User talk:Badener

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Alemannisch: Hiir chasch mir e noii Nochricht hinterlaa und vergiss ned din Biitrag mit --~~~~ z unterschriibe. Merci.
English: Leave new message and please don't forget to sign your contribution with --~~~~. Thank you.
Deutsch: Hinterlasse eine neue Nachricht und vergiss bitte nicht deinen Beitrag mit --~~~~ zu unterschreiben. Danke.
Français : Laisse un nouveau message et n'oublie pas signier ta contribution avec --~~~~ s.t.p.. Merci.

Ihr Foto[edit]

Guten Tag.

Ist es korrekt dass Sie das Foto `´Rangierbahnhof vom Heitersberg`` geschossen haben? Gerne würden wir es für ein Bühnenbild verwenden. Ist das für Sie in Ordnung? Bitte schreiben Sie mir meine Mail adresse ist portmannjoel@hotmail.com

Vielen Dank und bis bald

Gruss

Joel Portmann

KGS Number[edit]

Hoi Badener. I ha gseh, dass du bi dine Fotos d'Vorlag "Template:Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland" ifüegsch. Chasch du mir bitte erkläre, wo dass me die ominösi KGS-Nummer recherchiere cha? u.a. würd i die Vorlage gern bi dere Datei ifüege. Viele Dank.--Minnou (talk) 10:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Di han ich glaub nöd sälber iigfüegt. Lueg doch mol d Versionsgschicht wer es gsi isch und frog derte. Ich ha vo KGS-Nummere leider kei Ahnig. -- Badener  19:54, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
So wiit han i gester gar nit denkt. Danke fürd Info. Gruess--Minnou (talk) 08:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Préhisto-parc de Réclère 013.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Préhisto-parc de Réclère 013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Kategorie: Cultural properties in Switzerland[edit]

Hoi Badener

Wie wäre es mit einer Kategorie:
Category:Cultural properties in Switzerland

Dort kommen dann diese rein:
Category:Cultural properties in the canton of Aargau
Category:Cultural properties in the canton of Zug
...
Macht das Sinn? --Schulerst (talk) 18:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

oder noch besser Category:Cultural properties of Switzerland by canton? --Schulerst (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Letzteres, würde ich meinen. --Badener (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Kreuzgangkapelle im Kloster Wettingen[edit]

Hallo Badener, die von dir erstellte Kategorie Marienkapelle bei den Commons ist nicht korrekt. Es müsste heissen Kreuzgangkapelle. Die Marienkapelle befindet sich nicht im Kreuzgang. Könntest du dies bitte korrigieren? Danke! --Ninninana (talk) 22:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

THank you :-). --Badener (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kloster Königsfelden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Königsfelden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Filemover[edit]

Hoi Badener Du hast doch die Berechtigung zum Dateien verschieben, oder? Ich habe bei den beiden Dateien File:Geronticus_eremita_at_Zürich_Zoological_Garden_01.jpg und File:Geronticus_eremita_at_Zürich_Zoological_Garden_02.jpg den falschen Namen reinkopiert. Kannst du das bitte auf Neophron percnopterus at Zürich Zoological Garden ... verschieben? --LuFiLa (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ciconia ciconia at Zürich Zoological Garden 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciconia ciconia at Zürich Zoological Garden 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Wettingen_Landstrasse_McOptik.jpg[edit]

Jetzt habe ich für dich auch mal eines hochgeladen. Nun auch mal auf diesem Wege danke für deine häufige Unterstützung! --LuFiLa (talk) 12:54, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Gern geschehen :-) --Badener (talk) 17:54, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Danke![edit]

Danke für Service und Info :-) --LuFiLa (talk) 08:12, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bahnhof Baden mit NR-Wahlplakat für Florian Vock 2015-10-01.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bahnhof Baden mit NR-Wahlplakat für Florian Vock 2015-10-01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Bahnhof Baden mit NR-Wahlplakat für Florian Vock 2015-10-01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bahnhof Baden mit NR-Wahlplakat für Florian Vock 2015-10-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:Bahnhof Baden mit NR-Wahlplakat für Florian Vock 2015-10-01.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bahnhof Baden mit NR-Wahlplakat für Florian Vock 2015-10-01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:06, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Base (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lenzburg DJI 0960.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lenzburg DJI 0960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)