User:Taivo/Archive13

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Taivo!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lilienthal.jpg

Hi Taivo. You obviously made a mistake by putting the deletion request to the subpage of another deletion request. Can you please fix this? --Leyo 09:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

What about enabling the Quick Delete gadget? --Leyo 11:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Becuna 81.JPG

I would not oppose deletion if we have a better version of those posters/stickers. Doesn't have to be from Becuna. Link them and I'll support any deletion request. Otherwise I'll oppose due to "poor is better than nothing". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 14:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

mistake on your part?

Here, [1] you closed the discussion. I did not have time to respond. Furthermore, as can be seen, there is no evidence that the person indeed has permission to upload that image. Hence how can you keep the image? (Lilic (talk) 02:10, 20 May 2013 (UTC)).

I did not close the discussion. I am admin in Estonian wikipedia, not in Commons. I have no right to close any discussions in Commons. I simply voted. I believe, that my vote is correct, and I explained that. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Voting on deletion requests

It is very important to keep this in mind: deletion debates are no votings. Just arguments count.  Keep or  Delete implementations without meaningful statements get ignored. --High Contrast (talk) 18:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for mentioning. I read carefully Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_36#User:High_Contrast to learn, how to vote in deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

DR

Would you mind reprising your vote in this renomination please? Thank you. Fry1989 ^eh? 21:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Rajju Bhaiya talking to Krant.jpg

Mr Taivo! Kindly see this page. Mr Sitush has some doubt about my integrity. May be his personal opinion. I do not deny for that. Every body has got the freedom to write here. But personally attacking any user is not good. I have uploaded another better file on wikicommons today titled File:Krantji & Rajju Bhaiya.jpg which is a different photo of the same persons viz. I & Prof.Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya). Kindly see it and then suggest me what to do in future. Whether I should upload here any more file or not. You can see my User talk page for how many times I have been harassed here. Excuse me for the trouble. Krantmlverma (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Evans Evans Tours coach, 25 July 2011.jpg

Please note my objection to this deletion here, in case you have anything to add/clarify. Ultra7 (talk) 18:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

 Comment Ultra voted on DR "keep" due to correct licence. I voted "delete" due to tiny blurry image. The file got deleted. Ultra created undeletion request. This was rejected. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

PA removed

Hi Taivo, I have removed the word "evil" from your comment[2] as it was a needless personal attack. If some disagrees with you, it does not mean that he or she is evil. --Túrelio (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

OK Taivo (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

 Comment I used the word "evil" partly as joke. Apparently this was not evident. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Sinterklaas do you actually know what it is?

you might wanna deepen more into the Sinterklaas festivities in The Netherlands and or Belgium. this is a picture from me as being a "black jack" I know it's diifficult to expain this in english as others might not know this festivity in the Netherlands and or Belgium around the 5th of december this total festivity runs ussually 4 weeks before the 5th december. not to be mistaken by christmas and santa claus, here by a dutch page about the sinterkaas festivity's: [3] so I myself don't see the problem It seems that you either maid this request because you either don't understand what Sinterklaas is or feel like something else is up with the pictures, I did ask that before anything is happening to these pictures to please first ask what is not understandable about my explanation about myself as zwartepiet (Blackjack this is a direct translation in English which is difficult to explain) if you read the sinterkaas page you might understand it better, if not I do urge you to ask what is not understandable. then to be ignorent and not ask it and think you just can delete it. Ricodol74 (talk) 02:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

User_talk:Russavia#Cross_of_Liberty

Hello Eesti, mate could you possibly have a look at User_talk:Russavia#Cross_of_Liberty and give an opinion on what it is we will need and the best way to go about it. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

I replied in deletion request. I voted  Keep and explained my vote. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Eesti Animafilm Tallinn (7952374756).jpg

Hey again Taivo, more help requested here. I know what the plaque is portraying, but any information you can give on who holds copyright over the drawings as seen in the cartoon would be great. This page (albeit in Lithuanian) states that Elmar Jaanimägi (the animator) died in 1937. So if he held copyright over his works, and this is a faithful reproduction of his work, then the underlying work is probably in the public domain. But any help in determining if this is the case would be great. Cheers, russavia (talk) 18:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

As always, a pleasure to do business with you. russavia (talk) 19:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Deletion nominations

Why are you so sure photographs nominated for deletion are not taken by the owners ??

 Keep I asked Stephen to upload his photographs to Wikimedia after the University of Sydney discontinued personal web pages which had hosted his excellent Web page on miscellaneous preserved X10 Class locomotives for the NSW Government Railways

Have you nominated all his photographs ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpeterswald (talk • contribs)

I wanted, but ćould not, because they are all nominated for deletion by others. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Hint --> VisualFileChange

Hi Taivo! I noted your activity in deletion requests (DR). It might interesting for you to know that some processes can be automatized by using Help:VisualFileChange.js - especially (but not limited to) for preparing mass deletion requests regarding uploads from 1 user with 1 deletion reason. In this context, Help:QuickDelete (a gadget which can be enabled or disabled in your Preferences) eventually might be of interest to you too. Gunnex (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

In addition: Some of your DR are stuck, no timestamp given. Doesn't happen if you would use VFC. See Category:Deletion requests - No timestamp given. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

It seems to me, that I understood, what was wrong. I will avoid that mistake in the future. (But most gadgets need javascript enabling. This is complicated in my computer.) Taivo (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Portrait Andrus Ansip.jpg

