User talk:Ymblanter

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Puzzle x template.gif
If you leave a message here, I will answer it here. So check back later.
If I left a message on your talk page, please reply there. I will watch your page and reply as soon as I can.

User:Ymblanter/Arxiv2011; User:Ymblanter/Arxiv2012; User:Ymblanter/Arxiv2013; User:Ymblanter/Arxiv2014; User:Ymblanter/Arxiv2015 User:Ymblanter/Arxiv2016


Dave leduc[edit]

Dear Ymblanter. Thank you for the recent modification on Dave Leduc. I would like enquire about the recent deletation of my photographs. If possible I would like to request the undeletation of my work, or the possible re-upload, as it rely suits the article I beleive. I have taken many photos of Dave and his wife over the pas few years, along with almost all Myanmar Lethwei fighters Too Too, Saw Nga Man, Tun Tun Min ect. as I travel to most major Lethwei events around the world. If there was confusion on one of my last pictures taken on August 19th in Yangon Myanmar, I can understand as it was posted on Dave's Facebook page as well. I have given his team access to my coverage of the event, that would explain why it was posted on his Facebook as well.

 File:Dave Leduc - MLWC 2018.jpg

Thank you for your time! Lethweimaster (talk)

Hi @Lethweimaster:. The file you uploaded was clearly taken from FB. The easiest in this situation for you is to contact Commons:OTRS, they could advise you and, if they are convinced you are the author of the photo, they will undelete the file. They are currently backlogged, and it might take some time before they look at your message, but they never lose anything.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)


Я бы хотел потребовать (попросить) удалить некоторые из загруженных мной фотографий. Можно их удалить? Очень нужно. --Akhemen (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Если они подходят под критерии быстрого удаления, я могу удалить.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

1,3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12,

и это

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Akhemen (talk • contribs) 13:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

13, 14, а также все анимационные и простые флаги. Может быть не все они попадают под критерии БУ, но нужно их удалить. Для моего же блага. Пожалуйста. Потом я Вам напишу в ФБ причину. --Akhemen (talk) 12:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Удалил три неиспользуемых файла, используемые выносите на удаление. По второй ссылке не понял - вообще Ваш весь вклад удалять? Анимационных флагов не вижу.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Флаги можете оставить. Не можете удалить все приведённые фото в ссылках выше? Многие же не используются. Используемые сейчас удалю со статей. --Akhemen (talk) 13:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Всё удалил, кроме въездного штампа, он используется.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Большое спасибо. Akhemen (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Aphrodite Ping Pong.jpg[edit]


You have deleted the File:Aphrodite Ping Pong.jpg an illustration of the work of artist Silvie Defraoui, that was generously provided by the artist herself, in the frame of a Wikimedia CH event.

It has already been deleted twice by users Túrelio and Lomita, and restored after discussion and providing proof of authorship.

Do we really need to go through the hassle a third time? Why?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1904.CC (talk • contribs) 23:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
We have Commons:OTRS. To avoid the deletion of this file for the third, fourth, and so onth time, please follow the procedure once, and the file will be safe from deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok, will try, but it's hard to achieve this with an elderly person not using email. --1904.CC (talk) 23:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Ignacio Zuloaga[edit]

You are referring to a law of 10 January 1879. I can only assume that 1978 is a typo and should be 1879. Why would a law from 1879 say something about an event 101 years in the future? The English list mentions 1879–87, which is 1879-1887, not 1879–1987. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

My reading is that the 1879 law established 80+ years, and the 1996 law reduced it to the 70+ years (possibly because of the European regulations) and established that 70+ refers to those who died after 1987. I had a Zuloaga upload speedy deleted recently: It was nominated by a user who apparent,ly was only interested in my upload and not in other files in the category, without telling me anything, and deleted (again, without telling me anything) by an admin I had long-standing issues with. I would nominate other files for deletion, but since recently I do not care a shit what happens in this sick project and try to avoid editing the :Commons namespace.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Well, join the club, I have been harassed by people and administrators over something many other contributors do. Won't go into detail. They even blocked me for that. Now, you would expect them to follow up and address other users as well, but no. Like George Orwell said in Animal Farm: All are equal, but some are more equal than others. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


This is saddening to hear that user ban in a project can be considered in OTRS. I generally agree that local wiki should have a voice regarding to volunteers that taking care files in their language. The relationship between local wiki and OTRS is not very clear. If you need my help in that matter please let me know. -- Geagea (talk) 13:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I stopped editing the Russian Wikipedia 5 years ago, and I do not care what happens to the Russian segment of Wikimedia with the only exception of the Russian Wikivoyage, but things like this happen.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

МЦК в нидерландской вики[edit]

Здравствуйте. Так как вы знаете нидерландский язык, решил обратиться. В НЛ-вики полный бардак со статьями о станциях МЦК (nl:Categorie:Station van de MZD), многие статьи носят неверные (проектные?) названия станций (Севастопольская вместо Крымской, Черкизовская вместо Локомотива и т.д.). Если вы знаете, как действующие названия верно транслитерировать, не могли бы вы переименовать то, что нужно, и немного навести порядок. Спасибо! --A.Savin 16:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Хорошо, я посмотрю. Будет не очень быстро, но постараюсь всё сделать.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Tosini Holy Family.jpg[edit]

hi, nice upload. i would suggest using artwork template, using either the old uploader [1] or commons:pattypan. cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 14:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I will have a look. I upload indeed a lot of artwork now.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:17, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

I agree with your comments[edit]

I hate to say it but my attitude towards Commons has taken a turn for the worse as well. I completely agree with your comments here. We're not just losing admins either but editors as well. Reguyla 2601:5CC:101:2EF2:4944:FA1D:A2B6:CA2A 23:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Deleted revisions on VP[edit]

