User talk:Vijethnbharadwaj

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vijethnbharadwaj!
Babel user information
kn
en-4
hi-2
sa-2
ta-1
Users by language

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Vijethnbharadwaj,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Notif Map.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 07:03, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004 Indian general election results.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Number 57 (talk) 08:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004 Indian general election schedule.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Number 57 (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MYSORE TALUK 2011.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MYSORE TALUK 2011.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Njd-de (talk) 15:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Njd-de: : The website policy says, "Material featured on this website may be reproduced free of charge after taking proper permission by sending a mail to us. However, the material has to be reproduced accurately and not to be used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Wherever the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledged. However, the permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any material which is identified as being copyright of a third party. Authorization to reproduce such material must be obtained from the departments/copyright holders concerned." - Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Vijethnbharadwaj. Then I believe the question is whether they sent Commons such a permission. Or what's your interpretation of their policy ? Njd-de (talk) 10:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you uploading ECI content as CC-SA licensed?[edit]

ECI site does not license it so. At best, it might be GODL - India, but that requires correct attribution which you've failed to do. Also ECI site, updated after GODL notification in 2017, specifically asserts that copyright is reserved.

I see that you have been warned about this earlier on your talk page, I think for exactly similar content from ECI. Can you please correct the license to appropriate ones as soon as possible? Hemantha (talk) 10:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The more I look, the more I'm convinced that you do not understand copyright policy. Please stop uploading anything until you clean up your uploads with correct licensing. Hemantha (talk) 10:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hemantha. The copyright policy of ECI said, "Material featured on this site may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission" [1]. I saw that CC-SA was being used for File:Kannur Lok Sabha Constituency.jpg, which was taken from ECI website and hence tagged ECI Maps under CC-SA. Anyways I ll change them now and intimate you. Can I ping you after I update so that you can review the same?
Also I had used GODL-India for File:2004 Indian general election schedule.jpg Can you put your name under reviewer? Like {{GODL-India|status=confirmed|reviewer=Hemantha|date=2021-06-22}} For that file too? Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 10:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Vijethnbharadwaj, I'm not particularly familiar with commons or the specifics of GODL. Especially because eci.gov.in has a different policy, I do not feel comfortable enough to add it. If you point me to a specific discussion about ECI and GODL, I could try to. Hemantha (talk) 10:52, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK for now then. I ll remove . -Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 10:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Hemantha: Have replaced CC-SA with GODL for all files uploaded from ECI. -Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 14:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In the future please use GODL without the status=confirmed parameter. GODL should be reviewed by an admin or reviewer. I have therefore replaced {{GODL-India|status=confirmed}} with {{GODL-India}} in your uploads. Njd-de (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Njd-de. Noted Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Vijethnbharadwaj, you've done it only for some ECI uploads. There's still lots of others remaining which are incorrectly licensed as CC-SA. For eg this, this, this, this, this.
I suggest going through all your uploads and examine everything after May 2021. Since it's voluminous and repetitive, perhaps you may consider asking at Commons:Bots/Work requests. Hemantha (talk) 11:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Hemantha: Have removed CC-SA from all applicable files. Plz have a look now. -Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 14:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Yadgir Vidhana Sabha constituency Map.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yadgir Vidhana Sabha constituency Map.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vijethnbharadwaj, these were all tagged by the bot because you had added {{GODL_India}} instead of {{GODL-India}} to the images. Njd-de (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]