User talk:Stan old/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stan old!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cupless bra black.jpg[edit]

File:Cupless bra black.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pippobuono (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Babydoll 3.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Babydoll 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Babydoll 3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pippobuono (talk) 12:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crotchless pantyhose back.jpg[edit]

File:Crotchless pantyhose back.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

–Davey2010^Talk 00:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baby doll 2.jpg[edit]

File:Baby doll 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, –Davey2010^Talk 00:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Hello Stan old/Archive 1, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Baby doll 2.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:White babydoll front.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:White babydoll front.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:White babydoll front.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pippobuono (talk) 08:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:White babydoll front.jpg[edit]

File:White babydoll front.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, –Davey2010^Talk 12:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Hi Stan, These images are out of scope here, Without sounding disrespectful we're not a porn site, Once you upload images here they're free to use by anyone.... Do you really want your wife all over the internet ?, Well that's up to you but regardless please read COM:SCOPE and COM:NUDITY, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HI[edit]

hey can i use ur pictures? email me kostyapetrov2@yandex.com thanks kostya 2A05:1700:0:1:400:1FFF:FE29:2CE7 14:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Babydoll ewa6.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Babydoll ewa6.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Babydoll ewa6.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pippobuono (talk) 09:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Babydoll ewa6.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 14:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I understand the reason of blocked me by You. Creating and using other wiki account it was my big mistake. I will never do it again. Please, give me a chance and unblock me."

Decline reason: "User doesn't understand the rules, esp. Com:IDENT, scope of the project, com:NOT.) I see no reason to lift the block. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)"[reply]

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Btw, the photos which i posted are maked by me personally. Fact that they are available on some web sites isn't proof of not my authorship of them. As a proof of oryginality i posted some other photos, which are never before published on web, with my clothed model on my Flickr [REDACTED]

Oppose Commons is not a web host. Your contribution seem to be no improvement to commons and without Com:EDUSE --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 23:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further: Uploading to Flickr or whereever doesn't solve the problem of Com:IDENT, even if you are the photographer. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Well FWIW I had no idea about the other accounts but my main issue is the images - Now yes we do have pornographic images however the difference between the images here and yours is that the images here are models and the majority are taken as photoshoots ..... Yours on the otherhand is of your wife and you've already plastered her over the web .... which like I said at the DR leads me to believe you're treating this website nothing more than another porno site,

Yes you've released your images under a CC license but we're under no obligation to accept them and lets be realistic here no one's going to use any of your images for anything - Images here need to be in scope which I'm afraid your images aren't,

In short I think the block should stay and you should (kindly) leave this site and focus on whatever you enjoy most, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 03:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support reducing the block to a temporary one, if Stan old acknowledges that he should not bulk-upload such images. There are some which may be valuable, but it's important to curate them for educational purposes, rather than treating this as a web host. Guanaco (talk) 01:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Read Com:Ident. There's no way that any of your pics (as I recall) will not fall under the identifiable people clause. Further, we already have plenty of women in underwear, cameltoes, etc. pp. There's nothing new and nothing particular of Com:EDUSE. If you want your wife(?) on the web, you need to use tinder/facebook/flickr/tumblr.... --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Guanaco with the understanding that you will no longer use Commons as a web host. Wikicology (talk) 15:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hedwig in Washington, Dear Davey2010[edit]

Since You both make similar accusations let me answer You both in one post. The reason of block me was justified. Sorry for the fact that I created a second profile and used it. I will not do it again. But Your comments suggest that the reason for block me was the content I posted. I respect Your opinion but disagree with it. In general, Your accusations are three, namely: - that I do not have the copyright to the photos that I posted, - that the pictures I posted do not have any educational value, - that I broke Com.IDENT. As for the first plea, it is not true. All photos I made personally. As for the second plea, please let me answer that question: What educational values, for example, offers this picture: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Erect_shaved_penis_during_masturbation.jpg As to the last plea, please indicate why this photo broking Com.IDENT: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Babydoll_ewa2.jpg. I'm afraid Your opinions are not entirely objective. Sincerely Yours Stan_old — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stan old (talk • contribs) 11:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Guanaco[edit]

I admit that I posted too many photos. But actually some of them may have value for the Wiki community. One of them I used in the article [1], namely File: Half_corset_black.jpg. If the community of Wiki will revoke the blockade then I will not massively publish contents in the future. Best regards Stan_old — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stan old (talk • contribs) 01:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that i ask again, but I noticed that You accused me of License laundering using my Flickr. To me it is equivalent to accusing me of being a thief. I feel bad about it, I'm not a thief. All photos posted on my Flickr site have been made personally. Please indicate how I can apply to remove my Flickr from the blacklist. I'm sorry that i ask again, but I noticed that You accused me of License laundering using Flickr. To me it is equivalent to accusing me of being a thief. I feel bad about it, I'm not a thief. All photos posted on my Flickr site 77885672@N03 i have been made personally. Please can You indicate how I can apply to remove my Flickr 77885672@N03 from the blacklist. Sincerely Your Stan old (talk) 10:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed 77885672@N03 from the blacklist.On a new review, it looks like your original images. Guanaco (talk) 11:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for removing my Flickr from the black list. Thank You very much for your trust. Best regards Stan old (talk) 11:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to bother You again. My Flickr is still on the black list. I know that I myself am guilty because I used sockpuppet "old_sat". Please advice how I can authenticate my Flickr and remove it from the blacklist. Best regards Stan old (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because You are Admin, who has banned me, so i have request for You. Can you supervise, please, the thread of Hedwig of Washington and her argues for decline my unblock request? If you agree with Her, so OK - Wiki is wrong place for me. Sincerely Your Stan old (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've set your block to expire at the end of one month. I recommend only uploading risque photos where they are needed for Wikimedia projects, and also there are many other things you could photograph and upload. Nature, cityscapes, monuments, food, and many other topics are quite welcome here. Guanaco (talk) 22:37, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ +/−

