User talk:Mardus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Request for comment[edit]

Requesting comments on all contributed images. -Mardus 17:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Changing categories[edit]

I've moved some images from categories, such as Tallinn to Tallinn old town, as the Tallinn category has become very large and it has an insubordinate amounts of pictures of the Tallinn Old Town — not that I mind those images, but I am more for organising them better, whilst the best option is to view the Tallinn gallery or any of the potential sub-galleries. Therefore, if anyone has anything to add about it, then you are very welcome to do so. -Mardus 16:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Radisson_SAS_Tallinn_2006-08-14.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Radisson_SAS_Tallinn_2006-08-14.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 14:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Slightly wrong edit descriptions[edit]

Where the following applies:

I believe I did make the right edits in categorization, but I learned that many of my edit descriptions were wrong by one level:

  • cat change: specificity: Skyscrapers > Skyscrapers in the United Kingdom (child of Skyscrapers):
    In parentheses should be: child of Skyscrapers by country, grandchild of Skyscrapers
    Subsequently, I moved images from Category:Skyscrapers in the United Kingdom to Tall buildings in London and remembered to add correct edit descriptions, so this point is somewhat moot and therefore I didn't refer to here in respective images' Talk pages.
  • cat change: specificity: Skyscrapers > Skyscrapers in Singapore (child of Skyscrapers)
    In parentheses should be: child of Skyscrapers by country, grandchild of Skyscrapers

-Mardus 16:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Personal_computer.bristol.jpg[edit]

You said: "Hello. The image more appears to depict a typical table set up with technology, rather than your "three gigahertz personal computer", most of which is out of the picture at the bottom right of the image"

Depends on whether the reader regards "computer" as the entire set up or just the tower, and it depends on the subject of the article the pic is in (none, in this case). So I'm not clear what point you're making. Best Wishes, - Arpingstone 09:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Turns out that this image was a duplicate of Image:Pc.computer.bristol.750pix.jpg. -Mardus (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

fix it or revert it[edit]

Could you please quickly fix your last edit: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Unfree_screenshots_in_breach_of_Commons:Screenshots,_To_create_a_free_screenshot,_article_3&curid=12856564&diff=49000549&oldid=48981762&rcid=50176335

Either you fix it qickly or it will get quickly reverted ;-) Please use the PREVIEW before saving. --ALE! ¿…? 09:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

I noticed the mistake right away, so I reverted it as soon as possible, with Lynx, no less, so I hope my revert won't have to be reverted. Gonna use the sandbox after that... And thanks for telling. -Mardus (talk) 10:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

hu:Fájlvita:HEWabr.jpg[edit]

Hi mardus! I'm reacting to your message on behalf of the uploader because he doesn't speak English. It is a known fact in the community of huwiki that the uploader is actually the designer of the said device (Ganz factory) and the pictures you found are on websites of resellers. Uploader has sent me the original picture which is way bigger in size than any of those you can possibly find online. I will reupload with original size. Hope this clarifies the situation. 194.151.37.123 16:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC) (Sorry, forgot to login Teemeah (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2011 (UTC))

thanks for the suggestions, I will let him know. --Teemeah (talk) 08:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

I think this is getting way confusing and knowing him he will see all these as useless bureaucracy. I think it is best these photos stay on huwiki... Teemeah (talk) 14:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


File:SeaMonkey 1.1.9 -- SOPA blackout.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:SeaMonkey 1.1.9 -- SOPA blackout.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mardus (talk) 11:32, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:D.Iceweasel6.0.2 (nl) file action dialog Ubuntu6.7.1.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:D.Iceweasel6.0.2 (nl) file action dialog Ubuntu6.7.1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Mardus (talk) 03:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#Logo for Strategic planning wiki[edit]

Voting is at m:Logo for Wikimedia Strategic Planning wiki. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 08:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 08:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 08:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

