User talk:Pibwl

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome! If you leave a message here, expect answer on your talk page, unless you specify otherwise.

Contents

...[edit]

Hi - is there a reason for removing categories from image-pages? As far as i can see, this is quite useful to create galleries efficiently. Why does this bother you? Categorizing images directly seems the only way to me to get a usable structure into the many uncategorized and unused images here. -- Duesentrieb 00:36, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Categorizing images directly is by some people preferred to creating pages for the images, because it is easier to maintain. I agree with this in many but not all cases. Anyway, I don't think that categorizing images directly does not do any harm, even if they are already on a gallery-page. Please have a look at the discussions about htis on the village pump, especially this one: COM:VP#Categories or 'normal' pages: A new proposal. -- Duesentrieb 01:22, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

French frigates[edit]

Hi ! Thanks for your interest in the photographs of the French Navy ! Just about the "destroyer" thing, the French navy doesn't use this term to categorise their vessels; there are "cruisers" (the only element of this category today is the Jeanne d'Arc, for what I know) and the others are classified as "frigates". It might sound a little bit underrated for the Tourville class or the La Fayette, but still that's the term; also, since the caption is directly taken from the original site (netmarine) and the English is supposed to be a translation, it might be better to stick to frigate, if you don't mind.

Oh, thanks for Image:French Navy1.jpg, I managed to identify them all (through other pictures). I'm very impressed by your correct ID of La Motte-Picquet, you'll have to explain to mw how you did that sometime !

Cheers ! :) Rama 00:17, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hello again ! I've just uploaded the last images:

  • on Image:FS Montcalm2.jpg one can easily identify the D642 Montcalm and the D645 La Motte Picquet (nice illustration of the difference between the ships which had the anti-air improvements and those who did not)
  • on Image:French Navy2.jpg you can see the hull number of the Dupleix D641, just on the right of the Var (the tanker). Not exactly easy, but readable if you zoom a little bit -- and if you know that you probably have to choose the last F70 type based in Toulon, which is D641 Dupleix (after D642 Montcalm, D643 Jean de Vienne and the D645 La Motte Picquet).
  • knowing this, you just have to re-compose the puzzle from Image:French Navy1.jpg and Image:French Navy2.jpg :)

Cheers ! Rama 23:04, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

T-4[edit]

Thanks! It's ok. --[[User:JProxy-Connection: keep-alive Cache-Control: max-age=0

|jno]] 09:20, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

deleted interwikis and transwikis on Hiryu[edit]

Note that the transclusion of the category Hiryu was not a typo on page Image:Hiryu burning.jpg

You may not have realized that this resulted in the removal of a half dozen interwiki links for each image, and captions from of different languages for this image. This results in poorer navigation, and makes access from internet search engines difficult if not impossible if no text for certain languages appear on the page. I have restored just the trans and interwikis. Removed the supercats using a noinclude, as their transclusion seems to be controversial ("redundant cats" camp vs. the "more see also links" camp)

Is this satisfactory? -Mak 22:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Actually, my use of categories in this way may not be the best way of achieving these goals. There is an ongoing conversation about it and I may come back and change this later to some other method of achieving the same. Anyway, just to let you know that this use of categories is very nonstandard and extremely controversial at this point. -Mak 19:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Order Nakhimov 1st.jpg[edit]

I have reuploaded the Official Design of the Order instead of a photograph to prevent possible copyright problems. If you have admin rights on Commons please delete all the versions of the image besides the latest Alex Bakharev 23:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Landing ship[edit]

If it can be of some help, the drawings of the Mistral, on Netmarine.net, were made by one of the fine people who gave us their blessing [1]. Cheers ! Rama 07:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Breguet 19.jpg[edit]