When removing such material, you need to make sure to not only to delete the edit where the comment was made, but also the revision 'content' of the edit where you removed it... otherwise, it's still visible in a diff. When it's something like that, though, you should really have us oversight it (I've done so). - Reventtalk 23:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@Revent:, immediately after revision-deleting it I sent an e-mail to the Commons oversight team, but never got any reaction. Could you please check that the e-mail arrived? I do it on a regular basis on Wikipedia, and it always works (though they have an interface for the mail, and here I had to go back to my e-mail client). In any case, thanks for oversighting.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
@Ymblanter: I have not seen your email, but the list is moderated for non-members, so the mails tend to not show up until 'daytime' in Europe. I just happened to notice it in the deletion log. - Reventtalk 06:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
It was day before yesterday, so that one daytime in Europe has already passed, and now it is another one. What would you recommend me to do if I run into the same problem next time? E-mail individual oversighters?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
I can't really speak as too how quickly other OS respond to their email, if contacted directly.... we mostly talk through the list, but it's not moderated for us. I do try to watch my email on a regular basis (my phone pings at me if I get an email). I'm also pretty much always on IRC unless asleep, and I use an IRCbot to watch edits to my talk page, so most of the time I end up responding to things fairly quickly.
The difference with enwiki, really, is that they use the OTRS system for handling email, while Commons uses a mailing list. Personally, I'd prefer that we used OTRS, as a much more robust system, but I'm the 'new guy', lol. 09:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I will have that in mind.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


Ярослав, о глубокоуважаемый и уважаемый! Не поможете мне? У меня есть такой подопечный, он как бы юзер, но в лицензиях и всем остальном не разбирается. А вклад у него хороший, потому что он архитектор, и из семьи художников -- и грузит отличное свое и предков. Сейчас в очередной раз все выпилили Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hitrovka. Я ему оформила страницу User:Hitrovka и написала, что он с наследием своей семьи часть нашего наследия GLAM (а также написала подсказок, как оформлять загруженное впредь). Может быть, вы восстановите все его удаленные файлы (у него еще и в предыдущие года удаляли), а я это все оформлю как надо шаблонами и лицензиями? Спасибо большое.

еще вопрос - легко админом коммонс стать? сильно придираются на голосовании? Shakko (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
А почему он отказался передавать права? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
кому передавать? где передавать? если ему объяснить, он все согласится. Он просто нефига не понимает, грузит например сканы книг дореволюционных как own-work -- их вот кстати совсем зря удалили, надо было просто переоформить. Shakko (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Админом стать относительно легко, можете выставляться. Надо только уметь отвечать на вопрос, зачем вам это нужно. С файлами сложнее - их удалил не кто-нибудь, а Jcb, над которым висит десисоп именно за такого рода деятельность. Давайте сделаем так. Если вы реально будете выставляться на администратора в ближайшее время - сначала выставляйтесь, потом, когда голосование закончится, пойдём на восстановление. Интерференция тут не нужна. Если это риторический вопрос, я могу вынести на восстановление сейчас, но мне потребуется время, чтобы посмотреть вклад и написать что-то разумное, и, вероятно, мне потребуется ваша поддержка (в смысле, что Вы поставите лицензии и т.п.).--Ymblanter (talk) 15:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
ну вот последняя страница удаления -- она лично мне не нравится. 6 дней всего обсуждение, удалены сканы с книги 19 века, по которым видно было, что они старые, файл File:Певческий переулок. Мичуринский план Москвы.1739.jpg тоже подозреваю выглядел не свежачком, файл Павел Михайлович Аввакумов. 1912-1939.JPG вероятно подпадал под PD-Old, т.е. надо было просто их было просмотреть и оставить многие, переставив лицензию. Так что заявку на этого админа можно было бы обогатить.
может, выставить на восстановление пока очевидные PD-RusEmpire и PD-Old, а с гламовскими вещами я буду отдельно возится? (У Хитровки тут просто нервный приступ был, он даже вот ко мне приезжал, я его успокаивала).
если легко, то наверно надо бы повыставляться. Только подумаю вот, реально ли у меня будет время на админство. Shakko (talk) 15:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Хорошо, я посмотрю, что там легко восстановить, и напишу запрос. Наверное, на выходные, завтра совсем нет времени, а с пятницы, наоборот, должно быть.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Мне показалось, что сам он не хочет разбираться в юридическом вопросе, потому что не хочет передавать права. Если он согласен, тогда подпишите с ним договор, а дальше действуйте уже с опорой на этот договор. Однако если в договоре не будет списка произведений, то российские суды не примут этот договор всерьёз. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
он не то что не хочет, он просто вообще не разбирается. Зачем договор, если он собственноручно всё грузит? Какие российские суды, это вы какой гипотетический случай представляете? Shakko (talk) 12:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
То есть человек «грузит», однако не разбирается в том, что он делает, и не понимает смысла своих поступков. Отсюда будут многие проблемы. А суды это не гипотетический, а совершенно обычный случай. Вот фирма возьмёт его «загрузку» и поставит в одну книгу, а другая фирма заключит с ним договор на конкретное произведение и поставит в другую книгу. Они будут судиться, другая фирма положит на стол договор, а первая фирма не положит ничего, потому что это самое «грузит» ничем подтвердить будет уже и нельзя. Человека привлекут как третье лицо, и он скажет, что не разбирается в вопросе.
Вот такую бомбу вы можете неосторожно устроить. Потому что мы здесь с вами обсуждаем не файлы и не сайт. Мы обсуждаем договорные отношения, которые возникают между физическими и юридическими лицами, и при которых меняется режим хозяйственного использования интеллектуальной собственности. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Шесть файлов выставил: Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Public domain files deleted by Jcb--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Есть ещё ряд файлов, которые, наверное, относительно легко можно восстановить, но с ними надо по отдельности разбираться:

С остальными, боюсь, только OTRS, и не факт, что примут.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
спасибо огромное, сейчас займусь. Shakko (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Шаблон Creator[edit]

Заметил странное поведение шаблона {{Creator}}. При открытии Creator:Yakov Perelman вместо шаблона я вижу красную надпись The ID entered is unknown to the system. Please use a valid entity ID. Ковыряние в коде выявило причину проблемы: строку | Wikidata = Q559531 (если её удалить, всё работает нормально). При этом с синтаксисом всё в порядке и сам ID корректен — Перельман действительно проходит в викиданных под номером Q559531. Но движок почему-то считает его ошибочным. Подобная проблема есть и у других подобных шаблонов, например у Антона Носика. Не подскажете в чём может быть дело? --Kaidor (talk) 11:12, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Нет, к сожалению, тут я мало что понимаю. Попробуйте спросить на общем форуме.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:12, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Anticom American Eagle Deo Et Patriae logo.png[edit]

You have deleted File:Anticom American Eagle Deo Et Patriae logo.png which was another official logo of the Anti-Communist Action, also called Anticom, which was made by their members. I have permission to upload them to Wikipedia as I have made artwork for them and I have asked the owner. You gave me no time to explain myself and you just removed them. I am a Artwork Minister, a staff position in Anticom, who makes logos and artwork for the community.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GrahamHughey (talk • contribs) 19:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
@GrahamHughey:, please send the permission for this and other files via Commons:OTRS--Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Фотоконкурсът „Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва – очакваме те![edit]

„Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва!

