User talk:AntonyB

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk:AntonyB/Archives de cette page

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Le Touquet-Paris-Plage - article du Figaro consacré à Paris-Plage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Hello, il y a un problème sur plusieurs des fichiers que tu as téléversés et je t'en signale quelques uns à titre d'exemple. Ce n'est parce que tu prends une photo d'un livre ou d'une image, quand bien même dans la rue, que tu possèdes les droits sur cette image et que tu peux la mettre sur Commons. Il s'agit d'une oeuvre dérivée et il convient de justifier que tu as l'accord du détenteur des droits patrimoniaux sur l’œuvre reproduite ou que celle-ci est tombée dans le domaine public. A ta disposition pour préciser si cela n'est pas clair. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 17:35, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour cher Racconish et merci du signalement. Mes conclusions :
  • Le Touquet-Paris-Plage - article du Figaro consacré à Paris-Plage.jpg : il s'agit du scan d'un article du Figaro de 1905. Cette illustration n'est pas dans le main. Suis-je autorisé à le publier en indiquant qu'il s'agit de 1905 (les connaisseurs du sujet peuvent dater en lisant l'article) ? Merci de ton avis.
  • File:Michèle Leleu - Diariste.jpg est une photo qui n'est pas dans le main. Elle a été utilisée uniquement pour finaliser une discussion. Elle peut être retirée sans problème (j'aurais dû demander sa suppression).
  • les deux photos suivantes peuvent être supprimées. Je pense que ta remarque est lamême que celle que j'avais reçue il y a une dizaine d'années lorsque j'ai entrepris de photographier les fameuses "pelles" de Starck dans les rues de Paris. Que n'avais-je fait : cf par exemple ici. Plusieurs admins de Commons m'étaient tombé dessus. Depuis, l'eau de la Seine a dû couler, et non seulement les pelles sont revenues mais elles font même l'objet d'un article : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panneau_Histoire_de_Paris. C'est à ne rien y comprendre. En conclusion, si tu veux supprimer mes deux photos, pourquoi pas !
  • Quant à la quatrième, il s'agit d'un portrait de mon arrière-arrière-arrière grand-mère (1814-1891 : ces dates sont indiquées près de l'illustration dans le main). Le tableau est chez moi. Il a été peint par l'un de ses neveux, mort à la fin du Template:S-. Je pense donc que cette illustration peut être conservée, tellement cela est ancien. Je viens de compléter en conséquence la description du fichier. Es-tu habilité à enlever maintenant le bandeau ?
Bien cordialement et encore merci du signalement. AntonyB (talk) 10:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Pense à ne pas te déclarer l'auteur d'une reproduction d'un document tombé dans le domaine public mais à expliquer pourquoi il est dans le domaine public. Pour le tableau, il y avait le choix entre deux modèles {{PD-old-assumed}} et {{PD-heirs}}. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 10:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Acte de naissance de Joseph-Henri GUIGUET.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Acte de naissance de Joseph-Henri GUIGUET.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lognes (plan de la ville).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Poudou99 (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Viennot[edit]

File:12.12.1901 - Acte de naissance de Roger-Vincent Marie VIENNOT de VAUBLANC.JPG Bonjour,

Je tombe sur ce fichier qui était classé dans Software.

Peut-être peux-tu encore lui trouver aujourd'hui une meilleure catégorie que celle qu'il a ?

Bonne continuation.

TigH (talk) 18:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Tant qu'à faire...

  1. File:1808.09.15 - Mariage Claude-Armand-Donatien de Sade et de Laure Gabrielle de Sade à 02-Condé-en-Brie (2 sur 2).jpg
  2. File:1875.06.23 - Mariage de Paul de Graindorge d'Orgeville le 23 juin 1875 à 60-Rainvillers avec Béatrix Le Bastier (1 sur 3).jpg
  3. File:1875.06.23 - Mariage de Paul de Graindorge d'Orgeville le 23 juin 1875 à 60-Rainvillers avec Béatrix Le Bastier (2 sur 3).jpg
  4. File:1875.06.23 - Mariage de Paul de Graindorge d'Orgeville le 23 juin 1875 à 60-Rainvillers avec Béatrix Le Bastier (3 sur 3).jpg

Ouf, je viens de passer près de deux heures sur seulement le début de la catégorie Software !

TigH (talk) 19:05, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour . Merci de ton intervention @TigH: mais j'ignore tout de cette catégorie et de cet ajout. Le mieux serait que tu en discutes avec son auteur : @Akinom: , puisque c'est lui qui a ajouté cette catégorie que je ne comprends pas.
Bien cordialement. AntonyB (talk) 20:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok, mais en fait, la catégorie je m'en fiche, c'est plutôt "tes" fichiers qui méritent au moins une catégorie. Tu dois savoir laquelle ou lesquelles.
Merci.
TigH (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 20:09, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Pont d'Antony et parc de Sceaux 2 trait rouge.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pont d'Antony et parc de Sceaux 2 trait rouge.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour EugeneZelenko. Toutes ces cartes sont issues de Wikimedia maps | Données de carte © Contributeurs d’OpenStreetMap.
Je viens de corriger dans chacun des fichiers.
Tout est ok maintenant. Bien cordialement. AntonyB (talk) 16:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:1865.05.25 - Acte de décès de Madeleine Sophie Barat.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1865.05.25 - Acte de décès de Madeleine Sophie Barat.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour EugeneZelenko. Je ne comprends pas votre demande. Mais je réponds positivement en ajoutant la licence self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all comme vous le proposez. Pour votre information, l'état civil en France est en libre accès (open data) sur des sites Internet pour toutes les personnes mortes il y a longtemps. Bien cordialement. AntonyB (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't know French :-( This is historical letter. It it's in public domain, proper license tag and source information must be provided. Same for other historical photos and documents. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:1936.11.30 - Danielle LICARI.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1936.11.30 - Danielle LICARI.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour EugeneZelenko : même réponse que pour l'acte d'état civil précédent. Bien cordialement. AntonyB (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:1853.05.26 - Acte de naissance d'Auguste Pierre Carpentier.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]