User talk:BevinKacon

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, BevinKacon!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Hyperedge[edit]

Hi BevinKacon, you recently marked two of my images as copyright violations, * File:Moon Base.png and * File:Moon Base 720p.png. I don't know much about copyright laws, but I believe I have the ability to put the images on Wikipedia, considering I was the one who created the images on Khan Academy. The link for the program can be found here: Moon Base. If you could explain why the images are copyright, I would greatly appreciate it. --Hyperedge (talk) 23:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for bringing those copyright violations I uploaded to my attention, I've nominates them all for deletion now as they are all in fact derivative works ans I highly doubt that any of them are old enough to be in the public domain. Have a nice day. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Erik Nussbicker[edit]

Hi BevinKacon, I've reverted/removed your speedy-tags of the "Erik Nussbicker"-images, not because they might be wrong, but because the regular DR is still ongoing and as they don't seem to be blatant copyvios. --Túrelio (talk</span>) 09:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Palmyra Syria.png[edit]

Thank you for your message. I'm always checking and citing the sources of images before uploading them to commons, so I wanted to check how it could happen, that an image was violating any rights. So I can learn how to avoid this mistake if it happened. But I'm not able to see my uploading edit anymore. Is there a way to find my cited sources, that means, to make my uploading edit visible for me? Greeting,--Anglo-Araneophilus~commonswiki (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Patel Gamer 1.png[edit]

Good spot on this copyright violation. I´ve found more proof to it and added on this image page as the following commentary, "Also, flickr uploader admits that "pictures were randomly found on the net, they were not taken by me", to take any doubts that might appeared, like mine as i always thought that this image was a self made work. Tm (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:MinotaurOnGoblinSword.png and File:ShadowTempleOnGoblinSword.png[edit]

Hello.

KevinBacon, I am writing to you because you've deleted two of the images that I've uploaded for an article on Wikipedia named Goblin Sword. I apologise for uploading copyrighted material. I did not realise that even a screenshot of the game would be under copyright, regardless of my knowledge about copyright laws.

Thank you CrayonS (talk) 11:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Photoshop-screenshot.JPG[edit]

Please do not revert the deletion request template any more. Converting speedy deletions into regular DRs is now a valid form of objection to speedy deletion per a discussion at the admins' noticeboard. Please feel free to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photoshop-screenshot.JPG though. De728631 (talk) 21:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative works of Mirai Suenaga[edit]

These files are derivative works of File:Mirai Suenaga with solar marine uniform by Koizumi Amane 20130312 3.jpg (https://www.flickr.com/photos/dannychoo/8551083870), CC-BY-SA-2.0 licensed. --Solomon203 (talk) 11:36, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi User:Solomon203, dannychoo provides the original artist as Koizumi Amane, only they can release the work under a free license.--BevinKacon (talk) 17:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Spice Greene and Bruce Willis.jpg[edit]

Hello. What do you want to be cropped?Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:02, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

I did it myself, but thank you. I needed to use Template:Extract.--BevinKacon (talk) 16:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

I'm still not quite familiar with policies here. Many thanks about CSD G7! -- Hal 09:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Alyssa Sutherland.jpg[edit]

Hi. I uploaded the file, but i'm not the author. As you say me, i must provide "from or who created it". That's what i did.... If you go to: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alyssa_Sutherland.jpg , you can find de source (http://vikings.wikia.com/wiki/File:Alyssa_Sutherland.jpg). Following the link, you'll see a tab called "File History". There you will see the author. I would like to link directly, but i can't get the url ... Thanks --Astur (talk) 11:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Images[edit]

I don't understand this site, if I put the image, said that I'm violating even with the exact descriptions. Many wikis warned me that before putting any image must enter a description where you found this image to have no problems and I am doing this. Sincerely I don't know what to do. ChristopherPAraujo (talk) 13:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Justin Bieber Miami Beach Police Department March 04, 2014.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Justin Bieber Miami Beach Police Department March 04, 2014.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Justin Bieber Miami Beach Police Department March 04, 2014.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Justin Bieber Miami Beach Police Department March 04, 2014.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 17:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Please don't edit war on that page.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

No need, admin will just revert it again when the time comes.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Women In Tech - 63 (22532111725).jpg[edit]

I await your response at User talk:Pigsonthewing#File:Women In Tech - 63 (22532111725).jpg. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:26, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh, it was tagged because the meta data says all rights reserved and the author doesn't match the source.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Nice work[edit]

Catching the promotional garbage - thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:10, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Quite easy when they describe images as "my company logo" or "our company" etc.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Nominating PD-text tweets[edit]

Stop nominating PD-text tweets for deletion. Just stop it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: The onus isn't on me to edit and upload replacements to make it compliant with Commons policies. With the screenshots containing Twitter profile photographs, you can either revert yourself, or remove the photographs. Adding Template:Non-free frame revdel should get the old versions deleted too.
The majority are of questionable scope, so would likely only delay their deletion anyway.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
You don't (yet) understand the scope of Commons. It goes beyond Wikipedia. As I said in the edit notice: "PD-text, if you disagree, nominate". I didn't say "PD-text, if you disagree, go to edit war with me and see who will win". Because of that, I will roll back those "dw no source since" speedy deletion tags. You could nominate if you must, but it's a bad idea. It would be much wiser to start a discussion about such tweets in general to get consensus on the subject. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Nothing to do with scope, the screenshots contain a photo, of which no source \ licensing information has been provided. Pretty straight forward. Unlikely a DR would overrule core policies.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Abiyahmed.jpg[edit]