Здравей, Ymblanter

получаваш това писмо, тъй като миналата година си участвал/а в изданията на „Уики обича Земята“ през 2015 или 2016 г. или „Уики обича паметниците“ 2015 или 2016. До края на този месец юни, те каним отново да участваш в тазгодишното фотосъстезание „Уики обича Земята 2017“.

Отново търсим твоите снимки от защитените природни обекти на България – национални и природни паркове, резервати, защитени местности и природни забележителности и отново това могат да са както пейзажи, така и снимани в близък план животни и растения. Специален акцент тази година поставяме на снимките на балканските и българските еднемични растителни видове. Отново няма ограничения за броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса и можеш да използваш същата регистрация в Общомедия като миналогодишната. Не е нужно и снимките да са правени през този един месец – можеш да разгледаш архивите си и да споделиш снимки и от минали години и сезони. Единственото условие на конкурса е да отдадеш снимките си под свободен лиценз и без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях.

Авторите на първите 10 класирани снимки ще продължат в международния кръг на „Уики обича Земята“ и ще представят страната ни. Някои от партньорите ни в конкурса ще предоставят награди – книги по география и екология. Междувременно, ако качиш над 25, 50 и 100 снимки, ще получиш съответно виртуална бронзова, сребърна и златна УОЗ-значка ;)

Но най-важното за „Уики обича Земята“ е, че с дарените от теб снимки енциклопедичното знание, достъпно на български език, се разраства и подобрява, тъй като използваме снимките за илюстриране на съществуващи и създаване на нови статии в Уикипедия! Затова не се колебай, а участвай! :)


Екипът на „Уики обича Земята“! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


Ярослав, добрый день. Вы еще активны? Вы как-то говорили что можете помочь с опросом на Викискладе на предмет копивио в файлах подобных

схемы походного ордера Хиппера в Ютланде

. Вы еще можете помочь с этим вопросом? --Sas1975kr (talk) 19:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

А в чём там проблема с файлом?--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
То что он находится в "серой зоне". [общий запрос на весь мой вклад] с условно четырьмя категориями файлов - 1) схема как эта, которые можно построить и по текстовому описанию и которые в теории тривиальны, но это нужно доказывать. 2) Карты; 3) простые схемы-чертежи; 4) "чертежи". Запрос волевым решением закрыли. Но де-факто по каждому отдельному файлу он опять может быть создан. Так как у Jameslwoodward очень жесткие критерии. по сути сводящиеся к тому "что отличается от источника, то ОРИСС. Что совпадает с источником, то копивио". Мы с вами этот вопрос обсуждали и вы рекомендовали отложить этот вопрос по ка страсти не улягутся. А потом каждую категорию файлов обсудить отдельно. --Sas1975kr (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Да, я помню, и, по-моему, с этим файлом проблем нет. Если Вы хотите открыть опрос, то надо просто это сделать, открыв новую тему на Commons:Village pump/Copyright.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
К сожалению не все так считают. Jameslwoodward как минимум нет. Поэтому хотелось бы понять это его личное мнение или оно все таки более распространено. А потом уже перейти к картам.
Да, мы про Commons:Village pump/Copyright в свое время и говорили. Но мне нужна помощь как с английским (знания у меня средние), так и формулировками вопросов. Поможете? --Sas1975kr (talk) 07:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
С английским без проблем, с формулировками - начните, посмотрим, что я смогу сделать.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Boychuk milkgirl.jpg[edit]

В разных источниках указаны противоречивые данные о времени опубликования: по одним - это работа 1921-1922 года (т.е. охраняется, поскольку автора реаблидитировали посмертно), по другим 1910-е годы. Alex Spade (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Science-related tasks[edit]

Hello. When time permitted, could you review this, please? I would like to see your comment on the associated talk page. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Nikolaev commune 2008 stairs 01.jpg[edit]

File:Nikolaev commune 2008 stairs 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Пусть удаляют, не связывайся ты с этим. Слишком много неприятностей из-за этой лестницы. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Да я как-то не вижу, зачем удалять фотографию, которая явно находится в общественном достоянии. Тем более по такой номинации.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Причину-то я не посмотрела и что ты уже ввязался тоже не проверила. Оно, конечно, как знаешь, но, по мне, лучше поберечь нервы. Твои. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 15:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Да нет, у меня в понедельник утром самолёт в Торонто и там две недели почти без интернета. Не успеют.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Request for deletion[edit]

Hi, Ymblanter. If you have time, please kindly delete my js page. I won't need this anymore. Thanks in advance! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 16:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thanks for the tip about changing pages to show my uploaded pictures. I really appreciate it.


         Kirk Kirk McDougall (talk) 00:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen![edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Beste Ymblanter,

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is vorige week begonnen! Aan deze fotowedstrijd nemen dit jaar 54 landen deel, waaronder bijvoorbeeld Nederland, Groot Brittannië, Thailand, Rusland, Oekraïne, maar ook de eilanden Aruba, Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius en Sint Maarten in de Nederlandse Caribean. Je wordt dus van harte uitgenodigd om te kijken tussen de deelnemende landen of jouw vakantieland er ook bij zit dit jaar en je foto's uit die landen ook te delen!

Net als voorgaande jaren hebben we prijzen voor de mooiste foto en de meeste foto's en een keus gemaakt voor een speciale categorie. Heb jij een foto gemaakt van een monument waarvan voor 1 september 2017 nog geen afbeelding op Wikimedia Commons bestond? Dan doet de afbeelding mee in de speciale categorie! Heeft een monument nog geen foto in de monumentenlijst op Wikipedia, dan is het aannemelijk dat we er nog geen foto van hadden. Om het zoeken naar monumenten zonder afbeelding wat makkelijker te maken, kun je op Wikipedia lijsten en een kaart van Nederland vinden.

Tot slot nodigen we je nog van harte uit om volgende week met ons op pad te gaan. Op zaterdag 16 september wandelen we tijdens een Wiki Takes rond in Hoorn: op zondag 17 september doen we hetzelfde in Leiden. Onder ervaren gidsen wandelen we langs monumenten in de stad en nemen we ruimschoots de tijd om de monumenten goed op de foto te zetten. Aanmelden verplicht en plaatsen gelimiteerd!
Tot en met 30 september heb je de tijd om je foto's up te loaden: de top 10 gaat door naar de internationale wedstrijd, waar de hoofdprijs de nieuwste Canon EOS 5D camera is!

