User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 32

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Barbie, edición solterona. (3306133271).jpg

File:Barbie, edición solterona. (3306133271).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tomer T (talk) 08:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you!

For your enormous contribution to Commons! In quantity and quality. And I see also to the whole wide Wikimedia project! Amazing. Thank you! --Palosirkka (talk) 06:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montreal city, downtown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Adamant1 07:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

File:5jul-mujer-banderita (743250888).jpg

File:5jul-mujer-banderita (743250888).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

62.216.210.8 16:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Carteles (2242440365).jpg

File:Carteles (2242440365).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

219.78.190.98 02:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Persea americana from Canadian supermarket.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 10:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for your nice photo Charlie fong (talk) 13:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Absolute Goose (5157679521).jpg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Absolute Goose (5157679521).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:

  • Photography in Nigeria
  • Photographing vehicles
  • I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…

If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!

I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

This Sunday!

Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZAANDAM Cruise in Quebec City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château Frontenac, Quebec ville, Canada 232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and a great view. -- Ikan Kekek 03:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sucrerie Blouin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré, Quebéc, Canada 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré, Quebéc, Canada 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré, Quebéc, Canada 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Peintures

Bonjour Wilfredor, Les peintures dans la cathédrale de Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré par les peintres Louis-Gilles Doyon (1938-1993) (nom d'artiste « Frédéric ») et Marius Dubois (1944-2016) sont trop récentes pour être dans le domaine public. Malheureusement, ces images ne pourraient probablement pas être sur Commons. (Par exemple, File:Intérieur de la Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré, Quebéc, Canada 1017.jpg, par Frédéric.) -- Asclepias (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour Asclepias, selon moi, avant d'évaluer l'élimination, le plus prudent serait d'envoyer un OTRS à secretariat@shrinesaintanne.org juste pour confirmer que ces œuvres ne sont pas sous une licence compatible avec Commons. Aussi, j'avais créé cette catégorie la qui peut être complètement nominée pour suppression. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Base de plein air de Sainte-Foy, Lacs Laberge 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mosaics of the Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontenac Hotel, Quebec ville, downtown 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image. Please mention in the Summary/Caption which part of the hotel is shown. --Tagooty 03:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done thanks --Wilfredor 18:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré, Quebéc, Canada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:14, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intérieur de la Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré, Quebéc, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Château Frontenac in Quebec city, Canada colorfull.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Château Frontenac in Quebec city, Canada.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Carmen Clemente Travieso.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carmen Clemente Travieso.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Taichi (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Te voy a agradecer que me facilites las cosas. Tanto tú como yo nos conocemos mutuamente, así que elige cuidadosamente la serie de acciones para que esta situación termine en paz. Este dibujo no debió salir de un ideario en algún rincón de tu cerebro. Necesito saber de dónde proviene, si es un libro, revista o fotografía, cuándo y dónde fue hecho el original, etc. Mientras más detallista seas, terminamos esto más rápido. Quitar la plantilla nuevamente no es respuesta a mi solicitud. Saludos. Taichi (talk) 02:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Fue una pintura hecha a mano realizada a partir de todas las fotos que estan en esta pagina con una interpretacion personal del rostro de Carmen Clemente Travieso. Por ser una interpretacion y non una copia de alguna de sus imagenes, no debe ser considerado una violacion de derechos de autor. Esto lo hice porque forme parte de un Wikiproyecto de pintura entre varios otros usuarios para poder cubrir articulos con pinturas propias --Wilfredor (talk) 13:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
A ver Wilfredor, ¿en qué parte yo consideré que el archivo era una violación de derechos de autor? Yo estaba solicitando la fuente, era tan fácil poner "pintura hecha a partir de la imagen alojada en el blog X", eso yo no vi en la descripción de la fuente. Ahora mandas la imagen a consulta de borrado (que a la postre me facilitas un paso, porque ni siquiera tenía en mente ello, pero gracias), así que no haré más nada porque ya me diste la respuesta a la duda. Solamente bastaba aclarar el origen del archivo. Saludos. Taichi (talk) 08:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carica 15, São Paulo Downtown, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 16:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière de St-Jean de l’Île-d’Orléans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Breakfast in Île d'Orléans 072.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breakfast in Île d'Orléans 072.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Édifice Price at night, Quebec city, Canada.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Édifice Price at night, Quebec city, Canada.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wilfredor/Archive_32&oldid=696280772"