User talk:El bes

Welcome to the Commons, El bes!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 01:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Danubio

Ciao El Bes. Complimenti per il tuo italiano. Ci vorrà molto tempo per fare una cartina del genere sul Danubio.

Non ti prometto nulla, ma se riuscirò a farla ti manderò un messaggio :). A presto. --Cristiano64 04:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

« שמועס »

Dear friend please come to ‎« שמועס »‎ to see if we can use this channel as a place for Yiddish chats. This form should work at ‎װיקיװערטערבוך‎ when you are using Firefox, Konqueror or Opera. Unfortunatelly if does not work yet in Internet Explorer.‎
Please search in ‎װיקיװערטערבוך:הויפט זייט‎ at the seventh item in נאוויגאציע.‎ It is ‎« שמועס »‎.‎ I assume that you agree to add such an « שמועס » item at ‎װיקיפּעדיע‎‎ to נאוויגאציע as soon as our friends m:n:en:user:bawolff ... have fixed the code. Please do not hesitate to write your comments in the comment section.‎
Please make proposals about translating of the text / help: Only Latin characters and Latin numbers are allowed as « Your Nickname: » . Exceptions are « tekhniker|avek » , « ales-viser » etc. Please add some explanations about accessing the channel « #kavehoyz » by using the page chatwikizine: One should select the channel « #kavehoyz » from the channel list, select a Nickname and hit enter. All other fields are optional.‎
Thanks in advance and Good luck! Best regards
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 07:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Austriazismus 07.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Austriazismus 10.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Now the image is ok ;-) Bye, --Filnik^{\b[Rr]ock\b!?} 13:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Naturhistorisches_Museum_Wien_Sept2007.jpg

---

Hallo El bes!

Vielen Dank für das Hochladen von Dateien auf Wikimedia Commons. Bitte denke daran, dass die Bilder und Mediendateien auf Commons für Nutzer von allen Wikimedia-Projekten nützlich sein sollen. Dies ist nur möglich, wenn die Bilder auch von anderen gefunden werden können.

Um dies zu ermöglichen, sollen Bilder sollten in das Kategoriesystem eingeordnet sein. Deshalb sollten die Bilder in eine passende Kategorie eingeordnet sein, zusätzlich ist es möglich, die Bilder auf Galerieseiten einzubinden. Um gute Kategorien zu finden, bietet das Tool CommonSense Hilfe.

Eine Übersicht über alle von dir hochgeladenen Dateien findest du hier.

Wichtig ist, dass Bilder an irgendeiner Stelle eingeordnet werden. Es gibt eine große Anzahl von Bildern, die noch unsortiert sind. Hilf mit, diese Anzahl nicht weiter wachsen zu lassen!

Vielen Dank. Patstuart (talk) 03:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Das scheint eine automatisierte Message zu sein, aber trotzdem: Für mich ist es wichtig, dass die Fotos einmal auf Commons sind, damit ich sie in Artikel einbauen kann. Ich gehöre nicht zu den Heavy-Usern von Commons und bin ehrlich gesagt mit der Kategorisierung etwas überforder, weil ich nicht weiss, wohin man das jeweils stecken soll. Ich finde es auch nicht sooo wichtig, dass jedes Bild eine Kategorie hat. Ich lade ja nichts einfach so hoch, sondern baue die Bilder immer in Artikel ein und dadurch werden sie auch gesehen und können gegebenenfalls bei anderen Artikeln oder in anderen Sprachen verwendet werden. Reine Karteileiche produziere ich keine, dafür wäre auch der Speicherplatz am Server zu schade. --El bes 03:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

If I've understood your response properly via Google translator (which is questionable): you do not spend much time on commons, so you don't know how to categorize, and you don't find it so important. It was just a request to categorize the images, because if you don't, then someone else will have to. And if they don't, then they won't be so easy to find. After all, it is a commons policy that all images should be linked so they can be found. Thanks for the time! Patstuart (talk) 03:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your commitment. We may also communicate in English. I just wanted to point out, that I try to label my pictures as thoroughly as possible, not only in English, but also in German, Spanish and my first language Bavarian. I do spend quite some at Commons, but my main target is to write articles in Wikipedia and therefore I just upload the pictures I need for new articles. You are right by saying that categories are a nice help, but the main objective should be, that pictures are used for articles and are found by other user, who might be working on similar topics and of course the main principle is, not to upload loads of fotos that will never be used and just consume webspace on the servers. I suppose that all those criteria are fulfilled with the pictures that I submitted here. If I occasionally find a category where they might fit in, I definitively will put them there. If I do not find such a category, I am just happy that I have an illustration for my articles and don't bother the categorization issue any longer. Perhaps other users are more committed to this, but nevertheless it is a community project that grows with the help of many people, isn't it. --El bes 04:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