Hello BevinKacon, I noticed that I was given a final warning from you because the images I uploaded are considered not a work of mine. I sincerely apologize for uploading such material. I did not know about the CC licensing rules and that a cropped picture taken from a copyrighted picture would be under copyright protection. I apologize for any inconvinience. Thanks

Cat Stevens and 2959 others[edit]

Dear BevinKacon, You added a tag ("missing evidence of permission") with 3 photographs of Cat Stevens from Beeld & Geluid Wiki (the Netherlands). These files are not missing evidence of permission. They form part of a collection of thousands of photographs made available by Beeld & Geluid (Hilversum) in collaboration with Wikimedia Commons. See the Commons page made by User:85jesse (working at Beeld & Geluid) in case of doubt. At present the Category:Media from Beeld en Geluid Wiki holds 2962 images, used 7682 times on Wiki. Please remove the 3 tags or start deletion requests. Vysotsky (talk) 19:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

See also here (in the English Wikipedia, on the official cooperation). Vysotsky (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Files tagged as "Source of derivative work is not properly indicated"[edit]

Hello there

Those files are purely created by Quince Media (us). Not sure who else do we need to tag as a original copyright holder? Since iphone is on most of them do we need to tag the Apple?

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quincemedia (talk • contribs) 07:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Tekken7 Logo.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tekken7 Logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Non-free logo. Copyright holder: Bandai Namco Entertainment
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The1337gamer (talk) 11:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Tekken7 Logo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tekken7 Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Crop[edit]

Hello.You can crop yourself using CropTool.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Home Theater 1.jpg[edit]

Hi. You have put a warning on this file. Can you please be more specific on what's wrong with it? Is it the image on the television screen? NPat318 (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

@NPat318: yes and posters.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:22, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

این یک اثر اشتقاقی نیست[edit]


سلام دوست عزیزم
شما چطور این عکس رو یک اثر اشتقاقی تشخیص دادید؟
اینجا ایران است. چیزی به اسم کپی رایت و مالکیت معنوی وجود ندارد. این یک پلاکارد مرسوم است در دست یک انسان عادی. این پلاکارد ها به تعداد بی شمار در راهپیمایی در دست مردم استفاده میشود. حتی فتوشاپ، عکس روی پلاکارد، طرح های روی پلاک و حتی فونت روی این پلاکارد خریداری نشده و از نسخه های رایگان و کرک شده استفاده شده. در عین حال اگر مدیری که میخواهد آن را حذف کند تشخیص دهد که یک اثر انشقاقی است من احترام میگذارم
از شما متشکرم به خاطر بررسی. شما به تشخیص خودتون عمل کردید

@Mostafameraji: Commons:FOP#Iran says otherwise.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:22, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

User notifications[edit]

Please notify uploaders of problematic files. Help:Gadget-UserMessages is very helpful in this task. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Will do.--BevinKacon (talk) 12:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Mass CSD tagging[edit]

Inserting "{{SD|1=F10|2=user page cat batch}}"

This is a horrible idea and I'll bothering COM:REFUND again real soon. Please respond. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Notifying you about Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#BevinKacon and CSD F10. It's about you for this particular mass speedy tagging, but also about CSD F10 in general. Because of the latter, I opened the ANU thread. Without your examples, it would have been an AN thread. I believe the issue with F10 is greater than your mass taggings, that's why I opened a noticeboard thread and not merely discuss it on your talk page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:16, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for letting everyone know you disagree with a new policy.--BevinKacon (talk) 12:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Redundant deletion tagging[edit]

Hello BevinKacon, I checked my watchlist this afternoon to notice a series of edits like these : Special:Diff/326340917, shortly following my edits which were already nominating them for deletion. My question is: why? I'm one of the admins that delete most G10s, and I deemed that set not qualifying for G10, but either way, it'll most likely be deleted in a few days anyway. It would be more worthwhile to go through other categories to find other images to nominate for deletion instead of adding a different deletion tag on images already slated for deletion. Thanks. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

To speed up the DR closure and reduce DR backlog.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Dove Cameron and Cameron Boyce talking about Descendants 2.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Dove Cameron and Cameron Boyce talking about Descendants 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: tv screenshot
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Zac Efron and Zendaya in 2017.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Zac Efron and Zendaya in 2017.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: tv screenshot see first version
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Zac Efron and Zendaya Coleman in 2017.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Zac Efron and Zendaya Coleman in 2017.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: tv screenshot with no exif see first version
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Sam Claflin & Shailene Woodley.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sam Claflin & Shailene Woodley.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: tv screenshot, no exif, see first version
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Aircraft Photos[edit]

Hello.I can remove watermarks from all aircraft Photos and more but two days later.If there is no hurry, please remove the templates and let me do it all.Greetings ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:32, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi @ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: there is no hurry to remove the watermark or the templates, please take your time. Thanks.--BevinKacon (talk) 16:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Did you remove my response by accident or intentionally? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Kiev Major 2017.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kiev Major 2017.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: not own work, stolen from [1] as seen by higher res and quality
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi KevinBacon. I am the original author of the photo. I've updated my site to reflect that the photo was released into the public domain, so it is suitable for inclusion on Wikimedia Commons. Could the file please be undeleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watbe (talk • contribs) 22:47, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 11:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of two files[edit]

Hey BevinKacon, I understand the request for deletion of File:Sandra Naujoks 2011.jpg and File:Moritz Kranich 2011.jpg. But are you sure that the source image File:Nations Cup London Winner Team Germany.jpg was deleted correctly? I am pretty sure it was under a correct license. Maybe the license what just valid in Germany because the file was imported from the german wikipedia, as you can see here. Greetings and merry christmas, M-B (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC).