Hi mate, could you please check the source of File:Portrait Andrus Ansip.jpg and do a {{Licencereview}} on it. I can't find this photo on the site, let alone find anything that would state that photos are under a CC licence; perhaps I am merely overlooking it. Help appreciated. Cheers, russavia (talk) 07:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

I did not find this photo on this site and the only licence in the site is "© Riigikantselei" ("© State Cancellery"). Taivo (talk) 11:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

It seems that until November 2011 the site was licenced under CC-BY-3.0-EE, so it's all good. Thanks for help. russavia (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Adminship

Hey Taivo, how ya doing mate? Have you considered doing an RfA here on Commons? I've seen enough of your "work" that I know you have a fairly good knowledge of copyright issues, and are always willing to help editors when they need it. And of course, we could always do with more admins here on Commons to pitch in and do cleanup when required. What do you think? russavia (talk) 19:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

That would be useful. I accept the nomination. Taivo (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Great stuff, I have gone ahead and nominated you at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Taivo, you just need to accept the nomination there. Cheers and good luck. russavia (talk) 20:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Administrator

---

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Taivo, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Congrats! The DRs are all yours now. INeverCry 17:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Everybody loves Eesti! Good stuff mate, welcome to our non-exclusive group of admins who are expected to keep this project clean of copyvios, sort out arguments etc. My talk page is free any time. russavia (talk) 21:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Congrats! You can start here ;-) Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 13:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

 Comment I bought that cake and ate it. It tasted good. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Piltide kustutamine

Jõudu uues ametis! Märkuseks nii palju, et nagu näha, oled juba omaks jõudnud võtta põhimõtte, et väike eraldus ja EXIF-andmete puudmine on piisav põhjus kustutamiseks. Kui üleslaadija väidab, et tegu on tema oma tööga, siis tuleks minu meelest lisaks kahtlusele leida siiski ka tõend autoriõiguse rikkumise kohta (Google'i pildiotsingu abil või kuidas iganes). Selle kahtlase väärtusega põhimõtte pärast kustutati üksvahe näiteks see pilt. Mõtteainet. Pikne 17:37, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Jah, mõtlesin järele. Aga ega ma paljalt selle pärast ei esitagi pilte kustutamiseks. Ma arvestan ka pildi väärtust Commonsi jaoks ja üleslaadija muud kaastööd. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Caspar David Friedrich 067.jpg

Please update the file uses for File:Caspar David Friedrich 067.jpg in fr-Wikipedia. --Botaurus (talk) 13:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

This file (File:Caspar David Friedrich - Winter Landscape - WGA08244.jpg) was not a duplicate to File:Winter Landscape by Caspar David Friedrich.jpg. --Botaurus (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it was not a duplicate. I made a slight mistake in edit summary. The file was simply smaller than alternatives. But I tried to find, where the files are used in fr.wiki – I could not find. Probably robots have removed unused photo. I thought, that I looked for file uses before deleting. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

I have already loaded the larger over the smaller file. Fore the fr-wikipedia-site see here. fr:Liste d'œuvres de Caspar David Friedrich and position „Paysage d'hiver“, 1811, Schwerin. The name of the now linked file is Winter Landscape by Caspar David Friedrich.jpg. --Botaurus (talk) 14:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, this was my mistake. I replaced the image. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. --Botaurus (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Taivo. You have new messages at Eleassar's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Help with Mediawiki Translation

Sorry to trouble. I am a local sysop at Cantonese Wikipedia and I have posted my translation for the Cat-a-lot tool in Mediawiki talk:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js/yue and Mediawiki talk:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js/zh-yue. Would you mind helping me update the Mediawiki page? Thank you. --William915 (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

 Not done No. Sorry, I do not understand Chinese language. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Why do you have to understand Chinese? It's just a simple import, following Mediawiki:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js/translating. If you insist that it must be someone who understand Chinese to do so, would you please kindly transfer this message to someone who can help? Thank you.--William915 (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Вопрос

Здраствуйте, я имел право создавать File:Flag map of Armenia, new.svg, и тоже самое могу сделать с картой File:Rivers of Armenia.jpg?

Да, это вполне разрешено. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Уважаемый админ, Вы сказали, что File:Flag map of Armenia, new.svg так можно, а этот Фрай теперь хочет и этот файл удалить, теперь что мне делать?--6AND5 (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Ничего не нужно делать, файл уже оставили. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Alyn hospital

This is strange to keep incorrect capitalization forms of titles as redirects to a same-spelling title. Our search engine is caps-smart (and not caps-sensitive) so no one will know of or ever use the "secondary" form. It is not like cases of fifferent characters, where keeping a varying option has a point. The above page is purely superfluous. Thanks, Orrlingtalk 12:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

I imagined, what happenes, if I make a photo about that hospital. I upload it into Commons and try to categorize. I add category "Alyn hospital" and look from preview. Red link, that means, nobody has never photographed (or at least categorized) that building. And I create the category. But if this kind of redirect exists, then I notice: strange, there exists redirect into Alyn Hospital! This is quite surprising for me, that the hospital is written with big H, although ... yes, I know, such things happen. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

No one uses categories by manually typing their full names from guessing. Today we have the upload wizard, the auto-completer search box and the category tool where all the suggestions that are available pop up as you start typing. By this, even when you type "alyn hos..." you'll authomatically get Alyn Hos. This makes the redirect page eccessive. If I were in that situation trying to pick the Alyn Hospital from the box and there suddenly I were offered two different ones, I would be confused and would not like it. If it had a different spelling, like "Alyn" and "Alin", it would have a big point, but when it's only mis-capitalization pages like this are normally deleted. Do as you believe.. Orrlingtalk 17:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