Witaj... zmieniłem licencję na "naszą" bo zasugerowałem się, przyznaję dość pobieżnie, oznaczeniem na kadłubie który wydał mi się znakiem eskadry kościuszkowskiej. Wcześniej licencja była inna, ale ponieważ wrzuciłem tę fotkę dość dawno, to nie pamiętam już szczegółów... Mój błąd, jeśli uważasz że nie da się jej odratować jakoś, to spoko, usuwaj, lub zgłoś ją do usunięcia. Pozdrawiam i sorki za tak późną odpowiedź, ale nie zaglądam tu zbyt często. Voytek s 09:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Varyag[edit]

Hi, I replied to your comment at Image talk:Cruiser Varyag in the Golden Horn Bay.png. Sorry it took so long—I didn't notice it right away. Thanks.Ezhiki 16:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


Przecież nie ma czegoś takiego jak zmiana nazwy dla grafiki załaduj ją jescze raz i starą w tedy skasuję, a poza tym nic więcej zrobić nie moŋe :(--WarX 20:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

hey[edit]

Just-do-it :)

--WarX 20:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image:Yak-38.jpg[edit]

I don't think that it is an art photo. However, I've uploaded it using the old tag "PD-USRR", that now has been changed. I found that picture on it.wiki with public domain tag and I've uploaded it on commons. Let me know what do you think. Bye! --SCDBob 20:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

dobrze, że cię widzę...[edit]

Czy mógłbyś wywalić stare wersje grafik:

Blokują cache i w artykułach wyświetlają się stare wersje... Julo 01:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Could you request this pronunciation file on pl for me?[edit]

I see that you speak Polish. If you could go here and request a pronunciation of the name Jan Matejko, and let me know if and when it's uploaded, it would be very much appreciated. Thanks! grendel|khan 05:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Could I also trouble you for pronunciations for Szymon Buchbinder and Maurycy Gottlieb? (Also, I think the Anglicized version of the former is 'Simeon', not 'Simon'; is this correct?) Thanks! grendel|khan 07:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

MiG-15[edit]

  • Co do usuwania - commons duże jest, więc nie myślałem :)
  • Co do maszyny - w internecie jest bardzo mało o tej maszynie. Muzealnicy opisali go właśnie jako MiGa-15. Jet to o tyle prawdopodobne, że Krzesiny były jednym z pierwszych miejsc gdzie stacjonowały te samoloty, właśnie te z dostaw z ZSRR, a większość maszyn do muzeum trafiło z jednostek wielkopolskich. Pozdrawiam Radomil talk 20:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

ItalyDefense images[edit]

Hi Pibwl, I found some images which were uploaded by you after May 23rd, 2006. Unless you can find (i.e. in archive.org) that these images had previously been released in the PD by the Ministero della Difesa, they will have to be proposed for speedy deletion, because that was the last evident date in which the content of www.difesa.it was expressely licensed as free. These images are:

I have to underline that even if some of them could probably fall in the so-called PD-Italy, that kind of PD is not recognised on Commons, so we need to find evidences that these images had been directly released in the PD by the MdD, as described in the Template:ItalyDefense, or they will have to be deleted. In case you find archived versions of the webpages which you found them in, please add links and/or details. Thank you for your kind cooperation. --Gianfranco 01:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Grafiki - własność rządowa III Rzeszy i zasady autorskich praw materialnych - na marginesie PD-Polish[edit]

Na marginesie dyskusji o Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Polish cały pakiet spraw dot.

1. Grafik, których prawnym właścicielem był rząd III Rzeszy (np. MSZ III Rzeszy),lub agencje państwowe ( jak Deutsches NAchrichten Buro) - A NIE OSOBY PRYWATNE- prawa wygasły w maju 1945 po likwidacji III Rzeszy jako państwa -podmiotu prawa cywilnego. Prosi się o stworzenie Template:PD-NaziGov.

2. Zauważyłem ,że niektórzy administratorzy (konkretnie-niemieccy) próbują wykorzystać dyrektywę harmonizującą EU dla generalnej blokady foto sprzed 1945 r.- niezależnie od proweniencji.

3.Tymczasem podstawową sprawą jest kwestia istnienia lub nie MATERIALNYCH praw majątkowych do dzieła, ktore są zbywalne i mogą ulec umorzeniu nawet przed datą śmierci autora.

