk) 16:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support seems fine now. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Kersti (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

FP Nomination

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Lithodes.santolla.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lithodes.santolla.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marine française - demo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight noise but not something one sees everyday --Ianare 00:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Port Lockroy "Base A" (Antarctic).jpg

Hello Butterfly voyages. For the QI issue (resolution too low) perhaps you could simply "upload a new version of this file" (i.e. same name, just replacement with higher resolution)? The extra resolution might allow you to crop down some of the sky a bit. I don't think you would need to relist it under QI. Just my 2 cents! Cheers, --Jcart1534 (talk) 02:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

It (Port Lockroy Antarctic Peninsula.jpg) is definitely better. But the sky needs to be cropped down a bit (too much sky perhaps)? --Jcart1534 (talk) 10:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port Lockroy Antartic Peninsula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Dumont d'Urville

merci de tes encouragements

Il me manque certaines planches qui sont trop floues. j'irai donc refaire une séance de photos pour rattraper. Mais dès maintenant tu peux retrouver les descriptions à l'aide des pages de tables (les numéro des planches doivent correspondre si je ne me suis pas trompé).

amicalement Jeffdelonge (talk) 06:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

White Squall

Hi, there is a comment at [1] on English Wikipedia, regarding the attribution of this image. Please can you join the conversation. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:46, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

File:White_Squall.jpg

File:White_Squall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jezhotwells (talk) 14:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

You might want to take a look.

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mirounga leonina.jpg Wolf (talk) 23:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirounga leonina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! ZooFari 04:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)  Support Awesome, you can see a Person in it's left eye. --Snurre86 12:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King Penguins (Youngs).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not all sharp, but it is well composed and looks like conditions were difficult. --99of9 06:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Lenticular Cloud South Georgia.jpg

Bonjour, Cette image pourrait certainement obtenir le statut d'image remarquable. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

En attendant ce statut d’image remarquable il faudrait ce sortir du piège des images de qualité. Après avoir douté et examiné ton image je ne trouve aucun argument pouvant faire douter de sa véracité. De plus après m’être intéressé au personnage je suis sûr que tu as d’autre chose à faire que de bidouiller des images. Premier point positif : je suis contant de t’avoir découvert.

Tu as versé ton image dans sa deuxième version comme une image à part. De telle sort que le vote ne peut pas ce faire sur elle.

Je te propose je retirer la version actuelle en mettent {withdraw} et de représenter la nouvelle et je serais heureux de la soutenir. Amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Babel boxes

Please add Babel (es:Wikipedia:Babel) boxes to your user page so others may know what languages you can speak. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 07:13, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whaler Ship Petrel Grytviken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo --George Chernilevsky 07:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenticular Clouds South Georgia1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 12:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)  Comment yes, very good now! --Carschten 15:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glaciar Vinciguerra .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Carschten 18:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Faroevangelistas.jpg

File:Faroevangelistas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—Bkell (talk) 04:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cyttaria.fruit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cyttaria.fruit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Bravo, l'ami! --Citron (talk) 11:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Haha! Je n'y suis pas pour grand chose! C'est toi le photographe! Cependant, j'espère que ça te motivera pour nous ramener d'autres merveilleux clichés! Je vais assez bien, je continue d'avancer! Et toi? J'espère que tout va bien et que tu ne te lasses pas de voyager! amicalement--Citron (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Butterfly austral!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

• Image:View of Talcahuano.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Chaffanjon01.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Chaffanjon02.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

FPpromotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:King Penguins (Youngs).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:King Penguins (Youngs).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Congratz! --Citron (talk) 16:11, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica Nuestra Señora del Pilar (Buenos Aires).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good. --Ankara 13:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptonychotes weddellii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments some CA, but QI to me --Carschten 14:04, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Foto antigua

Hola. Si no entiendes mi mensaje, por favor avísame e intentaré escribirlo en inglés. La imagen File:Alberto de Agostini.jpg figura como tu propio trabajo del año 2009, pero no parece que la hayas tomado tú y el año no es correcto, porque de Agostini murió en 1960. Por favor, indica quién es el verdadero autor y el año, para que quede claro si se encuentra en el dominio público. Saludos. Lin linao ¿dime? 05:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, unknown author. It is possible that this is the Agostini's camera... I do not know more. Sorry. Butterfly austral (talk) 01:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your picture : Cap Horn2.jpg I'm making a french page with it Phare du Cap Horn... Maybe you have a better picture (closer) ? thanks 2 u my french account for an answer !

Location?

Hola Butterfly austral - do you have a photo location (which part of Tierra del Fuego) for File:Parcnatioanaldelaterredefeunotro.jpg please? Gracias! - MPF (talk) 19:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Gracias! - MPF (talk) 22:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Alberto de Agostini.jpg

File:Alberto de Agostini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 09:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Canned food2 (Port Lockroy, Antarctica).jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 04:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)