You wrote: "No one uses categories by manually typing their full names from guessing." Well, I do. Auto-completer search box does not work in my computer. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

OK. Orrlingtalk 19:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

---

Siin on üks taastamisarutelu Eesti ajalugu puudutava objekti kohta. Võib-olla tahad arvamust avaldada. 193.40.10.180 10:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

 Comment Väljendasin arvamust, aga ei osanud seisukohta võtta. Pilti ei taastatud. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

I'd like to find your email address on here to write you. Can you get in touch with me? Respectfully, Kingslove2013.

 Not done Taivo (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

	Thanks
	thanks Kingslove2013 (talk) 23:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Seattle.png

Hello, I saw that you've deleted , but why? It's uploaded at Pixabay with a CC0 license in public domain and even the English wikipedia says that all the files that are uploaded overthere are in pulic domain. - Supercarwaar (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

I don't want to be rude, but can you answer my question? Supercarwaar (talk) 10:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

This flag was too complicated for public domain. It was over threshold of originality. Some state/country flags are also complicated, but they can stay in Commons, because (it differs from country to country) generally they are descripted by law and law is not copyrightable. City flags are generally not law and so copyrightable. There are nevertheless some city or county flags in Commons. Some of them are too simple for copyright and some come from countries, where city/country flags are not protected with copyright. No evidence was given, that city flags are not protected with copyright in Canada.

The file may come from Pixabay or from other source with Commons-compatible licence, but that case the licence is simply wrong. The flag-drawer had no right to publish the flag under Commons-compatible (or actually under any) licence. It is copyright violation not only in Commons, but also in Pixabay and should be deleted from there also.

But thank you for pointing my attention. I try to explain my deletion request closures better in the future. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Okay - Supercarwaar (talk) 05:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Closing DRs

I see you're using {{DeletionHeader}} and {{DeletionFooter}}, the latter with its optional parameters. These confused me a little as I have never seen them before -- you will find that all of us use {{Delh}} and {{Delf}} without parameters.

While {{DeletionFooter}} with its parameters is a neat way to close a DR where DelReqHandler doesn't work, the opportunity for confusion might make it less than the best choice.

By the way, you may find User:Jameslwoodward/Commons notes for administrators useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Urgent File:Andrej Babiš.jpg

Hey Taivo,

I'm wondering how to find out why File:Andrej Babiš.jpg had to be deleted, as there has not been any discussion. If it was an obvious copyright infringement, then I understand. But as the file is very urgently needed in important Wikipedia articles covering the Czech elections, it would be good to know. If there was any doubt if the file might be okay, then please restore it immediately and let's discuss it in the regular way.

Thanks, --PanchoS (talk) 03:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

User Brzlík presented the file for speedy deletion with reason: "Copyright violation. The author is not Jakrys, but Czech photographer Tomáš Loutocký. Check metadata and contact him by email at tomas@loutocky.com (http://portfolio.loutocky.com/92941/contact". I checked the metadata and found, that Brzlík was here right. So I deleted the file immediately. Taivo (talk) 07:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CORLIN

I've renominated File:Lycée climatique Jean Prévost.JPG, which you chose to keep in the subject DR. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

OK. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/2012 Summer Olympics and Paralympics gold post boxes

Can you please expand this closing statement, so that it actually refers to the issues I raised? Or at the very least clarify whether or not the removal of the misleading and inaccurate text re-introduced in this edit would count as an "improvement"? Ultra7 (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I am totally agree with Rodhullandemu. Read once more his comment. But you are welcomed to improve the page. Remove misleading text and write, what is correct. But – do not write long texts. Articles belong to wikipedia. Consider to make similar article in en.wiki. There you can write longer and explain all more thoroughly. Taivo (talk) 08:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

I don't need to read it again - he was wrong. Sole author rights are not a 'myth' on Commons. But I see I am wasting my time here - you're making points here that I already answered in the DR at length. I'm not interested adding to or correcting in Wikipedia - I'm here to help uploaders/re-users of Commons media - which is understandably seen by Wikipedia editors as not the primary purpose of their project. Whether you realise it or not, most of the text that was removed would not be accepted by Wikipedia because they would classify it as 'unencyclopedic'/trivia, or require verification in reliable sources (they really don't like it when you tell them to verify something using just a picture and their eyes). I will remove the misleading text, but I leave it to you, or anyone else in the 'community' who wants to claim ownership of the gallery, to figure out how to explain a gallery of 100+ images to potential uploaders/re-users in ? words, without making the same mistake as Hedwig in Washington did, of thinking that the garbage that is in Wikipedia is ever either comprehensive or even accurate when it comes to understanding media hosted by Commons. Ultra7 (talk) 13:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Re-name account

I would like to change my username, how can I do that? May I know what I can do to unblock my account? --DUROMAC (talk) 08:42, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

At first, you are not blocked now and DUROMAC has never been blocked. But you can be, if you continue uploading unfree files. These files were actually quite good, but they had no proper licence. If you own copyright for these files, you need to send OTRS-permission. All your uploads are presented for deletion, but they will not deleted, if proper permission is given. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

For changing username, please go Commons:Changing username. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Вопрос

