User talk:Ivory

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:James Ivory.jpg[edit]

This image has been deleted because it was not released under a free license but claimed fair use which is not allowed on Commons. --Matt314 20:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Freedom of panorama[edit]

Answer moved to where the question is, at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#:Image:Villa_savoye_avant.jpg_and_:Image:Villa_savoye_cote.jpg by Ivory 15:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:20060608maagdvanholland.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 16:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:20070711Voorschoterlaanhofje.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 22:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:20071013Kleef_Schwanenburg2.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 22:12, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:20071014Xanten Hafentempel detail.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:20071014Xanten Hafentempel detail.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:AllHallowsByTheTowerChurch.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AllHallowsByTheTowerChurch.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

De Welvaart[edit]

Hallo Ivory, bedankt voor het bijplaatsen van enkele foto's m.b.t. beelden in Rotterdam. Hoe meer (want er zijn er zo onnoemelijk veel in Rotterdam) hoe liever. Maar waarom twee afbeeldingen van "De Welvaart" (20071024 versie 1 en versie 2, beide nogal slecht (sorry), want vaag en in een lage resolutie ) als er al een kwalitatief veel betere afbeelding (Rotterdam_077) staat (eigen opname, maar dat is echt niet mijn uitgangspunt)? Graag je commentaar/reactie, want de in de categorie:Sculptures in Rotterdam opgenomen afbeeldingen zijn toch uiteindelijk bedoeld voor een groter publiek c.q. andere Wikipedia's.Groetjes--Gerardus 08:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Ha Gerardus, leuk om voor de verandering ook eens direct contact te hebben op Commons. Nu zie ik Image:Rotterdam 077.jpg ook staan in de zoekresultaten als ik "welvaart" ingeef, daar moet ik eerder overheen gekeken hebben-of mijn zoeken vond plaats voor 11 sept., het is al even geleden. Ik meende dus dat er geen afbeelding van dit fotogenieke beeld aanwezig was en wilde niet tot de lente wachten op goed weer. De foto die ik maakte was inderdaad tamelijk onscherp maar altijd nog beter dan niks, was de overweging. Het gaat hier tenslotte meer om het informeren van geinteresseerden die het beeld nog niet kennen en voor wie elk tipje van de sluier iets nieuws kan inhouden, dan om het mooiste of meest gedetailleerde plaatje. Omdat mijn foto cropped niet laat zien hoe groot het beeld is, en mijn foto uncropped wel een houvast biedt middels dat raam maar dan het beeld te klein weergeeft wanneer de afbeelding als "thumb" in een artikel staat, heb ik beide versies geupload. Nu ik ook jouw foto gezien heb, denk ik dat mijn cropped foto zijn nut verloren heeft, maar de grotere versie heeft nog wel een context die ik niet op jouw foto zie. Ook zie ik verschil tussen onze standpunten (de letterlijke, toen we ervoor stonden). Jouw muur is recht, ik koos een zichtpunt met een schuine hoek, om het beeld duidelijker voor de muur te laten uitsteken en de muur zelf ook wat diepte te geven. Het effect daarvan komt ondanks de onscherpte wel over volgens mij. Onze foto's vullen elkaar aan in de derde dimensie. Het zij verre van mij om de categorieen te vervuilen met vakantiefoto's en andere ballast, als er iets in de weg staat, moet dat worden opgeruimd. Ivory 18:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Ivory. Bedankt voor je reactie. Ik heb er ook een gewoonte van gemaakt meerdere, andere opnames te maken van hetzelfde object (Zie: Willem de Kooning), dus echt schrikken doe ik niet van je uiteenzetting. Het was meer mijn bedoeling te waarschuwen voor foto's met een te lage resolutie (Wikimedia kan echt MB's aan in plaats van KB's). Overigens zie ik volgende opnames van beelden in de openbare Rotterdamse ruimte graag verschijnen. Groetjes--Gerardus 08:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

File:20121005 Aleksandr Lebed.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:20121005 Aleksandr Lebed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Clarissy. 11:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

File:20121005 Vladimir Govorov.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:20121005 Vladimir Govorov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Clarissy. 23:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

File:20121005 Andrei Tupolev.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:20121005 Andrei Tupolev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Clarissy. 00:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)