P.S.: Just for fun I let Google translate my German post from above. The result is horrible! It sounds like worst Chinese and complete nonsense ;-) --El bes 04:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

AlthochdeutscheSprachräume962 Box.jpg

I just added a subsection to the discussion on AlthochdeutscheSprachräume962 Box.jpg. I don't know where you based the information on, but Old-Frisian was never a part of the German language. The previous version showed the real situation. Furthermore, in 962 Old-Frisian was spoken on the North-Frisian islands. The mainland of 'Nord-Friesland' was colonized in the 12th century. Although, like you mentioned, the borders cannot be drawn accurately, I think this map gives a good impression of where the Old-German language was spoken. Maybe you would like to make a separate map for the Old-Frisian language? In this format? Thanks in advance. --Blautosk (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Engelbert_Dollfuß_Briefmarke.jpg

File:Engelbert_Dollfuß_Briefmarke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 9f8b91dddb67fbd1adabe304477a00c6

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Engelbert_Dollfuß_Briefmarke.jpg

File:Engelbert_Dollfuß_Briefmarke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 14:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:AlthochdeutscheSprachr%C3%A4ume962_Box.jpg

Thanks for this map. But I think it can be improved. Old Frankish doesn't seem to differentiate between Low Frankish, which unlike the other Frankish dialects (High Frankish) was not High German. And the border between Low Franconion and the Francophone dialects was a bit more southward at the time. Machinarium (talk) 01:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

That's true, the difference between Low-Frankonian and High-Frankonian could be added to the map. Concerning the language border between Germanic Frankonian and Romance Old-French, I have no data. But a map cannot show this correctly for that time anyway, because it was more a scattered ethnic thing, without clear borders. The Germanic noble class in France may have still spoken some remnant of their germanic Western Frankonian, while the Gallo-romance population spoke a latin based dialect (vice-versa than in England, where the Norman upper class spoke a romance dialect and the peasant population a germanic dialect). --El bes (talk) 21:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer. I believe Old Low-Franconian is called Alt-Niederfränkisch in German. The Franconian dialects spoken in Germany are a bit harder to name. "Old Franconian" usually refers to just "Old Low Franconian". I did find a few hundred sources on google books in both English and German for Old Middle Franconian / Alt-Mittelfränkisch, AltRheinfränkisch, and Old East Franconian / Alt-Ostfränkisch. I think that's the best way to divide them (if you plan on doing so!). The only problem is that I can't find an equalevant for South-Franconian. "Old South Franconian" hasn't been introduced in either German or English. But there's is "Old High Franconian" which seems to cover both East and South Franconian together. It's hardly used in German though. Another option is that All of the high german dialects are combined under "Old High German or "Althochdeutsch". If you're interested in the language border between Low Franconian and French look here [1] and here [2]. It's in dutch but I think with your knowledge of German you can get pretty far. Machinarium (talk) 18:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

On a second note I found this: Old and Middle High German were spoken and written in central and southern Germany, south of the so-called Benrath line. Low German was the language of the north, i.e. the northern parts of Germany and the eastern provinces of the Netherlands. Both High and Low German cover a group of several dialects. The three major Old High German dialects are (Upper) Franconian, Bavarian and Alemannic. in The Germanic Languages by Ekkehard König and Johan van der Auwera (1994). Perhaps it's best to reffer to all the high franconian dialects as Upper or High Franconian, in German without adding 'old' in front of it. Machinarium (talk) 22:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