Здраствуйте, это правомерно?[4]----6AND5 (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Думаю, что в общем правомерно. Мне кажется, что в нынешнее время такого энклава не существует (если существует, тогда я ошибься и в карте всё более-менее правильно). По-моему, картов Армении можно использовать три типа: во-первых, официальные (советские, со всеми энклавами), во-вторых, упрощённые официальные (советские, но вообще без энклавов), и в-третьих, фактические (показавшие, какие территории Армения контролирует). Было бы лучше, если в Коммонсе были бы карты всех трёх типов. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо за ответ, я не видел эти правки, ведь это уже вандализм? [5] и что я могу сделать в этом случае?--6AND5 (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Я не считаю это вандализмом. Фрай заменил карту Армении. Теперь на этом странице находится карта первого типа, а раньше там была карта, которая не соответствовала ни одной из трёх типов. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Нет раньше там были 2 карте, он удалил 2-ю карту, что мешает, чтобы эти 2 карты были там? смотрите, что он сделал, сперва удалил свою версию[6], а потом удалил мою версию, добавляя свою версию[7], это уже по-моему вандализм, кроме того это не первый случай когда этот участник не смотрит, что я правляю, а сразу реверт делает, это уже не хочу говорить, о чем показывает, если я сейчас верну мою версию, и там будет как раньше 2 карты, меня заблокириют?--6AND5 (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Не знаю, заблокируют или нет, но эта карта некорректная и не советую эту карту вообще использовать. Если Армения так близко к сердцу, тогда можно создать карту, которая покажет территории, фактически контролированные Арменией. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Block review

Thank you, Taivo, for the review of the discussion, and your sense of justice. I appreciate you as an administrator. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

for reacting quickly to my speedy deletion request. It's no fun if a photographer phones twice with legal threats. And DLR is no help at all. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

A different name for the category

Good evening.

Can you, please, delete this category Category:Montagne de Bergiés on Commons where I made an mistake of accent? I replaced it by this one Category:Montagne de Bergiès by correcting the error.

Cordially. --Anthospace (talk) 18:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done Next time use {{speedy}} tag. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. --Anthospace (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Rue des Francs-Bourgeois

There is more than one "Rue des Francs-Bourgeois" in France, so redirecting to the one in Paris is indeed unnecessary. Thank you. --Edelseider (talk) 15:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

OK Thank you for explaining. Now I deleted the redirect. Please add next time such kind of explanations to speedy deletion requests, this helps others to understand, why the redirect is uneeded. Taivo (talk) 15:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

You were right, delete these photos

Delete both images - you are right, I have read the rules and the copyright does not fall under what is allowed to be placed on Wiki commons. Please delete the following images that I placed on Wiki commons asap:

• File:Debutantes of the 58th International Debutante Ball at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel New York City.jpeg
• File:Princess Marilène of The Netherlands.jpg

Thanks--1wikideb1 (talk) 15:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion File:Giglia Tedesco Tatò ( scheda del Senato).jpg

I understand the reason for cancellation but the same reason could apply to this File:Andreotti 1991.jpg with same institutional source and same period. By and thanks --Giu Pepis (talk) 09:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

File:I am blue.jpg

Hi, you delated this photo with remark: "unused personal photo with bad quality" It is the lie. File was used on pl-wiki, see: https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barwa_niebieska&diff=37896852&oldid=37702717 . 15 minutes before you deletation a person called The Photographer cut if from the article. It has only 5 edits on this wiki -> https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specjalna:Wk%C5%82ad/The Photographer . I am suppose that this person is a vandal. And maybe it is you... Regards Electron ツ ➧☎ 15:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

See also -> Commons:Deletion_requests/File:I_am_blue.jpg. If you have any problem with the photo you should start a deletation request but not go in this way. It is not a way that an admin can go... Electron ツ ➧☎ 15:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

The copy of the photo -> File:I_am_blue.jpg. I can't see any "bad quality". Next lie. Electron ツ ➧☎ 15:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. I restore the image. I trusted The Photographer, this was mistake. I did not know, that he acted like that. This can actually be quite a big mess now. Taivo (talk) 20:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

OK. Thanks Electron ツ ➧☎ 11:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Hasty deletions

I think you deleted at least two categories (1, 2) that had earlier today been moved by this user to new names while they were still being discussed at the move bot command page (here). That is, maybe it's not a good idea to encourage actions that contradict our process at the movebot. But as Admin you may see things that I don't. Thanxx :] Orrlingtalk 16:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I did not know, that there is a discussion about that. I thought maybe ten seconds about that and saw, that the requester is anonymous, but ... deleted. Maybe this was mistake. What to do now? I can restore them, you can create them anew. Taivo (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Taivo, why did you delete File:Волгоград. Аллея пирамидальных тополей.jpg without any further discussion? The Alley of Heroes in Volgograd is the main tourist place, and the view of statue is the integral part of it. The file was used in the article , properly illustrating the subject, that is, Tourism in Volgograd, thus not violating the Russian law. --Fedor Babkin (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Волгоград._Аллея_пирамидальных_тополей.jpg. It has been discussed more than usually. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't think that my arguments at the discussion page were properly answered. Anyway, to resolve the situation to the best, can you please reupload this file to ru-wiki or give me an opportunity to do it by myself, per "can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists"? Thanks. --Fedor Babkin (talk) 20:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy or nomination

Regards,

Thank you very much for your recommendation. I noticed that the inclusion of this image in other articles and projects made ​​no sense, however, you're right, it is best to clear nominate instead of quick removal. thank you very much :) --The Photographer (talk) 20:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Self promotion

Hi Taivo,

I need your help. Could you delete every use page of this file?. The user had been blocked in spanish wikipedia, self promotion of course.

Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I can, but I do not want. If a user is blocked from one wikipedia, then he can still contribute into others. He has right to keep a personal photo in his user page. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The problem is that the "user page" is promotional and vandalism :( --The Photographer (talk) 12:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Philipp-Fuerst-von-Eulenburg (1847-1921).jpg

Just thought you might want to be aware of GDallorto's comment there about other images needing deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:SherlockHolmes&DrJohnH.WatsonMoscow4.JPG‎ et al

I'm not sure where it's written down, but there's certainly an informal rule, and maybe a formal one, that FOP cases will go to a full DR and may not be closed speedily even when, as in these cases, it's perfectly obvious there's a problem.

While I see no way to keep these, an early close simply invites the uploader to file an UnDR on the grounds that we did not follow due process..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

OK Next time I know, that FOP violation is not a reason for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Workbench31.gif

Can you tell my why youve deleted my Screenshot and the Screenshots from Workbench 1-4 can be viewed without any claims? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workbench_(AmigaOS)

You uploaded File:WORKBENCH3.gif. On 15th of November an unknown (not logged-in) user nominated it for speedy deletion with reason: "This image is a screenshot of a non-free program or other copyrighted material. Although the image may be usable in certain circumstances under the doctrine of en:fair use, fair use claims are never allowed on Commons: see COM:FU. This file may be deleted without further notice. Note: If the screenshot shows a program or other material that is itself under a free license like GPL, please indicate this with the {{free screenshot}} tag.". I deleted on the same day the file and my log says:

• 10:06, 15 November 2013 Taivo deleted page File:WORKBENCH3.gif (Copyright violation: big © on picture)

Apparently the software is not free. Screenshots of it cannot be in Commons. The other files in this article are not in Commons, but in en.wiki. You can try and upload the screenshot into en.wiki, but not into Commons. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Raudoksiidi nanoosakesed.tif

Selgus, et see fail tuleks kustutada. Kuidas tuleks toimetada? Mingeid pikki arutelusid pole vaja, autor ise nõuab seda. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done samal päeval. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Old DR page Commons:Deletion_requests/2013/09/18

Taivo, I just found several DRs from 2013-09-18 that were never processed, yet that day was deleted ( example). I've linked them to today's date at DR, but I'm worried that there might be more. Is it possible that somehow you deleted Commons:Deletion_requests/2013/09/18 too soon? Could you look through it's old revisions to see what might have happened? —RP88 16:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I did not make here mistake. The file was empty, when I deleted it. Robots made it empty. This deletion request was never part of deletion requests log of 18th of September. Probably Dianna created this deletion request, but forgot to add it into the log. Happens. Thank you for adding it into today's log. Taivo (talk) 16:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for investigating this for me. —RP88 16:34, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Based on the edit summaries, User:Diannaa created the discussion using the standard script for nominating files for deletion, which would normally add it to the log page automatically. Maybe someone removed some deletion discussions from that log page? In that case, we need to check whether other deletion discussions are missing too, so that they can be closed. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I opened some older versions of the log file and saw no open requests. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Kvinnostrejk i Reaykjavik.jpg

Hi, the version with the statue here needs to be deleted. Thanks and regards, --Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:37, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

I am not sure. User:Gestumblindi explained, why (s)he loaded a new version. (S)He has a point and I do not want to decide alone that. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

I not only loaded a new version, but also deleted the version with the statue (I agree that this was necessary). The old version now remaining is Fae's retouched one with the statue removed from the pedestal. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Saules Akmens

You closed as delete but kept one file. Could you clarify? That file still has a {{Delete}} template. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for mentioning, this was my mistake. I deleted the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Images uploaded without license

Hi: Please, check images uploaded by this user. He was banned in Spanish Wikipedia for copyright violation. Thanks in advance.--Fixertool (talk) 14:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Jeanneke Pis.JPG

Hi Taivo, I saw you deleted this image. Why is it a copyright violation? I took the photo myself, and it's a public monument. Cheers, Azylber (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

This photo violated sculptor's copyright. There was no permission from sculptor. In some countries (Germany, Netherlands, Great Britain) you can freely use photos about sculptures, in some countries (Belgium, France, Italy) you need sculptor's consent for that. Taivo (talk) 15:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

This is not a private sculpture, it's a public monument. Aren't photos of public monuments allowed? Azylber (talk) 16:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

No. Please read COM:FOP#Belgium. The same is with architecture. Every year Commons deletes a lot of photos about Category:Atomium. (And photos about private sculptures are copyrighted in Germany, Netherlands and Great Britain also.) Taivo (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Pireti pildid

Vt et:Kasutaja arutelu:Piret.kuub. Kasutaja juhindus siin minu soovitusest ja laadis oma pildid uuesti üles, v.a need, mis sattusid pildi uusimaks versiooniks ja olid kasutatavad ning mille nüüd kustutasid. Pikne 12:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Ehk siis selle kasutaja pilte polnud tarvis kustutada ja ta ise ka ilmselt enam ei soovinud nende kustutamist. Need tuleks taastada. Vanemad versioonid ilmselt võib taastamata jätta, need on nüüd erineva nimega üles laaditud. Pikne 15:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:VB UK Patent 883870.jpg