Veel succes gewenst,
het Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments team 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Форум#Ваши фотографии никому здесь не нужны[edit]

Привет, если у тебя будет время, загляни пожалуйста. Что-то я в шоке от хамства. --Shakko (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Ох, Соня, не зря я стараюсь проводить тут (и тем более на русскоязычном форуме) как можно меньше времени.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
да, это просто ужас какой-то. --Shakko (talk) 07:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Хамство в том, что человека просят дать наилучшие изображения, а он даёт испорченные копии. Конечно, другим это не понравится. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


Yes very good :) [2] See "Autore"="Author" and "attribuzioni precedenti"="old attributions". Official page of Barberini Gallery in the Official State office for cultural heritage website.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 20:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC) --Pierpao.lo (listening) 20:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. But it is used in the articles about Bigot in a dozen of projects, we probably need to take them out.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
I'll help you.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Checked and fixed both File:Unknown French Master - Allegory of the Vanity of Earthly Things - 2.jpg and File:Unknown French Master - Allegory of the Vanity of Earthly Things.JPG usage. I wrote "Anonimus painter" in the relative language in pages that were not about Bigot--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Are here other versions of the picture?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Not that I know of.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Запрос на АПАТ[edit]

Доброго времени, коллега. Что-то запрос повис и на "да" ни "нет". Рассмотрите, будьте добры. Красный wanna talk? 02:03, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Я боюсь, после блокировки на месяц за нарушение авторских прав Вам всё-таки надо привести какие-то аргументы, а не просто написать, что Вам нужен флаг.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Особенно учитывая, что эти фотографии ничего не нарушали, прекрасно. Можете проверить тикет OTRS в конце концов. Красный wanna talk? 19:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Я не могу проверить тикет, у меня нет доступа. Хорошо, если Вы считаете, что фотографии ничего не нарушали, так и напишите - считаю, что был заблокирован неверно, мои файлы были удалены в нарушение правил. Вряд ли Вы получите флаг в этой ситуации, но, по крайней мере, будет честно.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Ну, то бишь вы считаете, что проще отозвать запрос? Красный wanna talk? 19:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Скажем так, я думаю, что без убедительного объяснения, что произошло, и достаточных аргументов, почему это не должно произойти ещё раз, шансов немного.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
А, ну тогда при условии, что я до сих пор несколько зол на выдвинутые мне тогда обвинения в т.ч. и в "краже" этих фотографий, и не хочу поднимать опять эту историю (т.к. от меня собственно требуется признать вину и всё такое), заявку можете закрыть. Спасибо за рекомендации. Красный wanna talk? 23:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Мастер-класс в Вышей школе кулинарного мастерства СПбГЭУ.jpeg[edit]

  1. Ты удалил фото без обсужения почему?
  2. на сайте пишут. Там поня лрасовая неприязнь.
  4. Санкт-Петербургский государственный экономический университет. Все права защищены.

При использовании материалов сайта ссылка на обязательна.

  1. Поставил ссылочку на ресурс при использование.. Зачем Вы вмешался.. ?
  2. Проговор мысль? --Zelio007 (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Я ни слова ни понял. Пишите, пожалуйста, на каком-то понятном языке. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 : : Что ты понял там написано на сайте указывать источник я указал. будишь удалять тебя админстрация удалит --Zelio007 (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Я в таком тоне разговаривать не буду.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Студенческая экскурсия на Объединение «Светлана».jpeg[edit]

  1. † Сразу удали что хотел. Не надо частями искать славу. Зарплату. Что тебе нам --Zelio007 (talk) 14:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  2. † Мне сказали король Ниедреландо в тебе премию как админ дал.. --Zelio007 (talk) 14:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  1. Удали поставь сразу все фото. мы с учасниками обсудим. не такай по одной сиги --Zelio007 (talk) 14:23, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Kolomiytsev monument[edit]

Hi, Ymblanter, can you take a look at this category where I added to more images? Just wante~d to know if that is correct. Thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 14:04, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, this is definitely correct, but the category must be generated automatically by the template. I will have a look and see whether it needs fixing.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

File:View from Belvedere Pienza.jpg[edit]

Hello Ymblanter, i removed the category because the Belvedere is outside the walls of Pienza, so it is not included to the historical center. Greetings, LigaDue (talk) 22:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

sorry, you're right, i missed the place and mixed it with the square on Santa Catarina church, i'm sorry bothering you and please parden my mistake. LigaDue (talk) 22:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
No problem, and best wishes for the New Year.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Fields of expertise[edit]

Hello again. Haven’t an expertise in side effects of deletion of a Q number – you, a bureaucrat on Wikidata and a sysop here, on Commons. For problems of diagrams and graphs you, a physics professor from Delft, have it neither. What is your expertise then: to restrain militant PoV pushers in wikipedias? Or to clean up excretions of copyright infringers?

Mild trolling aside, why do you behave with such a pattern, Yaroslav? Why do you avoid interaction with people needing your intellect and prefer to mix with the silly and mean? May it be some deeply entrenched personal problem? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

I thought you were asking a technical question about how a lua template can be modified to avoid redlinks.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
I asked opinions on whether should this now-ubiquitous template be modified to remove the corroding red stuff in such a condition. It is pointless to ask how to do before agreement on merits of such a modification. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I think it is better to modify it if at all possible.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Просьба N2[edit]

Здравствуйте. Эту фотографию наверно надо удалить [3]. Наверно какой-то скриншот без источника. Плюс к этому Zaruhimar - эта скрытая провокация. В феврале 2017 года она вышла из партии Наследие и уже в марте из разных Вики проектов удалили совместную фотографию с лидером Наследие и ставили эту фотографию. А himar на армянском означает дура.---Hayordi (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Вынес на удаление--Ymblanter (talk) 11:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Большое спасибо.---Hayordi (talk) 11:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Freedom of Panorama in UZ[edit]

My understanding is that UZ allows the Freedom of Panorama. Please see paragraph 2 point 8.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Armenius vambery (talk • contribs) 07:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The link does not have paragraph 2 point 8.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC) ID (P1483)[edit]

is this something you do fix ? 03:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

As I said, I am unable to understand what you want. I gave all my reasoning there a couple of days ago.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

i did not know that was you this is wikimedia, the point is it is off why do you keep it as an identifier and it's web sites pages. 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Because it is apparently in use in Wikipedia (this was not me who added it as identioficator), and all the data have been saved and are accessible even if the Ministry of Culture website is down. If you want to delete this property, you should return to Wikidata and propose it for deletion at the Properties for deletion page.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

i think the point was if, it is turned off how can you use it, you can't. 13:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, it is used in the items.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

so can an item get a different and or new identifier ? 14:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes, any item can have multiple identifiers. They typically correspond to different properties.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
it is in use the form is asking for the Geo Names ID.
this says that you are in charge
This template and pages using it are maintained by the Russian WLM team. 04:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

you are on this, it is still open,so what is the new identifier ?