I had no part in the deletion of the original file, if you'd like it reviewed, file a COM:UDR.--BevinKacon (talk) 12:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
@M-B: source (in 2013 at the time of upload, may have changed later) was "Deutscher Poker Sportbund", permission was "Deutscher Poker Sportbund" and the author was Juergen Bachmann. That raises questions. If the image was http://www.hochgepokert.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Nations-Cup-London-Winner-Team-Germany.jpg it may also have been deleted because of the trophy. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Yes that was the picture. For me it is important to say that I have not uploaded any copyrighted picture. I was banned before because of a similiar case where I just cropped a picture which was later marked as copyright. -- M-B (talk) 23:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

About my images that you are confused about,[edit]

Hi, I just got the message that some of the images I have have been put on the deletion notice board, and since there appears to be confusion, I'll explain.

Firstly, File:Wilmington Delaware Skyline.png. I uploaded this image way back when and I didn't see a copyright logo so I assumes it would be okay to use. I have removed it from the List of Tallest Buildings in Wilmington, Delaware article just to be safe in case it was copyright because back then, I didn't know better.

Secondly, File:Comcast Innovation and Technology Center.jpg can be found on my personal Flickr account. The link is here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/146875064@N03/31512090804/in/dateposted-public/

Third, the rest of the images were taken by some fellow members on a development forum website that can be found at http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=72398 and I think it was ok to use them here so I did.

I hope this clears some confusion about these images and if these images are still not okay on wikipedia, I am very sorry and I do not want to violate any policies. Thank's for the notice and have a great day! Jonesrmj (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)jonesrmj

Francesco Braia di Corradi[edit]

hello Mr. BevinKacon, I am writing to ask you if you could submit the deleted files of this user, to the commons undeletion request,

I tell you because among the various deleted files, there are many images of pd license, including many paintings of excellent quality, since she recently asked for a file restore about the work of this user --87.8.55.132 01:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, who is writing you is a well known vandal that persists committing copyvios and harassment here on Commons. Please ignore the message above. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 09:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

File:SS1.png[edit]

Hi,

I own the company that is developing this game and all of the content you marked for deletion. We wish for those screenshots and content you marked to be open to the web for anyone to use, view, or anything else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IversonBLC (talk • contribs) 20:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Photo à problème ?[edit]

Bonjour BevinKacon,

Je ne parle pas anglais, donc je m'exprime en français. J'ai remarqué que vous avez apposé un message sur cette photo. Apparemment elle pose problème, peut-être à cause des publicités sur le grand écran de télévision ! En tous les cas si cette photo contrevient aux règles de Wikimedia Commons et bien supprimez-là. Maintenant si je peux faire quelque chose pour arranger cela dites-le-moi, mais en français, si vous le pouvez.

Cordialement --Jamain (talk) 07:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Wukoki Introduction.jpg[edit]

I saw this introduction outside the NATIONAL monument, assumed it is a US Gov work, and uploaded it to Commons. After seeing your copyright notice, I did a quick search on the internet, and this pdf published by National Park Service was the closest thing I could get. Do you think the art work is in PD? If so, what should I write in the licensing part? (talk) 22:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

[edit]

Aha... beszélj magyarul, utána jelöld törlésre. A szerző neve is ott van.--BlueBizarrrd (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Re: Source of derivative work is not properly indicated[edit]

Te escribo en español porque mi inglés es lamentable. Estoy desconcertada con el borrado de estas imágenes, tomadas por una amiga con su celular. Entiendo que la obra derivada sea borrada pero ¿por qué borraron las otras? por baja resolución? Es lo mejor que pudo hacer mi amiga con su celular venezolano... José Ledezma es un maestro venezolano, ya con más de 80 años de edad, no creo tener muchas oportunidades de tomarle una buena foto. Saludos, Laura Fiorucci (talk) 21:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Buddha 1950s postcard.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Buddha 1950s postcard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 12:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

User:BevinKacon/Badstock6[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
User:BevinKacon/Badstock6 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gbawden (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring over "Original" template[edit]

BevinKacon do not edit war over things on Commons. You were bold to add it, you got reverted, and now it is up to you to justify putting it back. Just putting it back without consensus is edit warring. You don't seem to understand what the {{Original}} template is for, nor do you understand the value of a 16-bit image.

Firstly, the template was intended for Wikisource. For example File:Noções elementares de archeologia fig189.png is a scan of a page of a book that is now at Wikisource. It is also used to mark obsolete maps for example File:United Arab Emirates-CIA WFB Map.png is from the 2004 CIA World Factbook and shouldn't be updated to a modern map. There is no sense that this TIFF is "obsolete". It is superior to all other formats we have since the smooth tonal graduations are handled well by the 16-bit data. In contrast all 8-bit files will suffer from banding artefacts and some degree of dithering. The lossy compressed files will also suffer from JPG artefacts. This is the kind of image that really benefits from 16-bit. If someone was to use Photoshop to modify this image, then they will certainly want to work with the 16-bit file, as any kind of modification to the 8-bit file will greatly increase the risk of artefacts being visible.

