User talk:Koelner50

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Koelner50!

Cats

[edit]

Hi. Du solltest deine Bilder bezüglich Maifisch in die Alosa alosa einsortieren. mfg. --Itu (talk) 02:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:EU Life Preis 2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:EU Life Preis 2012.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

INeverCry 07:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, das hier habe ich eben erst entdeckt und gelesen. Es stellt sich die Frage, ob für diese Fotos und weitere überhaupt eine spezielle Einzel-Genehmigung erforderlich ist, da es sich um offizielle EU-Fotos handelt, die allerdings auch bei FlickR eingestellt wurden (damit jeder sie sehen kann). Ich bin Teil des "EU-Life-Shade-Projekts" unter Projektmanager Andreas Scharbert und schreibe schreibe viele Presseberichte über das Projekt - auch in Wikipedia. Die emails von /an die EU-Commission habe ich direkt an INeverCry zur Kenntnisnahme gesandt --Koelner50 (talk) 08:45, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Maifischlarven, wenige Tage alt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mippzon (talk) 21:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Poller Heimatmuseum Hanno Fischer Segelflug.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Poller Heimatmuseum Hanno Fischer Segelflug.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 02:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wiedereröffnung Poller Heimatmuseum.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wiedereröffnung Poller Heimatmuseum.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Raymond 19:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Da der Fotograf "M.M.-Fototeam", Manfred Reifsteck, seit fast 20 Jahren in meinem Auftrag Fotos von meinen Aktivitäten macht, habe ich eine pauschale Erlaubnis, seine Bilder in jeder Form mit Namensnennung zu verwenden - siehe Email vom 09.Mai 2011 (wurde heute an permission-de@wikimedia.org verschickt)--Koelner50 (talk) 05:34, 26 September 2018 (UTC) Ticket#2018092610002104--Koelner50 (talk) 06:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Traditionsbrauhaus und (vormalige) Brennerei Stüsser - seit weit über 100-Jahren

[edit]

Hallo Kölner Kollege (...falls Du noch mitliest und/oder noch (auf de.wp) aktiv bist. : - Vor langen Jahren hattest Du Dich mannhaft für die "Rettung" des Wikipedia Artikels zur renommierten Kölner Puszta-Hütte sehr erfolgreich eingesetzt - und es ist ausschließlich Dir zu verdanken, dass die altehrwürdige Puszta-Hütte nicht der Löschwut von "Kollegen" zum Opfer gefallen ist. - Leider ist der Artikel zum weit über 100-Jahre alten Brauhaus (mit hauseigenem Schnaps - Stüsser Kräuter Bitter u.a.), genau dieser unsäglichen Löschwut aktuell zum Opfer gefallen; nur noch "Randnotizen" zur Neusser Straße 47 erinnern an unserer Kultbrauhaus Stüsser. - Der vormals (von mir angelegte und m.E. auch ansprechend, unentgeltlich und sachgerecht bebilderte) Artikel Brauhaus Stüsser wurde - bei "Nacht und Nebel" ohne jedwede vorherige Diskussion - schnell gelöscht (SLA). - Ich selbst wurde sodann sogar noch als mutmaßlich bezahlter Wikipedia Schreiberling auf der entspr. Prangerseite öffentlich diffamiert. - Kurzum : Falls Dir - als alteingesessem Kölner - irgend-etwas einfallen sollte, was für den Erhalt unseres altehrwürdigen Traditions-Brauhauses Stüsser spricht (d.h.: Einzelnachweise / Literatur / Medien) melde Dich bitte auf der Diskussionsseite zur Neusser Straße 47 : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Neusser_Stra%C3%9Fe_47_(K%C3%B6ln) --- Die de.wp Relevanzhürden für Kölner Schankwirtschaften sind ja ansonsten recht niedrig aufgehängt, wie man z.B hier beim ganz wichtigen Päff sieht ... alles Joode vun de schäl Sick wünscht Dir - mit einem Sebus Ständchen - aus unserem herrlichen Stüsser Gordito1869 (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]