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Livorno Piazza Matteotti skyscraper 01 @chesi.JPG[edit]

The file was uploaded three years ago and you discovered it only yesterday ? Too late.Chesipiero (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

I am not patrolling new uploads.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Фотографии Виктора Буллы[edit]

Здравствуйте! Не хотелось Вас отвлекать, но мне посоветовали обратиться именно к Вам как наиболее опытному русскоязычному администратору, поскольку другими языками я, к сожалению, не владею. Много раз читал в архиве форума по авторским правам, что факт репрессий и реабилитации запускает отсчет срока охраны авторских прав с года реабилитации. Как же тогда быть с категорией фоторабот Виктора Буллы , который был реабилитирован в 1958 году? Спасибо заранее за Ваш ответ и извините за беспокойство. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Всё, что после 1917 года и не было опубликовано непосредственно правительством, можно выставлять на удаление.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Вынес на Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Viktor Bulla. Если Вас не затруднит, выскажите свое мнение, пожалуйста. Я не очень понимаю, как реагировать на возражение, что неуказание известного автора в каком-то источнике может быть важнее, чем то, что он документально установлен. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 07:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Delete all files by TeddyMStudio[edit]

Hi, I have made a grave mistake it seems by uploading photographs to Wikimedia Commons. Other users tell me my photos are free to be sold and used by others, I did not realise this at the time of upload, I thought my photos were to be available for use but, not resale as this will have a detrimental effect on my business.

Given I do not really understand the processes of Wikimedia, I would be much happier if you could just delete all my uploaded images from this account please.

I welcome your consideration and I apologise for my confusion and misunderstanding.

Kind Regards Teddy. Teddymstudio (talk) 06:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

I have deleted all of your uploads and also closed the two deletion requests which were started last week.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Russian Wikivoyage and Commons Deletion Notification Bot[edit]

Hi there,

Thanks for volunteering the Russian Wikivoyage. I have two questions. Is there a bot approval process to go through there, and will yourself or someone else be willing to "own" the bot through the community process and be a person to contact about the bot? There will not be any running of the bot for the person to actually do. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

For the second question, I will probably be the person responsible for the bot; Atsirlin who is doing this task now may be willing to help since I understand very little in bots, but even if not I can still do it. Usually when the task is clear we just ask our crat to approve the bot, we do not need a special process for that. But obviously we should understand more or less in detail what the bot is doing.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay. The bot is just about complete, I will let you know when it's ready. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I am around and ready to help, if needed. --Alexander (talk) 21:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Retaliatory nomination[edit]

Hi, any chance you could take a look at this deletion nomination? I am convinced it is a retaliatory nomination from someone who has a lot of problems understanding copyright/attribution. I'd usually let it run its course but the discussion will hold up closing a Good Article nomination on English Wikipedia. I'm a bit miffed by it but no worries if you'd rather let it run. - Sitush (talk) 08:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 09:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks very much. - Sitush (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Здание городской почтовой конторы (ТЮМЕНЬ).jpg[edit]

(Good time of the day, I know Russian, if you wish you can reply in either language.) The image was uploaded in 2013 and marked as a heritage number 7200029000, as far as I can see this number does not correspond with anything. It is possible that a person made a mistake, but I do not know what to do to fix it. Gone Postal (talk) 06:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, I updated the number.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Great. What about Category:WLM/7210012000. Do I create an empty category? What is the correct way? Gone Postal (talk) 06:56, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
No, do not create it. It is for our internal purposes and normally must be hidden. We have a real category for the building.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks for explaining everything. Best of luck! Gone Postal (talk) 07:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Copying the code to the category[edit]

Hello again. I have another question. I have created this category and noticed that one of the images I found to put there has {{Cultural Heritage Russia|3630025000}} in it, so I copied this code into the category page without removing it inside the file. If this is incorrect approach please let me know. Thank you and be well. Gone Postal (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

This is perfectly fine, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


This is the Main Post Office building in Yakutsk. The uploader claims that it is a cultural monument. I thought that you may be interested in it. Be well. Gone Postal (talk) 05:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:20031125123522.jpg[edit]

According to Template:FoP-China, ‘The reproduction of this artistic, architectural, or applied artwork, is covered under the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China (《中华人民共和国著作权法》), which allows reproduction of works in a public place if the author and the name of the original work is attributed.’ Njzjz (talk) 07:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

I believe it is not, and the author was not attributed in any case. Please take it to Commons:Village Pump/Copyright.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Incnis Mrsi[edit]

The protection IMHO has little merit. Sonia_Sevilla’s blackmail possibly has to be reported to <> in continuation of my report from June 5 – but she is not an ignorable person to me. I currently have a poor workplace to do all this stuff. The vandal always got RBI and will get RBI, and he can indeed be easily spotted on my user_talks alongside other honeypot pages. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

No problem, I will unprotect now. If at any point you change your mind pls let me know.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

No hard feelings[edit]

I noticed your last comment personalized some things I'd said when you tried to characterize my argument: I just wanted to assure you that nothing I said was directed at you personally. I found your argument to be very poor; that's not to say that you yourself are a poor arguer, or even that the next issue we cross paths on won't find us in lockstep agreement. MjolnirPants (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Well, you did say verbatim "so I certainly believe you are completely unwilling to be convinced of anything". You do not expect me to be willing to convinced that this was not directed at me, do you?--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Fair enough, but as I was agreeing with a statement you made, I hardly consider that to be beyond the pale, or even "personal commentary" the way the term is usually used around here or at en.wp. You said something about yourself, I said I believed you. Were I trying to attack you personally, I certainly would not be here trying to extend an olive branch. MjolnirPants (talk) 21:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
I do not think you were trying to offend me personally, but you do not expect me to be happy with what you have written. And I obviously disagree with your premises, that it is perfectly ok that there is a community with functioning (possibly badly functioning) norms, policies, regulations, and practices, and suddenly hundred users could be canvassed out of nowhere to break anything without actually willing to take responsibility for these policies and practices.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Look, I came here to state that no matter how little I thought of your argument (and to be honest: I think your argument there -continued here- is utter crap), I am not upset by you making it, and I would prefer that you not to be upset by my disagreement with it. I did not come here to continue the argument. If you insist upon personalizing the argument and holding a grudge, then I can't stop you, I can only be disappointed. But I won't be holding a grudge. MjolnirPants (talk) 12:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Fine with me. To be honest, I think your argument is utter crap as well, but I usually do not have issues with editors who think my argument is crap, only with those who start harassment.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
You think I'm harassing you? Oh for fuck's sake... Whatever. Have a nice life. MjolnirPants (talk) 14:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
No, not at all. Other users did. What I meant to say is that despite finding your argument crap I still think you are a user in good standing, and whereas you are clearly not going to become a friend of mine, I have no issues with your behavior in this episode.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


