User talk:Mattbuck/Archive9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents


Month Year in City

Nonsense. Leeds and Salford already have images by month and the overall volume by city is certainly there to justify very many others of this ilk. Ardfern (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Question about deliberate use of bad faith barnstar?

This appears to be deliberate use of the "Wikilove" function for a bad faith barnstar. Can something be done about this? It seems to violate our Commons project principles of COM:MELLOW, yes? I could use your advice here, -- Cirt (talk) 20:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

  • You can always remove it, Cirt. I'm surprised that you saw through my scheme--I guess I should give you more credit next time. Oh, "bad faith" should probably not be italicized; use quotes. Cheers, Drmies (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
    • Mattbuck, this is clearly inappropriate behavior, yes? I think something should be done about this. -- Cirt (talk) 22:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
      I would concur, but I am now an involved admin and so can't do anything about it. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
      Oh I wasn't asking for you to do something, but thanks. :) Just advice about where to take this. I'll inquire with the closing admin. -- Cirt (talk) 23:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Update: Please see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Drmies_.3D_use_of_bad_faith_barnstar_via_WikiLove_function. -- Cirt (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Oldfield Park railway station MMB 08 158958.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldfield Park railway station MMB 08 158958.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

St Philips Marsh TRSMD MMB 03 153382 43183.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Philips Marsh TRSMD MMB 03 153382 43183.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paddington station MMB 01 332XXX 332005 43XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paddington railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tamworth railway station MMB 01 170107.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 01 170107.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Birmingham New Street railway station MMB 15 221133.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birmingham New Street railway station MMB 15 221133.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pilning railway station MMB 04 158767.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilning railway station MMB 04 158767.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 21 220022.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 18 220022.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

A women's vulva

Can you please move File:A_women's_vulva.jpg to File:A_woman's_vulva.jpg? They're duplicates of each other. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 23:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Responses on en:WP

FYI, there were several responses to your post on en:WP: [1]. --JN466 20:47, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Please check this addition for correctness

Hallo Mattbuck, please check this addition for correctness (my source is not authenticated). Thanks. --Saibo (Δ) 21:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

your barnstar

Hi, I consider this barnstar a personal attack on a named editor. The fact that this editor is blocked and cannot respond makes the situation worse. May I please ask you consider changing of the wording in your wikilove message? Thanks. Oh, yes, the turtles image was taken by me, so thanks for commenting on it.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

FYE

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Mattbuck --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Good grief: that's not going to be the last one of those, I'm afraid. You've long been one of the good guys in my book (tough but fair, dedicated but level-headed), but I think you've been orbiting awfully close to the drama-black-hole event horizon lately. FWIW, YMMV, etc. --SB_Johnny talk 00:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Concerning one of your blocks

I forgot to let you know earlier, but I've started a discussion about Saibo's block: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Unblock. I'm proposing for Saibo to be unblocked. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality images

Bonjour. J'ai remarqué que vous posté quelque chose comme 20 images à la page Qualité Images aujourd'hui. Bien qu'il n'y ait pas de règle explicite contre cela, il est généralement considéré comme une mauvaise forme pour ajouter plus de 4 ou 5 en une seule journée. Merci. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Vous pouvez également envisager d'archiver cette page, car il est assez long. S'il vous plaît voir Commons:Bien utiliser les pages de discussion.. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour, suite à ta remarque, je viens de supprimer des images. Bonne fin de journée. --Thesupermat (talk) 13:35, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Kuhmar sdd 9396.jpg

Where is this overexposed? Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The sky is white, grass is too bright. Even if it weren't, I wouldn't promote as there are awful JPEG artifacts, especially in the trees. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. It was 95% JPEG or 94% JPEG quality -- about uncompressed... Too strange to hear about JPEG artifacts...--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Your comment helped me to reproduce the image from raw file. Could you please check it and share your opinion with me? Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
New version is better, but still not QI to me. Same problems actually. Not as severe, but still there. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Paddington station MMB 15 332014 332006 43XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paddington railway station MMB 12 332014 332006 43XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tondu railway station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tondu railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Stapleton Road railway station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stapleton Rd Stn 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flax Bourton railway station MMB 27 150281.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 27 150281.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image rename

Thanks, and sorry about the ".jpg". --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Yate MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yate MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Birmingham International railway station MMB 03 390035.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birmingham International railway station MMB 03 390035.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mass deletion of Sridhar Babu Peram's files