4.Przykładowo - zdjęcie , do którego prawa zostały sprzedane np.Ilustrowanemu Kurierowi Codziennemu czy DNB,albo wykonane przez pracownika Ministerstwa Propagandy Rzeszy czy DNB , a osoba prawna uległa likwidacji bez następców prawnych prawa nabytego jest zdjęciem w domenie publicznej (prawo zbyte skutecznie nie wraca do zbywcy -autora)

5. Poza tym bardzo dużo starych zdjęć to zdjęcia legitymacyjne, paszportowe etc robione przez rzemieślnicze zakłady fotograficzne , które albo w ogóle nie są ( i nie powinny być )przedmiotem prawa autorskiego , albo jeśli traktować to restrykcyjnie - prawa do nich zostały zbyte przez wykonawcę (twórcę)- fotografa w chwili wyjścia klienta z zakładu fotograficznego po zapłaceniu za wykonanie zdjęcia, niezależnie od tego gdzie pozostał negatyw ( i nikt po wydarzeniach II wojny i komunizmu badać tego nie będzie)

6. Pozostaje kwestia zdjęć amatorskich - bez autorstwa. Jeśli już dziś niektórzy niemieccy admini chcą usuwać zdjęcia egzekucji dokonanych przez Wehrmacht w 1939 r vide : Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Ciepielow.jpg

pod pretekstem dyrektywy harmonizacyjnej i poszukiwania autora ( gdyby się znalazł - to pierwszy do zawiadomienia - Prokurator IPN)...

a zdjęcia z powstania w getcie warszawskim zostały usunięte to aż się prosi o rozwinięcie tematu.

A prawna sytuacja jest taka,że w prawie europejskim ciężar dowodu faktu spoczywa na osobie,która z tego faktu chce wyciągnąć konsekwencje prawne. Dotyczy to zarówno prawa karnego ( domniemanie nieiwnności) jak i cywilnego , którego częścią jest prawo autorskie. Tzn. o ile nie ma dowodu na zastrzeżenie prawa o tyle ono nie istnieje . W polskim prawie autorskim przerzuca to ciężar dowodu na autora ,zaś wydawca ma jedynie OBOWIĄZEK ZACHOWANIA NALEŻYTEJ STARANNOŚCI - tzn. wiedzieć to co może uzyskać przy zachowaniu zwykłych wymogów staranności. Prawo zakłada domniemanie dobrej wiary użytkownika rzeczy czy prawa tzn. ewentualne naruszenie prawa materialnego może stwierdzić tylko właściciel tego prawa zwracając się z żądaniem do użytkownika o zaprzestanie naruszenia prawa ( i udowadniając swój interes prawny). Tzn. trzeba wykazać naruszenie prawa.

Ponieważ jest to powszechna zasada prawa rzymskiego ,obowiązująca zarówno w prawie polskim, jak i niemieckim inne postępowanie jest uzurpacją i po prostu robieniem ludziom wody z mózgu poprzez świadome mieszanie pojęcia autorskiego prawa osobistego, autorskiego prawa materialnego, zasady należytej staranności, domniemania legalności i zasady cięzaru dowodu po stronie tego, który zgłasza zarzut naruszenia prawa.

Generalnie: często słyszany argument,że każda grafika ma autora należy uzupełnić następująco: KAŻDA GRAFIKA MA AUTORA ALE WCALE NIE KAŻDA MA WŁAŚCICIELA i nie ma to nic wspólnego z datą śmierci autora.

To takie wstępne uwagi , które IMHO warto przemyśleć w długi weekend a potem przegadać z innymi adminami na Commons i na wikipl.

Serdecznie pozdrawiam:

Andros64 08:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:PZL M20 Mewa.jpg[edit]

Poważnie ten na lotnisku Bemowo to nie Mewa? --Hiuppo 15:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Ano racja - jak możesz to popraw. --Hiuppo 15:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

nazwy[edit]

Zasada na commons jest taka, że rzeczy łatwo tłumaczalne są po angielsku np. 'Opera building in Bytom', natomiast już 'kościół pw. śś. Piotra i Pawła w Katowicach' po Polsku. Dlatego np. jesus jest redirektem do nazwy w jidysz ;).