File:SEB Eesti Ühispank - peahoone 2006-08-14.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:SEB Eesti Ühispank - peahoone 2006-08-14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 23:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely McZusatz (talk) 10:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Jordan FOP[edit]

Hi Mardus, You posted a NO Jordan FOP last year. You missed the fact that articles 17 and 20 target Books, booklets and other written material. Please check to the original new 2014 Arabic Text, not the old translated one. --Tarawneh (talk) 14:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, User:Tarawneh. I can't read Arabic, so I don't know the current nature of Jordanian copyright law. The main idea is, that just as "books, booklets and other written materal", works of architecture also fall under 'published works', and for FOP to apply (to be 'OK'), there should not be any requirement to ask permission from the author (one or more architects) or the owner of the building, and/or requirements of payments to the author or any collection agency for publishing a photo or other audiovisual media made of a work of architecture. -Mardus (talk) 15:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Mardus, you are just extrapolating other laws into the Jordanian law based on the meaning of English words used by some translator. The only acceptable laws texts in Jordanian courts are Arabic text, cause the parliament produces the laws in Arabic. The concept of asking for permission to get a photo of an intentionally-publicly available structure ( not persons ) has no meaning in Jordan or in the Jordanian law. This concept does not exist in Jordan. I my self when I joined commons 10 years ago had some rough time to get the idea of forbidding a user of using images he shot him self. I even dare anyone to get me a single case outside of our commons servers that talks about the existence of the concept in general in Jordanian laws :P . --Tarawneh (talk) 16:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Tarawneh: Because the main FOP page on Commons relies on the English language, then other users also rely on English-langauge translations of the law.
Unless Jordanian copyright law explicitly says that it's permissible to make and freely publish visual media that depicts works of art situated in public spaces (including photos of works of architecture), then it is really not permissible.
Assuming that maybe it's permissible only because it doesn't say that it's prohibited, inevitably opens a huge can of worms, because then other users might begin assuming this about other countries' copyright laws that are at best ambiguous and at worst confusing. Therefore it's better to err on the safe side. -Mardus (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Mardus and Tarawneh, I would suggest to discuss this at CT:FOP. Thanks for the important point that the copyright law was amended in 2014. This amendment is already recorded at WIPO but has unfortunately not yet been translated to English. It would be helpful to provide a translation of the relevant passages of the amendment from Arabic to English at CT:FOP. When this discussion has been opened, I will post a notice to the three deletion requests that they should be suspended until we have resolved this. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Mardus: @Tarawneh: I'd like to jump in and add that after reading the supplied link of the amended law that the law explicitly exempts Architectural Structures from copyright (public domain. owned by the state) if they can be considered "folklore" or connected to the Jordanian heritage or tradition. --Hexafluoride (talk) 00:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

USGS Postscript[edit]

Hi. Where can i find that USGS Postscript-shakemaps ? -- ...

OK, found it in the drop-down below ... but e.g. looking at recent Ecuador-quake: pdfinfo intensity.ps says only 612x792 and it looks much low-res even compared to the previous versions of File:Shakemap_Ecuador_April_2016.jpg. --Itu (talk) 05:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

@Itu, it seems, that the USGS website went through a redesign. Anyways, I went to a recent shakemap of Equador from the USGS website, and the page has a Downloads section. The file you might be looking for, is the intensity map and a ZIP version of it, which is actually ps.zip; it's size is approximately over 800 Kb. I looked through my recent Commons maps files, and I have intensity.ps.zip for the Nepal earthquake map. I used The GIMP to open that file, and Ghostscript. Before the file is opened in GIMP, I can set height and width parameters as in the JPEG original, such as 2125 × 2480 pixels, and specify graphic and text antialiasing. Antialiasing must be be set to strong to avoid hairy text and lines in the map. -Mardus /talk 11:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
@Itu: GPL GhostScript binaries can be downloaded from SourceForge here. -Mardus /talk 12:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
It's not easy to follow your procedure and its pretty manual. Generally there should be some automatic processing with the basic tools given by a commandline. --Itu (talk) 13:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Installing The GIMP is easy; intalling Ghostscript is easy, too. All I need to do after that, is download that intensity.ps.zip file and set the dimensions to 2125 × 2480, and crop after that. It does take several steps, of course. Most Linux setups already have The Gimp and Ghostscript installed out of the box. -Mardus /talk 13:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Freedom of Panorama World Map - Norway[edit]

