User talk:Mark Miller

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Amadscientist)
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mark Miller!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Transferred from old account as I should eventually fix these things[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Mark Miller!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Amadscientist[edit]

Hello Mark. Could you clarify the situation with User:Amadscientist? Did you request a rename or did you simply create a new account? If the former, please could you point to a link confirming this. If the latter, please could you log in as Amadscientist and redirect your userpage and user talkpage to your new userpage and user talkpage respectively? That will help people who might be wondering what happened to Amadscientist. Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 12:32, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Well...uhm alright Green Giant. Here is the full story. I requested the name change and was actually told it could not be done locally and that I would have to request the change at Meta. That confused me so I just left it alone at that point, however, when I went from Commons to Wikipedia that very act of going from this site to that site began to suddenly, automatically log me into Wikipedia under my old user name there: Amadscientist. When I asked about this I was told that the Foundation made some changes to the renaming of accounts and that editors would now, no longer be able to request name changes localy and that it would be a single name globally. I had already usurped the username Mark Miller across all global account except the Italian Wikipedia because there was a blocked user with that name and I would have to ask directly there...but this was some time ago.
Then the other day I came back here to commons and I was switched to the Mark Miller account. I have no idea who actually performed that action but I am very thankful because the situation was a bit stressful. Here is the original request: Commons:Help desk#Need to change my user name and the diff. Somewhat related to this is my last request under the old name for a deletion of an original upload (I had blurred some license plates after I had noticed the number were clearly visible) and received some great help from admin INeverCry at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Please delete the original upload. I hope that helps. Is there anything else you feel I should do or other steps I need to take? (oh..I forgot..I also noticed when looking at an international use of one of my images that I now automatically get logged into the other Wikis with the Username Mark miller, so that seems to indicate some overall change and perhaps not local to just Commons) --Mark Miller (talk) 21:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Ah yes, so you have got stuck in Login Unification too. I have a similar problem at Italian Wikipedia, the account hasn't been active in years but they won't let me usurp the name. :)
The only thing you need to do is put the following text on User:Amadscientist:
#REDIRECT [[User:Mark Miller]]
and similarly on the talkpage:
#REDIRECT [[User talk:Mark Miller]]
so if anybody clicks on your old user name they will be redirected to this set of pages. Green Giant (talk) 22:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
You know...I should have really already thought about that. LOL! But I come here and my brain seems to default to photographs and suddenly I become braindead. LOL!--Mark Miller (talk) 22:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps the med scientist in you isn't dead after all? Better than sharing a name with a fictional mascot for canned vegetables. :) Green Giant (talk) 22:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
LOL!...or Ho Ho Ho. ;-)--Mark Miller (talk) 22:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Requesting permission for photo to use in book[edit]

PLEASE BE SO KIND AND SEND ME PERMISSION QUICKLY: MY BOOK IS GOING INTO PUBLICATION SOON!

Dear Sir,

I would like to have permission to use your photo of Rome Forum Reconstruction

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/Roman_forum_sketch_up_model.png in my humorous new book on architecture and city planning, titled "Hillary can bellydance too: a quest to save piazzas". Please be so kind and send permission directly to mbookwalter@services.lulu.com (ID no. 702288)and cc to me hillarydanesh@yahoo.de

Sincerely, Homa Jahansouzi-Danesh (Hillary)

Title: Hillary Can Bellydance Too: A Quest to Save Piazzas Publisher: Lulu.com Publication date: August 28, 2015 Format: Paperback and the print run is based on demand The territory: Architecture and City Planning, Humor

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Stop x nuvola.svg This user has been blocked
The reason for the block is available in the block log. The administrator listed in the block log can give you further information.

See also the contributions of this user or the upload log in order to find out why this user has been blocked.


العربية | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Expires: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:18:53 GMT --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

An involved admin has blocked this user.--Mark Miller (talk) 08:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "A challenge has been made to an involved admin. It is the belief of this editor and contributor that an OTRS ticket may not contain verification that conforms to the Wikimedia Foundations policies and procedures in regards to permissions for the following images; It is the belief of this editor that a copy of an e-mail was used to confirm permissions for use of a work for hire not yet established by the sender of the e-mail and that the source of the images are the copyright of the museum itself. It is requested that an outside, uninvolved admin check OTRS verifications to confirm that all verifications that require private e-mail verification have been met to demonstrate that the entity involved has the exclusive right to release these images as a work for hire to the public domain without attributing the essential information of the sender itself being the source of the image.--Mark Miller (talk) 08:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "You have been warned not to revert admin actions and did it anyway, knowing that there might be consequences. The block is valid according to blocking policy. You can complain about the block on the admin noticeboard in 3 days. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