Pozdrawiam --WarX 10:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

mentalność Polaka[edit]

Witaj! Czasem zastanawiam się dlaczego urodziłem się w Polsce. Czasem jestem z tego dumny, czasem nie. Czasem chciałbym powiedzieć komuś, że jest zwykłym chamem, ale się zazwyczaj opanować zdążę. Czasem chciałbym być bezczelny ale się powstrzymuję. Powiedz mi czym kierowałeś się zgłaszając do usunięcia zdjęcia mych dzieci (których na razie jestem opiekunem prawnym) do usunięcia mimo iż zdajesz sobie sprawę, że inni pl.commonsowcy podają swe prywatne zdjęcia na commons? Nie wiem, czy nie zauważyłeś, ale jest grupa zapaleńców, która usuwa moje fotki mimo zgody na ich wstawienie (vide WKU Gdynia, dM) - chcesz im dać kolejny powód do ataku? Hieny czekają tylko na rozerwanie ciała ofiary i jak wyczują krew rzucają się hordą. Powiedz, jesteś złośliwy, czy tylko głupi? I nie obrażaj się na ostatni zarzut: zerknij na stronę Lou lub Szczepana - prywatne fotki jakoś nikogo tam nie rażą! Jednak na koniec pozdrowię serdecznie Joymaster 20:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

PS. Zastanawiałeś się kiedykolwiek nad osobami które prowadzą rodzinę zastępczą? Czy może znasz taki obrazek z sielankowego serialu pod tą samą nazwą?

Co do kategoryzacji. Nie mam ostatnio wiele czasu (stąd edycje poprawiania linków) a jak już mam - to wklejam masowo hasła pisane w pracy lub z materiałów, które dostałem do opublikowania. Albo wklejam fotki, które zrobiłem wspólnie z rodziną. Co do dM - może i nie są rewelacyjne - ale są. Co do kasowania fotek WKU Gdynia i 2 KOP - to nie wiem jak tłumaczyć, i nie wiem, czy autor zdjęć (lub posiadacz praw autorskich) pisząc do George'a nie jest wiarygodny? Pozdrawiam Joymaster 11:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

KAtegorie[edit]

Nie ciachnąłeś za duzo ? Pmgpmg 14:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Croix-de-Guerre.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Croix-de-Guerre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Thuresson 13:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Medal trud USSR.jpg[edit]

Please, notice license change from cc-by-sa-2.5 to public domain, according to Part IV of Civil Code No. 230-FZ of the Russian Federation of December 18, 2006. Vlsergey 10:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Tłumaczenie[edit]

Pozwoliłem sobie pożyczyć [2] :) Pozdrawiam. Nemo5576 20:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

re: image:Tx_26.JPG[edit]

Możesz to spolszczyć  :) ?
Pozdrawiam Konradr (talk) 10:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Duquesne and Suffren[edit]

Hi. Haven't you ONI drawings of Duquesne or Suffren class cruisers? Pibwl (talk) 23:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Chances that is I did not upload them, I do not have them, but I'll double-check. At worse, we can make them ourselves. Cheers! Rama (talk) 07:48, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
I definitely do not have that. I have low-resolution photographs of Duquesne, but they are not in the public domain, and not good enough that I could make a drawing out of them. If someone has good enough photographs, I might draw something. Rama (talk) 20:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Naval ships of the United States[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Naval ships of the United States and Category:United States Navy ships have been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

-- Jmabel ! talk 06:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Fiat Uno 3d PICT0113.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fiat Uno (2nd generation).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

KRAZ[edit]

Jak bym wiedział, to bym napisał. Szater talk 15:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


Image:V-2.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:V-2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

69.112.61.79 23:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

German armoured cars[edit]