Although many of his (the various socks) files were copyright violations, not all were violations. The Kabandha's image was a PD-India|PD-art as artist Balasaheb Pant Pratinidhi died in 1951. A case to case basis decision should be taken instead of a mass deletion. Please revert the deletion. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Could you give me a link to the specific file? -mattbuck (Talk) 18:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
File:The Picture Ramayana 1.jpg or File:The Picture Ramayana 2.jpg. Other files also need to be scrutinized. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Undeleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
There were many other useful (PD-India/PD-art) images uploaded by Sridhar Babu Peram. Can undelete all and go by case to case basis on deletion? He planted many of his images of Hinduism-related articles of English wikipedia and many articles are suffering red links. Some of them: The_forces_of_Visvamitra_and_those_raised_by_Vasistha's_volition_battle_for_possession_of_Sabala.jpg, File:Hanuman vanquishes Nikumbha by wrenching off his head.jpg etc. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Done. Please take any other requests to COM:UDEL. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Revert_mass_deletion_of_Sridhar_Babu_Peram.27s_files--Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Beeston railway station MMB 12 222019.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beeston railway station MMB 12 222019.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 41 150239 153380.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 41 150239 153380.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stratford International station MMB 10 395017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 10 395017.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Watford Junction railway station MMB 17 321415.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Watford Junction railway station MMB 17 321415.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Beeston railway station MMB 17 156415.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beeston railway station MMB 17 156415.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB 29 Sir Colin Campbell Building.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB 29 Sir Colin Campbell Building.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Leytonstone High Road railway station MMB 04 150130.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leytonstone High Road railway station MMB 04 150130.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 77 43149.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 77 43149.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB F7 Atrium.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB F7 Atrium.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Homo en USA.pdf

Why do you add that sexuality cat to a DR that has nothing to do with sexuality? Being about sexuality is not a valid reason for keep or delete in this case. That fact that it is about sexuality doesn't make the file in scope or not and it doesn't create or block permission. I want to assume good faith, but the way you use the cat in this DR is quite strange. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

You seem to misunderstand the idea of the category. It is not to watch deletion requests based on sexuality or nudity reasons, it's to watch deletion requests of media relating to nudity or human sexuality, no matter what the rationale. The PDF description mentions homosexuality in the US, so I assumed it is about sexuality and add the category. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: File:Jubilee Campus MMB C8 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg

Hi, I was just wondering what you find unusual about this image, other than it's not of a train? -mattbuck (Talk) 10:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, No, I did not think about trains. I thought about the light, the perspective, the night, the lamp, the snow... All the mood I like very much. I think this kind of pictures is "refreshing" the usual way of "Commons", so it is to me "unusual" (but maybe it is not the good english word, sorry...). Well, I congratulate you for this image.--Jebulon (talk) 11:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Thirsk railway station MMB 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thirsk railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Euston station MMB 46 378229.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euston railway station MMB 12 378229.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB C8 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB C8 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Minehead railway station MMB 04 9351.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minehead railway station MMB 04 9351.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 43 220003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 43 220003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Farringdon station MMB 10 C-Stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 10 C-Stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kentish Town station MMB 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kentish Town railway station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Chepstow MMB 15 Gloucester to Newport Line.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chepstow MMB 15 Gloucester to Newport Line.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Burton-on-Trent railway station MMB 05 220029.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burton-on-Trent railway station MMB 05 220029.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flax Bourton railway station MMB 22 220XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 22 220XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB 80 Computer Science.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB 80 Computer Science.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Watford Junction railway station MMB 23 390025.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Watford Junction railway station MMB 23 390025.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tondu railway station MMB 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tondu railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Comedor de la Universidad Técnica de Múnich para estudios mediáticos, Riesstr. 44, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 03.JPG

Hello, I worked the picture although you marked it with a red frame. The version I just uploaded is for sure better (easy to do with RAW and PS5.5), but I am not confident if it is good enough. Please, let me know what you think. Thanks and regards, Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Much better. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick reaction! Will try to follow this path. Poco a poco (talk) 22:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Yatton railway station MMB 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Birmingham International railway station MMB 04 390035.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birmingham International railway station MMB 04 390035.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Euston Square tube station MMB 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euston Square tube station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Watford Junction railway station MMB 27 378210.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Watford Junction railway station MMB 27 378210.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oxford railway station MMB 05 165133.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxford railway station MMB 05 165133.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Reading railway station MMB 54 165116.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 54 165116.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tal-y-Cafn railway station MMB 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tal-y-Cafn railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Alexandra Palace railway station MMB 06 365521.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexandra Palace railway station MMB 06 365521.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Radcliffe railway station MMB 10 156413.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radcliffe railway station MMB 10 156413.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bedford railway station MMB 15 319365 319385.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedford railway station MMB 15 319365 319385.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Nottingham railway station MMB 54 156414.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 54 156414.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Parson Street railway station MMB 27 150247.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parson Street railway station MMB 27 150247.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dawlish Warren MMB 06 South Devon Main Line.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawlish Warren MMB 06 South Devon Main Line.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bedford railway station MMB 05 222022.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedford railway station MMB 05 222022.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Yatton railway station MMB 22 220021.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 22 220021.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of Vojtech Sedlacek

