User talk:JurgenNL/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reuskens.jpg

Hallo Jurgen,

Voor verwijdering deze foto roept u geen FoP in België in. Mag ik U er op wijzen dat de Reuskens Van Borgerhout reeds bestaan sinds 1712 en dat volgens mij hiervoor geen auteursrechten meer gelden. Groetjes, Luxil (talk) 07:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oei, dat wist ik niet. De beelden leken veel minder oud, vandaar mijn nominatie. In dit geval zullen ze inderdaad oud genoeg zijn. Ik heb de nominatie geschrapt. JurgenNL (talk) 08:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Set

Hi JurgenNL. Thanks for the license review on File:Ashaahmed1.png. When you have the time, could you please also confirm the following set? (File:Ucidlhd24.png, File:Ucidlhd15.png, File:Ucidlhd18.png, File:Ucidlhd17.png, File:Ucidlhd21.png, File:Ucidlhd22.png, File:Ucidlhd25.png, File:Ucidlhd27.png, File:Ucidlhd29.png, File:Ucidlhd28.png, File:Ucidlhd30.png, File:Ucidlhd1.png, File:Ucidlhd5.png, File:Ucidlhd9.png, File:Ucidlhd5a.png, File:Ucidlhd12.png). Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files from this user [1]

I am currently meeting with this user. He is wondering why you deleted his images and has assured me that he took them himself. James Heilman, MD (talk) 13:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the images have a very low resolution and all images don't containt exif data. The own work claim was doubtful for these images. JurgenNL (talk) 13:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Was sitting with the user in question. Did you find other exact copies published elsewhere? James Heilman, MD (talk) 03:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, but some of them looked like screenshot of television broadcasts. Please read COM:PCP. JurgenNL (talk) 03:51, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:CCFL563@VCordón2009.ogv

If you can, please consider marking this video file. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New cat

Hello, I think that the right naming for Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Earth 2014 in Macedonia should be rather Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Earth 2014 in the Republic of Macedonia in order to be consequent to all other categories, and, at the same time, be politically correct. I can take care of it, if you like. Btw, the cat should also get a mother category like Category:Quality images of the Republic of Macedonia. CU, Poco2 18:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Poco², thanks for your message. You're right. I was already wondering why I couldn't find a mother category ;). I have moved the category and files and added the mother category. Thanks for noticing me! JurgenNL (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Me overruling you at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Platz ist in der kleinsten Hütte (Blüte).jpg

Hi JurgenNL, sorry for overruling you at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Platz ist in der kleinsten Hütte (Blüte).jpg. I was handling some more deletion requests by this user who wanted all his images removed. Seeing as he requested deletion only 20 minutes after uploading the images I think we would have a hard time defending the CC license in court. I did see that you had already kept one of the images but I didn't think it would be a good idea to leave that one and delete the rest so I went ahead and deleted that as well. The images were not of great quality anyway. Hope you don't mind too much. Sorry again and best regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your notification. I agree with it. JurgenNL (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot van open source software

Hoi Jurgen,

Ik zag dat je een groot aantal afbeeldingen op de Nederlandstalige wikiversiteit hebt verwijderd. Een aantal van deze afbeeldingen waren screenshots van open source software. Deze afbeeldingen mogen toch, net als de software, vrijelijk gedeeld worden? Zie ook onderstaande link:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Screenshots

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tim Ruijters, Timboliu (talk) 15:49, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Van alle verwijderde afbeeldingen klopten de licenties en/of bronnen niet. Alle afbeeldingen stonden als (eigen werk) met een cc-by-sa licentie, wat sowieso niet klopt. Sommige afbeeldingen bevatten auteursrechtelijk beschermde foto's die daarom ook weg moesten. De afbeeldingen kunnen alleen bewaard blijven (of teruggeplaatst) wanneer er een correcte bron en licentie voor alle inhoud wordt gegeven. JurgenNL (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hi. I don't upload non-free files to Commons willingly. The licenses on the Cristiano files I recently uploaded were cc-by-2.0 but I didn't know people could upload files to Flickr with the wrong licenses. I'm still getting to know the finer details about such stuff. In my defence I've also contributed a substantial amount of free files to Commons. Davykamanzi → talk · contribs 09:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see - the uploaded copyvios were AGF uploads, but uploads from blacklisted users. I deleted the template from your talk page. JurgenNL (talk) 09:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Verwijderde bestanden Victor de Stuers