Commons is a repository, we do not make judgements about what users do to with our files. We have the Other versions field and the category field to indicate that there are other images to choose from. You also seem upset this is "uncropped" as though your square crops are inherently superior. The creator of this image presumably felt the aspect ratio used has some purpose or aesthetic merit. Let's leave it for re-users to crop images. Even Wikipedia markup can present a cropped thumb without having to create one on Commons.

A situation where the "Original" template might be useful for the black hole image is if the ESO published an even better, sharper image in 2020.

Please will you revert your incorrect use of this template.

Btw, your File:Black hole - Messier 87 crop max res.webp is only 224 pixels high. And an 8-bit png is only 20% smaller than an 8-bit zip-compressed tif. Such a difference may be important if you are storing lots of images, but for a single image, is not "far inferior". The reason this file is so large is the excellent 16-bit quality. -- Colin (talk) 10:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi User:Colin, can we use Template:Superseded instead if I supply correctly lossless uncropped PNG? I am looking to provide something, as a 93+ MB TIF isn't great for typical uses.
File:Black hole - Messier 87 crop max res.webp is not 224 high, it's a mediawiki bug.
Please review my edits to File:1000 Year Temperature Comparison on SpringerImages.jpg and File:British Columbia Regiment 1940 original.jpg.--BevinKacon (talk) 08:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
The problem is your view that a 8-bit file supersedes or should be used in preference to a 16-bit file does not hold for many cases. An 8-bit PNG isn't lossless compared to an 16-bit TIF. The former has 256 shades of red, green and blue to work with; the latter 65536. That's 256 times less precision: huge information loss. If someone simply wants an image to stick on a website then they'll pick the JPG we already offer as an alternative version. If someone wants to stick the file into Photoshop and work on it, the 8-bit file is dreadful, no matter which compression format you pick. The only time the 16-bit file could be regarded as superseded is if there is another 16-bit image format with better compression that Commons supports and a wide variety of editing tools supports. A 16-bit tiff is considered the highest quality interchange format in photography. Considering that folk are happy to stream HD or 8K videos these days, most folk will not find 93MB a problem at all. Other than download size, there is no reason why anyone would choose to use the PNG: for web purposes the JPG is quite sufficient. -- Colin (talk) 19:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. And of course, you were right about the dithering in the "original" 8-bit that ESO offered. -- Colin (talk) 08:44, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Copyright[edit]

The image I used was from an article Kingofsting87 (talk) 19:53, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Check[edit]

...now ok? PicTrans (talk) 19:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Director Simerjit Singh With Actor Amrinder Gill (cropped).jpg[edit]

Sir, you have nominated the file for deletion. I am not the author of picture I just cropped it. The author of this picture has uploaded many other pictures from sets and it seems to be his own work. It doesn’t seems to be to scan of the magazine means quality of the image seems to be orignal content. Please, help sir. SangrurUser (talk) 00:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

User:SangrurUser, cropping a photo does not make you the original source or the new copyright holder, you must get the original file restored by asking the deleting admin or using COM:UNDEL.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

File:The cast of The Simpsons attends the unveiling of The Simpsons stamps.jpg[edit]

I reverted your tag for two reasons. First, I wasn't sure of your reasoning. Second, if this image is a problem, what about File:Simpsons voice actors.jpg uploaded by @Scorpion0422~commonswiki: back in 2010? The second image doesn't have the character images I'm guessing you find problematic.

Thanks. Evrik (talk) 14:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Civility Barnstar Hires.png The Civility Barnstar
Appreciate your picking up on photos of documents. All photos are from the following sources: old postcards whose copyright have expired, government documents at National Central Library, Taiwan (equiv to Library of congress), or object (porcelain or stamps) belonging to me.

I am not proficient enough in wiki speak to properly syntax the above. Would very much appreciate your help by example.

Thanks, Ed QSandai (talk) 14:37, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy tagging files already in the deletion queue[edit]

Why do you add copyvio tags to files that already have a DR open or "no permission since" waiting to run out? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Because they are blatant copyvios with no possibility of being kept.--BevinKacon (talk) 15:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
You too make mistakes you know. Some would. And the DR won't close itself, it just becomes a DR that can't possibly be discussed if the file is deleted. So now one admin needs to handle your copyvio tag and another admin still has to handle the DR. That's just creating workload, in a way a form of forum shopping. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:29, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Wrong, User:Krdbot closes the DR.--BevinKacon (talk) 15:34, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Images on the "BitLife" app page[edit]

Hello, All the images of mine which you deleted off of the BitLife page, which included the following...

File:BitLife yellow skin emoji.jpg

File:BitLife Reddit community.jpg

File:BitLife driving test.jpg

File:BitLife first kiss.jpg

File:Warsaw, Poland in BitLife.jpg

File:BitLife Area 51 pop up.jpg

File:BitLife sexuality identifier.jpg

File:BitLife relationships tab with main character.jpg

File:BitLife relationships tab.jpg

File:BitLife character stat bars.jpg

File:BitLife leprechaun occupation .jpg

File:BitLife gravestone.jpg

...were images I screenshoted of the BitLife app myself while playing. All of them were my own original images. Now if a screenshot of app for an image counts as a copyright violation, then I can see where you justified taking them down. However if it's not, then there's no reason why they should have been deleted, especially given the developers of BitLife (who would own any such copyright of my screenshots if such copyright existed) actively encourage you to post screenshots of the game online while playing with their own buttons that they have implemented into the game.

