User talk:Alexis Jazz/Archives/2019/February

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commons overleg:Openbaarmaking van monetaire compensaties voor bewerkingen

Ik denk dat je de tekst waarschijnlijk zelf kan vervangen, zoals je al zei is een stemming niet nodig en veranderd er niets aan de inhoud anders dan een verduidelijking, ik denk dat uw tekst onze betaalde collegae better kan helpen dan wat er nu staat (Mobiel 📱). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Hasive bedoel je? Zijn ban heeft al 4 tegenstanders tegenover 1 steunstem. Lijkt me niet dat die ban doorgaat. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Wie? Ik houdt mij niet zoveel met administrator zaken bezig? Is dat op Wikimedia Commons of the Engelstalige Wikipedia? Sinds mensen hier niet de jure door de gemeenschap worden verbannen. Voor het geval ik bedoelde het in het algemeen. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
@Donald Trung: Ah oh ah oh aaaaaah oooooh ja nee juist precies dat nee ja uiteraard logisch eigenlijk nu je het zegt. Wikimedia-brede ban voorstel voor Hasive die op Commons niets fout heeft gedaan heeft hier niets mee te maken. Dom dom dom. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Om eerlijk te zijn snap ik de kruistocht tegen onze betaalde collega's niet, zolang zij dingen neutraal en positief doen zie ik niet hoe zij schadelijk voor Wikimedia websites zijn, uiteindelijk zijn het de lezers en (be)kijkers van deze projecten die er baat aan hebben, ik denk niet dat iemand erover nadenkt of mensen betaald worden om artikelen te schrijven en/of foto's te maken wanneer zij hun kennis met informatie op Wikimedia verrijken. Zolang er geen betaalde administrators zijn die betaald worden om bepaalde gebruikers die teveel over "de competitie" schrijven te blokkeren zie ik niet wat voor kwaad zij hier kunnen doen, wij worden gemotiveerd door onze wil om onze medemens slimmer te maken en zij worden gemotiveerd door steenkoude cash, verschillende motivaties maar dezelfde resultaten. Trouwens ik kijk nooit naar Meta of iets buiten de artikelnaamruimte op Engels, waar ik niet mag bewerken heb ik geen reden om mijn tijd mee te verspillen om te kijken. Wat trouwens raar is is hoe een aantal afbeeldingen van politici werd verwijderd als "persoonlijke afbeeldingen". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: Afbeeldingen van politici? Waar doel je op? Jimbo heeft trouwens een uitgesproken mening over betaalde editors: User:Jimbo Wales/Paid Advocacy FAQ. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Bijvoorbeeld "Commons:Verwijderverzoeken/Bestand:Ibrahim Muddasser.jpg", deze persoon is over ik kan vinden hem, waarschijnlijk is hij in Bangladesh bekender dan in Engelstalige landen maar sinds ik niet in het Bengaals kan zoeken kan ik dit niet bevestigen. "Gebruiker:Moheen" spreekt wel Bengaals als zijn moedertaal dus kan hij wel gelijk hebben, maar Wikimedianen die minder voor het onderwijs doen en alleen hun gezicht bij een WikiEvenement laten zien mogen hun foto's op Wikimedia Commons hebben maar mensen zoals Ibrahim Muddasser niet. Natuurlijk moet iemand wel eerst een Wikipedia artikel hebben, maar ik denk dat Ibrahim Muddasser wel in aanmerking komt om zijn eigen Wikidata voorwerp te zijn. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

This DR

Can you vote  Keep in the DR above? Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Davina Michelle optreden DWDD 2017.webm

The youtube source clip is free from Google archive but it is only 2 minutes and 7 seconds. The uploaded Commons video clip is 2 minutes 30 seconds and is from another source. They show different women too. I cannot review this image. Suggest you upload the correct video from the source. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: you are absolutely correct, I apologize! The video2commons tool failed on this video so I had to upload it by hand and copy pasted the description from another video. The archive.org link was correct, but the live Youtube link was still the one from the video of which I copied the description. Entirely my fault. I corrected the source link. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment: I will be signing out in 30 minutes for bed soon. Feel free to ask another reviewer such as Roy H, GRuban, etc to use Cacheview to confirm the images you uploaded from DWDD are CC BY 3.0 and review them. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: I just finished uploading. The "try Google cache" link should have the same effect as cachedview, btw. Thank you again for your amazing work. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

I managed to review all the last DWDD images you uploaded. Finished at 2:01/2:02 AM Tuesday morning. I was really tired.

