User talk:Christophe.Finot

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Rimini[edit]

Hi christofe!

I see the nice shots you've uploaded and I've put it in the rimini's page.

Do you have some special reason to have these photos categorized twice under the same category (one as a page and one as a photo)?

Please note that yuor categorization and your information are preserved and that in the italian cities pages we're trying to put all the photos in a page.

Thans for your comprehension, --mac 10:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi christ.

Thanks for your reply; we don't agree on the browsing functionallity. I've preserved it. What sense is to have a category nwith tonns of files with dummy names or wrong names? Insetead we check the photos, we put them under the right cat, ant we describe them. Why do you want to duplicate the photos under the same cat? It's confusing. Please have a look on how the category Cities in italy is strucutred and please consider to respect others work. Thaks for your comprenhsion, --mac 11:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

For exaple see category:Roma; would you substain that putting all the photos under a cat is a better way for browsing? Please consider that this is a standard and a consistent way we're organizing italian citis photos; could this be a good reason for you? --mac 11:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


I didn't intend to hurt you. As I know there is a final decision in wiki; there is a still running discussion on that. Two different ways of thinking. I'm not the only one archiving photos of italian cities, and the fact that the great part of them are organized this way is just the power of standards (or templates). A newcomers arrives, looks at others work, and follow them because it has a sense. For example, at the beginning cat itay was containing tousends of photos with no other browsing info and they were not linked to the wiki pages. Just trown there like in a basket. With this organization we ( I repet I'm not the only one) organized in a browsing way all the photos ( also 2 or 3 browsing path) and we linked them to the italian wiki ( and you can do the same with the french one ); this way, now, we can find any new image, categorize it, link to the enciclopedia. It ha sense. So, you can still reach the photos by browinsg cat rimini; why it's soo urgent for you to have it also under the same category? --mac 11:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC) Could you please levae your signature when you post, in order to make me esier to reach your page?

Image:Chateau de Dree 20.jpg[edit]

Je parcourais les nouveaux fichiers mardi dernier et j'ai beaucoup aimé la composition de cette photo.Je me suis permis de la proposer dans les Images de bonne qualité technique et elle a très rapidement été promue.En espérant que vous serez d'accord avec ma démarche, et avec mes meilleurs sentiments. Vassil 15:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chateau de Dree 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Dree 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Musée des Beaux Arts de Dole[edit]

Bonjour Christophe, J'ai vu que vous avez contribué par des photos de Dole sur wikimedia. Connaissez vous une vue du Musée des Beaux Arts de Dole (Pavillon des Officiers, 85, rue des Arènes, 39100 Dole)? En vous remerciant, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 18:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Panorama des quatre lacs.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai utilisé ta photo (File:Panorama des quatre lacs.jpg) pour illustrer des articles sur le lac d'Ilay et les Lacs de Maclu dans le Jura, sur fr:Wikipedia. J'ai commenté l'image pour identifier les lacs mais j'ai un doute pour le Petit Maclu : est-il visible à droite ou s'agit-il du lac de Narlay ? Le panoramique me perturbe et je ne sais plus. Peux-tu m'éclairer ? J'ai cru bien faire en complétant aussi la description sur Commons mais il faut corriger si je me suis trompé. Merci de ton aide. PRA (talk) 14:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Je m'étais bien trompé : j'ai découvert le lac de Narlay au fond à droite en passant en full resolution. J'ai corrigé.PRA (talk) 08:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Steinbeisser and his barracks[edit]

Hello, I saw your remarks on the talk page of User:Steinbeisser.

I've encountered some of his edits, and I've reviewed some more of them later on. All I can say: damn, he seriously messed things up. If you have time, I hope you can keep an eye on what he's doing, because he surely isn't making things better for commons. When reviewing his changes, most of his edits have to be reverted unfortunately, and there's a lot more to undo, I'm afraid. Regards --LimoWreck (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Photo de Dole 013[edit]

Bonjour,

stagiaire en communication, je suis à la recherche d'une photo de la ville de Dole pour illustrer une fiche de référence de projet que ma société a fait dans cette ville. J'aimerais proposer votre photo Dole013 en illustration de cette "fiche projet" à mon tuteur de stage, m'en donnez-vous l'autorisation ? A savoir que cette photo aura une utilisation commerciale, puisque la fiche sera envoyée à nos clients potentiels, conjointement à nos propositions commerciales. Elle ne sera néanmoins pas revendue et ne sera pas inclue sur des documents ayant vocation à être vendus en tant que tels (nous sommes une société de consulting et d'ingénierie, nous ne vendons donc que des services). A savoir que votre nom apparaîtra en bas à droite de la photo si vous m'accordez l'autorisation de l'utiliser(elle ne sera, d'ailleurs, peut être jamais retenue par mon tuteur, le cas échéant je vous préviendrais).