Sincerely, Psherman122

Es ist ist überhaupt nicht hilfreich[edit]

ohne Begründung bei ineligible Medien einen Schutz zu behaupten. Eröffne eine Löschdiskussion oder LASS ES! --Historiograf (talk) 12:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Castell sprichwort.JPG[edit]

Hi BevinKacon, I was asked to review your {{No permission}} tagging of File:Castell sprichwort.JPG. I've reverted it as it does not appear to be helpful to ask for a permission in {{PD-ineligible}} cases. In such cases, a regular deletion request should be opened if there is serious doubt that a file is below the threshold of eligibility for copyright. I've added an English description to this file which provides a little bit more background to this particular case. I hope this helps. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Captain america expo (cropped).jpg[edit]

look at the section Description, and you will see :

Source : Derivative from File:Captain america expo.JPG
link of the original image in Commons : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Captain_america_expo.JPG
Author (of the original image in Commons) : Ivan bea

that it currently specify who created the original work.--Zugmoy (talk) 07:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Advice[edit]

You really need to avoid adding copyright violations and out of scope files like this to your user page. Thanks. 1989 (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Fixed.--BevinKacon (talk) 15:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

I recommend that you become a license reviewer. Requests is this way. 1989 (talk) 13:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Hello, thanks for letting me know I violate copyright laws and I will delete that picture immediatelly!

Dominik Prymus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominik Prymus (talk • contribs) 14:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Agree to delete[edit]


Hello my dear friend.

I accept deleting the file.

This is a divisive work.

Thanks

This letter has been translated with Google.
(Mostafameraji (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC))

David Goodhart at UCL[edit]

File:David Goodhart at UCL, November 2015 crop.jpg

Hi, I am here to discuss your tag on this file. I really thank you for writing an elaborate edit summary explaining the concern. I see that this has a free license. I cant see the deleted image, so appreciate if you can clarify why this has to be deleted.

FYI I also tried discussing this concern with BMK at en:File talk:David Goodhart at UCL, November 2015 en-wiki.jpg where he believes that this file is acceptable for Wikipedia. It may be possible that the file is ineligible for both. DBigXray 10:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Ping the deleting admin User:JuTa if he can throw some light on the problem that led to the deletion. DBigXray 07:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
It was cropped from File:David Goodhart at UCL, November 2015.jpg which has been deleted by Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Matthisvalerie. This made the image without a source. reagrds --JuTa 08:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you bevin[edit]


Hello. Thank you for your review (My Photos).

(Mostafameraji (talk) 07:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC))

File:MWC 147 Close-up.jpg[edit]

Hi BevinKacon, did you intentionally nominate the higher-res version be replaced by the lower-res version of that image? --Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Túrelio, yes, it's not higher-res it's upscaled, see ESO website, also that is why text at corner is mess.--BevinKacon (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Ok, ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 15:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Intrigued...[edit]

How are you finding the Getty ones? Face-smile.svg and thanks --Herby talk thyme 16:07, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

I use a mix of external tools and very long searches.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Clarification[edit]

Hi BevinKacon. You tagged my photo File:Digital control screen Tesla Model 3 DCA 08 2018 0268.jpg for DW containing an "image within an image". The additional source you are requesting is for the car's tablet control panel or for the map shown in the digital screen? If the latter, if I blur the image shown in the tablet would that satisfy your concern about Copyvio? Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 13:35, 30 November 2019 (UTC) By the way, can you check this one: File:Cybertruck.jpg por posible copyvio, I am not sure the YouTube license can be use that way. Thx.Mariordo (talk) 13:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

It is from a stolen unfree video, COM:LL, so tagged.--BevinKacon (talk) 16:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
I already fixed the problem (blurred all contents within the screen). Could you please check it out? Thx.--Mariordo (talk) 01:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Yes.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanx[edit]

for your "replacing raw old http to internal link of png links". May I tell you that it might habe been better to write{{F|...}}or{{F|...|+}}instead of[[:File:...]]? And in the special case of |Source= the best would have been to change into|Source={{Own based|...}}.But anyway, thank you for making things better! -- sarang사랑 08:18, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Every situation is different, removing http and shortening it to internal link is most useful.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Deletion[edit]

I appreciate your feedback but I only removed the deletion tags from the photos I uploaded that were not at all from Google Maps Street View screenshots while leaving the deletion tags on the ones that are Google Maps Street View screenshots. Wikipedia User WMSR is repeatedly harassing me and falsely/unfairly accusing me of only having screenshots from Google Maps, which is not the case. I do not even know if WMSR is even a real wikipedia user or just some sort of bot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor of Directions (talk • contribs) 01:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

morning[edit]

honey, you marked my files for deletion, reasoning they are unfree screenshots. I let you teach me how they can be done free. kisses. --Abkhazian1 (talk) 20:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Deep_learning_meme.png and File:Soweego_poster_wikidatacon2019.pdf[edit]

Hey @BevinKacon: thanks for the heads-up about User_talk:Hjfocs#Source_of_derivative_work_is_not_properly_indicated:_File:Deep_learning_meme.png and User_talk:Hjfocs#Source_of_derivative_work_is_not_properly_indicated:_File:Soweego_poster_wikidatacon2019.pdf. I did my best to update the source information and would appreciate if you could double-check that and eventually remove the derivative work template. The latter file should be totally fine, while I'm not completely sure about the former: just let me know what you think. Best, --Hjfocs (talk) 16:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

I reverted Soweego poster, but the other one has movie screenshots which Piotr Migdal has no permission to relicense, and the original source is still missing for each pane.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