As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely thank Author of this bot for bringing my attention and advice. Best regards Stan old (talk) 10:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hedwig in Washington[edit]

I know that Your position on my case is an expression of concern for the high quality of Wikimedia Commons. I respect that and I do not consider Your comments to be prejudicial to me. However, I am very hurt that You are still suggesting that I was not the author of the photos. I strongly ask You to stop making such suggestions or to present a person who claims the rights to my works. Stopping allegations that I have appropriated someone's copyright for me is more important than unblocking on Wikimedia. Sincerely Your Stan old (talk) 09:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The problems are Com:Ident and Com:Scope. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You very much for answer. I know that Your comments are also an expression of concern for me as the beginner user of the Wiki. I agree that my ignorance was a main reason that would break Com:Ident by some my photos. But some of photos had educational value, maybe very small value but not equal to zero. I am also aware that some of my content can be called epigony. Sincerely Your Stan old (talk) 23:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I remind You that the reason for blocking me was "Editing and uploading from Stan old was disabled by Guanaco for the following reason: Abusing multiple accounts ". Your argument "against" is based on false assumptions. You use that I was blocked for another reason, in order to get rid of me from the Wikimedia, because my earlier content does not suit your and Davey2010 personal tastes. Since you are a very ethical person, I would like you to explain these your actions to me:

Hi Hedwig, Hope all is well :),

Sorry to bother you but when you have 5 mins spare could you restore File:BBC iPlayer Screenshot.png so I can download it and save the rationale too - The deleting admin's not been on all day and dunno how long COM:UNDELETE takes so figured I'd ask you lol :),
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

@Davey2010: ✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC) All saved, many thanks Hedwig m( :) –Davey2010Talk 18:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

The conversation was about this file: File:BBC iPlayer Screenshot.png

Check, please, its history.

The above conversation may give the impression that someone is providing someone with stolen content. I hope this impression is wrong. Sincerely Your Stan old (talk) 20:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Davey2010[edit]

Honorable Debater, in your statement of 03:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC), You have accused me that the pictures I posted are pornographic. I absolutely disagree with your position. As Wikimedia definition sexual content is, I quote:

start quote:

vaginal, anal, and oral intercourse;
non-penetrative sex, including masturbation;
certain paraphilias such as urolagnia and coprophilia;
sadistic or masochistic abuse;
prominent depictions of the pubic area or genitalia.

end of quote

None of the pictures I posted contained the above content. If you think that the view of a woman's breast or female body without visible pubic area is pornographic, then I very much ask you to change this definition.

Sincerely Your Stan old (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment of 11 November 2017 I received as a personal attack on me. There are no substantive arguments in it, it is just a reflection of your personal prejudices. Are a task of administrators the censoring user activity outside of Wikipedia? Is the task of administrators to ban Wikipedia users on the basis of personal antipathy criteria? I urge administrators like you to follow the Wikipedia rules and in particular to be objective. Thanks Stan old (talk) 10:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I've not been on - The way the images were taken made them pornographic .... I'm not going to get into a debate but myself and others agreed your images were pornographic, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for response. In my opinion everyone should express his position in a case without supporting his opinion using the hypothetical opinion of unspecified group of people. Besides, your answer does not address the fundamental issues whom I asked. In addition, I think you are not objective, and your answer only confirms this. Thanks, Stan old (talk) 19:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikicology[edit]

Thank You for giving me a second chance. I'm a Wiki greenhorn and i made some mistakes. In the future i will be more attentive and censorious to my content. Sincerely Your Stan old (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Mistakes are inevitable, in fact life would be incomplete without them. Wikicology (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:MILF[edit]

Category:MILF has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 07:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Stan old/Archive 1

Contents

File:Cupless bra black.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Babydoll 3.jpg[edit]

File:Crotchless pantyhose back.jpg[edit]

File:Baby doll 2.jpg[edit]

Deleted content[edit]

File tagging File:White babydoll front.jpg[edit]

File:White babydoll front.jpg[edit]

Images[edit]

HI[edit]

File tagging File:Babydoll ewa6.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Unblock[edit]

Dear Hedwig in Washington, Dear Davey2010[edit]

Dear Guanaco[edit]

Please sign your postings[edit]

Dear Hedwig in Washington[edit]

Dear Davey2010[edit]

Dear Wikicology[edit]

Category:MILF[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:Stan old/Archive 1

File:Cupless bra black.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Babydoll 3.jpg[edit]

File:Crotchless pantyhose back.jpg[edit]

File:Baby doll 2.jpg[edit]

Deleted content[edit]

File tagging File:White babydoll front.jpg[edit]

File:White babydoll front.jpg[edit]

Images[edit]

HI[edit]

File tagging File:Babydoll ewa6.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Unblock[edit]

Dear Hedwig in Washington, Dear Davey2010[edit]

Dear Guanaco[edit]

Please sign your postings[edit]

Dear Hedwig in Washington[edit]

Dear Davey2010[edit]

Dear Wikicology[edit]

Category:MILF[edit]

Navigation menu

Search