PS: This note by me to Natuur's comments is one reason why it may be safer Not to be an Admin sadly. We are all Unpaid Volunteers here. Some Admins and License reviewers lose their rights due to lack of activity....but most people have to work to pay the bills. I have a real job to do too which is why I don't want top be an Admin too. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: License reviewers don't lose their rights. I know a license reviewer who has never reviewed a single file. None! In fact he doesn't even know what a license reviewer is. You and Natuur12 have nothing to worry about when it comes to activity. As for adminship, there are quite some downsides. There is some legal risk and admins have to deal more often with angry users. I'm not planning on adminship either. There is so much to do without being an admin. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
  • I know there was a proposal to strip away license review rights from license reviewers who don't review X number of images after X months or X years...but I don't know whatever came of that proposal. I don't know why but I notice many reviewers get this right and then don't use it...perhaps because they have their work obligations. By the Way, the most rewarding DWDD video file to review/pass was this one File:Ode aan Dolores O'Riordan.webm on the late Dolores O'Riordan who died in January 2018. I guess I'm biased but I liked her 1990's music with the The Cranberries such as 'Linger' which she sang. Thanks for uploading that clip. Unfortunately she drowned and died like Whitney Houston in a bathtub sadly but such is life. How sad that life repeats itself here to such good singers. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:46, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
I liked her music too. Heck, still do.. Incredibly sad, indeed. Makes you feel powerless. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Help desk

Hello.
Revision of Commons:Help_desk – too hostile summary. This is very likely a person from a poverty-stricken region in India, and the user may also have a poor command of English. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

@Incnis Mrsi: either that, or a troll/scammer. I found the "intimate student" amusing though. In addition, I had left a message on their talk page. Whatever their motivation, they should take it elsewhere. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

2 images

Managed to review these 2 images below with Google cache from this List:

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: for "Chunk 6, less hurry" there is a copy at archive.org and/or a review available onwiki. I see the search link was broken, I fixed it. As you can now see, there is both File:Jeroen Kampschreur (2018).jpg and File:Bibian Mentel (2018).jpg taken from the very same clip, reviewed by you. So you have actually seen the license. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
@Leoboudv:
The screenshot, however, was taken from a different video. There is no shot of Ruben from this particular angle in the video. I'll go find the right video for the screenshot. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:46, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Found it. Can you review File:TV-Serie 'Door het hart van China' - Ruben Terlou.webm? I'll replace the source for the screenshot with the correct one. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Santing

Dear Alexis Jazz, I tried to listen to this file. Do I miss the sound because my speakers are broke? Vysotsky (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

@Vysotsky: no, for some DWDD uploads I unchecked "keep audio". Only some musical performances that didn't include an interview. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Shall I re-upload this file? Vysotsky (talk) 22:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: why? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
What should I do to hear the sound (on Commons)? Vysotsky (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: Wait for the copyright on the song to expire. Rob de Nijs ain't dead yet. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Forgot about that. Will wait for another 90 years or so. Vysotsky (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