File:IronException_2b2t_Spawn_Render_July_2019.png[edit]

Hey @BevinKacon:, I replaced your speedy deletion request with a regular deletion request because I'm quite sure it isn't truly a copyright violation. This is my first time doing something like this, so please let me know if I did it wrong. I totally see how it just looks like an arbitrary video game screenshot but I had permission from the author, and he released it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL for this specific purpose. Thanks! Leijurv (talk) 22:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

dupe-merge[edit]

Hi BevinKacon, is there a specific reason why you asked[2] the higher-resolution version be merged into (replaced by) the lower-resolution version? --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Same reason as you asked before at User_talk:BevinKacon#File:MWC_147_Close-up.jpg.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Baluarte de Santo Domingo (Cafe del mar) (cropped).jpg[edit]

Thank you for detecting that file, and for warning me. I wish you a Merry Christmas and a New Year. Face-smile.svg Greetings. --Hispano76 (talk) 20:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

JPS68 upload[edit]

Hello, can you explain how, or why File:Mogettes de Vendée.jpg is showing the same problem raised with JPS86 aka Varaine? Thank you.--BevinKacon (talk) 08:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, i have no explanation. Marianne Casamance (talk) 09:34, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
What is youur really problems with all thoses files ? Marianne Casamance (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
I could not explain what could have happened. I always put my own photos online, without any corrections. for a short time, JPS68 used my computer, due to a breakdown of its own. Did he take advantage of it to use my account, without telling me? I couldn't say. Marianne Casamance (talk) 10:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
There is not 13 years of loading in question, the problem, if there is a problem, could only arise over 2 or 3 days, in 13 years! Marianne Casamance (talk) 10:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

JPS68 had access to my computer only in the 2nd quarter of 2016. My password has been changed since this time. I will check this week end the files which I am sure are not my fault, because obviously, I have changed my own photos, during the same period. I let you know quickly. Marianne Casamance (talk) 14:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

This is not true, both File:Mogettes de Vendée.jpg and File:Poulet farci du Gâtinais.jpg were uploaded outside of Q2 2016. All 2016 is suspect, which is around 30% of your uploads.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
You may have a look on Category:Files may uploaded by JPS68 with Marianne Casamance account. I have grouped together the photos which, for me, must be loads by JPS68. Concerning the others, you have no way of asserting that they are not mine, or in agreement with the freedom of rights, for old postcards. If you touch the other files, you would do it against the Wikipedia principles, which you imply wanting to serve. Marianne Casamance (talk) 16:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Panneaux.png[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your effort on combating copyright violations. Please note when marking copyright violations, please give out relevant links if possible, such as the file's source page or Google image search results. Please mark it after |=source=, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:07, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

If it's available on 20 different websites already, and uploader is claiming own work, it's not needed.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Teror, Gran Canaria (32434720647).jpg[edit]

I can not comment since you deleted the File:Teror, Gran Canaria (32434720647).jpg before I had a chance to see which one it is. Bengt Nyman (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images/Archive 6#Deleted account cleanup[edit]

Hi. I’ve tagged this to remove the page from the edit protected category. I’ll work on it tomorrow or perhaps the weekend because there are so many accounts. -Green Giant (talk) 20:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Statue of Frank Pantridge cropped.jpg[edit]

Dear BevinKacon. I stand accused of "not having indicated the source of an incorporated work" concerning the file "Statue of Frank Partridge cropped.jpg". All I did was cropping the file "Statue of Frank Partridge.jpg" stored in Wikimedia. I believed that photo to have been taken and submitted to Wikimedia by the eminent Wikipedian User:Bazonka, who edits since about 15 years, has more than 51,365 edits to his credit, lots of barnstars and other honours. I see now that this file is credited to User:Lecochonbleu. I did not add anything to this photo. So what source should I acknowledge other than user Bazonka or Lecochonbleu?

I write to you among others because I have cropped several other files and submitted them as separate images on Wikimedia. I guess these are just as likely to be deleted as this one, and I would like to learn what to do in such cases. If the File reserved-word had a Crop parameter, I would gladly use that.

Or is it that you want to delete the non-cropped image for copyright violation and mine is then just affected as a consequence? The statue is surely not very old, but it belongs to Lisburn municipality and stands in the public space in front of the conference centre. I cannot imagine that the municipality would object.

I am a newby and still on an endless learning curve, being surprised each time by all the things forbidden in Wikipedia and all the menaces one receives ("the use of discretionary sanctions has been authorized ...") when trying to contribute. Thanks for your time and for looking after these photos. It must be quite a job. Humbly yours Johannes Schade (talk) 20:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I have no objection to my photos being cropped and re-used... however, I'm fairly sure that's not my photo of Pantridge. (I put 3 photos of the statue on Commons, all taken in fairly poor lighting - this cropped one is a much better picture.) I can't find the uncropped version of this photo on Commons or elsewhere. Bazonka (talk) 22:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Back blows picture[edit]

Hello. I have found a message in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Back_blows_against_choking_in_adult.jpg that doesn't sound very good. It would be valid according to https://shutterstock.com/license clause 1. Anyway, I thank any guide in case of any problem. The picture is quite necessary so I will need some time at least. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helper ya (talk • contribs) 04:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Deletions[edit]

Hello!