Merci d'avance pour votre réponse

Maïna Leroux

Vierge à l'enfant[edit]

Bonjour, I am sorry, mais je n'avais jamais vu nulle part que les catégories devaient être obligatoirement en anglais, et j'ai envie de demander pourquoi en anglais ? et pas en français, en mandarin, en swahili ? Et je ne m'en sors jamais, avec le principe des catégories et sous-catégories (même en français), qu'il est impossible de trouver autrement qu'en tâtonnant, au hasard, et on s'aperçoit après qu'il y a une autre catégorie qui existe et que c'est la bonne, ou peut-être pas... Bref, je vais laisser faire les amateurs de catégories, et soigneusement éviter de m'en occuper. Morburre (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dijon - Eglise Notre-Dame - Gargouilles 7.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dijon - Eglise Notre-Dame - Gargouilles 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Retouches d'images[edit]

Bonjour,

Je me suis permis d'éclaircir plusieurs de tes images concernant le Fort de Beauregard à Fénay. Il s'agit d'éclaircir les parties sombres de l'image afin d'en améliorer le rendu. Si cela ne te convient pas, ce n'est pas grave, je ferai une œuvre dérivée. Dis-moi si cela te convient. Amicalement.--Bertrand GRONDIN (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour. Je préférais personnellement les images initiales. En effet, elles étaient peut être légèrement trop sombres, mais en éclaircissant, les contrastes sont dégradés. Je me suis donc permis de revenir à la version initiale des photos, mais libre à toi si tu le désires de faire une oeuvre dérivée. Bien cordialement. Christophe.Finot (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
J'en prends note. En outre, il faut éviter l'utilisation des écrans plasma qui faussent la luminosité des images. Si tel était le cas, l'image peut paraître claire.--Bertrand GRONDIN (talk) 20:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
J'ai retiré certaines catégories que tu avais ajoutées par rapport au fichier initial. En effet, cela constituait une surcatégorisation, la catégorie fort de beauregard étant déjà une catégorie fille de côte d'or. Pour une meilleur navigation, l est fortement conseillé de se limiter à la catégorisation la plus précise et d'éliminer toutes les catégories mères. Bien cordialement. Christophe.Finot (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Please don't blank pages[edit]

Hi Christophe.Finot,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Hôtel Aubriot on Commons. If you meant for the page to be deleted, blanking the page is not the right way to do this. A simple real-world comparison to illustrate: You removed the entire text of a page from a thick folder, but the then empty, useless page itself remained in the folder.

Please use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed.

For redirects use #REDIRECT[[Target]] or {{category redirect|Targetcategoryname}}. For more information please read Blanking. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 22:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

*/Classification des images/*[edit]

Salut, ok pour l'info : je ne dois donc catégoriser qu'avec "monuments historiques in France". Merci pour vos photos car je vois que vous en êtes souvent l'auteur. Je mets à jour la liste des MH de Cote-d'Or en ajoutant les images disponibles puis, étant du département, je ferai des clichés des MH manquants. Cordialement, et merci de ta surveillance. prosopee (talk) 06:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Christophe.Finot,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Identification plus précise à Bordeaux[edit]

Christophe : Es-tu d'accord avec ceci ? Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 05:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

English: As there is no Freedom of panorama in France.

Sincerely, Jean-Fred (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Léna (talk) 18:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Rimini Grafiti.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rimini Grafiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Sarlat - Place du marché aux oies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sarlat - Place du marché aux oies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thesupermat (talk) 08:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Remiremont - Abbatiale Saint-Pierre 11.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Remiremont - Abbatiale Saint-Pierre 11.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Saint-Jean de Losne - Saone.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai remodelé ta photographie avec Exposure Blend de Gimp et l'ai sauvegardée avec le minimum de perte jpeg. J'ai remanié aussi la netteté. J'ai pris sur moi d'inclure des métadonnées t'attribuant la parternité de l'image ainsi que la licence. J'ai ajouté les données de géolocalisation. Je pense que cette nouvelle version te plaira.-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 15:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Saulieu - Pompon.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Saulieu - Pompon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

90.44.2.92 18:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Auxerre - Marie-Noël.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Auxerre - Marie-Noël.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

90.2.103.99 21:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Auxerre - Nicolas Retif de la Bretonne.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Auxerre - Nicolas Retif de la Bretonne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

90.2.32.238 12:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Pour la photo de l'église Saint-Fleuret d'Estaing! Aarp65 (talk) 07:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

File:International Year of Light 2015 - color logo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:International Year of Light 2015 - color logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Danmichaelo (δ) 12:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Villefranche-de-Rouerge 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Villefranche-de-Rouerge 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)