Re deletion nomination on above file please note following info = UK Patent specifications published before 1 August 1989- Copyright in these belongs to the Crown but in normal circumstances no steps would be taken to enforce that copyright (notice of this was given in our Official Journal (Patents) on 25 June 1969). You would be allowed to copy these patent specifications freely but on the understanding that if the privilege is abused, for instance by copying for the purpose of selling them on, then the government may take action. ref = http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-other/c-other-faq/c-other-faq-type/c-other-faq-type-patspec.htm cheers, Tfitzp

Hi again - I have uploaded a new version of the Patent File - after this advice =

If you had provided the proper source and the above posted information, the image might not have been tagged for deletion. --Túrelio (talk)

Hope it will now be acceptable Cheers

I am afraid, that the UK patents are not enough free to be hosted in Commons. Let's see, how the deletion request will be closed. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

This is with regard to the wiki media images used in the article Gopichand Lagadapati . Have forwarded the mail of Mr.Gopichand Lagadapati to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org giving his permission to use the photographs under free licence category. Am waiting for the reply and instructions from wiki so i ask you to kindly be patient before you take any further action. Thanks,Rock (talk) 16:25, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Chevrolet Camaro 45th Anniversary Edition - Flickr - Alexandre Prévot (7).jpg

Dear Admin Taivo,

I don't know why the Flickrbot doesn't pass this image (very strange) but perhaps you could pass it as an Admin? It may be better for an Admin to pass it in this case. I don't know what the problem is. Goodnight from Metro Vancouver, Canada where its 12:41 AM, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:41, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done Taivo (talk) 12:17, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

• Thank You for your help. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana street (7).jpg

Hi, in regard to File:Ljubljana street (7).jpg, what should be done to get this fake photo deleted? Should I simply remove it from the article as incorrect? --Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, at first that, and write there, why do you think, that the photo is fake. I think, that there is more specialists of Slovenian geography than here. If during a week nobody has said, that the photo is correct, you can try again. Personally it seems to me, that there were no such white mountains in Ljubljana at all, so this can really be either fake or at least wrong city. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I've removed it from the article and will replace it with another one that I plan to take in the following days or weeks. The depicted buildings truly exist, but they're not placed as depicted in the image, and the mountains are not visible from this street. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Here is an already uploaded image of Barjanska, though the details in the background are hard to see. If nothing else, the mountains are missing and Nebotičnik is not visible where it is in the discussed image, but the turn is there. I'll take another shot, perhaps tomorrow. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I was mistaken. The image is ok (I've been there today), it's just highly zoomed. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 14:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Old deletion requests

Hi!

Why do you deleted old and fully processed deletion requests? Is there any consensus about that? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 12:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Apparently you mean Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Robitsju. I created that before I realized, that exists Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Robitsju, created by Eugene Zelenko. Then I deleted own-created deletion request. The deletion request was not processed. I restored that, do with that, what you want. But I saw, that McZusatz closed this request as deleted, but the files are not deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

No, no, no. Your phantasy is wrong. I mean e.g. this, this and this. Comment please. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 14:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

The others deleted these logs, then I started to delete them also. I think, that there is nothing to do with them. Nobody told me to delete them. But "Empty deletion requests log" is a standard reason for deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry for my comment above. You are right, old discussions must get deleted. This changed obviously - years ago it was not usus to get rid of those. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Taron Saharyan

Even after warning he continues removing category. --Interfase (talk) 13:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Vaja ühe faili taastamist

Sain OTRS kinnituse sellele failile. Võiks taastada. Kruusamägi (talk) 03:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done Võta heaks. Lisa OTRS-luba ja kategoriseeri. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

File:London Underground full map.svg

In this edit Commonsdelinker has removed a link to a file with the edit summary "Removing "London_Underground_full_map.svg", it has been deleted from Commons by Taivo because: Unused and implausible, broken, or cross-namespace redirect: content was: "{{speedydelete|Need to move [[comm...".

I have been unable to find the deletion request for this or establish why it has been deleted. Could you explain? --DavidCane (talk) 18:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Logs say in Commons: "13:44, 2 December 2013 Taivo (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:London Underground full map.svg (Unused and implausible, broken, or cross-namespace redirect: content was: "{{speedydelete|Need to move File:London Underground full map complete.svg here}} #REDIRECT [[File:London Unde...) ".

But there exists also File:London Underground Zone 1 Highlighted.svg. Taivo (talk) 22:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

User Jc86035 nominated the redirect for speedy deletion, but the speedy deletion request was badly written, it was difficult to look at and so I was not so careful as usually. Taivo (talk) 22:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Velveteen Rabbit.djvu

You have deleted a work that was in use at Wikisource. That you have done that without consultation with Wikisource is wrong. Further that you deleted the file without having first transferred the work to Wikisource is wrong and a disappointment that you have not undertaken the process at {{PD-US-1923-abroad-delete}}. Please resurrect the work, have it transferred the work to Wikisource before removing it. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons does not consultate with projects, where the files are used. Some file, which is presented for deletion, is used in fifty projects, and it is not practical to consult with all of them. Do you think, that Wikisource is special? Why?

Usually the deletion requests are closed, when 7 days is passed from creation of DR. This request was open 22 days, a lot longer than usual. And I did not create this request, I closed it. With pretensions of notifying please address to creator of the request.