You said "racist accusations from all sides". I'm not clear where the "from all sides" comes from, as I only see text by Rowan that is problematic here. But I don't think anyone is making "racist accusations", but rather "accusations of racism", which is quite different. At the very least it is "accusations of repeatedly making racist remarks" (because I accept that one may not be habitually racist for such remarks to be made, and regretted). Could you clarify your text please. -- Colin (talk) 14:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I believe all topics related to (real or imaginary) racism in this episode have been exhausted and should not be revived.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
My point is your language. There have been no "racist accusations". Not one. The correct language is "accusations of racism". It is a simple matter, and your text is confusing/misleading. -- Colin (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Ok, I will write "all topics mentioning racism", Would that be more clear?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
I'd certainly prefer that, because I've been making accusations, and I wouldn't want anyone to think that you were implying some of my accusations where racist. I'm not planning to add anything further tonight, and the discussion seems to be accumulating healthy comments, so don't see any reason to formally "close" any part of the discussion. We all agree certain points don't need repeating further. -- Colin (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 17:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


Hi, when referring to me on-wiki, I would prefer you stick to gender neutral terms please. See User:Fæ#pronoun. Thanks -- (talk) 20:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. My apologies. I will try to remember this.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights[edit]

Hello Ymblanter, can I be an autopatrolled? I saw at Commons:Requests for rights the require to make 500 edits, but I have experience on other projects and here. Also, no need to patrol by others. Marshmallych 08:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Администрация Президента Российской Федерации[edit]

Скажите пожалуйста, вы действительно уверены, что Администрация Президента Российской Федерации нарушает законы РФ и международные договора? Для нас, жителей России, такое отношение к высшей власти недоступно и удивительно. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:11, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Вы меня ни с кем не путаете? У меня есть мнение о том, нарушает ли президент РФ, а вместе с ним и администрация, законы и международные договора, но я не помню, чтобы я его высказывал в проектах Викимедиа.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Вы недавно предложили к удалению фотоснимок, все права на который (в том числе права на свободное воспроизведение награды ФИФА) принадлежат Администрации Президента РФ. Очевидно, что АП выполняет международные договора, поэтому сначала обратилась в ФИФА и получила все права, которые нужны для лицензирования фотокопии этой награды. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Это производное произведение. Не вижу никаких причин считать, что АП РФ имеет авторские права на оригинал.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Причина известна: тот договор, который заключён между АП и ФИФА. Однако, если вам показывают договор, вы всегда утверждаете, что договор поддельный? И в данном случае, когда АП показывает вам лицензионный договор, вы сразу уверены, что это фальшивый договор? И следовательно, по вашему мнению, Администрация Президента и Президент Путин нарушают международные соглашения об охране авторских прав? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Мне бы хотелось увидеть договор, по которому права авторы скульптуры переданы им в общественное достояние (разрешено рапространение изображений под лицензией CC-BY-SA). Проще всего отправить этот договор в OTRS.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Автор скульптуры не имеет ни малейших прав на неё. Все права принадлежат ФИФА. Администрация Президента получила от ФИФА права на воспроизведение этой скульптуры в свободных изображениях. Пользуясь этими правами, Администрация Президента передала все права на свои изображения вам по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution.
Упомянутая вами лицензия CC-BY-SA здесь вообще ни при чём. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Изложите, пожалуйста, эти соображения в обсуждении удаления.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Да-да, уже сделано! --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Да, я потом уже увидел, спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

deletion of image: wrong application of copyright regulation[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clevedon Pier, Song of the Helix.JPG < Commons:Deletion requests

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted. File:Clevedon Pier, Song of the Helix.JPGEdit

The text is copyrightable. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Deleting that image (above) under the regulations quoted means all photos of all sculptures and artworks on Wikimedia and Wikipedia must also be deleted because they are all copyright of the authors of their respective works. photos of every statue must also be deleted u ever the same application of Wikipedia/media regulations as applied to the above work. Ashattock (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Yes, indeed.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Rdsgp2018 01.jpg - File:Rdsgp2018 21.jpg[edit]