Hello, I know that the categories of the German armoured cars are not quite adequate, but sombody made the incorrect "Leichter/Schwerer Panzerspähwagen" categories. I would prefer to make individual categores for the different SdKfz. If you feel up to it and have time I would be glad when you could help. Since we have a flood of pictures coming in from the German Federal Archive with no categories, I tried to start it. For the German self propelled guns "Wespe", "Hummel" of "Nashorn" somebody created categories which have only this name. However, in German these mean only "Wasp, "Bumblebee" and "Rhinoceros". Therefore, for example, I would like to have new categories, probably like "Wespe self propelled gun" or so. Cheers --Cobatfor 15:40 12 December 2008

Hello, I think, as wikimedia is English, categories like SdKfz 221/222 would be better than "Leichter Panzerspähwagen", which would be something like "Light armoured reconnaissance vehicle"., Well SdKfz means "Sonderkraftfahrzeug" (special vehicle), but it is an abbreviation and not a German description that many people would not understand. As for categories in general, I think that they should be unique in a way so that they cannot be mixed up with others, but I won't insist, of course, on somthing like "Wespe self propelled gun". Cheers --Cobatfor 23:13 12 December 2008

Jewish people of Poland 1939 in German photographs[edit]

Thank you for your ideas on this issue. I had wondered about possible overlap, but let me give my reasoning. The Germans seem to have been selective in how they photographed the Jews in the various places of Poland they occupied. The general category for Jews in Poland does not discriminate between who was taking the photographs and what their usage might be. For example, I believe in the Stroop report there are photographs of militant young Jews (taken, I believe, by the Jews themselves and later captured by the Nazis during the 1943 uprising) which would be inconsistent with the impression these images appear intended to convey. Who took the photos then becomes important to an understanding of their significance.
In many of the images, the Germans seem to have selected older more traditionally dressed Jews for photographic study, while ignoring younger or otherwise less traditional appearing people, apparently to emphasize the "otherness" of the people they are depicting. Disabled people seem also to be emphasized. There are other studies, I have seen a whole book of them, which collect images of the Jewish people of Poland living ordinary happy lives not much different than those of their German neighbors. Of course, nothing like this emerges from the collection of German photographs.
These images taken by the Germans require in my opinion a separate category to clearly flag them as propagandistic or perhaps trophyist images. There may be a better way of doing this, but I think the idea of flagging the images as being created by the conquerers and, eventually, murderers of these people is important.Mtsmallwood (talk) 04:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

I understand your point. However, on most of early photos I can see "normal", relaxed people, and I can't imagine that a photographer can take such personal portraits without some liking of their subjects. These early portraits of traditionally dressed Jews are fascinating to me, for they show "real", vivid persons, of an extinct culture, before they were reduced to Ghetto prisoners. By the way, I was always wondering, why the Germans bother to take so many pictures, of great etnographic value, of a nation, that they considered inferior and wanted to destroy... I'd agree with this category, but somebody would have to recategorize all pictures from Category:Jewish people of Poland during World War II. pibwl (talk) 10:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't worry about recategorization, wiki commons will always be a work in progress, and although there is a genuine effort to be objective, ultimately there is a matter of opinion in all categories to a lesser or greater degree.
On the issue of why would the fascist occupiers of Poland study people they planned to murder, well, that is a big topic, and given my limited knowledge I can suggest only a quick sketch of possibilities. While there were widespread brutalities and war crimes starting right away in Poland in 1939 against Jews, and other Poles, the decision to exterminate the Jews in Poland by deliberate and organized mass murder was probably not made until 1942. In the meantime the occupiers ghettoized the Jews, tried their best to steal whatever they could from them, and did their best to turn them into a slave labor force.
While this was happening, the Nazi mythology of racial superiority needed to be fueled by so-called "research" and many of the leading murderers made themselves knowledgeable, at least superficially, about Jewish culture. For example, Eichman taught himself enough Yiddish to be able to read a newspaper. (actually not that difficult due to the similarities between Yiddish and German).Mtsmallwood (talk) 13:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Duquesne[edit]

I have finally come up with something for Duquesne. It's at File:Duquesne.svg. The top view is still lacking, but I might be able to put it on sooner than later. Thank you for the Russian books, they are a mine of very useful schematics!