File:Vojtech Sedlacek.jpg

How may I prove the autorship of the picture? I am the worker in Vojtech Sedlacek's company. He sent me his own photo he made and told me to put it to the bio article about him on Wiki.

We have a problem. The oldest photo of Vojtech, uploaded by me in Dec 2008 is always side distorted in the Biography page. That's why I started to experiment with the picture. Can this be solved, please?

I just tend to be suspicious when I see such images, as they're mostly culled from company websites without permission. I'm happy to accept what you say as true, though it would be best if you could forward your original correspondence to our OTRS team. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

File:BSicon exCONT3.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BSicon exCONT3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 02:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Some people have too much time and imagination and not enough common sense… Useddenim (talk) 10:38, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bedminster railway station MMB 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Much Dewchurch field MMB 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Much Dewchurch field MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Yatton railway station MMB 17 150267.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 17 150267.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hornsey railway station MMB 22 321418 365505.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornsey railway station MMB 22 321418 365505.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Brockenhurst railway station MMB 04 444010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brockenhurst railway station MMB 04 444010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Guildford railway station MMB 17 455725.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guildford railway station MMB 17 455725.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hello and sorry

(poor english, sorry) Hello Mattbuck. I check (or review) your images frequently, but I can not comment on them frecuently because my monitor is a bit dark and in my opinion your images are a bit dark. Sorry, others users can review: It is usual that I'm not sure--Miguel Bugallo 21:23, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Nevertheless, good work, congratulations--Miguel Bugallo 21:26, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll try and make sure my images are a bit brighter in future. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

St Pancras railway station MMB A5 222012 222003 43055 373XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB A5 222012 222003 43055 373XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB B7 43XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB B7 43XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

About aurochs-morphology illustration.

Hi mattbuck!

The forest is from perfect vision graphics, and it have free license. The bull is a modification of some drawings of Tom Hammond (I have his permission) The man is my own work.

So I ask you to abandon your nomination.

I think you should have asked first.

Bye.

--Aurochs1 (talk) 04:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

You will need to explicitly state the provenance of all images on the page and the licence. -mattbuck (Talk) 05:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Paddington station MMB 48 166217 332010 332013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 48 166217 332010 332013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Williton railway station MMB 03 4936.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Williton railway station MMB 03 4936.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cardiff Mardi Gras 2010 MMB 44 Amanda Protheroe Thomas.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cardiff Mardi Gras 2010 MMB 44 Amanda Protheroe Thomas.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bedminster railway station MMB 17.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Temporary undeletion request

Just so that I can archive them:

You're free to delete them when I'm done, which will take minutes. I want a copy for posterity. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 21:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Jubilee Campus MMB 38 Djanogly LRC and The Exchange.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB 38 Djanogly LRC and The Exchange.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

St Pancras railway station MMB 08 373XXX 373XXX 373005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 08 373XXX 373XXX 373005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 64 150278.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 64 150278.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Blackfriars station MMB 11 319377.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackfriars station MMB 11 319377.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Parson Street railway station MMB 30 57303.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parson Street railway station MMB 30 57303.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Can they recover?

Thank you for having removed the image. But why delete these files:

This image created by me, I am the owner of these images.

Can they recover?