:THAT is the fucking shit you use to decline? From the very admin that blocked me? Holy shit!!~ OK. As I stated, I am challenging the OTRS. Verify that it contains the needed verifications for a work for hire or delete the image.--Mark Miller (talk) 08:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

An e-mail has been sent to the first uninvolved admin listed.--Mark Miller (talk) 08:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

== OTRS ==

It really is to verify stuff....right? I mean, if an admin....say...the one that blocked me for just reverting them over their involvement and outright declaration that all the uploading editor do is send them a copy of the e-mail they received....then couldn't that editor...say...make up anything they want and send it to said Admin? How do we know that the OTRS is valid without the museum curator that supposedly sent the email...confirming that the file sent was a work for hire and that they sent said e-mail...even though they cannot remember the photographer? Hey...if being blocked over that shit is what it takes....fuck this shit. You want files that are uploaded by questionable means. That does not mean that Wikipedia's image use policy agrees...but frankly, I really question this block and the admin that handed it out. They seem far too involved with a questionable upload at this point for me. But, that is not at all the issue. All I ask is that the OTRS be confirmed to contain all the criteria need for a confirmation of a work for hire by the institution in question.--Mark Miller (talk) 08:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

I told you before, ask another OTRS agent to waste some time on your demands, since you don'trust me. I blocked you for reverting admin actions after warnings -> vandalism. I did not block you for stating concerns. Complain about me at the AN board in three days. Until then, good luck. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

::Oh...no, I do trust you....to do exactly what you stated and no less. What I challenge is what stated is all that was needed and if you can decline the block you made...go fuck someone else and not me. My asshole is sore from the thumping you are giving me. So stop. No, means no. Take your dick out of my ass.--Mark Miller (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

And yes....that was rape analogy.--Mark Miller (talk) 09:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
And by the way....telling me to "waste time" is redundant. You wasted mine. You might as well use your god like powers to ban me because if you have authorized an invalid OTRS ticket, blocked a concerned editor just for reverting you over it (a fucking sad ass excuse) and then declined my unblock request yourself....then maybe it is I who have made the wrong choices and am fooling myself about Commons. Thank you for the demonstration of how this entity works.--Mark Miller (talk) 09:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

== When I am unblocked, Wikimedia may need to get some shit in order. ==

As I intend to bring this up in all the proper locations and the issues it involves. Blocking me only says, "Fuck you, we don't give a shit how much you support us or contribute to us.....we have our favorites that can do nothing wrong......even if we have to trump up their claims". That is the accusation that only verification can confirm or deny. OTRS is here for a reason. If it is the claim of the blocking editor that I have done something wrong besides reverting their unsubstantiated claims, I would love to hear it. That isn't something I expect to be forthcoming.--Mark Miller (talk) 09:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

You have editwarred and therfore the block itself is valid. It does not matter if you are right or wrong, removing OTRS tags is NOT OK. You have to ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard brefore removing tags. Apart from that, you used a strong language here such as "fucking shit". Don't do that again. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Yep. Can't argue any of that. Nutting up never looks good does it. Not a pretty site to see and is absolutely not following the rule of not being a jerk, although I am not clear about the strong language issue. Is commons censored in a manner (I would suppose by consensus) that such language is not at all acceptable here?
I apologize for my edit warring and removal of OTRS ticket. I do not know the guidelines or policies of Commons in this regard. I am familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and that the two are separate entities, but Wikimedia Commons should be respected in the same manner even if their procedures differ. I also am not familiar with who are admin and who are not, or what powers and tools they have here. I have only ever once discussed dispute resolution for commons and it was not something editors seemed interested in.
Even if I am encountering issues with a particular editor on or off Wikimedia Commons, dragging disputes from one location to another is something I do not agree with. It shouldn't be done from Commons to Wikipedia, and it shouldn't be done from Wikipedia to commons. Man...not like I need to add fodder for wikipediocracy. LOL!
The very fact that it was a temp block also seems that there was certainly an over reaction of such a classic sort.....I almost want to chisel this in stone for my own memory if no other reason. OK...well back to the purpose of being here. Uploading images.--Mark Miller 04:43, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Mark Miller,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)