Cheers! Rama (talk) 20:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

And here is Tourville: File:Tourville 1945.svg. The comparison of the two diagrammes is interesting to illustrate the transition from anti-surface role towards anti-air.
Cheers! Rama (talk) 14:04, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
And finally, Suffren: File:Suffren cruiser class.svg. Cheers! Rama (talk) 18:49, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

Witaj, poszło z rozpędu,żeby to skatalogować - bo to las. Teraz pora na kategorie szczegółowe.

Serdecznie pozdrawiam:

Andros64 (talk) 17:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Suplement

Ale dlaczego usuwasz kategorię Luftwaffe (Wehrmacht) przy zdjęciach samolotów z kampanii francuskiej - tego za Boga nie kapuję :)

Serdecznie pozdrawiam:

Andros64 (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:AEG bomber[edit]

Please don't blank pages, use {{move}} if you want to rename a category. Multichill (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

OK, sorry, I left it to think if it should be category redirect or marked for deletion. Maybe just delete it? pibwl (talk) 21:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Anything but blanking. I deleted the category. Please don't hop talk pages btw, i have a watchlist and i use it. Multichill (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Well, this is the first time somebody expects not to receive answer on his talk page :-) As for blanking: I know it's bad and I don't think you can find any other case of blanking a page in my history. Btw, I have a question, since you're an admin: if I upload new version of my photo (with the same name), shouldn't old files, available in file history, be deleted to save space? pibwl (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
It's custom at most wiki's I frequent. Deleting files doesn't save space, just hides them for normal users, so don't bother. Multichill (talk) 01:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-013-0075-28, Polen, Jude in Kielce.jpg[edit]

Zauwazylem ze opisałeś to zdjęcie jako Mielec nie Kielce. Ciekawy jestem jak do tego doszedłeś i czy także rozpoznałeś konkretna ulice? Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 04:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Category:Brassey's Naval Annual[edit]

Don't you think, that it will be far easier to search if they are sorted in alphabetical order? We could make a separate page with a gallery sorted by year. Pibwl (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

The reason I sorted under year is that this category is about Brassey's Naval Annual.. it shows what was published, year by year... if people want an image of a particular ship they can search for the ship's category... but I'm just one contributor and if you and others think differently then of course it will change - majority rules. Thanks for adding more diagrams. regards. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 03:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Bofors 120 mm gun on ORP Błyskawica 1940 IWM A 672.jpg[edit]

Hi, I see you changed the description of this gun from 120-mm Bofors to 4-inch Mk V. The ship's page states she only got the 4-inch guns in 1941, and that they they were Mk XVI... But I agree this gun isn't a 120-mm Bofors, as those guns werre mounted in turrets and were much longer (50-cal)... What are your sources for stating this is a 4-inch Mk V ? regards, Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 10:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)



Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska zaprasza Cię na warsztaty fotograficzne, które odbędą się w Łodzi, 1-3 maja 2010. Twój wkład do Wikimedia Commons wskazuje, że możesz wiele skorzystać z udziału w warsztatach i podzielić się swoim doświadczeniem fotograficznym z innymi. Warsztaty są skierowane do:

  • osób już wgrywających mniejsze czy większe ilości zdjęć do Wikimedia

Commons - niezależnie od ich jakości

  • fototoamatorów - nie związanych dotąd z projektami Wikimedia
  • zawodowych fotografów - w charakterze doradców i wykładowców

Nie ma znaczenia jaki typ fotografii preferujesz - w Wikimedia Commons jest miejsce zarówno dla portrecistów, dokumentalistów, jak i fotografów pejzażu miejskiego i przyrody. Wikiwarsztaty będą miały charakter kameralny (max. 40-50 osób) i trwały przez weekend 1-3 maja 2010 <sobota-poniedziałek>, Zajęcia będą się odbywały w Łódzkim Domu Kultury oraz w plenerze. Organizatorzy zapewniają w ramach opłaty konferencyjnej (50 zł od osoby) - nocleg( PTSM na ul. Zamenhoffa), wyżywienie (obiady) i bezpłatny dostęp do Internetu w trakcie obrad.