Один из активных участников Викисклада и постоянных журналистов Викиновостей аккредитовался на этапы РДС Гран При 2018 в Сочи (гонки). Условием фото-аккредитации было размещение на фотографиях текстового логотипа организатора. Он отработал на жаре все гонки, обработал и загрузил под свободной лицензией на Викисклад фотографии (File:Rdsgp2018 01.jpg - File:Rdsgp2018 21.jpg) и создал в Викиновостях фоторепортаж: n:ru:Огненный дрифт в Сочи. Однако практически сразу фотографии были выставлены на быстрое удаление с приблизительно такой аргументацией "нарушение авторских прав (присутствует логотип и нет EXIF файла)". Тут же эти фотографии были удалены Ellin Beltz. Я обратился к Эллин и у нас состоялось следующее обсуждение: User talk:Ellin Beltz#File:Rdsgp2018 01.jpg - File:Rdsgp2018 20.jpg. В двух словах, участник сразу на странице новости пояснил, что размещение логотипов - это требование организаторов (я обратился к нему ещё до удаления для собственного успокоения). Затем связался с ним приватно и ещё раз аккуратно всё переспросил и, чтобы быть окончательно уверенным, попросил прислать оригинал какого-то фото, что он и сделал, прямо в RAW формате. Ссылку на этот файл дал в обсуждении у Эллин. Мы работаем с этим журналистом давно, он загрузил на Викисклад море файлов и создал множество фоторепортажей. Я даже сам делал ему аккредитацию, например, на ЧМ-2018. Он очень ценный и добросовестный участник и у меня не было оснований ему не доверять с самого начала. Тем не менее, я предпринял все известные мне меры предосторожности, чтобы убедиться, что эти файлы действительно являются его работой. Однако Эллин мои аргументы не убедили и она направила меня за принятием решения напрямую к любому русскоговорящему администратору. Что и делаю. Если есть возможность, предлагая вникнуть в ситуацию и восстановить эти файлы. Если нужно что-то уточнить, можно обратиться к участнику напрямую на русском языке или сказать мне. Постараюсь решить все оставшиеся вопросы. --sasha (krassotkin) 19:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Я могу восстановить (предварительно договорившись с Эллин), но, мне кажется, проще отправить письмо в ОТРС на русском. Если агент примет, то они же файл и восстановят.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Ну вот я тот самый агент ОТРС. Что я ещё могу выяснить у нашего многолетнего участника, который уже и публично и приватно сообщил, что это его работы. Не говоря о том, что это вообще не формат ОТРС: добросовестный участник много лет загружает свои собственные файлы, и тут его вдруг заставляют написать официальное письмо, что несколько типичных для него работ сделаны именно им. А что он делает, когда эти файлы загружает и своими руками ставит на них своё авторство. Какие сомнения агенты ОТРС должны ещё развеивать, если у нас в руках RAW оригинал. Проблем тут нет, если участник должен выполнять какие-то бессмысленные манипуляции, я постараюсь ему это мягко пояснить. Кто бы мне объяснил кому и для чего это нужно. И ещё, среди активных русскоязычных агентов ОТРС нет ни одного администратора Викисклада. Нам в любом случае придётся оставлять запрос на восстановление на Commons:Undeletion requests. Где уже просто доверятся моим или чьим-то другим словам что всё хорошо и можно восстанавливать. В чём смысл такого кривого пути? И это благо, что в российских очередях есть другие активные агенты. В украинской вообще всё остановилось, прямо сейчас просят что-то там посмотреть и обработать, но даже дойти до их просьбы времени не остаётся. Там вообще больше не к кому обратиться случись такое же. Сорри, пошёл пояснять ему про ОТРС. Если появятся предложения что ещё мы можем у него спросить, кроме уже сделанного, буду благодарен. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
    Хорошо, я завтра ещё посмотрю.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
    Не успеваю, я всё-таки в отпуске до 13-го, и компьютер вижу иногда час в день. Посмотрю сразу, как будет время.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Уважаемый Ymblanter! В OTRS поступило разрешение на свободные лицензии от данного участника Викискада, Ticket#2018080210003392. Нами подтверждено, что удаленные выше файлы сделаны лично на собственный фотоаппарат данным участником, авторские права эти фото принадлежат только ему. Просьба, восстановить удаленные файлы. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 13:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
      Спасибо, восстановлю, как только окажусь у компьютера долше, чем на пять минут.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
      Уважаемый Ymblanter! Спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
      ✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 05:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Yours sincerely, Rschen7754 18:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ezhov268[edit]

Maybe you are interested (per Commons:Monuments_database_in_Russia#Contacts). Wikisaurus (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, but at this point there is very little we can do other than transfer the files to the Wikivoyage.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Vasyugan Swamp.jpg[edit]

Hi Ymblanter!

Can you undelete the above file for a brief period so that I can import it to Wikiversity for fair use? Thank you in advance for your kind consideration! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done, please let me know when the transfer has been completed--Ymblanter (talk) 06:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
@Ymblanter: Transfer process complete! Thank you! --Marshallsumter (talk) 09:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Улучшить MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js[edit]

Поступило предложение добавить в гаджет код, вычищающий невидимые символы нулевой ширины, в частности LTR mark (E2 80 8E), который регулярно откуда-то попадает в конец названия категории (перед закрывающими ]]), мешает ботам (в частности АВБ - боты не находят категорию для замены, если она оканчивается этим символом, я даже писал таск на фабрикатор, пофиксить отказались) и самому хоткату, как пишут мне на СО. Я смотрю, вы отписывались на СО гаджета и вносили правки в него, поэтому обращаюсь к вам. Рувичный гаджет представляет собой включение здешнего. MBH (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Напишите на странице обсуждения гаджета (и, если можно, более точно - какой конкретно код куда добавить), если не будет возражений, скажем, за неделю, я внесу.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
    • Код, к сожалению, не приведу (я больше по C#, а не по JS), но попрошу его написать технических спецов рувики. Я сюда написал потому, что писать на русском мне заметно проще, чем на английском, может вы сами откроете там тему "нет ли возражений против того, что гаджет будет автоматически вычищать LTR marks после конца имени категории"? MBH (talk) 17:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Он не откуда-то попадает. Он записан сразу после названия категории в листе над-категории. То есть коли уж вы открыли страницу категории и скопировали оттуда название под-категории, то это название вы, скорее всего, скопируете вместе с символом LTR. Истинно, истинно говорю вам, потому что нашёл это место в коде медиавики, и не понимаю, зачем надо ставить LTR символ в этом месте. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
    • То есть, везде вот здесь стоят лтр-марки? Мда, сколько вреда от двух с половиной лтр-языков... MBH (talk) 17:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
      • Так и есть! Чтобы ответить вам наверняка, скопировал я строчку из страницы с категориями и вижу:
      • </a>? <span
      • Знак вопроса и есть LTR mark. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kuchino platform.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kuchino platform.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ( This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: I do not quite see what the problem is. The source field has a link, and the author of the photo (prompted by me) stated there (the last comment of the FB thread) that he shares this photo under CC-BY-SA 4.0. In this case, OTRS is not required. Or am I missing smth?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry missed that done in the thread. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:09, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
No problem, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Image restored[edit]

Hi Ymblanter, I restored File:Reinhard Heydrich colourised wiki.png by adding a valid license, and correcting the source. I am actually revising some DR because of this ongoing discussion: the user apparently removes files from wikis and proposes them for deletion here in some sort of political agenda. If you feel that I did a mistake, feel free to delete the file again (in case, do not forget to add it in [[Category:Undelete in 2062]]), but I strongly feel that those files can be kept and fall in scope. Cheers! --Ruthven (msg) 06:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

No, I am fine as soon as the user has been properly informed and knows how to appeal the decision if needed. I personally do not have strong feelings about this file.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Serial copyright offender[edit]