Beste JurgenNL, Ik zie dat diverse afbeeldingen van tekeningen die Victor de Stuers in het Leidse Academiegebouw gemaakt had, verwijderd zijn. (Voorbeeld: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload?uselang=nl&wpDestFile=Interieur,_begane_grond,_midden_%28Trappenhuis%29,_muurschildering,_De_student_verlaat_het_ouderlijk_huis_-_Leiden_-_20390365_-_RCE.jpg ). Dat lijkt me vreemd, want De Stuers is overleden in 1916, dus er zit geen copyright meer op de afbeeldingen. De foto's zijn afkomstig van RCE. Zou je kunnen toelichten op wiens verzoek en om welke reden ze verwijderd zijn? Ik wil ze anders namelijk graag nomineren voor undeletion (dus voor terugkomst op Commons). Met vriendelijke groet, Vysotsky (talk) 15:41, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Vysotsky, zie de link die ik als verwijderreden heb opgegeven: Commons:Deletion requests/RCE images. Groet, JurgenNL (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dank. Dit zijn blijkbaar de verwijderredenen: "Privacy sensitivity, copyright (they don't own the images, or it's deritave work which they don't own), portrait right, and unclarity on any of the reasons". Natuurlijk is dat jammer, maar zoiets kan gebeuren. RCE handelt zaken als altijd netjes af, en dat daarbij dan 1% van de enorm grote RCE-donatie teruggetrokken wordt, is overzienbare schade en dient het belang van zorgvuldigheid. Belangrijk is dat RCE netjes in een lijst heeft aangegeven om welke bestanden het gaat. In de zes gevallen die ik hier aankaartte (nr 698-703 in de RCE-lijst), kan dat dan alleen maar zijn omdat de betreffende fotograaf bezwaar heeft gemaakt, want auteursrecht van de tekenaar en privacy zijn hier niet aan de orde. Vysotsky (talk) 20:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Vysotsky, ik zal eens vragen waarom deze 6 afbeeldingen verwijderd moesten worden. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 16:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dank Basvb! De tekeningen op deze 6 foto's (698-703 in de lijst) zijn gemaakt door Victor de Stuers, die overleed in 1916. De plaats (Academiegebouw Leiden) is openbaar toegankelijk. Ik hoor de uitkomst van de navraag graag. Zonodig maak ik zelf nieuwe foto's, maar die van RCE waren heel behoorlijk. Vysotsky (talk) 21:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Verwijderen

Wil je onmiddelijk stoppen met het verwijderen van informatieve foto's. Als je hiermee doorgaat doe ik op WP/nl een verzoek tot roament voor het leven.Spoorjan (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De afbeeldingen zijn auteursrechtenschendingen en dienen dus verwijderd te worden. Als u wilt, kunt u antwoorden op de pagina die in het sjabloon en op uw overlegpagina staan aangegeven, niet door het sjabloon te verwijderen. JurgenNL (talk) 17:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC) P.S. Google geeft geen duidelijke uitkomst over wat roament betekent.[reply]

Big Mac box image

Why did you ask to delete my file?[2]

--Wacky25 (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Big mac box is copyrighted. JurgenNL (talk) 18:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Church of St.Giles (Milevsko)- Czech Republic

Good evening, I would like to ask you, why have you decided to delete some images from the article Kostol svätého Egídia (Milevsko) on Wikipedia Slovakia, images were on Wikimedia Commons. Well, the pictures were taken from one Czech book, which is named in sources in the article, but it is possible to use these images freely, because there is a law about 70 years after author´s death in the Czech Republic. Thank you for your answer.(KKDAII (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

These images had no license and the source was incorrect. If you want, you can request undeletion at COM:UNDEL. JurgenNL (talk) 08:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Code issues in User:JurgenNL/common.js

Hi JurgenNL, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:JurgenNL/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 64 character 35: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: alert(mw.config.get( 'wgDBname' ))

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 19:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Yes I know kthxbai JurgenNL (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your administrator status

Hi JurgenNL, please resign as an administrator at Wikimedia Commons. If you don't, I will initiate a discussion about your admin status. I was the one who nominated you for adminship back in December 2013 and I feel responsible to take all steps necessary after what happened. Jcb (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused by [3], were you notified of all this? --Nemo 13:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I now found out some other discussions and asked a few questions there.[4] [5] --Nemo 13:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I moved on. Jcb (talk) 22:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is sufficient support to start a desysop nomination, which I did: Commons:Administrators/Requests/JurgenNL (de-adminship). Jcb (talk) 00:23, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am really sorry. The decision to desysop was unfair. I saw no illegal data collection, no stalking, nothing inappropriate (except the prank call, but I consider this a minor offence, making an elephant from a fly). I have a feeling, that I have encountered into dystopy. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Desysop

It's done. Thanks for your past service. Elfix 10:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your service. I've removed your admin template. :( — revi^ 11:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Odder (de-bureaucrat)

In the discussion at Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Odder (de-bureaucrat) you have expressed an opinion that Odder's bureaucrat status should be kept or removed, but you did not express the reasoning behind that opinion. I would appreciate it if you would return to the discussion and share why you believe Odder's actions were or were not appropriate for a bureaucrat. This will help avoid future drama by making it clear why (or why not) the community believes bureaucrats should be free to act in this way. Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 17:26, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hernoemen