Dear Mardus, Thank you for contributing the freedom of panorama map, it was very helpful to me. But it looks to me like Norway should be a "yellow" country. Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Norway Would you mind updating? --Pfandtasse (talk) 13:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. I'll look into it. -Mardus /talk 17:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Notice about Samsung Galaxy Note 7 devices (29986812710).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Notice about Samsung Galaxy Note 7 devices (29986812710).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on display (29179352184).jpg[edit]

This file was deleted mostly because of bad quality, as it was taken with an iPhone 6 at such a distance, that the device was really small relative to its surroundings, so the crop was quite grainy. The filename was also wrong, and so was the original description, as I didn't notice that the device in the photo turned out to be a Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge and not a Note 7 (the latter was not on display, but shown in a large promo display image). -Mardus /talk 20:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (tJosve05a (c) 22:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

No longer a penguin (talk) 11:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Adblock Plus Add-on.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Adblock Plus Add-on.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Firefox 17.0 Page Inspector - Selected element.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Firefox 17.0 Page Inspector - Selected element.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

bjh21 (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your behaviour[edit]

What you do here clearly amounts to harassing. You've came up with bunch of baseless accusations. I don't think I've ever given you reason to suspect me of something sinister. If I use an IP address then sure, this address may change occasionally, but this in itself can't be a problem. I recall you that sockpuppetry is special kind of use of IP addresses and/or usernames in order to deceive or mislead other users. Using IP addresses is allowed, and not every use of IP address should be suspected of sockpuppetry. Otherwise the working environment here'd be ill-natured for everyone. Neither is there a rule or convention that you can do only non-prolific editing without logging in or without having an account. So, if you come across sockpuppetry in future and what to make accusations, then also please make sure that there actually is deceiving (e.g. someone uses muliple accounts/addresses to gather support, doing controversial edits in particular area using multiple accounts). Also, multiple accounts that you suspect of being the same person need to be named, and most importantly, behavioural evidence to tie these accounts need to be provided. Making accusations without considering these basic aspects can only be rude.

You accuse me of "trying to get an upper hand in a conversation". My intention never is to get merely an upper hand in discussions. I always try to argument in discussions and I try to be clear. This may put me somewhat "upper" position, but only if opposite user doesn't follow standards of sensible discussion. I assume you refer to earlier dispute on categorization. I'm sorry but to me it seemed and still seems that in this dispute you made claims that you refused to explain and prove. You pretty much demanded your counerpart to take your actions as they are because you say so. Specifically, you are probably aware that as per COM:CAT users are expected to determine main subject and/or noteworthy features. If you look around in categories you see that other users generally follow this. You however often choose to ignore this practise and instead you look for tiny details that are as little noteworthy as possible and categorize by that. Your purpose seems to be to play hide and seek, as "Look what I found on this image, see if you can find it too." To me this looks like straightforward misuse of categories as you make categories less useful, if not useless, for people use categories to find reasonably good illustrations on particular subject. Keeping all that in mind you really shouln't accuse me of daring to question your actions.

Now, I didn't reply in order to pick up a fight or in order to continue it. I only ask you to assume good faith in interactions with other users, both with users that are logged in and those that are not, or those that are prolific and experienced and those who are not. If other user starts a discussion then one probably has a point and a reason to do so. In this case good manners is to at least try to understand what the concern is instead of running down your opponent at any cost. 90.191.81.65 18:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Firefox in Telugu.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Firefox in Telugu.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)