See Special:Diff/408571860. {{SD|COM1}} should be used for deletion requests.Jonteemil (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

G1 criteria covers accidental page creations fine.--BevinKacon (talk) 16:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
If the case was accidental creation I guess G1 works (eventhough I prefer COM1). I don't remember the content though and since it has been deleted I can't see.Jonteemil (talk) 12:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyright[edit]

You recently marked my image as a violation of copyright about a screenshot of a game character. This character is my own avatar an I created myself so I thought that I could use it freely. Maybe I am just wrong and I can’t upload this image? Respond me Denbra37 Denbra37 (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Francisco de Miranda by Tovar y Tovar.jpg[edit]

I reverted your revertion on File:Francisco de Miranda by Tovar y Tovar.jpg, because replacement with higher resolution versions of the same file --Wilfredor (talk) 18:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

@Wilfredor:, Artificially upscaling or enlarging using any tool, including AI-based or deep learning services was recently added, your edit summary says "upscaling AI" - would you revert yourself?--BevinKacon (talk) 18:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Oh ok, you was right. Thanks I did not know this new rule --Wilfredor (talk) 19:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Minecraft shader image[edit]

Hello. I have recently added an image to an article about Minecraft mods. You described it as copyrighted, because "unfree video game screenshot". I do not understand that, because: 1. I made sure the image comes from a website, which has only photos free from copyrighting claims, 2. there are a lot of paid-game screenshots in Wikipedia articles. Could you please explain it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szymioza (talk • contribs) 22:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Any image you upload as your "own work" when you've actually copied it from a website will be immediately deleted, you'll need to read COM:FAQ, thanks.--BevinKacon (talk) 15:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Help Desk[edit]

Inre to this - I don't believe I asked you for your opinion nor do I believe I asked "should I leave these images alone?" ... so your comment wasn't needed, wanted or even helpful.
If you have nothing of help to say then kindly move on and allow someone to reply who will be of help. –Davey2010Talk 00:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You did actually ask for any users opinion by posting in that location.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I asked for other editors help, I didn't ask for their opinions per se, Whether you or anyone else on the project believes they should be left alone is irrelevant to me as either way the images were going to be reuploaded so my goal was find out the best method to use not whether they should be uploaded at all. Happy editing. –Davey2010Talk 15:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Question about GPL[edit]

Hello BevinKacon, I am wondering what you mean about being unable to relicense a image created in a GPL program as CC-BY-SA? If I created an image by drawing in GIMP, for example, I don't believe that would be GPL, just as if I created an image in Photoshop, Adobe certainly wouldn't own it. Leijurv (talk) 01:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:Leijurv, as the software generated the image from data you have no authorship over, it could be argued there was no creative input from you. As it's the software that added the new data, the license of the software should be used. See Wikilegal/Sweat of the Brow. You could argue that neither licenses are valid, as the original data isn't yours, so should be deleted. If you produced a large mansion in Minecraft, I downloaded it, rendered it in Splunk with my own custom colors, I cannot relicense it under CC.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Ah. I don't really think that's true since there is many hours of effort required to world-download the area in the first place (2b's world is not publicly for download so you actually have to travel back and forth in-game to load the whole area), import it into the program, set up all the parameters for lighting, reflection, textures, etc etc, setup and position the camera, and babysit it while it raytraces for multiple days. And I am aware that you didn't really buy the de minimis argument in the first place. Thank you for explaining where you are coming from though and linking that policy! Leijurv (talk) 21:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
You can restore the CC licenses, I will not revert, but please keep the new description I added, thank you.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Deleted image[edit]

Hey, Bevin. You've recently deleted an image called File:SibiuPSDHeadquarters.png that I've posted on Commons.

I was aware the photo might get deleted because of copyright violation, but I've still added it after seeing that this photo is also from Google Maps, but didn't get deleted. So, why did mine get deleted? Could you explain, please? Lupishor (talk) 14:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:Lupishor, that file exists because an admin hasn't deleted it yet. Policies apply to all users.--BevinKacon (talk)

@BevinKacon: Thanks for answering. Is there any way to add Google Maps images? Lupishor (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:Lupishor, there is not, you would need to use OpenStreetMap instead.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Image submitted for deletion[edit]

Hey, I am not a license specialist, but please consider not deleting this file: 15px. In license there is "You can use in digital format on websites, blog posts, social media, advertisements, film and television productions, web and mobile applications, in printed materials such as magazines, newspapers, books, brochures, flyers, product packaging, for decorative use in your home, office or any public place, or personal use. For purposes of this agreement, “use” means to copy, reproduce, modify, edit, synchronize, perform, display, broadcast, publish, or otherwise make use of." Regards, Et4y (talk) 15:45, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

It also says

Restricted Uses.

  • No Unlawful Use. You may not use content in a pornographic ... manner.
  • No Standalone File Use. You may not use content in any way that allows others to download, extract, or redistribute content as a standalone file (meaning just the content file itself, separate from the project or end use).
  • No Use in Trademark or Logo. You may not use content as part of a trademark, design mark, tradename, business name, service mark, or logo.
  • No Products for Resale. You may not use content in connection with any goods or services intended for resale or distribution where the primary value lies in the content itself including, without limitation, cards, stationery items, paper products, calendars, apparel items, posters (printed on paper, canvas, or any other media), CDs, DVDs, mobile applications or other items for resale, license or other distribution for profit. This includes “on demand” products (meaning products in which content is selected by a third party for customization on such product on a made-to-order basis), including, without limitation, postcards, mugs, t-shirts, posters and other items (this includes the sale of products through custom designed websites, as well as sites such as zazzle.com and cafepress.com)
  • No Electronic Templates. You may not use content in electronic or digital templates intended for resale or other distribution (for example, website templates, business card templates, electronic greeting card templates, brochure design templates).
This makes it incompatible for here. Please do not upload any further images from this website. Thank you.--BevinKacon (talk) 15:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
OK. I just have a question - the fact that I changed the image resolution to just only 200x200 px from original 2048x1536 does not make it useable for wiki? -Et4y (talk) 15:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Clash of clan[edit]