Put simply, no, not going to happen. Most of them show a program which you clearly did not create yourself; then there's the logo, which is at best a derivative work; and that leaves only the smoky ones which are to my mind out of scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Hornsey railway station MMB 17 365XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornsey railway station MMB 17 365XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paddington station MMB 49 166217 332010 332013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 49 166217 332010 332013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB B2 43061 222006 222023 377505.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB B2 43061 222006 222023 377505.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Birmingham New Street railway station MMB 18 350104 220014 323212.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birmingham New Street railway station MMB 18 350104 220014 323212.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

St Pancras railway station MMB C9 395028.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB C9 395028.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jebulons behaviour at QIC

Hello mattbuck,

if you are consistent you have to ban User:Jebulon for this personal attack which was not his first time (I already said). Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Euston station MMB 76 2009-stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euston station MMB 76 2009-stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

St Pancras railway station MMB G9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB G9.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Holly Valance at Speed Racer premiere.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Holly Valance at Speed Racer premiere.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teemeah (talk) 12:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Holly Valance at Speed Racer premiere.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Holly Valance at Speed Racer premiere.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fred the Oyster (talk) 13:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined - DR is ongoing, plus, of the 3 tineye hits, 1 is a 404, the other 2 link back to us. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Try this then, seeing how you weren't convinced with the crap TinEye search. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Cube?

Now? :) --Herby talk thyme 17:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Uhm... ok? -mattbuck (Talk) 17:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Or did I misread something somewhere a while ago ;) (if so apologies) --Herby talk thyme 17:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm just confused. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Aren't we all - if you saw the cube then it might have made far more sense given who was on it - if not then apologies - got that wrong :) --Herby talk thyme 18:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
All I know about The Cube is that it's a gameshow with Philip Schofield, which was parodied by Jon Culshaw. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop

In case you have not noticed I practically left commons. Please stop mentioning me at AN/U.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bedminster railway station MMB 24.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 24.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Uploads

Hi Mattbuck, thanks for all your feedback, it is helping me to improve the quality of my pictures. I have uploaded new versions of 3 pictures that you reviewed in the last days:

All the best, Poco a poco (talk) 16:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi mate. Regarding DD09, there are still noticable blue/yellow fringes around the horizontal(ish) bars. I've uploaded a new version of DD01 here, but cannot upload to Commons due to my connection. DD08, I am still seeing the same problems, and the new colour balance is worse. I'm afraid I don't think that will be QI, no matter how you play with it. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for your reply. Regarding DD01, actually I like your version. Should I upload it to Commons although you are the author?. Regarding DD09 I think that I got it now, please, have a look. And finally in regards to DD08, I will follow your advice, I give up. Best regards! Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Please do upload, just add "white balance adjustment by mattbuck" or somesuch. And I agree, you've got it. promotion. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
✓ Uploaded and thanks for the promotion! Poco a poco (talk) 22:17, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hi. Please notice Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Pozor, úchyl.jpg. --ŠJů (talk) 08:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Montpelier railway station MMB 10 143620.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montpelier railway station MMB 10 143620.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Duplicate pictures

It seems we have two identical images of a class 483, File:Isle of Wight 483 001.jpg and File:483 001 at St John's Road, 1989 - geograph.org.uk - 790855.jpg. The first a direct upload and is used in lots of places, the second transferred from Geograph at a higher resolution but apparently not linked to from anywhere. Bringing it here since you're the person most likely to be able to sort this all out for me! Alzarian16 (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm not inclined to delete, as the images are different in terms of quality. I grant you they have the same negative, but the digital outcome is rather different. I have added notes on the other's existence to each page. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
That makes sense. Thank you! Alzarian16 (talk) 18:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Picture nominated for deletion

Hi. I replied to your deletion request of File:Josef Hofinger.jpg. The man on the picture is my grandfather, and I suppose the picture was taken by my grandmother. Own work might be wrong, but since I am their own flesh and blood... and I own the negatives I scanned it from. Thank you in case of re-consideration! --Admi niko commons (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Starcross railway station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Starcross railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Pelouse Champs-sur-Marne.jpg

Hi Mattbuck,
Your comment was: "too bright". Could you please give me any suggestion in order to improve this ? Is a problem due to exposure ? Contrast ? Saturation ? I don't understand what I could do.
Thanks in advance, and thanks for useful reviews anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 10:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi mate. My too bright comment was mainly due to the sky being cyan rather than blue, indicating the blue channel is completely overexposed. The rest of the image could do with being darkened as well. I'd say there's probably also a general blue tint to the image which could do with fixing. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for quick answer, I'll try to check. (you know what ? It is the first time somebody calls me "mate", I did not know that word !!! Very kind of you !--Jebulon (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC))--Jebulon (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
I should tell you, I'm from Bristol, we generally call everyone mate. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Now go review all my photos :p -mattbuck (Talk) 21:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
I've tried something, I hope it's good. And because you tell me "mate", I'll review one or two of your pictures, even if I'm absolutely not interested by trains... Lol.--Jebulon (talk) 22:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
I don't review things I'm interested in, I just review whatever's there, though there are a few things I tend to stay away from if I feel I'm not quite in a position to be able to say if it's a decent photo or not. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Jubilee Campus MMB E0 Melton Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB E0 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Uploaded pictures

Hi, I run into the problem. I was uploading pictures with Upload Wizard and on final step (when I already put categories, descriptions and the licences) Wiyard become frozen and on the end pictures came out with masages: "The database did not find the text of a page that it should have found" and so on...