The file was not marked with template PD-US-1923-abroad-delete. I do not feel myself guilty and I do not feel, that something was made wrongly (except 22 open days, which is long, but not unacceptable. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Major General Robert Murdoch Smith.jpg

At my request you deleted File:Major General Robert Murdoch Smith.jpg which I had uploaded. I thought it was copyright so had it SD'd. I now find that the artist died in 1939 making this a PD-Art-70 under EU law. Could you restore it please with my apologies Victuallers (talk) 12:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done Taivo (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

THX Victuallers (talk) 20:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Transiciones (Una nueva persona) (3352703668).jpg

Hi, could you please add a deletion rationale to this DR that relates to policy? The original is at http://www.flickr.com/photos/21400340@N05/3352703668. As this is a high quality photo (2448 x 3264) by a photographer with a good track record for artistic and sensual portrait photographs (NeoGaboX), I would like to take this up at Undeletion requests if you do not wish to reverse your deletion. I wish to ensure that I understand your policy based reasoning so that I can fully counter it in the undel request but at the moment the closure statement is not written this way. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!

Here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barry Roark, Denver, CO, contributing writer for Wikipedia.jpg. You closed this DR with a rationale that actually addresses the points raised during the dicussion. That is a good thing, of which we should have much more. Thank you! -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:49, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:FIFA World Cup 2010 South Korea Nigeria.jpg, File:FIFA World Cup 2010 Portugal Brazil.jpg & File:FIFA World Cup 2010 Germany Australia.jpg

Can you review these files to see if they are the same ones you deleted following Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Moses Mabhida Stadion and if so re-deleted them please. LGA _talk^edits 03:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

The photo of South Korea and Nigeria is different. In my opinion, the photo does not violate freedom of panorama, because no details are seen. The other two photos (Portugal–Brazil and Germany–Australia) are the same and I will delete them. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I agree the flare from the lights obscures most of the detail so probably COM:DM. LGA _talk^edits 10:46, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Could you please explain why you have deleted those images? I have submitted an undeletion request Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2013-11#Matches played at Moses Mabhida Stadion and the result was to crop the architectural features and restore. I have indeed cropped the architectural features (you can compare the old and the new versions of these files) and restored this image. Please do not overturn the consensus in the undeletion request. Thanks — NickK (talk) 14:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

I did not know, that such undeletion request exists. Now you see, why you should inform me (because I was closing admin) about creation of such request (or at least about re-uploading of the files). I did not realize, that new versions are cropped, although, of course, they are cropped. Maybe too few cropped from up. The problem is that consensus give you permission to crop architectural details out, but this was in end of October and you uploaded cropped photos on 10th of November, so there is no consensus whether the architectural details are cropped out or not. Oh, what should I do now? I restore the files, mostly the architecture is cropped out and remaining part can be considered de minimis. Кстати, если будет удобнее, могу и по-русски говорить. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

You said that I should have informed you before reuploading, but you did not inform me before deleting them again (nor LGA did before re-nominating them) — what's the difference? I did submit the request asking community to comment on the issue, as deletion was a community decision and not your personal one (I hope at least). From discussion on DR, Village pump and undeletion request it seems to be clear that grandstands completely covered by spectators do not meet COM:TOO (like you said onlookers cover with their bodies all architectural features). Of cours, onlookers could not cover the arch and the roof, thus I cropped them, as well as some parts of the image picturing nothing relevant to the game (e.g. track around the field). As the closing administrator said If the copyright elements are cropped out, then the two remaining photos are ok for Commons, I re-uploaded these images without copyrighted elements. I do not see how I overturned the community consensus — NickK (talk) 16:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

At first, if something is deleted and re-uploaded, then deletion of re-created content does not need any discussion and every administrator can do that any time. At second ... the deletion was my personal decision, but also community's decision, because every closing administrator becomes a representative of community. At third ... you did not violate community consensus, when you re-uploaded the photos, although telling me would avoided a lot of troubles. Peace? Taivo (talk) 17:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

I agree that deletion of the same content does not need any discussion, but re-uploading of a different version following an undeletion request is a different case. I just thought that you would probably check "What links here" before deleting these files to check if there was a reason to re-upload this image. All right, peace :) — NickK (talk) 17:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for undeleting those images, but you forgot the decription of File:FIFA World Cup 2010 Portugal Brazil.jpg – NickK (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Riga Maxima supermarket collapse.jpg

In situations such as that one, what does need to be done to add a correct image which satisfies commons criteria? Valenciano (talk) 19:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

The file was kept. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Architectural Images

Following this close, just wanted to let you know that enwp does not need to rely on fair use to host such images, as there is no issue with US copyright law, the only reason commons does is that they are not free in the source county. LGA _talk^edits 20:08, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

OK. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sigaste raudteepeatus.jpg

Saabus kiri OTRS-süsteemi, kus autor teatas, et lubab pildi avaldamise CC SA-BY SA 3.0 litsentsi all. Ehk taastaksid selle, mis iganes selle nime taga seisab. Kruusamägi (talk) 00:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done Võta heaks, lisa OTRS-luba ja kategoriseeri. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Vabandan. Täitsa ununes ära, et lasin selle taastada ja nõnda jõuti see juba uuesti ära kustutada, enne kui OTRS asjaga ligi sain. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Kuid File:Sigaste raudteepeatus (2005).jpg on juba isegi olemas. See on minu meelest täpne koopia. Ole nüüd kärmas ja lisa vajalikud litsentsid, enne kui seegi ära kustutatakse. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Huvitav. Ja sellelt kirja autorilt pole ma ka vastust saanud (pärisin nt, et kui tema nimi ei ole R. Jeerland, siis kes ikkagi autor on). Kruusamägi (talk) 05:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Premature DR closures