I'm so sorry about this. Actually, my purpose is to make the article looking good. Why Wikipedia English only can upload it while the other Wikipedia can't upload. it's not fair. In Wikipedia, we must be sharing knowledge and maybe Wikipedia policies need to consider this. For example, the clash of clan logo only Wikipedia English can upload and I suggest this logo also can be used in other Wikipedia by putting permission. This is only a suggestion to improve Wikipedia. Sincerely NikoUMS (talk) 04:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Wanna reapply to Commons:License review/Requests?[edit]

I see you applied to Commons:License_review/Requests/Archive/2018#BevinKacon, but were turned down. However, it's been two years, and due to your excellent sleuthing at Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "Sky Brown" "UPROXX", I think you might be a great help to the project as a license reviewer. I mean - I'm a great help to the project (well, OK, some help to the project!), and you clearly spotted a video that I didn't, so I'd think you could help even more. Want to give it a try? --GRuban (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

That just lets me add the green box, I can already review files, so it seems unnecessary.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
How's that? You don't seem to be either an image reviewer or an administrator. Is there another way you get to mark files as reviewed? --GRuban (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Deletion is a form of review.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Face-sad.svg --GRuban (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

What about adminship? 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Pass, that may encourage me to spend more time here, when it should probably spend less.--BevinKacon (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Abusive CU case at de:wp[edit]

Hi BevinKacon, yesterday you issued a warning and nominated multiple recent uploads by PastorPeitl for deletion. You notified COM:AN/U which led to a block of two weeks for PastorPeitl. He has now opened an abusive and absurd CU request at de:wp where I have already posted a comment which provides some background. I am sorry for this and this is absolutely bizarre as you have no contributions at de:wp. I do not think that you need to add a comment. I will watch it and keep you informed. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 00:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi BevinKacon, sorry for the really "absurd" (like AFBorchert wrote) notification on de:WP; case is closed without any further action. Best regards --Rax (talk) 05:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC) (CU on de:WP)

Logos as spam[edit]

Awww… — you think some users love spam, BevinKacon? So cute. Well I for one think some other users are petty deletionist vandals, but let me strike that so that I can say I am all mellow and stuff. Oh, and that word "insane" in the o.p.? As one who was blocked for misusing a mental health slur against a swath of Commons’ users, I caution you to mind your language. -- Tuválkin 23:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

User messages[edit]

Please use Help:Gadget-UserMessages to notify users, for example, Dont advertise. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi EZ, that does not seem to offer a batch function. I can link to the criteria instead if you prefer.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:03, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Tupac Shakur.jpg[edit]

Hi BevinKacon,

I've reverted/removed your speedy-tags of the "File:Tupac Shakur.jpg", because this is not a copyright violation. Stock is free.

Please see Dreamstime Terms and conditions:


Public Domain (RF-CC0) Images

Dreamstime offers a large selection of images that it believes have entered the public domain, either through the copyright owner`s express dedication to the public domain (as described here), or for some other reason, such as expiration of copyrights. You are free to use public domain images you download from Dreamstime in any manner you choose, subject to our Sensitive Subject restrictions and provided you do not use them in connection with offering a service that is competitive to Dreamstime. Dreamstime offers no model or property releases in connection with any public domain image, and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Dreamstime will not provide any warranty or indemnity with respect to your use of any public domain image.[3]


Please review this.

Thanks.

--Santiago Plá Casuriaga (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Nokia3410.jpg[edit]

Dear BevinKacon,

Given the age of the publication (2007), I'm afraid the written permission I had in my mailbox disappeared since then. Feel free to delete it as it seems there are now many other pictures used to depict the object.

Kind regards, Vascer (talk) 16:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)


File:Faces of Doctor Who.jpg[edit]

Dear BevinKacon,

This was mine another unsuccessful attempt to upload mine photo. This time it was collage of all Doctor Who faces made by myself. I don't have permissions which you require so you can delete this file without waiting a week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lepo93 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Regards, Lepo, 21:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lepo93 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Fotos de Judit Benavente[edit]

Buenos dias

Se me ha etiquetado como procedencia dudosa un grupo de fotos que subi sobre la modelo Judit Benavente

Estos archivos tienen marcas de agua, fechas de elaboración y pagina Url de los mismos.

Entonces por que los borran?

Saludos

George — Preceding unsigned comment added by GEORGEB1989 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

File:BBS - The Documentary intro.jpg[edit]

This feels like you pressuring me into guarding my files here from capital punishment – because of whatever small inconvenience or error of form in how I documented the original license statement for that file that you are too lazy to fix yourself.

I don’t even know what exactly I’m supposed to do for you here – add a redundant quote of the license statement on the source site?.. Please go fix it for yourself.
Maybe here’s a more convenient second link for you: https://archive.org/details/BBS.The.Documentary
Here’s a quote of the licensing statement over on archive.org: “Usage Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States”
Or am I supposed to call the authors for you? Yes, they donated the whole ginormous documentary. It’s fuckin’ awesome. Maybe let the Internet explain you some details...--Reseletti (talk) 13:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)