Here they are: File:Pančevo Vajfertova pivara01.JPG, File:Pančevo Vajfertova pivara02.JPG in total 19 files. Those last 19 uploaded on my upload page. I can not do nothing with those files, when I try to ad category or description it is not working. can you do something about or just delete it. Thanks ----László (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Nuked. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks----László (talk) 00:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi

Hi muttbuck. How are you? I am asking you about File:SantisimoSacramento.jpg, I want to know if it may be QI, Best regards!!! Ezarateesteban 13:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

That image is not QI I'm afraid - high ISO noise, blurry and noticable bad JPEG quality. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!!!--Ezarateesteban 13:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

And this ? I nominated it 2 days ago and I am waiting for an evaluation --Ezarateesteban 13:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

It happens, keep waiting, someone will get to it. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Please consider

Hi Mattbuck. Please consider these remarks. Thank you.  B.p. 10:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Jubilee Campus MMB K5 Business School North.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB K5 Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Undeletion request

Please undelete User:C3F2k/possibly copyrightable content. I forgot to remove the speedy tag. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 15:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Er... what? You want me to undelete something so you can remove your request that I delete it in the first place? That makes no sense whatsoever. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I changed my mind. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 15:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Innsbruck_-_Bergiselschanze6.jpg

Hi,

I have uploaded a new version. Please check if this meets your perception of QI. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 53 67016 67018.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 53 67016 67018.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Newport railway station MMB 32 43187.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newport railway station MMB 32 43187.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB F7 395027 395005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB F7 395027 395005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paddington station MMB 66 C-stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 66 C-stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB P2 Business School North.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB P2 Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB H4 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB H4 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


The Death Match Monument2.JPG

WHY DID YOU DELETE: " The Death Match Monument2.JPG "  ?

Because Ukraine has no Freedom of Panorama - images on Commons must be usable commercially, and Ukrainian freedom of panorama laws don't allow that. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Flax Bourton railway station MMB 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB C2 373213 373212.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB C2 373213 373212.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

St Pancras railway station MMB E1 395025.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB E1 395025.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Yatton railway station MMB 21 150238.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 21 150238.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Blackhorse Road station MMB 19 2009 stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 19 2009 stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rugby MMB 01 Frank Whittle memorial.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rugby MMB 01 Frank Whittle memorial.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 55 57309.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 55 57309.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Minehead railway station MMB 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minehead railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Yatton railway station MMB 18 150267.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 18 150267.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Paddington station MMB 33 43XXX 43185 43XXX 43088 43021 332003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 33 43XXX 43185 43XXX 43088 43021 332003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Euston station MMB 74 2009-stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euston station MMB 74 2009-stock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Euston station MMB 13 350254.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euston station MMB 13 350254.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Blackhorse Road station MMB 10 172007.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 10 172007.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flax Bourton railway station MMB 36.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 36.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Filton Abbey Wood railway station MMB 14 158956.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Filton Abbey Wood railway station MMB 14 158956.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

St Pancras railway station MMB 97 406-585 373010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 97 406-585 373010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Willesden Junction station MMB 29 378228.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willesden Junction MMB 05 378228.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 82 220XXX 43154 43127.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 82 220XXX 43154 43127.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Euston station MMB 90 221110.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euston station MMB 90 221110.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Northwick Park station MMB 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northwick Park station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Blackhorse Road station MMB 16 172001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 16 172001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB Q2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Q2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

St Pancras railway station MMB 46 395017.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 46 395017.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Yatton railway station MMB 19 150267.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 19 150267.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

speedy deletion?

hi matt;

respectfully, i have a question:

why did you delete this file File:Two women helping to give handjob.jpg, which is part of a mass-nomination, after it had only been listed for <3 days, & without providing any comment or reason-rationale for doing so?

