User talk:Bastianow

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

a b c d e f ...

Odpowiem tylko na korespondencję w języku polskim polskim!
I WILL ONLY ANSWER MESSAGES IN POLISH!

Would You?-2

[edit]

Yours pictures of Polish Coats of arms are beautyful as usual! Maybe, it could be need a very little more --Arachn0 (talk) 10:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!!! You works all the best!


Polish

[edit]

You may see at User:Arachn0/Niesiecki K. Herbarz Polski - there are more work too !

Starostwo Powiatowe w Lubartowie zgłosiło w OTRS reklamację, że oficjalny herb jest trochę inny: http://splubartow.bip.lubelskie.pl/upload/pliki/herbPdf.pdf Mógłbyś się temu przyjrzeć? Ankry (talk) 17:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL Mińskie COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

217.21.43.64 07:15, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Herby województw I Rzeczypospolitej

[edit]

Herbem ziemi krakowskiej (przedstawionym w 1506 roku jako herb województwa krakowskiego) był orzeł w koronie zwrócony heraldycznie w lewo. Herbem ziemi poznańskiej (przedstawionym w 1506 roku jako herb województwa poznańskiego) był orzeł bez korony zwrócony heraldycznie w lewo. [1] Co widać na graficznym przedstawieniu w wydaniu Statutów Łaskiego w 1506 roku. Wystarczy chyba zrobić lustrzane odbicie. Mathiasrex (talk) 07:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC) Tak, dziękuję i jeszcze ten: [2] pozdrawiam Mathiasrex (talk) 07:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL powiat mrągowski COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

89.231.29.191 09:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wymiana herbu Powiatu Jarosławskiego na prawidłowy

[edit]

Prosimy o wymianę herbu Powiatu Jarosławskiego na prawidłowy (w mieczu zamiast trzech serc powinny być płomienie). Uwaga - obecny powoduje duże zamieszanie! Prawidłwoy plik do pobrania ze strony http://www.jaroslaw.samorzady.pl/kat/id/1550 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.25.120.47 (talk) 12:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL gmina Chełm COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beatajaniuk (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Witam. Podziwiam umiejętność tworzenia takich grafik. Trafiłem na nie przypadkiem widząc przy Buczackich starszą wersję herbu Awdaniec. Intryguje mnie katalog "zamówione". Jak można zamówić u Pana jakiś herb? Przyznam, że szukam średniowiecznych wersji, bez tych barokowych upiększeń. Pozdrawiam z Torunia. Eder Thorunensis (talk) 13:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Identyfikacja herbu

[edit]

Dzień dobry. Czy mógły Pan pomóc mi w identyfikacji herbu na tej kapliczce: [3], [4], [5], [6]? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL Prusice COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dzień dobry. Moim zdaniem ten herb musi zostać poprawiony. Jeśli blazon mówi, że ryba płynie w lewo, to nie jest "na lewo od widza", ale "na lewo od uchwytu tarczy". Cf. z historycznym heraldystą - http://www.wawrzak.org/herbarz_niesiecki/niesiecki_page12.htm --Kaganer (talk) 11:57, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! POL Wielkie Księstwo Poznańskie COA.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:POL powiat bartoszycki COA.svg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:POL powiat bartoszycki COA.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 08:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FC Kattowitz.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FC Kattowitz.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gwiazda dla Ciebie!

[edit]
Gwiazda Pracowitości
Robisz świetną pracę, widać, że bardzo długo z nimi Ci schodzi, a i tak wciąż ciężko pracujesz, a twoje pracę są ładne, i estetyczne. KotBartek (talk) 13:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:POL Chełmno COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:117F:42B:D200:28F7:C3F4:CF62:9CB0 18:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL Tychy flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bolszewski Wikipedysta (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:POL Kociewie COA.svg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:POL Kociewie COA.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Herb gminy Grodzisko Dolne.

[edit]

Gmina Grodzisko Dolne (powiat leżajski, woj. podkarpackie, Polska) nie posiada własnego herbu. Prowadzone są prace nad jego opracowaniem i zatwierdzeniem, ale herbu nie mamy. Wdł. stanu prawnego na dzień 20.06.2023r. gmina posługuje się tylko i wyłącznie logiem, który został zatwierdzony przez władze gminy. Logo obowiązujące znajduje się m.in. na stronie: https://gminy.podkarpackie.com/gmina-grodzisko-dolne,21.html

Z poważaniem Adam Chmura Sekretarz Gminy 193.19.166.58 (dyskusja) 08:53, 20 cze 2023 (CEST)

Co Ty na to? Pamulab (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL gmina Grodzisko Dolne COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pamulab (talk) 07:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL gmina Cewice COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Promocja2020 (talk) 10:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]