User talk:Nokib Sarkar

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nokib Sarkar!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:08, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ahmed midaoui in rabat.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Krdbot 23:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of muktijoddha sangsad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:38, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jacqueline Aguilera.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nakash aziz at studio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:42, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Pratul Mukhapadhyay.jpg

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Pratul Mukhapadhyay.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 12:42, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: From the link,the image is seemed to be public.
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:William Albert Allard.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:William Albert Allard.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of File:Mrb Rafi in the Dark and Light.jpg?

[edit]

Hi Would you be so kind to identify how the upload File:Mrb Rafi in the Dark and Light.jpg is within the scope of Wikimedia Commons. Its scope is not immediately obvious to me. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

billinghurst Thanks for asking. Actually this is a photo of my new wikipedian friend Mrb Rafi. He is blocked in wikimedia due to ip reason. So he asked me to upload his photo to wikimedia. I think wikimedia may have at least one personal picture of a wikipedian. Kind to response. Thanks a lot. Nokib Sarkar (talk) 13:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. Please look to categorise to category:User page images.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About Shohag_S.jpg and also Shohag_and_Sohag.jpg

[edit]

I simply don't understand that Wikimedia have any policy like that or maybe have any rule for uploading free works. Look closely, you will find that these two pictures are entirely different and also represent different phenomena. But If you truly think so, I am going to consult with an admin about that. Thanks A. Shohag 14:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found that your actions are truly hoax. If you see in wiki closely, you will find that a lot people have their own picture in different phenomena, there's even a lot of admins too. But If you keep doing like this, you will get warned, probably consider this one as a warn. Thanks and keep contributing on wiki. A. Shohag 14:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShohagS, Thanks for your response. Would you please read the first point of the instructions here? Sorry if anything was wrong. And please DO NOT remove if any image is tagged for deletion as that is an offence. You are free to discuss. Thanks again. Nokib Sarkar (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tatya Tope.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A. Shohag 14:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tatya Tope.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SohagRJ (talk) 09:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Project Korikath

[edit]
Dear Nokib Sarkar,

We are thrilled and overwhelmed with joy to welcome you into the esteemed folds of Project Korikath. As a proud member of our growing family, consisting of individuals hailing from four countries and beyond, your presence holds immense significance.

Together, we embark on a profound mission: bridging the visual knowledge gap reagarding local topics within Wikimedia projects and bringing them closer to the fabric of everyday life. Your dedication and contributions are instrumental in propelling us towards this shared vision. With heartfelt gratitude, we raise our glasses to you, celebrating the beginning of a transformative journey filled with growth, accomplishment, and the profound satisfaction of making a change in the real world with open knowledge.

Join our telegram group to communicate with our community.

Cheers!

Korikath steering committee

Wasiul Bahar (talk) 13:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]