User talk:Joee
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by adding a suitable copyright tag. --EugeneZelenko 16:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Enter i miękki enter w MS Word.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Martin H. (talk) 15:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the welcome template, thought, that you are a new user, but seeing your contribs... Also sorry for deleting this image and File:Enter i miękki enter w MS Word 2003.jpg, MS Word is non-free software and screenshots are also non-free. --Martin H. (talk) 15:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Jestem za połączeniem Siliesiac (talk) 19:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Złoczew 2009-04-12 - 010 Kościół Św Krzyża.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kurpicz 20:48, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Złoczew 2009-04-12 - 022 Kościół Św Krzyża.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kurpicz 20:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Złoczew 2009-04-12 - 025 Kościół Św Krzyża.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kurpicz 20:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Gąszcze - stary wiatrak.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gąszcze - stary wiatrak.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Ikona koniec ulicy początek deptaku.svg
[edit]Poproszę o ikonę odwrotną - koniec deptaku początek ulicy.
Zapytanie o zdjęcia zabytków
[edit]Cześć Joee!
Dziękuję za niedawne przesłanie przez Ciebie zdjęć do Wikimedia Commons – cieszymy się, że dzięki Tobie powiększyły się zasoby plików na wolnych licencjach, które pomagają ilustrować polską Wikipedię!
Zauważyłam, że przesyłałeś zdjęcia zabytków w czasie trwania konkursu Wiki Lubi Zabytki, jednak nie zrobiłeś tego poprzez mapę na stronie konkursu, w związku z tym nie znajdują się one w kategorii konkursowej. Daj znać, czy chciałeś, żeby przesłane przez Ciebie zdjęcia były zgłoszone do konkursu – jeśli tak – proszę o jak najszybszą informację, abym mogła ręcznie dołączyć je do zasobu zdjęć konkursowych.
Jeszcze raz dziękuję Ci za przesłane zdjęcia.
Pozdrawiam Cię serdecznie i życzę Ci miłego dnia!
Paulina Studniczka (WMPL) (talk) 22:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)