File:David Bloch.jpg en anderen

Als het bestand op Flickr een voor ons geldige licentie heeft, dan graag die licentie wel laten staan. Het is dan immers niet nodig dat het bestand in Category:Files with no machine-readable license terechtkomt. Jcb (talk) 23:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: oh, dat was slordig. Waarom zetten mensen ook flickrreview en de licentie op dezelfde regel.. Maar, mijn fout. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Geen probleem, kan gebeuren. Jcb (talk) 23:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: als je er meer tegenkomt, druk rustig op rollback. Ik weet even niet hoe ik ze nu nog makkelijk terug kan vinden. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Ik kom ze vanzelf tegen, ik ben bezig met mijn wekelijkse rondje door Category:Files with no machine-readable license. Jcb (talk) 23:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Ik zal zelf ook zien wat ik kan fixen. De FlickreviewR zegt soms "size_not_found" en als je het bestand dan gewoon nòg een keer aan FlickreviewR voert dan doet ie het wel. Dat deed ik dus, waarbij ik de aanname deed (zeer onterecht) dat iedereen flickrreview toch wel op een apart regel zet, of minstens na de licentie. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: ik weet al wat, ik maak mijn actie zo ongedaan. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Opgelost. (hoop ik) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Sony A7S II with FE 24-70 F4 ZA lens.jpg

File:Sony A7S II with FE 24-70 F4 ZA lens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Not mine, also no way that gets deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Sony A7S II with FE 35mm F1.4 ZA.jpg

File:Sony A7S II with FE 35mm F1.4 ZA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Not mine, also no way that gets deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Some Poolaki for you!

Poolaki with a cup of tea
For your technical help with clearing Category:Farsnews review needed. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Gebruiker:JazzBot

Zou het niet slim zijn om zelf je eigen bot in de vorm van "Gebruiker:JazzBot" of zoiets te hebben en dan autorisatie ervoor aan te vragen om dingen zoals die "doos" bij "Gebruiker:Alexis Reggae/VoostelTest-nieuwsbak"? Er is best veel dat je met een bot kan doen, plus dan hoef je niet te wachten tot iemand anders het voor je gaat doen, alleen maar toestemming van een bureaucraatje zo nu en dan voor wat extra taken als je het nodig hebt. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: vind ik geen mooie naam. En bij een bot komt vanalles kijken. Ik heb niet eens een website. Ik moet sowieso eerst naar DWDD kijken. Plus een aantal "real life" zaken. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Misschien is "Alexis Techno" dan een betere naam. Maar ik begrijp wel wat je bedoeld, hopelijk krijg je geen burn-out van al je harde werken hier en blijf je er plezier in hebben. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Your hotcat

Hi Alexis, thank you for your categorizing into Fake SVG with raster version available. Because it seems to me better, I expanded the Template:Image generation that it categorizes automatically if the parameters "\" and "!=f" are set. At the moment that is done only in the sandbox, and it is verified at File:Cbq82-creqx.svg. If you have more suggestions for expansions, please let me know! Kind regards -- sarang♥사랑 13:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

@Sarang: good idea. I converted some files for JoKalliauer and wanted more of an overview of which files had to be converted and which ones were already processed. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Pretty sure I used cat-a-lot btw.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Wow I suck. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:31, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear_eu.png

I saw you extracted the png. I would use PNGOUT to minimize the png-filesize, this removes sometimes also problems. In extrem cases: File:Screenshot_PNGOUT.PNG#filehistory you can reduce the filesize to below 0.2% !

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

@JoKalliauer: any reason why PNGOUT should be used over pngcrush? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:31, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
I don't know the differences between png-optimizers, I don't even know the difference between zip/rar/pdf/png/... compression. I just noticed that File:Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear_eu.png#filehistory was rendered incorreclty. (also in my browser) I don't know why.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
@JoKalliauer: it rendered correctly on my computer (which is why I hadn't spotted it), but indeed it does not in the browser. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
I just googled for a benchmark: https://css-ig.net/png-tools-overview#overview There you see differences in file size & cpu-time.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 16:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