Lx 121 (talk) 04:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that. As I said at the time, clearly a different penis, attached to a different person. The person in the photo looks pretty tanned and thin, versus File:Full erection Clearly showing scrotal raffe.jpg and the majority which feature someone pale and overweight. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:29, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 22 220022.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 22 220022.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


DR nominations

Please do not "renominate" files which are already up for deletion. It is not helpful. If you wish to post a comment, do so. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:54, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


play nominations

Thank you, I will nominate now files wich are for new deletion, ok so much!, though they never mind me to be erased already being there uploaded.How things in Bristol, sir? Skapheandros (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

King's Cross railway station MMB 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 41.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 41.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB 95 The Exchange and Djanogly LRC.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB 95 The Exchange and Djanogly LRC.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oldfield Park railway station MMB 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldfield Park railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Liftarn

Sorry if I'm un-"mellow", but I already found both the style and substance of the way Liftarn does things to be extremely tedious and tiresome five years ago. My patience with him was pretty much exhausted back then, and none of the old issues or longstanding points of dispute have been resolved or settled by mutual agreement in the meantime -- and whenever I'm faced with the unenviable chore of dealing with him yet again, I'm always rather quickly and forcibly reminded why I found the task so frustrating in the past... AnonMoos (talk) 16:01, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry, I understand completely. I feel the same way about other people, for instance Mbz1. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Railway map

Severnside Community Rail Partnership route map 2012.svg

Hope that's what you had in mind :)--Nilfanion (talk) 22:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, that'll do. I should comment though, your map shows the Portishead line going into Portishead: it doesn't, it goes to the docks. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
The Portishead issue reflects what is contained in the OS data. I'm not satisfied with it, but I've used it to date for simplicity. One obvious problem is the heritage lines aren't included. Strangely enough, the track is still in place (judging from satellite imagery) towards Portishead.
This strikes me as the sort of thing OSM should be better at - so I'm going to look at making use of that.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
It is, but it's very overgrown, and it's built on within Portishead. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
I've updated the Severnside map to use OSM data, and I'll have a look at the Metro one soon.
A couple questions about these though:
  1. What to do about the heritage lines (especially the long ones like the WSR)? Should they be included as the background network shown on the maps? Seems odd to include barely used industry lines, and exclude the steam lines with heavier traffic...
  2. Adding relevant stations is easy enough. However, would it be better to include that in the image itself, or via templates on WP (eg Superimpose2)? If I record the boundary info properly, the template option may be easier and also allows wiki-linking.
I can see value in maps to accompany the route diagrams for all the routes - so best to get it right early on.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I would say yes, heritage railways need to be included, and probably better not to differentiate between heritage and mainline if we don't differentiate between mainline and industrial. Regarding stations, I'd rather have two versions of the map, one with and one without the stations pointed out. I don't want the stations named, just a little marker which can be easily coloured. Superimposure isn't as easy as images are IMO, plus it's more susceptible to subtle vandalism or accidental changes. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough. I'll upload the maps without stations first (to get volume through). I suspect a bit of discussion to get the marker "right" will be good. Also investigating the OSM data more thoroughly - some of the pre-Beeching routes are plotted but its very incomplete. I think I can recover many of those data holes, to a good enough quality for WP (if not OSM).--Nilfanion (talk) 23:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Cambridge MMB 07 Emmanuel College.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambridge MMB 07 Emmanuel College.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB M6 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB M6 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 46 220003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 46 220003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ferry Roland

You are welcome to examine Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rolandhelper 2. Σ (talk) 00:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

London MMB 14 Blackfriars Bridge 319XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackfriars Bridge MMB 02 319XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Euston station MMB 06 350235.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euston railway station MMB 33 350235.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Crowcombe Heathfield railway station MMB 04 88.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crowcombe Heathfield railway station MMB 04 88.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clapham Junction railway station MMB 11 455851 455835.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clapham Junction station MMB 08 455851 455835.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Willesden Junction station MMB 02 1972 stock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willesden Junction railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Weston-super-Mare MMB 52.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 52.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 04 G-OFXP.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 04 G-OFXP.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Teignmouth MMB 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teignmouth MMB 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanway House MMB 18.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanway House MMB 18.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Redcar East railway station MMB 01 142021.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redcar East railway station MMB 01 142021.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Crowcombe Heathfield railway station MMB 10 60163.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crowcombe Heathfield railway station MMB 10 60163.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB B4 222006 377505.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB B4 222006 377505.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nottingham railway station MMB 41.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 41.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Newport railway station MMB 21 DR77327.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newport railway station MMB 21 DR77327.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Waterloo station MMB 08 450031 450561 455907.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterloo station MMB 08 450031 450561 455907.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «67 Netham Weir.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «67 Netham Weir.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 25 EI-ECC.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 25 EI-ECC.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cheltenham Racecourse railway station MMB 02 5619.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheltenham Racecourse railway station MMB 02 5619.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB I1 Melton Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB I1 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Description