Please remember to use a grace period of 7 days after opening a DR, not the five days I have sometimes seen (except for clear copyvios and similar stuff landing in DR instead of speedy). Thanks. --Denniss (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Graffiti DRs are clearly FOP-related cases and need time for discussion. That is the reason for 7 days waiting time. You deleted Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Jesenice after only two days? It seems you are also ignoring Commons:GRAFFITI with your admin actions.  ℳ₪Zaplotnik  15:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

This is quite obvious case, there have been similar cases in the past, but ... OK, next time I will wait 7 days with graffities. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Natureum_Niederelbe

Moin Taivo, I have these images photographed and uploaded only for training purposes, the right images are now as well. Bye -- Ra Boe watt?? 11:43, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Moin Taivo, ich habe diese Bilder fotografiert und nur zu Schulungszwecken hochgeladen, die richtigen Bilder sind jetzt ebenfalls da. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 11:43, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

By principle, these photos are usable. You can make a proper deletion request, but these photos do not qualify for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

ok wie Du möchstest, man kann ja in den Exifdaten sehen das ich der Fotograf bin und nicht der Benutzer. ;) Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 12:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

ok as you viewing categories, one can see in the Exif data that I'm the photographer, not the user. ;) Bye - ~ ~ ~ ~

speedy

Hi, Please do not speedydelete redirects. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Strange. Every day a lot of redirects (maybe half hundred) are presented for speedy deletion. "Unused redirect" is a standard reason for deletion. That means, some redirects are allowed to be deleted speedily. You mean, some redirect, which I deleted as unused, was actually used and I did not notice that? I try to be more careful in future. Taivo (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Microsoft Office 95-XP logo.svg

Hello, could you look at this DR? --Rezonansowy (talk) 17:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Карабиць.JPG

Hi! Please restore File:Карабиць.JPG, I need use it in my local wiki. You deleted it too quickly. After I`ll use it you could delete it once more if you still would like to do it.--A1 (talk) 08:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Restored for eleven hours. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Jianhui67 is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 09:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

deletion nomination

Hi. I see you closed the discussion on my propsed deletion of a gallery, Commons:Deletion requests/The Triumph of History over Time - Anton Raphael Mengs. I don't mind, have nothing specifically against that page, but can you how is that kind of redundancy a good practice? When I looked for the rationale for having gallery pages at all, I got the bottom line is that they allow some flexibility with the presentation and selection that cats can't. What of that is present in the discussed page? Danny lost (talk) 22:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Any thoughts? Danny lost (talk) 12:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot. Galleries can include subsections, but categories cannot. If there is only few images in gallery, then the difference is not big, but look Eiffel Tower or Leonardo da Vinci. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays!
	G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:52, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

The panther image

Hi, Taivo, what makes you think that this derivative work is too old to be still copyrighted? It is a modern version of an old coat of arms.[8] The coat of arms is out of the copyright, but this modern derivative has copyright on its own. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

I don't think, that the panther has copyright nowadays. It is main part of historical seal and so its copyright has expired with coat of arms. I opened the mentioned page and found year 1214. Year of Estonian ancient war of independence! Probably since 13th century the panther has been drawn a lot of times on its own. The panther has the same shape as in coat of arms, so no creativity was used when drawing it. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Are you sure? The two images resemble each other, but they don't seem the same to me; the difference is significant enough (e.g. I don't see the tail in the old image).[9][10] Perhaps it would be good to ask for a third opinion. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

The file in the first page you showed to me (crni panter slovenski grb) has clear tail, same type as in graffiti. The file panter2.jpg has no tail, but description says "odlomek". As Slovenian and Russian are a bit similar languages, I suppose, that "odlomek" means: this isn't whole coat of arms, a significant part is missing. So this does not count. I do not see need for third opinion. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Odlomek (i.e. fragment) here refers to odlomek pečata ("a fragment of the seal") - the seal is not shown in its entirety, but the coat of arms on it is. I've asked Jim to comment here. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Here is the comparison with a panther image at Schlossberg castle in Graz, they look remarkably the same. ℳ₪Zaplotnik^contribs 11:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

As a general rule, a new representation of a coat of arms, drawn from the blazon, has its own copyright, so it is entirely possible for a new SVG, for example, of this CoA to be copyrighted -- see COM:COA. With that said, it looks to me like this is not a new representation, but a simple copy of the old COA and I would be inclined to say that it is OK on copyright grounds. Whether it is useful for educational purposes is another question..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

I tend to agree with Jim. Not everything that is drawn is per se copyrightable. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 18:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Graffiti Ljubljana 131.JPG

Hi Taivo, what is your closing comment ([graffito] also seems to me simply as vandalism) supposed to mean? All graffiti I uploaded are illegal and can therefore regarded as vandalism, that makes them different from murals. This is already explained in this guideline and is the ground reason why graffiti like this one should be kept on Commons. Why are you keep ignoring this? (The message written in this graffito was not offensive or vuglar, it was a philosophical thought and I can translate it to you). ℳ₪Zaplotnik^contribs 11:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. This is my mistake. I remove that sentence. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)