File captions

(Bewerkingsconflict, oh, die link doet niks) Het ding is... De Wikimedia Stichting (Sociëteit?) heeft het al jaren geleden aangekondigd, maar voor de structurele data moest je "in the know" zijn, ik wist het en ik had ze al gewaarschuwd voor het licentie debacle, Jheald had ze al vanaf 2017 gewaarschuwd. En van alle structurele data-gerelateerde toepassingen zijn "Captions" het meest nutteloze (als ze dan "een nut" hebben, ik heb het idee dat de Wikimedia Stichting "hun eigen descripties" wil hebben voor structurele data maar volgens mij willen zij het wiel opnieuw uitvinden en dan een derde wiel aan het voertuig toevoegen (Wikimedia Commons is als een fiets 🚲 waar bestandsnamen één wiel zijn en descripties de andere, "Captions" does essentieel hetzelfde maar slechter, dus waarom zou je lekke band gevuld met spijkers aan je fiets vastmaken?), dingen zoals "Depicts" zijn wel nuttig maar ik heb het idee dat de Wikimedia Stichting of denkt dat wij ze niet meer willen of weer de eerdere fouten gaan herhalen. Wat wel een plus punt is dat niemand voor 10 januari over structurele data praatte maar nu dat wel gedaan wordt... Alleen niet in een positieve zin maar tenminste krijgen de ontwikkelaars nu terugkoppeling. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: een reactie op de meest recente toevoeging aan mijn gebruikerspagina neem ik aan? Ik ben niet tegen structured data, mits goed uitgewerkt kan het denk ik heel veel toevoegen. Vooral al die leipe categorieën die we hebben ("mensen met deels rode spechten gefotografeerd van de linkerkant in Italië in 2017"), dat kan vast beter met structured data. Maar voor nu hadden ze gewoon beschrijvingen voor slechtziende en blinde mensen moeten toevoegen. Sterker nog, dat moeten ze alsnog doen. File captions in de vuilbak, project mislukt, jammer, hernoem het naar "descriptions for the visually impaired" en dan gaan we dat invullen. Dat heeft nut, kan direct ingezet worden, vereist geen wikitext, véél minder licentieproblemen en dan krijgt de Commons-gemeenschap er allicht weer een beetje vertrouwen in. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

License Review

Why don't you apply to be a license reviewer since you are doing so much other work on Commons. Just tell others that you are applying to be a reviewer too. I will support you. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: I had already removed those from the queue. (at least those without archived links) I'm now doing the same for Category:Photographs by Agencia Brasil. I have a proposal in the works to deal with old files with linkrot like these. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Cb9zo-h1avu.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Cb9zo-h1avu.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Oh, right, this was part of the fake SVG conversion batch.. Not really "my" upload, it was extracted from File:Cb9zo-h1avu.svg. I had my doubts about this one, but I couldn't investigate everything. It was too much work as it was. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Wow I suck. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:27, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Just FYI

TheWhitePelican and AbeEzekowitz were the same person. He is now deceased. Vannesaezekowitz was his wife. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@World's Lamest Critic: With that "thanks" I meant "thanks for the information" as I have nothing else to add. In hindsight maybe not the best choice with the happy smiley thing that pops up on the receiving end. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Pinging @Majora. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Upload Wizard

Where would the best place to post about an issue with the Upload Wizard that should be fixed? (In this case, Upload Wizard doesn't take into account copyright expiration in the US from January 1, 2019) Abzeronow (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

@Abzeronow: Phabricator. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Looks like there is already something on Phabricator about this: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214426 Abzeronow (talk) 17:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests#File:MediaWiki_bureaucrat.svg

Deletions for files like these really shouldn't happen under the radar like this.

Was it wrong to mark it with {{No source since}}? Would a deletion-Request would be better?
In my opinion tagging a image as {{Own}} is a copyright infrigment. Even if it wouldn't be a copyright infrigment: Tagging images with {{Own}} is something difficult to prof. I am cooperative if someone forgot to add the source, added a wrong source, whatsoever. But claming images as {{Own}}, is something I do not tollerate.
I am shure you have a better knowledge then me and you can clarify things to me.
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@JoKalliauer: the uploader presumably did put the tools over the flower. Still a derivative work, but not unacceptable as an "own work" claim. Source images should have been indicated though. Problem in this case was, that file was in use on mw:Project:Bureaucrats and mw:Template:User bureaucrat MediaWiki.org. "No source" allows for deletions "under the radar". They often get executed bot-like. That's fine for obvious derivative works that were just uploaded yesterday and cause no real damage if deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexis_Jazz/Archives/2019/February&oldid=344425033"