User talk:Caspian blue/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Just a general question in order to comprehend your logic

Hello Caspian Blue, just a general question, which could be answered by "yes" or "no":

If it is your opinion, that Liancourt Rocks should be in general included on all Maps showing (South-)Korea (see [1]), than you would also support an general include of Liancourt Rocks in all Maps showing Japan, right? Greetings --Valentim (talk) 15:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The islet is "governed by South Korean government" and the law states the fact, so I don't see why you're excluding the official designation by you. Please stop the disruption.--Caspian blue 18:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

As you know, only South Korean law says, that Liancourt Rocks are South Korean Islands (same for Japan), and you also know that in the last century this islets were governed by both countries alternately. And you know very well, de-jure-status is under dispute and it looks a little bit better for Japan (sorry, don't want to hurt your feelings, that's just what is printed in newspapers). If you have difficulties to face this (and it seems like this, otherwise I cannot explain your permanent usage of emotional terms like "POV", "disruptive edit",...) I advice you for your own good sake to read en:Wikipedia:Conflict of interest very carefully...

After clearing this, could you now please answer to my question: If it is your opinion, that Liancourt Rocks should be in general included on all Maps showing (South-)Korea (see [2]), than you would also support an general include of Liancourt Rocks in all Maps showing Japan, right?

An answer in "yes" or "no" would be enough. --Valentim (talk) 02:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't know when Japan is governing the islands. Please show me the evidence that why Japanese police can not be in the alleged territory? That is quite different from the case of other Japanese territories. The English Wikipedia does not show any such thing as you insist. That goes same as the Pinnacle Island de facto governed by Japanese not "co-governed by China and Japan. I'm sorry to see that your obsession with the Dokdo seems to be your long-run mission or agenda given your Wikistalking of people for one year, but please don't misuse Wikipedia for your such purpose. I think you're the one facing the difficulty to accept the reality. Please don't misuse English term like "permanent since we just "officially" met just few cases. Even if we might have met before on English Wikipedia (not your visit to my talk page on the English Wikipedia), that does not account for any "permanent" period of my feeling over your inappropriate conduct not only here but also on the German Wikkpedia. Perhaps, your Wikistalking of people for that long may be closer to your "permanent" mission. :-)
I will of course answer to your nonsensical questions, but that is not my "primary goal" to use Commons or Wikipedia project. My goal is to provide quality contents unlike your obsessive mission. That is about Japanese map, so I don't understand your deliberate exclusion of the Islets.
You're not my boss or you don't have no right to force me to follow your rude attitude. If you can not parse my reply to yours, then, that is your responsibility and ability. Also I can't wait to see your answer to my question to you on your talk page. During my absence, you archived "remarkable things" like "endless edit warring", and "harassing another editor". Sorry to see that you did such thing again. --Caspian blue 03:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
  • "I don't know when Japan is governing the islands.": Sorry, maybee your grammar here not correct and due to that the sentence is ambivalent. Or I just misunderstand what is written there. Is it possible that you ment "was governing the islands"? If you ment that, than you also have to deny full annexion of Korea in 1910 by Japan... Otherwise you can show me evidences, that this two tiny islets never have been part of the Imperial Japan de-jure and de-facto until 1945. But why are you beginning to raise such topics? This is not Wikipedia, and I refuse to continue such topic discussions on total other projects like commons.
  • "My goal is to provide quality contents [...]": Fine, me too. But please, don't make POV and half truth-edits anymore (e. g. [3], [4], [5], [6], ...).
  • ""harassing another editor"": Be careful, I'm not going to tolerate slandering (see also [7]).
  • Do I interpret your answer "That is about Japanese map, so I don't understand your deliberate exclusion of the Islets" correctly when saying that you agree to include this island also to Japan related maps? --Valentim (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
    • Ah, this message of yours goes into a realm of en:WP:TLDR. :-) You amaze me a lot with your assumption; "Sorry, maybee [sig] your grammar here not correct [sig]" This is grammatically incorrect. :-) I will reply to your nonsensical comment later when I can have time for your whole disruptive campaign.--Caspian blue 00:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 21:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I archived the ones that I could do. However, I am unable to find an OTRS ticket for the other ones. Do you think you could give me a number? Thanks, NW (Talk) 00:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
The rest done. NW (Talk) 04:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the caring, NW. --Caspian blue 20:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

OTRS invitation

The OTRS system is looking for trusted volunteers to help staff our permissions and photosubmissions queues. I would like to invite you to look over what OTRS involves and consider seeking approval at the volunteering page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 04:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)}}

Another OTRS en-masse ticket ;)

Hello Caspian, I have looked at your OTRS ticket related to File:North Korea-Kaesong Folk Hotel-Inside-01.jpg and others and have noticed you haven't uploaded all the photos to the Commons yet. May you please leave me a note when you finish doing so? I will handle the ticket immediately after that. Thanks in advance, odder (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Liancourt rocks map

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Simane-map.jpg... AnonMoos (talk) 04:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Keith's works

I think that your uploaded files of Keith's works, do not meet the Commons licensing policy. So, I've requested Speedy deletion by {{Copyvio}}. --Minor edit (talk) 07:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

The accusation is incorrect and false. The images are clearly in South Korean PD. I suggest you to read Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Old Korea-Keith-BRIDE.JPG or take them to Commons:Deletion requests.--Caspian blue 03:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Added a selection of photos of Tapsa a little over a week ago with the bulk uploader but failed to prefix the file name properly. After discovering my error I added the rename template requesting to properly name the files. So far the files have not been renamed. I seem to have read somewhere the the rename template is generally ignored so files seldom actually get renamed. Why is there a template that is not used? I'm ready to re-upload my files and flag the original files for deletion. How much longer do you think I should wait for these files to be renamed before I give up and replace them. I would appreciate your opinion regarding this activity. As always, thank you for advice. Steve46814 (talk) 01:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Please add permission info …

[8] --:bdk: 14:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: I removed the OTRS stuff now and fixed the licensing due to the recent change on flickr (> CC-by-2.0 > flickrreview). --:bdk: 14:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 00:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

All dealt with. NW (Talk) 02:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Underwater_beer_shot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 18:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Japan_North_Korea_South_Korea_Locator.png

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Japan_North_Korea_South_Korea_Locator.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Tryphon 21:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Korea-Gyeongju_City_Hall-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 04:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Korea-Hi.Seoul.Festival-Hanbok-Parade-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.148.133 19:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul-Han_River_and_63_Building-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.173.207 13:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Seoul-Gyeongbokgung-Heungnyemun-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 04:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Korean.beverages-02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Korea-Jeju-Haenyeo-01.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-Statue of Kim Gu-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul-N Seoul Tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moonian (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Seoul-Namsan-N.Seoul.Tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moonian (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-N Seoul Tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moonian (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul Tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moonian (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Seoul-Namsan.tower-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moonian (talk) 17:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Seoul.Tower.01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Moonian (talk) 17:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Korea-Seoul-Dosan Park-03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)