Hi Mattbuck, any idea why the file description shows only in Italian here?. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

I can see english in the description and on the video itself. Only seeing one language I think is a setting you can check, which blanks out all non-your-wiki-language-setting languages. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Right, I found it. Thanks a lot --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

FOP deletions

Glad to see someone who actually has the inclination to purge that lot :)

However, I would suggest using a better rationale than "no FOP for 2D works". Some essentially 2D works (stained glass) are classed as works of artistic craftsmanship and are covered by FOP, and some works with 3D elements (embossed text) are not covered as they are still clearly a textual work. Remember that ultimately all real world things are 3D, even a pencil drawing on a sheet of paper(!) The 2D/3D is a crude oversimplification and asks for trouble like on the NT request.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:35, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bedminster railway station MMB 30 150101.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 30 150101.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bristol MMB «C0 Clifton Suspension Bridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol MMB «C0 Clifton Suspension Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your personal attacks

As I asked you on IRC and on my talkpage (User_talk:AzaToth#Complaint_of_reviews_of_QI_images), I would like you to retract your personal attacks. Thanks. AzaToth 16:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


COM:AN/U

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−


float  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Mattbuck. personal attack. Thank you.

Quality Image Promotion

Reading MMB 17 The Blade.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reading MMB 17 The Blade.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanway House MMB 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanway House MMB 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 27 G-UPOI G-CODM.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 27 G-UPOI G-CODM.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thanks

Hi mattbuck, Thanks for fixing File:Jubilee Campus MMB G0.jpg. I thought the number (MMB G0) was meaningless, that's why approved that rename request.--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 13:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

No worries. It only goes into the alphabet because I reached 100 and 100 sorts before 11. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:23, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

2D images

Hi Matt. I see you have deleted File:Hafod Fadog plaque.jpg. I wonder if you can point me to any clarification on what a 2D image is? On the face of it this is a 3D presentation of text within a frame. The examples I have come across so far seem to relate to paintings (excluding frame), photographs, diagrams and prints (litho, offset, screen). Regards.... Oosoom Talk 10:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

It was my impression that something had to be "significantly" 3D in order to qualify for FOP, and that text like this did not count. However you may be right, I will undelete and send it to DR instead. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hafod Fadog plaque.jpg. Oh, and please remember to insert a : whenever linking to files, even when deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Sorry about the colon. Oosoom Talk 19:15, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 03 G-BZDJ G-CEUV G-CFKF.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 03 G-BZDJ G-CEUV G-CFKF.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Toddington railway station MMB 11 37324 5619.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toddington railway station MMB 11 37324 5619.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

King's Cross railway station MMB 70.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 70.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Geograph Information boards deletion.

The sole value I can see for snapping an information panel is for the information it publishes. As a copyright breach they should go, and fast-- but as a potential reference in WP:English they or a link to them is valuable. Is there a technical way to zap the image- but to keep the geotag and a link to the Geograph page where they may be consulted ? Just a thought as we needn't throw out the baby with bathwater. --ClemRutter (talk) 15:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

No, there's no way to do that that I know of, except by inertia of however long it takes geocommons to catch up. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:25, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
I haven't researched it- but after posting, and looking awesome of you awesome ballooon images it occured to me, that a little Python app that admins could use that simply overwrote the image with customised balloon image, and added hidden cat- Geograph images with information content deleted for copyright reasons. That would kill the image copyright vio, but maintain the data which already provides the link. Just a thought.--ClemRutter (talk) 08:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Thing is, Commons is not here as a source of information, that's what WikiSource is for. Commons is here to distribute freely licensed media. Anything which is not freely licensed should not be hosted by us. We are not an encyclopaedia, we are not a repository of human knowledge, we're a store of pretty pictures. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I agree with all you are saying- I just hate to lose data that would make someone else life easier. I work by geotags and a blob on Google map is an entry point to a category and from there I glean clues for articles. A good interpretation board can be the difference between an WP:Eng article or not- while the image is important the metadata can be more so. It seems simpler to maintain the metadata on Commons- than to script it to transfer WikiSource-then have some one write a tool to create blobs from both Commons and WikiSource.--ClemRutter (talk) 13:53, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Ask at COM:VP or something. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Sure, I'll copy all this across.--ClemRutter (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Teignmouth MMB 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teignmouth MMB 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Pancras railway station MMB D8 395025.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB D8 395025.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jubilee Campus MMB G0 Chroicocephalus ridibundus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB G0 Chroicocephalus ridibundus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Serra do Pilar, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 05.JPG