E-mail: wikifoto@wikimedia.pl WWW: http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwarsztaty_fotograficzne Tel: 0-22 219 56 94 Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska, ul. Tuwima 95, p. 15, Łódź.

Zobacz też: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/pl/6/66/Zaproszenie_wiki_foto_2010.pdf

Pozdrowienia,

Organizatorzy Warsztatów Wikifoto 2010

call for discussion[edit]

Category:Lakers (ships)[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Lakers (ships) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

-- Geo Swan (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Filmmaking of 'Black Thursday' on crossway of ulica Świętojańska and Aleja Józefa Piłsudskiego in Gdynia - 006.jpg[edit]

Witaj!

"Fake"? Myślisz, że to atrapy? Mnie wydawało się, że to prawdziwe samochody z muzeum. Choć malowane niedawno. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 19:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Australian Copyright on photographs[edit]

Hi, as far as I understand, any photograph taken in Australia before 1955, on on Australian Government duty before 1955, is now Public Domain. If it's Public Domain, nobody can add any conditions to its use, you can do what you like with it no matter where you got it. So orgamisations that claim "personal use only" on their website are claiming something they cannot legally enforce. However - these sites are doing a public service by making the images available, and need to make some money somehow, so my personal opinion is that we should just use the small images from their websites, not the high-resolution ones. But the text or caption they put online with the photograph is indeed protected by copyright, and in fact we cannot legally copy the exact text they use ! To avoid copyright infringement on the text, technically we need to reword it ourselves, despite what they say ! Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 15:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Star A25P.jpg[edit]

Dzień dobry.

Chciałbym się zapytać w jakim mieście lub miejscowości zostało zrobione to zdjęcie? Informacja ta potrzebna mi jest do wsadzenia go do odpowiedniej kategorii. - SuperTank17 (talk) 16:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 18:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you also for all your work with aircrafts by type and manufacturers. --Martin H. (talk) 18:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Tapferkeitsmedaille_1.Klasse.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tapferkeitsmedaille_1.Klasse.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Captured German half track Libya 1941.jpg[edit]

Since you seem to be an expert on this topic, maybe you can help to identify the kind of SdKfz that is depicted in this file. Thank you Cobatfor 15:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Liberation Day vehicles[edit]

Thank you for identifying vehicles in Jersey Liberation Day photos! Man vyi (talk) 04:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

James R. Nockson (talk) 19:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Prozorlivy Kildin-mod DN-SN-83-05600.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prozorlivy Kildin-mod DN-SN-83-05600.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prozorlivy Kildin-mod DN-SN-83-05600.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 13:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

File:2011-10 Mierzęcin 04.jpg[edit]

Hej.

Chciałbym się zapytać jak rozpoznałeś, że ciągnik na tym zdjęciu to Ursus C-330, a nie jeden z późniejszych bardzo podobnych modeli?

Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

To chyba ma sens. Bez widocznej nazwy modelu nie da się raczej rozróżnić Ursusa C-330 od C-330M, C-335 i C-335M. Taka sama sytuacja zachodzi z Ursusami C-350, C-355, C-355M, C-360 i C-360-3P.
BTW czy znasz jakieś dobre źródło informacji o koparko-ładowarkach marki Ostrówek? - SuperTank17 (talk) 09:48, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

DR[edit]

While closing the deletion requests, I noticed you often start a deletion request for one file and mention a few other files within the text that also should be deleted. Unfortunately, these files are not tagged on the file description pages and the uploader is not properly notified. If you used VisualFileChange for these DRs, you could properly tag the files and notify the uploader easily. --Didym (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Bots[edit]


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)