In historical linguistics a difference is made between Old High German (until about the year 1050 AD) and Old Middle German (Mittelhochdeutsch, from 1050 until about 1350 AD). These two should not be mixed up. The map we are talking about, showes the situation in early medieval time, when the tribal languages still existed and no standard form (German, Dutch, or whatever) yet evolved. That's why the map showes the settlement area of the five main tribes. It is true, that even within the Franks, there existed several dialects, of which one part later became the basis for the Middle Dutch language and the other part one of the basises for Middle High German. But still, at that time they called themselves Franks, no matter whether their offspring later became Dutch, German or became romanized and assimilated into the French population. --El bes (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Absolutely. I'm just thinking about the proper way to split low franconian from high franconian. Dialects were indeed a lot closer to each other, but the high consonant shift was quite significant. Machinarium (talk) 23:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Personally I think, that the early Frankonian was maybe much closer to the Low variant. My theory is, that the southern Frankonians adopted quite a lot from the Alemannic and Bavarian people. The Frankonians conquered these areas in the 7th and 8th century and made themselves the ruling class there (most German nobility is from Frankonian origin), but they also got influenced by those subjugated people. And than this southern Frankonians adopted more High variants, like the en:High German consonant shift. Thereby the northwestern and the southern Franks slowly drifted apart from each other in the 9th century. The exact details of this process are still debated among academics, but this is the most plausible theory at the moment. To draw an exact border between Low Frankonian and High Frankonian is therefor difficult, and also the line shifted geographically over time. --El bes (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Indeed the dialects were probably a lot closer so far back, but I don't think franconian without the high consonant shift was ever spoken in the High German Area. At least, I don't think low franconian texts have been found in this area. By the tenth century the high german consonant shift was already complete. The actual border is harder to determine, but I think some research has already been done, especially when it comes to Aachen (due to Charlemagne). I'll see what I can find. Machinarium (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Logo-LAs

Hallo El bes! Was sollen denn deine ganzen Logo-LAs? Das bringt doch nichts und ist nur pure Zeitverschwendung. Die Logos bestehen ausschließlich aus Text - die sind so simpel, dass sie selbst den strengeren Commons-Richtlinien locker genügen. Chaddy (talk) 02:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Das stimmt nur teilweise, manche haben auch graphische Elemente drin. Mir geht's einfach nur darum, einmal prüfen zu lassen, ob die Uploads von Jerry D. in Ordnung sind oder nicht. Wenn sie in Ordnung sind, dann verstehe ich nicht, warum Jerry überhaupt gesperrt wird. Es kann doch nicht sein, dass der User ständig gesperrt wird, aber seine Uploads ungeschaut stehen bleiben. --El bes (talk) 04:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

P.S.: Zeitverschwendung ist, dass wir kein festgelegtes Prozedere mit Jerry D. haben. Er macht fünf Edits in der Wikipedia, so wie gestern und vorgestern und ein Dutzend User editiert dann stundenlang hin und her, Diskussionen und Editwars werden geführt, manche unterstützen seine Logo-Ergänzungen, sichten sie oder revertieren, wenn sie wieder rausgelöscht werden. VMs kommen, Artikelsperren, etc. Der Typ lacht sich doch vor seinem Computer ins Fäustchen, wenn er sieht, dass so ein kurzer Auftritt von ihm, solche Wellen schlägt. Also will ich jetzt wissen, was wir in Zukunft tun.

a) Alles was er editiert/uploadet radikal löschen

b) Alles was er editiert/uploadet dankend begrüßen

c) jedesmal wieder in ellenlange Diskussionen verfallen

--El bes (talk) 04:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Mit Jerry D. hab ich mich nur oberflächlich beschäftigt. Einem kurzen Studium seiner Diskseite zufolge tätigte er offenbar zahlreiche wenig hilfreiche Edits - allerdings vermutlich in guter Absicht. Bloß wollte oder konnte er auch nach mehrmaligen Erklärungen keinerlei Besserung zeigen, weshalb er letztlich mehr Arbeit machte als seine Edits Nutzen brachten und er deshalb schließlich gesperrt wurde.

Derzeit fügt er aber scheinbar tatsächlich bloß Logos ein, was kein Vandalismus ist. Lediglich ein paar Mitarbeiter des Filmportals haben offensichtlich eine Abneigung gegenüber diese Logos und revertieren das dauernd wieder.