Hello Mattbuck, could you have a look into this picture, you suggested that the sharpness could be too low and actually it was to low, but after increasing it I didn't hear anything else back from you, and right now it is the last image waiting for review, all the best, Poco a poco (talk) 17:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Impressed because once I forgot to adjust the sharpness to the usual level and you noticed that. Poco a poco (talk) 20:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Everyone at QI has their own criteria which they judge a bit more sternly and others a bit less so. I tend not to care much about perspective distortion, but pick up on overexposure and unsharpness more. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 38 G-GOGB.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 38 G-GOGB.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dawlish MMB 14 South Devon Main Line 43003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawlish MMB 14 South Devon Main Line 43003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


UK FOP

Confused that you removed Dual_language_plaque,_Savoy_Theatre,_Monmouth_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1708043.jpg because (it said) there is no UK FOP ..... but I see lots of pictures on trains in the UK on your front page. The UK is well known for FOP. Can you explain? Victuallers (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Even if a country has no rules allowing freedom of panorama, certain things are considered ineligible for copyright anyway, on the basis that they are too old or are utilitarian. Trains fall into the latter category. As for the issue at hand, freedom of panorama in the UK extends to buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, but not that which is considered a graphical work. Quite where the line falls is difficult to say, but the general upshot is that if something is 3D it's fine, if it's 2D it's not. Unfortunately items like this which are barely 3D are a bit of an in-between which the guidelines provide no help for, so I tend to err on the side of caution per COM:PRP. I am happy to undelete and send to a deletion request if you feel that would be preferable. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:16, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

King's Cross railway station MMB 30 91110.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 30 91110.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Williton railway station MMB 02 4936.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Williton railway station MMB 02 4936.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clapham Junction railway station MMB 14 377XXX 377XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clapham Junction railway station MMB 14 377XXX 377XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 66 43384.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 66 43384.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 84 221XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 84 221XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Severn Beach railway station MMB 09 143621.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Severn Beach railway station MMB 09 143621.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weston-super-Mare MMB 39.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 39.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Stanway House MMB 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanway House MMB 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Re: File:Guildford railway station MMB 04 458010.jpg

Hi! Yes, the description is certainly wrong - my first feeling was "where is that train... oh, there you are..." :), but if you changed it to the railroad station itself, it would be OK for me and I'd cancel my declination. When it comes to technical details, I'm unsure. I've always had problems with rating such open spaces even on my own photos, mostly because of proper focus, and I'd like to hear an opinion of someone more experienced as well. By the way, you have a very nice collection of photos of trains, I really enjoy it! --Zyxist (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Glad you enjoy them. I must confess, I don't look at the photos when I nominate them, I have a long list of photos to nominate and I pick 4-5 fairly randomly from them, so yes, sometimes I end up with a bad QI description. Also I'm lazy. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Dawlish MMB 19 South Devon Main Line.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawlish MMB 19 South Devon Main Line.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Guildford railway station MMB 02 444010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guildford railway station MMB 02 444010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Weston-super-Mare MMB 51 Winter Gardens.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 51 Winter Gardens.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thanks for the heads up

I probably got carried away with the "Nom for Deletion" button. No matter. 68.173.113.106 02:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Weston-super-Mare MMB 44.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 44.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Guildford railway station MMB 04 455912.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guildford railway station MMB 04 455912.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FoP deletion categories

Hi,

The France FoP deletion requests are nicely sorted for some years in specific categories. Recently, this system were extended to other countries.

When you nominate for deletion a picture taken in UK with a FoP-related rationale, please include it in the Category:United Kingdom FOP cases. --Dereckson (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Brockenhurst railway station MMB 02 444010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brockenhurst railway station MMB 02 444010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Bristol MMB «B9 Cumberland Basin.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clifton Suspension Bridge MMB 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

London MMB 12 River Thames.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London MMB 12 River Thames.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Barking station cat

Thanks - saved a bit of time there! Sunil060902 (talk) 19:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

You could have just left it actually - a bot would have done it in a couple of hours. But yes, cat-a-lot is helpful. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)