Hoi JurgenNL. Ik moet regelmatig bestanden laten hernoemen door anderen. (niet alleen mijn eigen bestanden, maar ook van anderen) Zou ik die mogelijkheid kunnen krijgen, ik ben al controleur hier en dergelijke. Maakt het werken wat makkelijker voor me hier. Kun jij dat voor mij regelen, alvast bedankt en vriendelijke groeten - Richardkw (talk) (talk) 13:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(for the English readers:) Hi JurgenNL, regularly I have to let others rename files. (not only my own, but also files from other users). I'm already a patroller here (and other things). It would make working here easier for me if I could rename myself. Can you arrange that for me? Thanks a lot, kind regards, - Richardkw (talk) (talk) 13:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ik kan dat niet, maar een moderator wel als je een verzoekje doet op COM:RFR. Groet, JurgenNL (talk) 13:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Na BWC, ja ik zag net dat je hier geen moderator meer was. Ok, thnx. - Richardkw (talk) (talk) 13:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimedia Conferentie 2014 (15496296817).jpg

File:Wikimedia Conferentie 2014 (15496296817).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DDJJ (talk) 12:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimedia Conferentie 2014 (15496105058).jpg

File:Wikimedia Conferentie 2014 (15496105058).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DDJJ (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia cursus bij de Wikimedia Conferentie 2014 (15495625169).jpg

File:Wikipedia cursus bij de Wikimedia Conferentie 2014 (15495625169).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DDJJ (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wikimedia Conferentie 2014 (15496289097).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wikimedia Conferentie 2014 (15496289097).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    23:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Delete

Why you deleted File:Nicky Whelan.jpg this pic haven't copyright. :) Polkash (بحث)

The image was taken from IMBD, that's copyrighted. JurgenNL (talk) 08:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benedict Wydooghe.jpg

File:Benedict Wydooghe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ING logo.jpg

File:ING logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

14.2.169.117 11:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no scams

thank you for the massage but don't send more!
i think thats interesting Masterwikiprothebest (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Abdullah - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2008 (cropped).jpg

File:King Abdullah - World Economic Forum on the Middle East 2008 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bunker Westerbork

Beste Jurgen,

Ik heb een vraagje over de foto van de bunker die je geupload hebt van kamp westerbork. De cameracoordinaten geven aan dat het bij het commandantswoning is genomen en ik heb het daarom hernoemd naar de ss-bunker. Maar qua beeld zou het de aardappelkelder kunnen zijn. Weet jij of de cameracoordinaten wel correct waren? Het gaat om foto https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:SS-bunker_Westerbork.jpg met vriendelijek groet --Hannolans (talk) 23:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hannolans, de fotocollectie van de restanten van de Tweede Wereldoorlog zijn destijds aangeleverd door een externe fotograaf, Frits Pentenga. Ik heb even gekeken naar de bestanden die ik destijds gekregen heb. Zowel de coördinaten als het document komen overeen met wat op Commons staat. Of de bijgeleverde coördinaten en het document 100% correct zijn durf ik echter niet te zeggen, aangezien ik de foto's niet zelf gemaakt heb. JurgenNL (talk) 18:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dank! Ik ga nog eens checken welke nu welke bunker is. In de metagegevens van de foto zie ik geen geocoordinaten staan. het zou dan handmatig kunnen zijn toegevoegd of door een programma zijn toegevoegd waarbij een afwijking zat. --Hannolans (talk) 21:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks
Hi Jurgen,

Bedankt voor jouw reactie. Ik heb helaas weinig verstand van Wiki maar ik probeer het nieuwe logo van Blokker in Google te krijgen. Ik hoopte dat het overschrijven van het oude logo de oplossing zou zijn. Blijkbaar niet, kun jij mij wellicht verder helpen? Pbuitendijk (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pbuitendijk, in principe is Commons, waar u zich nu bevindt, enkel een locatie om bestanden te uploaden en te beheren. Het vervangen van de afbeeldingen moet in de artikelen in bijvoorbeeld Wikipedia gebeuren. Omdat het oude logo niet fout is, dient deze gewoon te blijven bestaan op Commons. Het oude logo staat opgeslagen met de naam Blokker logo.png, het nieuwe logo met de naam Blokkerlogo.png (zonder spatie dus). Ik heb net al een rondje gedaan langs alle artikelen waar het oude logo werd gebruikt, deze heb ik allemaal vervangen door het nieuwe logo. Als het goed is, is alles nu in orde. JurgenNL (talk) 15:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas

Beste JurgenNL, vrolijke kerstdagen (ondanks alles) en een gezond 2021! - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 13:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • PS I hope you see this, not everyone has forgotten you!

File:Kazakhstan road sign 4.4.svg

File:Kazakhstan road sign 4.4.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JurgenNL/Archive_3&oldid=636876174"