Und gesperrt wird er ständig wegen Sperrumgehung (sein Hauptaccount wurde ja wie gesagt unbeschränkt gesperrt). Chaddy (talk) 04:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Er ist der am öftesten gesperrte Troll der de.Wikipedia, mit weit über hundert Sockenpuppen die schon gesperrt wurden. Außerdem bespricht er sich auf Pluspedia mit Gleichgesinnten, wie man die Sicherheitsmechanismen der Wikipedia am effektivsten umgehen kann, etwa wie man verhindert, dass die Missbrauchsfilter anschlagen und wie man mit schnell wechselnden IPs unerkannt bleibt. Das ist keine gute Absicht, sondern geschickte Strategie, eigentlich ein Hack. Er fangt mit jedem Account harmlos an und steigert sich dann und findet immer wieder jemand, der ihm auf den Leim geht. Jedesmal lädt er dubiose Logos hoch, wenn es auf de.WP nicht geht dann hier. Mittlerweile scheint ihm Commons überhaupt am besten zu gefallen, weil hier die Mühlen extrem langsam mahlen und es ihm immer wieder gelingt, unerkannt zu werken. Und hinter ihm aufgeräumt wird auch nicht, sodass immer was bleibt. Und übrigens: die Schöpfungshöhe ist nicht das einzige was fraglich ist, ebenso die korrekte Quellenangabe und die Lizenzierung. Er schreibt da einfach irgendwas hin, was seriös klingt, weil er weiß dass es hier sowieso niemand kontrolliert. --El bes (talk) 11:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Hm, ok, dann sind die Sperren auf jeden Fall gerechtfertigt, trotz vorgeschobener sinnvoller Beteiligung (Logos hochladen).

Die Lizenzierung ist, soweit ich das sehe, überall richtig. Template:Trademarked und Template:PD-Textlogo. Das passt. Und die korrekte Quellenangabe ist nicht sooo schlimm, das rechtfertigt jedenfalls keine Löschung. Chaddy (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

LA statt SLA

Hi! Warum ersetzt du die SLA durch einen LA? --Polarlys (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Weil ich mich auf Commons nicht auskenne ;-) Könntest du nicht gleich auch noch eine Usersperre erwirken. Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass es Jerry ist. --El bes (talk) 14:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Florian silbereisen mannheim.jpg

File:Florian silbereisen mannheim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

75.118.127.5 02:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

File:BCR-office tower Sibiu.jpg

File:BCR-office tower Sibiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

//  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 6 August 2013 15:36 (UTC) 15:36, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:ÖWB Schulausgabe Auflage40.jpg

Yours sincerely, darkweasel94 21:57, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Austriazismus

Hallo El bes! Hab gerade die von Dir angelegte Kategorie Austriacisms entdeckt. Finde ich echt gut! Aber eine kleine Kritik an nebenstehendem Bild: Reinbeißen hat nichts mit österreichischem Deutsch zu tun, ich würde daher den unteren Teil wegschneiden. Obwohl ich ja den Eindruck hab, daß Du es ganz bewußt mitfotografiert hast, aber "rein" im Sinn von hinein ist einfach piefkenesisch und paßt nicht dazu, auch wenn es heute leider schon sehr viele verwenden. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 17:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

@Haeferl: du kannst gern einen Crop machen und als neue Version drüberspeichern, des is mir ganz egal. Und ja, du hast recht, "reinbeißen" würd ma im richtigen Dialekt nicht sagen, aber bei dem Fachbegriff "Austriazismus" gehts ja um österreichspezifische Eigenheiten in der Standardsprache und standardsprachlich würd man in Österreich auch immer "reinbeißen" schreiben und ned "einibeißen" oder so. --El bes (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC) P.S.: tschuldigung, dass I erst mit 3 Wochen Verzögerung antwort.

Da möchte ich mich auch nach langer Zeit noch kurz anhängen mit einem Lob für die schöne Kategorie und ein zwei weiteren Anmerkungen zu meiner Meinung nach nicht österreich-spezifischen Einträgen dort: Ich stamme aus dem west-mitteldeutschen Sprachraum, wo die Begriffe "reinbeißen", "Lehrling" (statt Auszubildender) und "Tischlerei" (anstelle der Möbelschreinerei) absolut zum umgangssprachlichen Standard gehören (also noch nicht mal hier von einer echten dialektalen Prägung die Rede sein kann). Von daher würde ich deren Klassifikation als Austriazismus ebenfalls in Frage stellen wollen. Grüße --chris 論 08:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Austriazismus 05.jpg

File:Austriazismus 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 20:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Mănăstirea Sâmbăta familia Brâncoveanu.jpg

File:Mănăstirea Sâmbăta familia Brâncoveanu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mihai (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Mănăstirea Sâmbăta death of Brâncoveanu.jpg

File:Mănăstirea Sâmbăta death of Brâncoveanu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mihai (talk) 16:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Mănăstirea Sâmbăta brief history.jpg

File:Mănăstirea Sâmbăta brief history.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mihai (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Mănăstirea Sâmbăta Pantocrator new church.jpg

File:Mănăstirea Sâmbăta Pantocrator new church.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mihai (talk) 17:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Austriazismus 04.jpg

File:Austriazismus 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateus2019 (talk) 12:33, 21 December 2022 (UTC)