Please take a look. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I nominated all of them except for three for deletion as obvious copyright violations; if they get deleted we can nominate also these three--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Brazil nazi flag[edit]

How I can download the nazi flag of Brazil? -- 23:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

There is no Nazi flag of Brazil.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Tiananmen east2st.jpg[edit]

File:Tiananmen east2st.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tyg728 (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Tiananmen east2st.jpg[edit]

File:Tiananmen east2st.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tyg728 (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


Hola Ymblanter no estoy de acuerdo que me haigas borrado esa imagen, puesto que lo tengo desde hace dos años desde el 2016 que yo lo subi esa foto y no tuve problemas porque fue por creación propia no viole los derechos de autor porque esa imagen nunca fue subida al facebook como lo afirma el usuario que lo nomino para el borrado. Considere mi petición de poder restaurarla mi imagen. Por favor considera mi petición. Bendiciones. Chico sensación (talk) 21:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Chico sensación: Por favor abrir una petition aqui: Commons:Deletion requests/2018/11/08. Gracias.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Gold award Maxx Get-A-Way.jpg[edit]

File:Gold award Maxx Get-A-Way.jpg

Hello! This file was deleted from wikimedia commons due to it being a dervative work! I am the photographer who took the picture of the award plaque.

Whatever additional copyright licenses that must be provided to wikimedia commons can be supplied. Please explain what must be done.

for this reason, the file should be undeleted

Hansgruber1967 (talk) 14:05, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

The objects which you photographed are protected by copyright, and therefore we can not undelete the file. If you own copyright on these objects as well and are willing to release them under a free license, please contact Commons:OTRS, they will take care of the issue.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
i took the photo myself in 1994. it belongs to me. The German record label which owns the album cover art displayed in the photo is no longer in existence. if needed i can provide proof of this. also the photo is a fair use image that is in the public domain. it can be easily found online just by searching and is already apart of wikipedia.
look here:
look here:
do the same rules apply to this article on Michael Jackson where his platinum award is shown along with the album cover of his hit album 'thriller' clearly displayed on the award plaque in the photo?
Michael Jackson,_Hard_Rock_Cafe_Hollywood.JPG Hansgruber1967 (talk) 11:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Yes, the same policy applies to photos of all copyrighted material. You can nominate these photos for deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)


Hello, I saw that you requested "Piacenza-Stemma.png" to be deleted. I do not need an explanation about copyright issues, I just need to know - as I try to build, improve and make my Wiki Ligure better - why other people from other Wikis do not share my positive attitude and my wish to make things better. Cordially, Luenséin (talk) 09:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

No, I did not request it to be deleted, I just closed this discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Piacenza-Stemma.png and deleted the file.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 6 December 2018 (UTC)


Should File:Aroonandmegan.jpg be deleted pursuant to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paintinglive.jpg? Sam Sailor 09:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


Hi! See. --Микола Василечко (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Birthplace of Endre Ady 2017-12 07.jpg[edit]

Hi Ymblanter! Why is 2050 the year of undeletion? According to the Corneille the works published abroad before 1978 will be in PD 95 years after publication date. This bust was erected in 1977. If it would be 1978 work then would be in PD in 1950 (death + 70 years). --Regasterios (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

I think you are citing the US copyright policy. Are you sure this is the 95 years publication rule in Romania? I do not think so. We can of course have URAA issues, when the monument is already free in Romania but not free in the US, but I think they will sort them out by 2050 (when I likely have been dead anyway).--Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Yes I am citing the US copyright policy. PD in Romania in 2050 it is true. Okay, it was only a question. Thank you. --Regasterios (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Sure, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Photo hasn't been deleted[edit]

Hello, just so you know the deletion request which you closed and deleted the picture. The image is still on there. --Vauxford (talk) 22:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done now, thanks for letting me know. --Ymblanter (talk) 22:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Question to my deletion request[edit]

Hello Ymblanter, can you delete this graphic? I have opened this deletion request 8 days ago and two persons support it! I think it´s time to delete it! ;-) 🔸 Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello Ymblanter, can you als delete this graphic? The deletion request is quite old now! 🔸 Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

It is not quite old. Quite old would for example be this one: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nklorety 5.jpg. And in the request you mention there are objections, so that it clearly can benefit from staying open a bit longer.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay, I have understand this! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello Ymblanter, today I replaced this graphic with a new one! Can you delete the old one for me? Thanks in advance! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

The request has to be open for 7 days, and there is no need to constantly ask me here. Any administrator can close the request after 7 days.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Because it is my own old graphic, there is no need to wait seven days! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Publication found for File:Alice Sheldon aka James Tiptree, Jr. with Kikuyu people.jpg[edit]

You deleted this file yesterday, but Leserättin has now found a 1922 publication of it. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alice Sheldon aka James Tiptree, Jr. with Kikuyu people (cropped).jpg. I think that makes it {{PD-US-expired}}. Would you mind undeleting it, please? --bjh21 (talk) 22:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

PS: I hadn't realised that you nominated the crop for deletion in the first place, so you're probably aware of the finding. Sorry for the noise! --bjh21 (talk) 23:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but the situation is too complicated, and I am afraid someone else would need to have a look. Would you mind listing it at Commons:Undeletion requests? Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Happy to do so. Thanks for your help. --bjh21 (talk) 11:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:HUP 50 1926 obverse.jpg[edit]

Hi Ymblanter! You forgot to delete this file: File:HUP 50 1926 obverse.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, deleted now.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Can you take a look?[edit]

Hello Ymblanter, can you take a look at those deletion requests? Commons:Deletion requests/File:2,5-dimetil-2,5-hexanodiol.tif and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aldol (1).png. I think they can get deleted now! Thanks and best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)


Hi. There was an issue at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Feminist-wiki-v1-1024px.png. I tried to fix it (separating 2 DRs) but probably could not. Please have a look. --E4024 (talk) 18:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

I have noticed this when I closed the request, and I also do not know how to separate it. In any case, I closed the second request as keep because the file has never been nominated for deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Lott-Sylvester Stallone-Tommy Morrison.jpg[edit]

It looks like Merlin2203 (talk · contribs) edited Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Lott-Sylvester Stallone-Tommy Morrison.jpg after your closing and pointed out that the source page,, says "These photos are is distributed under the license of Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0"; it's almost at the bottom of the page, under "Photos © 2018 Steve Lott" rather than "under contacts", but it is there. --GRuban (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

I strongly doubt they (Steve Lott) own photos (which do not seem to be taken by one person). We probably need an undeletion request here.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)